Power Of Attorney Child: Fill & Download for Free

I would. You don't want shock or a fight in the middle of a difficult situation. And if it becomes necessary for your younger daughter to use the POA, it means something terrible will have happened.I think you should think of a kind way to tell your son. If she is geographically closer, use that as a reason. If she has gone to college or has experience which makes her better suited, use that as a reason. You can also just say you didn't want to burden him with it since he has other obligations, assuming he does.If this is both your health care and financial power of attorney, you want to make sure your son understands your health care desires as well. You don't want him to be shocked if your daughter tells him that you didn't want extraordinary measures to sustain your life, for example.It is hard to discuss such things, but it is always best that there are no surprises.

Assuming you're talking about the United States, the answer is no. This is a question I've researched, as I'm polyamorous. A poly discussion group I attend even went so far as to bring in a family lawyer to discuss just this topic.In the US, there are about 1,400 rights and privileges granted by law to a married couple. Of these, roughly 1,200 or so can not be granted by any other means—not trusts, not contracts, not corporations.A corporation would allow a polygamous family to jointly own property, and wills can sort out inheritance (mostly). But most of the rights and privileges that come with marriage, nothing else can grant, full stop.I'll give you some examples:Married couples have spousal immunity. You can not be compelled to testify against a spouse in a court of law. No corporate structure, no contract, and no trust grants shareholders or officers in a corporation immunity from being compelled to testify in court.Jointly owned property in a marriage is immune to individual civil tort. Suppose you and your spouse own a house. Suppose your spouse, but not you, is sued in civil court and loses. The person who sued your spouse can attach a lien against your house to secure a judgment, but here’s the thing: if you don't sell your house, that lien can't be exercised until you die. If your spouse dies first, the lien is vacated. No corporate structure protects corporate assets this way.Married couples have a legal claim to inheritance of certain Social Security and pension benefits if their spouse dies. Corporate officers and shareholders do not.Married couples automatically have medical power of attorney. Corporate officers and shareholders do not.myou can grant these rights by signing the proper documents granting power of attorney, but be careful! Banks and hospitals have been known to refuse to accept durable power of attorney, it happens often.Corporations do not grant child custodial rights to their officers or shareholders.There are a lot, and I mean a lot, of laws around tax burdens attached to transfer of property within families and between spouses. Spouses can leave each other estates up to a certain amount or transfer property or money without incurring income tax debt. This is not true for officers or shareholders of a corporation.Similarly, parents can create trust funds for their children that have certain, often significant tax advantages that you can't get through corporate structures.The list goes on and on and on.

We do not force people to give blood, even when that blood could save lives.We do not force people to give up their organs, even if their organ is the ONLY one in the world that matches the patient.We do not take organs from dead people without an existing approval from the dead person (before they’re dead) or their power of attorney's approval.We do not take tissues from dead people without an existing approval from the dead person (before they’re dead) or their power of attorney's approval.If a child has kidney failure, the law does not force their mother to give up her kidney even if her kidney matches.If a child needs a blood transfusion, the law does not force their father to give blood, even if his blood type matches.I don’t understand why we’re still having this “but the fetus is a human being” argument.Even if the fetus is a human being, we do not force a human being to give up their organ, their bodily fluid to sustain another human being.That’s called body autonomyThere’s certain hypocrisy with pro-life people.Say, a fetus is a human.OK. Do fetuses get health insurance?Can fetuses inherit family wealth from the father?If a mother drinks alcohol during pregnancy, does it count as assault and battery?If a mother had a miscarriage, does that count as manslaughter?Can a pregnant mother collect food stamps for two people?Do pregnant women pay for two airline tickets when they travel?If a fetus is a human, the fetus is infringing on the basic human rights of the mother.If a fetus is a human, pregnancy would be like a woman is being forced to attach herself to another human being 24/7 for nine months.She is forced to provide blood and bodily fluid transfusion for another human being for nine months.She is forced to physically carry this human being everywhere for nine months.She is forced to suffer great bodily harm (swelling of hands and feet, back pain, morning sickness… etc) because of this human being.She will then suffer great pain, and risk death to separate this human being from her.That seemed absurd, isn’t it?So… is fetus a human or not?I mean, if you all care about the unborn baby so much, when is the last time you guys championed for “free prenatal care for all pregnant women because there’s a little human in those walking incubators and they need medical care!”no? no free prenatal care for pregnant women? obviously that lumps of cells don’t need health care.So basically, you’re telling me, a fetus is a human when you need something to justify limiting women’s options; the fetus isn’t a human when you dismiss the idea of free prenatal care for under privileged pregnant women.You can’t have both ways.Update:There seems to be a bunch of pro-life people posed as pro-choice just to troll people. They’ll start the comment saying something like “I’m pro-choice, and I agree with you. But pro-life people often said… blah blah blah”.Once you started a conversation, thinking you’re talking to a sensible person, they will give you a bunch of ridiculous logic and claims. That’s when you realized you’re actually arguing with a pro-lifer.Time wasted.