Bi 130: Fill & Download for Free

Let’s first consider just the ones that speak only a language.en = 100 - 20 = 80hi = 50 - 20 = 30And now sum it.en + hi = 80 + 30 = 110So 110 is the number of people that can speak only a language, now let’s sum the number of bilinguals ones.bi = 20en + hi + bi = 130So we got 130 people that speak at least one of the languages, and know we subtract it from the total and we got what we want.tot = 200spk = 130tot - spk = 200 - 130 = 70Then we got 70 non-speakers, but wait… look at the second and third line we counted the bilingual one two times, so we got to subtract it again.non-speakers = 200 - 30 - 20non-speakers = 50This questions, mislead you to the error.

Sir, In the early 90’s. the last 16 remaining U. S. Government personnel ( operating a Loran site on that island )left when that U. S. Coast Guard facility was closed with that island being handed back to Japan. When I was TDY to Camp Zama for just shy of six months in 86’, I was able to obtain permission to take one of the bi-weekly C-130 resupply flights to Iwo and tour Iwo for almost 8 hours before the cargo plane made the return flight to Yakota air base. My late mom ( visiting me in Japan ) accompanied me on the flight. It was a visit she never imagined she would be able to make. It meant a great deal to her as her uncle, a U. S. Marine, was killed there. His body was never found. My mother was normally a talkative lady but the visit had a tremendous emotional impact on her, especially when we stood atop Suribachi looking down at the former American beach landing areas. She barely uttered 10 words to me during the return leg of the supply mission.( the former Iwo Jima Coast Guard compound )One of the former LORAN station buildings left to basically “rot” by the Japanese photographed in 2003.

This is a very vague question, since it doesn't explain what is meant by "success".Certainly there is some inherent difficulty in understanding advanced concepts. When you read a book about programming, you can't read it the way you read a newspaper. It's likely that you often need to pause and think about what you've just read and try to make sense of it. Often it becomes necessary to exert considerable mental effort just to get through a page. Some people naturally find it much easier than others. This is what we might call talent or aptitude. We know that all forms of aptitude are positively correlated and this is the statistical basis for the concept of the g factor and IQ, which is supposed to be the numerical quantity corresponding to g.I think we shouldn't try to pretend that such innate differences don't exist. If I had been born into a wealthy, intellectual Hungarian Jewish family, giving me a similar set of opportunities as John von Neumann, would I have been able to learn mathematics as easily as him? Of course not, and there is no shame in admitting it. In order to keep up with him, I would have to work a hundred times harder than him. (Not possible, since he was apparently wholly dedicated to his studies.)Aptitude is not by any means the only factor that determines how hard you have to work in order to succeed. For example, if you own a computer with an Internet connection, you have a massive advantage over someone who is too poor to afford those things. But, even after controlling for differences in people's circumstances, it's clear that some people are naturally much quicker than others. So yes, chances are, a person with IQ 100 will have to work much harder than a person with IQ 130 to learn programming, and that this will probably be true for every domain of programming. If the IQ difference were smaller, it would be likely that one person would have more aptitude for some subfields of computer science and the other would have more aptitude for the others, since, obviously, aptitude is a much higher-dimensional quantity than IQ.But "success" is a vague notion, and I would have to know what you mean by that before I could tell you how heavily it depends on natural aptitude.And even though IQ is the best predictor of aptitude in intellectual tasks, it is still nowhere near a perfect one. So if your IQ is not very high, you should under no circumstances let that deter you from learning programming. Instead, you should learn programming, and continue learning it if you find it interesting and rewarding. Why preemptively rule yourself out when you can just get your feet wet and know for sure whether programming is for you?