Indiana Probate Forms: Fill & Download for Free

My answer is a little different because it's not someone who was scary because they acted crazy or were freakishly strong or big, it's someone who didn't scare or intimidate me at all.But they scared me because of what they could do once they were free again.He was one of only two inmates my entire time I had legitimate worry they would re-offend and hurt someone in the process. His name was Keith (not his real name, but what I will use for this story).He showed up about halfway through my bid. He was a friendly, skinny white guy with short graying hair in the early stages of balding. He was from Indiana and had some of a Southern charm to him. He was well-spoken and educated and he was also very friendly and likable.He was the kind of person who'd want to get to know, want to talk to and couldn't help but like. He was slightly effeminate, in the way that wasn't totally outright but made your "gaydar" go off. He had a boyish, youthful quality about him and a personality along with it that made him very disarming. He was kind and helpful and genuine. He didn't come across as threatening or harmful at all. He was the kind of person you couldn't help but like.He was also a serial sexual predator.I didn't know that at first, of course. I don't remember the first time we spoke but he approached me and instantly I thought he was an interesting and nice guy.I eventually would realize he was sexually attracted to me and was feeling me how to see if I was interested, and possibly to some degree grooming. Not necessarily me, but the situation.Someone once told me about Keith "you can have a conversation about that guy about anything" and that was totally the case.Now almost instantly I pegged him as gay or at least bi and I suspected he was a sex offender, but half the people there were and I judge people by the character they show me, not by what they did to get there.He did a lot of nice things for me. He smuggled some brand new board games out of rec, where he worked, to my unit so we could play them there (he was in a different unit, but me and my friends liked to play board games). He also somehow had become friends with a local AM station radio DJ and this was before they got the MP3 players, so there were songs I loved and hadn't heard for years. He would call the DJ and get him to play songs I wanted to hear.The longer we got to know each other the more he opened up to me. He started telling me stories about porn and then opening up about his past, which I soon realized contained a lot of very severe sexual abuse from when he was a child. It was clear eventually that this was a classic case of "do onto others what has been done to me."The stories he told, which I won't go into detail about, suggested he had been abused to make child pornography when he was young. He spoke of these memories fondly. It was weird and I started to distance myself from him.Our last conversation was when I ran into him in the music room, where he liked to hang out. I'm not even sure he played an instrument, but he liked music. I had been avoiding him, but didn't want to be rude. The thing is, despite everything, I still couldn't help but like the guy. He had a magnetic quality about him. I didn't want to dislike him.Anyway, somehow we got to talking about hooch and he was telling me about some watermelon hooch he had one time. I don't remember what I said next but his response was "Oh, you don't want to be around me when I'm drunk" and the look he gave and the way he said it was basically along the lines of I'd start trying to put moves on you.He said it blushing embarrassed like a school boy. It was weird and creeped me out. It was then I realized that all along I had pegged him as creepy and he made every alarm bell go off in my head when I met him, but despite this he had such a way about him that it caused me to ignore it all.That's when I realized he was the most prolific predator I'd ever met. He embodied what it meant and what made him the most scary inmate I've ever met is I can see him very easily, and successfully, preying on a child. Here I was an adult with lots of experience to draw from and he had influenced me. A child would be so easy for him. He's the kind of person that could easily insert himself into a situation, have the parents totally fooled, groom them and the child and when the time was right make his move.And from what I'd gathered that's what he'd done.His current charge was a receipt of child pornography charge, for which he'd gotten 12 years. That was his 5th criminal charge and it was also his longest. His other 4 charges? All child molestation and indecent liberties charges involving young boys. I read about him when I got out and these were like something you'd see chronicled on a True Crime show or that they write laws named after the victims because of... It also reflected how upside down our system is because ALL of these hands-on charges carried less than his non-hands-on CP charge.He is that guy in the van you worry about snatching your kid out of the park.And the most messed up part is that despite everything I know now part of me still can't bring myself to not like him and that scares me. If that doesn't speak volumes to how much of a super predator he is, nothing will.So what happened to him? One day he comes up to me after we hadn't spoken for months and tells me that he's being transferred to Kentucky to be closer to home."I'll never forget you" he said, smiling.A few months pass and I overheard some guys in the chow hall that used to hang out with him."You hear what happened to Keith?" one said."Yeah, that's