As Is Purchase Agreement Florida Far Bar: Fill & Download for Free

DWIGHT SCHAR, FOUNDER OF RYAN HOMES, IS INVOLVED IN THREE COMPANIES CONDEMNED BY A COURT FOR DECEPTIVE PRACTICESDwight Schar controls the Bella Collina community in central Florida and the founder of Ryan homes. Dwight Schar companies have been accused by some, including members of Congress, of deceptive business practices. To make matters worse, more recently, Dwight Schar, or his team members, purchased three companies through his CPA, Paul Simonson and/or attorney James Ryan. These companies were condemned by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for their deceptive practices and advertising among them ROCA LABS Nutraceuticals.Many residents in Bella Collina have complained that their complaints about the community and the way it is managed have been silenced. For the Juravin family, this became a reality after a simple Google review started a slew of lawsuits from the Bella Collina administration. As if to intimidate the Jewish family into silence, Dwight Schar unleashed an expensive and dizzying array of legal resources and frivolous lawsuits.ROCA LABS IS NOW IN DWIGHT SCHAR’S CONTROLPaul Simonson, Schar’s CPA, was involved in the purchase of three companies. The judge who dealt with condemning these companies wrote in the final judgment that ROCA LABS Nutraceutical and the others had “unfairly suppressed negative information about the Defendants and their products, to the detriment of subsequent purchasers, by making threats to sue and filing of lawsuits against dissatisfied consumers for violating non-disparagement clauses in their online sales contracts.”CONGRESSIONAL LETTER BEGGING SCHAR TO STOP GOUGING CONSUMERSIt is not the first time that Dwight Schar has been involved in companies that gag customers. In November 2019, four U.S. Senators called for NVR to stop “using mandatory arbitration” in a letter sent to the business. The company does so to leverage construction defect repairs.“Forcing homebuyers into arbitration and nondisclosure agreements is unfair, unjust and abusive,” according to the letter, dated Nov. 6, 2019. “NVR’s (Ryan Homes) reliance on mandatory arbitration provisions to evade accountability is unconscionable — and it may also be illegal.”A USA Today Network investigation shows that Ryan Homes, and its larger conglomerate NVR Inc., cut corners during construction and left homeowners to deal with the defects. When concerns were raised, homeowners say the company would ignore its warranties, refuse to fix the problem, leverage any repairs into nondisclosure agreements, or force customers into lengthy fights, costing them thousands of dollars.Examples of poorly built homes and failed projects done by NVR and Ryan Homes include:Improper repairs to an uneven floor that caused the possible loss of structural integrity of one house in southern Ohio.A lack of waterproofing causing rotting wood and major structural damage at a seaside condominium complex on the coast of Maryland.Toilets left unconnected to the sewer, flushing waste under a new home for nearly a year in South Carolina.Families who have purchased homes from NVHomes, the NVR Inc., homebuilder, have filed complaints against the company. The McCalleys, a family who lived in Maryland, say they quickly found numerous construction errors and code violations in their new house that the builder, NV Homes, has been unwilling to resolve after years of deliberation.McCalley said he has found similar problems that exist widely across NV Homes and Ryan Homes products in Maryland and beyond. (NVR, Inc. is the parent company of both NV Homes and Ryan Homes). He believes the city of Gaithersburg inspectors missed these problems during the construction of the home.COMPLAINTS AGAINST DWIGHT SCHAR’S COMPANIESIn the final judgment from the FTC, the company Must Cure Obesity was accused by the judge as “deceptively failed to disclose their financial relationship to testimonialists who worked for them, and their control of a supposedly independent and objective information website that they used to promote their products.”Four families have gone public with tales of intimidation, bullying, nonstop harassment, unwarranted texts, lawsuits, and threats from Dwight Schar’s staff at Bella Collina. They are the Juravins, the Heckenbergs, the Sheltons, and the Sutherins. Only one family has stayed in Bella Collina thus far, the other three have fled to safety found in normal neighborhoods.In 2017, three of these families filed lawsuits with Bella Collina, as reported by the Orlando Sentinel.To be clear, the three companies were bought after the court ruling. Dwight Schar and Paul Simonson were fully aware of the companies’ deceptive standings and yet assume ownership via Wilmington Financial Services, LLC (Delaware). When a business buys another business, they assume the reputation and the responsibility attached to that company.SCHAR’S CORRUPT LEGAL RESOURCE, ATTORNEY MARC RANDAZZAAttorney Marc Randazza, who was fired by InfoWars’ Alex Jones because a Connecticut judge accused him of “serious misconduct,” is Ryan Homes and NVR Inc., founder Dwight Schar’s attorney. Dwight Schar also chose a corrupt Marc Randazza to represent his Bella Collina in Florida. Randazza has been disciplined by the state bars in four out of the five states he is licensed to practice law.Randazza was issued a public reprimand by The Florida Bar on Sept. 3, 2020, DISCIPLINE CASE #201500718 against Marc Randazza. The reprimand was related to his ethical violations in Nevada, where Randazza, as a porn attorney, was sued by the State Bar of Nevada on nine charges of violations.The source is: https://www.universenewsnetwork.com/2021/01/26/dwight-schar-founder-of-ryan-homes-is-involved-in-three-companies-condemned-by-court-for-deceptive-practices/

