Document Pick Up: Fill & Download for Free

No basically because that’s not how banks worked at the time. You didn’t have a bank account you got your money deposited on and you didn’t go to the bank to pick up some money for your everyday expenses. Medieval banks did essentially two things: lending money and “money transfers”.Lending money means that whomever had a big plan to put in place (building a new cathedral, waging a war, arming a fleet to explore the Indian coast) would borrow money from a bank. Just like today banks lent money for promising projects.The other thing they did was providing money transfers, wich sounds like a very modern activity. If you had to face a long journey to conduct deals in a faraway country, you could deposit a certain amount of money with a local banker, who issued you a document with which you could get pick up your money at a bank at your destination. So, if you had to travel to France you could pick up the money from the local Medici bank agent in Paris (which could also be a different bank).There was no such thing as a bank account.

That’s something which all white people know, to pick cotton by hands.To scare certain people, you need to tell them with something they know which is scary. Otherwise it’s like playing piano to a cow. It might some reaction, but it would never tell you how emotionally moved it is by your music.They know this is wrong, so they tell you that this is happening in Xinjiang.They know this is wrong, so they tell you that this is happening in Xinjiang.They have done this to the North American natives, so they say that China is doing the same.They have wiped out all Tasmanians, so they tell you that China is doing the same.They have enslaved almost the whole Afria, so they keep telling modern days Africans that China is colonizing Africa.Just exactly what they claimed that is happening in Xinjiang hasn’t done by the white people? Picking up cotton is just too specific and too accurate to hit the soft spot of white people.It says that this photo was taken in Xinjiang. And how the heck could anyone verify that by looking at it? There is absolutely no useful info contained in the photo. Somehow every cm of skin is covered by something, even the hands.And why the heck should this person picking up cotton from the middle of the field rather than from one side to another? And why Chinese government provides them with clothes which have English printing on it?Let’s see how black people used to pick up cotton. Notice that there is a huge bag attached?Where is the bag or any container here? Does this even look like someone who’s working to you? If I had a slave like this, I’d let him or her just go. I would paid more to all the clothes, hats, and food than what they can harvest.I also went through the whole report, the PDF one. Besides this paticular photo, there is not even one more photo showing Uyghurs being enslaved. They could manage to take such a close shot, and they couldn’t do even one more?It’s a shameless lie, and some people are still going to take it as granted.

Because it was her furniture in the first place which she used in her offices in the state department. A journalist was reading through and tweeting as he read - and only picked up two and a half hours later that it was her furniture - but by that time the damage was done.