crazy."I had no idea what they were talking about and didn't inquire further, but a couple months later my celly comes rushing into our room holding a copy of USA Today."Look at this s**t" he says.The newspaper had done a front page article on the federal Civil Commitment program, which targets federal inmates who are deemed "sexually dangerous" and holds them indefinitely, even after their sentence.The program is located in FCI Butner Medium II and the newspaper included a list of names of those who had been civilly committed.His name was on it.He hadn't been transferred to Kentucky after all. That was a lie. He had been taken to Butner, evaluated, designated as "sexually dangerous" and confined.I had been against this program up until that point, but this news gave me a great moral conflict that continues until this day.Years later I would be on federal probation. We were required to go to this support group thing, starting at once a week and then eventually we could be discharged. They contracted an outside provider to run it and they also ran a sex offender specific group.About 3 1/2 years in I was still having trouble getting discharged despite only coming monthly for over a 1 1/2 years. The reason was I was a dollar sign to this provider and if I didn't come anymore, they wouldn't get paid for me being there.Probation saw what was going on and terminated that provider’s contract and went with someone new. The first time I met and talked with the guy he told me I wouldn't have to come anymore. I also learned he had been the previous head of the Civil Commitment Program at Butner and had been the lead author of the so-called "Butner Study," a controversial study in the sex offender field.We ended up having a long and interesting conversation about his time there and that study. I found him to be honest and I liked and still do like him a lot. He told me that he used to agree with me about civil commitment, but his time with the inmates he had interacted with changed him. I mentioned Keith and he says "I was Mr. [KEITH'S LAST NAME]’s therapist...:"I remember thinking what an odd coincidence. He couldn't tell me anymore details due to confidentiality, but it was pretty surreal.As far as I know, he still incarcerated at Butner.UPDATE: I decided to do some checking and learned that he successfully appealed the decision to commit him and was released to the custody of the U.S. Probation Office where he has a 5 year term of Supervised Released. The appeal was dated 2012 so unless he violated or re-offended he’s off probation

There is voter fraud but this isn't it. This is: https:///amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/terri-lynn-rote-iowa-vote-donald-trump-twice-two-years-probation-750-fine-a7900886.html%3fampThe woman in Indiana only got two years probation for deliberately committing voter fraud.

I can’t find the tweet you refer to in the comments on that article.I agree with the title of the opinion piece. Charles Manson was not a figure of the counterculture. No one would ever have heard of him if it weren’t for the murders.But I find the sort of political analysis that’s given there, and which is referred to in the piece, the sort of analysis which it seems to be responding to, to be so shallow that it’s worse than useless. We are living in the year 2017 right now. It’s been almost half a century since Charles Manson and his “family”carried out those horrific murders.What the hell has Charles Manson got to do with today’s alt-right, or Antifa?In fact, it is really a huge stretch to make Charles Manson into any sort of a cultural or political figure on any side of any of the various 1960’s cultural divides.The main thing to say about Charles Manson is that he was simply not that interesting or important a personality. He was not a political figure. He was mediocre and peripheral.He is infamous for one of many horrific crimes that were committed in the US during the same time period. Far too much ink has been spilled and far too much film has been wasted on discussing the life of that man. He was a borderline personality, probably what people now call a psychopath. He became the infamous minor cult leader and murderer we’ve all heard about, who recruited vacant personalities, both males and females, into his orbit. He became that person after a very unstable childhood and an extended exposure to the US juvenile and adult justice system during the late 1940’s, the 1950’s and the 1960’s.Such “politics” as Manson had is pure insanity and it can’t be seen except in the light of his blatantly obvious mental illness.He was at most peripherally connected with the 1960’s counterculture. He had been acquainted with a drummer from The Beach Boys, and apparently had some musical ambitions. He learned to play guitar in prison, and met a couple of peripheral figures from Hollywood. By all reports he wasn’t very talented. It seems he liked to listen to the Beatles. In prison he would have met plenty of white supremacists, too, and it’s pretty clear he had soaked up some racist ideas in his lifetime.But none of this really defines the man. What defines him is his early upbringing, which was an utter disaster. It would be hard to imagine someone who had a much more unstable childhood than Charles Manson. The following is completely derived from the Wikipedia entry on Manson’s early life. But it’s the starting point for understanding him, so I’m going to summarize it in detail.Charles Manson - WikipediaCharles Manson was born in Ohio to a 16 year old mother, Kathleen Maddox, whose boyfriend, Manson’s biological father, skipped town as soon as she became