No. In the first place, I don’t even see how such a moratorium could even be considered to be remotely constitutional. In the second place, legislation generally has a sort of built-in moratorium called the legislative process.If I was to propose a moratorium on anything, it would be to limit news and media organizations and public interest groups to reporting only exactly what was released by the lead agency investigating the shooting for a period of thirty days from the date the incident occurred or until the scene is released by law enforcement authorities. During the moratorium solicitation of or broadcast of commentary outside of this channel would be prohibited. Media speculation would be prohibited. Elected officials, other than a law enforcement officer speaking in his or her official capacity, would be expressly barred from commenting on the incident.This would not only frustrate those who milk these incidents to get viewers, readers, online and social media consumers, it would also give authorities the chance to perform the investigation and interview victims and witnesses. It would end the feeding frenzy and the media circuses and it might even cut down on these incidents because those inclined to commit them would be deprived of their moment of glory.Let’s see: how many constitutional rights would be trampled by such a moratorium?To be honest, I don’t really see any benefits of depriving Americans of their rights to a press free of prior censorship but I do see the benefits of an honest legislative debate and a fair presentation of the news.For far too long, the American general public has been exposed to only one viewpoint. There has never been any question raised in much of the media about whether that viewpoint is even honest or an accurate representation of the facts.Case in point: The shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018, in Parkland, Florida. This is the shooting that propelled David Hogg into the national spotlight; inspired states to pass new gun laws that included raising the age to buy a long gun from 18 to 21; and is still used today to justify things like restrictions on certain types of firearms and magazine capacities.In December of 2018, the Florida commission created to investigate the incident released its initial findings. All of the members of the commission agreed on those findings.The commission blamed the shooting on a single person, Nikolas J. Cruz. However, the commission called the incident “the most preventable mass shooting in history” and was harshly critical of the Broward County Public Schools, the administration of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, the Broward County Sheriff’s Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the deputy sheriff assigned as the school’s resource officer. The commission used words like “incompetent” and “abysmal” to describe the responses to the growing threat posed by Cruz and the actions of defenders on the day of the shooting.Nowhere in the 400+-page report did the commission blame Sunrise Tactical, Smith & Wesson, Dick’s Sporting Goods, The FBI’s background check system, or a failure in federal or Florida gun laws. Nowhere.Time for a pop quiz! But because I am a nice (if long-winded) guy, I am also giving you the answers.Question: In the 55 years since the Colt AR-15 Sporter first went on sale in the United States, how many of that type of rifle have been used by a shooter under 21, who legally purchased and possessed the gun, in a mass shooting?*Answer: One. Nikolas Cruz is the only person under 21 to have ever purchased an AR-15-style rifle (Smith & Wesson M&P-15) and use it in a mass shooting.Question: Over the same 55-year period, how many AR, AK, and similar rifles have been legally purchased by a person under the age of 21 and then used in a mass shooting?Answer: Three. Dean Melburg in 1994, Nikolas Cruz in 2018, and Santino Legan in 2019.Question: How many young Americans are in the age group including 18, 19, and 20 years of age?Answer: The U.S. Census Bureau estimates there are 12,750,000 young adults under the age of 21.Question: Would a law restricting magazine capacities to 10 rounds have made a difference in the Parkland shooting?Answer: No. Cruz had only 10-round magazines when he made his attack. Cruz paused to reload magazines.Question: Would an assault weapons ban have prevented the shooting or made a difference in the outcome?Answer: No. Cruz could have inflicted all of the injuries just as easily with any number of different rifles including a wide variety of semi-automatic, pump, and lever-action rifles. Cruz could have also inflicted even more serious injuries and likely reduced the number of survivors by using a shotgun.Question: Would universal background checks have prevented the shooting?Answer: No. Cruz passed the required background check because there was no disqualifying information in the national database.Question: Would waiting periods have made a difference?Answer: No. Cruz purchased the rifle a year before the shooting.Red flag laws might have been a possible preventative solution, but those would have required official action that contravened the diversion agreement between the Broward County Schools and the Broward County Sheriff’s Office.Red flag laws might also have prevented the shooting at the Borderline Bar and Grill because the shooter in that incident had been diagnosed with PTSD and the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office was called to the shooter’s residence because he was shooting holes in the wall. However, the shooter was not deemed as sufficient threat to take him into custody and request a competency hearing. Seven months later, the shooter was responsible for the deaths of 11 people.Senator Dianne Feinstein blamed that one on the influx of guns from Arizona and Nevada even though the shooter had purchased his gun from a local dealer in the Thousand Oaks, California area in full compliance with California laws which included universal background checks, red flag laws, restrictions on magazine capacities, heavy restrictions on military-style features, and a host of other feckless, and worthless, measures.In fact, California already had all the laws in the gun control wish book. But I don’t recall seeing anyone calling Sen. Feinstein out on this.Quite frankly, until gun owners and gun rights activists take the battle to Senators Feinstein, Warren, Sanders, and Schumer and start discrediting the claims of Michael Bloomberg, Shannon Watts, David Hogg, and all the Moms, they are going to get away with this.*”Mass shootings” based on the list maintained by Mother Jones.

