Of Ducks And Duck Eggs Reading Answers: Fill & Download for Free

I think Camilla will be forever in Harry and Markles debt. Nobody could have hoped for a better outcome to replace her as the most disliked royal and Camilla must be thanking her lucky stars when Markle arrived on the scene and thought she was far more important than any of them and she continues to be the gift that keeps on giving. On leaving all the duties she should have undertaken on behalf of the Royal family she declared she was pleased to be rid of that toxic family. Well in the months since finding their freedom they've achieved absolutely nothing that would signify to the royal family their departure was anything but a win, win, win situation for the crown. Several tv appearances saw both the Duck & Duck Egg of Sussex swallowing their tongues talking about subjects they didn't even bother read up on so consequently looking like a couple of chumps, then interfering in the US election after giving an undertaking they would do nothing to hurt the reputation of the family, Markles two lawsuits for invasion of privacy but willing to forego said privacy if the price is right, the disrespectful visit to the military cemetery and the latest, most damaging of all the disclosure that Markle is a liar. Admitted in court by her lawyers Markle told she had ALLOWED friends to talk to the authors of the book after telling the world they had nothing to do with it!In answer to your question I think Camilla will be eternally grateful to the gruesome twosome for being so publicly inept whilst trying to display a professional persona. It matters not that Camilla gets along with Markle as Camilla will command the respect of the pair by being the wife of the king and whatever title she is gifted with, they will always be lower in rank than Camilla once Charles is king. It is also very difficult to define who Markle likes and dislikes!

This link will tell you more or less all you need to know:Why Europeans Don't Refrigerate Eggs But Americans DoThe short answer, though, is that, since your eggs are covered in poop you need to wash your eggs and keep them refrigerated, whereas in Europe "The priority in egg production is to produce clean eggs at the point of collection, rather than trying to clean them afterwards."If you read through the link carefully you may actually see the sense in that approach.

Doubtful. Some of the reasons being the same as to why they weren’t bred as livestock while they still existed:The primary reason is that they only laid one egg at a time, and not that often. So, chicks were not numerous, nor frequent. New generations weren’t born at a rate making raising them financially practical. Evolution/nature had seen no need to have Dodos lay multiple eggs, as the survival rate of fuzzy, baby Dodo chicks was extremely high… prior to man’s involvement on the island.And potentially… taste. There is considerable disagreement on how tasty Dodo Bird meat was. There are as many articles that conclude that it did not taste good at all, as there are, saying it was very good. But all the information regarding their palatability originates from the writing of only 2 or 3 people. The confusion comes from the interpretations of what little was written (as is so very often the case with old writings, i.e. Bible, US Constitution, etc.). My best interpretation is that the breast meat was very good indeed! With the legs being far tougher. And that overcooking any of it only made it worse. It only makes sense that it would be of good flavor, since most texts state that its diet was mostly fruits like Mangoes and various palm fruits. Here is some more interesting stuff about their diet: Stefan Pociask's answer to What did the dodo bird eat? But you can read this source and make your own conclusion and decide if the taste was one reason they were not domesticated:** In 1598, Admiral van Warwijk goes on to explain about the Dodo "... that the longer and oftener they were cooked [i.e., "wallowed in the pot"], the less soft and more insipid eating they became. Nevertheless their belly and breast were of a pleasant flavour and easily masticated." Sir Thomas Herbert in 1634 said "It is reputed more for wonder than for food, greasie [robust] stomackes may seeke after them, but to the delicate they are offensive and of no nourishment."If only the breast meat were flavorful, that would be a lot of bird to raise for only a relatively small amount of meat. I suppose the exotic meat industry could make a profit by cashing in on it’s rarity and general legendary fame, and charge extremely high prices due to scarcity.Of course this scenario is extremely futuristic. Even if cloning programs succeed in the next couple decades, that is a far cry from breeding them in such numbers as to build a viable healthy population. There is a genetic diversity issue to contend with. That’s a long ways off.On the other hand, the emu and ostrich meat fad fizzled out pretty quickly, with many people losing huge investments. People still seem to prefer their chickens and their turkeys… even over well-established ducks and geese. Novelties wear out quickly. People are fickle. So… if someone has approached you and told you all the millions you can make by getting into the Dodo meat market, on the ground floor… I suggest you stay clear of that investment.As far as history, here is a more complete answer to why it wasn’t done in the first place.Stefan Pociask's answer to Given that dodos were so docile, why didn't the Europeans domesticate and farm them instead of hunting them into extinction?