pregnant. The father had been a drifter, a laborer and a con man of sorts, who went around pretending to be a Colonel in the Army. Manson probably never even met him. Kathleen married William Eugene Manson, a laborer at a dry cleaner’s, before Charles was born.William Manson divorced Charles’ mother within a couple of years, because she was regularly disappearing on drinking sprees with her alcoholic brother, leaving Charles to stay with various babysitters. In time she too became an alcoholic. She and her brother and a friend formed an impromptu plan to rob one of their drinking friends, who they though was wealthy. They were caught immediately and both Kathleen and her brother were sentenced to lengthy prison terms. Kathleen was paroled after three years. While his mother was in prison, Charles was sent to live with an aunt in West Virginia. After his mother’s release they moved to Charleston, where Kathleen married an alcoholic and kept on drinking. It seems that she tried half-heartedly to continue her career as a thief, since she was arrested for grand larceny there, though not convicted.Charles Manson meanwhile became increasingly a disciplinary problem. At first it was truancy, stealing from the home, and shoplifting. His mother tried to find a foster home for him, but couldn’t manage to, so she sent him off to a Catholic school for delinquent boys in Terre Haute, Indiana. He didn’t much take to life with the Priests, and he ran away from the school, but his mother sent him back. He ran away again a few months later and then moved on his own to Indianapolis, where it appears that he supported himself by burgling stores and rented out his own room.Charles Manson was then barely thirteen years old.He was caught, of course, and landed in a pretty soft reform school in Omaha, Nebraska, where he became friends with a child whose uncle was a career criminal: a professional thief. Together they escaped, stole a car, got hold of a gun, held up a grocery store and a casino, and ran away to stay with the friend’s uncle, who took them in and started to train them in the art of robbery. After carrying out a couple of more robberies, Charles was arrested again and sent back to a much harsher reform school, where he later claimed to have been raped and to have developed the tactic of acting insanely and very aggressively, in order to protect himself. He repeatedly tried to escape and he eventually succeeded, together with two other boys. The three headed out to California in stolen autos, and went on a spree of robberies along the way.This involved taking stolen cars across State lines, so it was now a Federal matter, and after Charles was caught out in Utah and arrested, he was sent to Washington, DC, to the National Training School for Boys. There he was evaluated and sent to a minimum security Reformatory, and he likely would have been paroled and sent back to live with his aunt, except that he was caught raping a fellow inmate at knifepoint. So he was transferred to the Federal Reformatory in Petersburg, Virginia. There he committed various infractions.From then on he was in Federal reformatories, including maximum security. He was released early for good behaviour in 1954 and went back to live with his aunt in West Virginia. He met and married a waitress from Ohio some time in 1954–55, and he drove her out to Los Angeles in a stolen car, where he was arrested once again on Federal charges and given five years probation. He was subsequently arrested in Florida on the same charges and then failed to appear in court in Los Angeles, which resulted in his arrest in Indianapolis, the revocation of his probation, and a three year sentence at Terminal Island. His wife gave birth to his son while he was in prison, but she stopped visiting him, and eventually married another man.He was paroled in 1958 and after this it appears that he became an itinerant pimp, a forger and an all around criminal. He accumulated State and Federal charges all over the country. Pretty soon he was back in Los Angeles, County. By 1961 he was transferred to McNeil Island. In 1966 he was transferred back to Terminal Island for early release.By the time that he was released in 1967 he had effectively been in jail, prison or reform school for half of his life. He was 32 years old._________________________He had never been treated for mental illness by any qualified person as far as I can tell, though he had had psychiatric evaluations. The “Manson Family” murders took place only a couple of years after his release.I don’t know about you, but Manson’s history doesn’t read to me like the history of either a typical hippy, or a Vietnam War protestor from the 1960’s, and it certainly doesn’t read like that of a typical square or a far right wing nut from the 1960’s. Manson was clearly from a poor working class background. He was what is and was called white trash. Many of the protesters and hippies were middle class college kids.Charles Manson had contacts on all sides of the political spectrum. I wouldn’t call him either left or right. I would call him bat shit crazy.His real education came from the criminal justice system. People much like Manson are probably not all that uncommon in any age, but most don’t act out in such a way, or become so famous. What distinguished Charles Manson is that he had enough charisma, and was physically attractive enough, to draw in people who were, like himself, lacking in any sense of inner stability, and to convince them to do his bidding. What distinguished him was that he was a psychopath who happened to be inclined to violence and that he was pretty good at manipulating people.