I looked on the web and I found many things, especially about Dwight Schar. It looks like he’s been involved in gagging and deceiving consumers with his companies. 500 lawsuits were filed from Bella Collina homeowners, who were forced to sell their houses because the management forced them to pay very high and unfair costs of the club. The homeowners were forced to sell the houses, where Dwight Schar bought them again for much lower prices. What a business!Dwight Schar controls the Bella Collina community in central Florida and the founder of Ryan homes. Dwight Schar companies have been accused by some, including members of Congress, of deceptive business practices. To make matters worse, more recently, Dwight Schar, or his team members, purchased three companies through his CPA, Paul Simonson and/or attorney James Ryan. These companies were condemned by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for their deceptive practices and advertising among them ROCA LABS Nutraceuticals.Many residents in Bella Collina have complained that their complaints about the community and the way it is managed have been silenced. For the Juravin family, this became a reality after a simple Google review started a slew of lawsuits from the Bella Collina administration. As if to intimidate the Jewish family into silence, Dwight Schar unleashed an expensive and dizzying array of legal resources and frivolous lawsuits.ROCA LABS IS NOW IN DWIGHT SCHAR’S CONTROLPaul Simonson, Schar’s CPA, was involved in the purchase of three companies. The judge who dealt with condemning these companies wrote in the final judgment that ROCA LABS Nutraceutical and the others had “unfairly suppressed negative information about the Defendants and their products, to the detriment of subsequent purchasers, by making threats to sue and filing of lawsuits against dissatisfied consumers for violating non-disparagement clauses in their online sales contracts.”CONGRESSIONAL LETTER BEGGING SCHAR TO STOP GOUGING CONSUMERSIt is not the first time that Dwight Schar has been involved in companies that gag customers. In November 2019, four U.S. Senators called for NVR to stop “using mandatory arbitration” in a letter sent to the business. The company does so to leverage construction defect repairs.“Forcing homebuyers into arbitration and nondisclosure agreements is unfair, unjust and abusive,” according to the letter, dated Nov. 6, 2019. “NVR’s (Ryan Homes) reliance on mandatory arbitration provisions to evade accountability is unconscionable — and it may also be illegal.”A USA Today Network investigation shows that Ryan Homes, and its larger conglomerate NVR Inc., cut corners during construction and left homeowners to deal with the defects. When concerns were raised, homeowners say the company would ignore its warranties, refuse to fix the problem, leverage any repairs into nondisclosure agreements, or force customers into lengthy fights, costing them thousands of dollars.Examples of poorly built homes and failed projects done by NVR and Ryan Homes include:Improper repairs to an uneven floor that caused the possible loss of structural integrity of one house in southern Ohio.A lack of waterproofing causing rotting wood and major structural damage at a seaside condominium complex on the coast of Maryland.Toilets left unconnected to the sewer, flushing waste under a new home for nearly a year in South Carolina.Families who have purchased homes from NVHomes, the NVR Inc., homebuilder, have filed complaints against the company. The McCalleys, a family who lived in Maryland, say they quickly found numerous construction errors and code violations in their new house that the builder, NV Homes, has been unwilling to resolve after years of deliberation.McCalley said he has found similar problems that exist widely across NV Homes and Ryan Homes products in Maryland and beyond. (NVR, Inc. is the parent company of both NV Homes and Ryan Homes). He believes the city of Gaithersburg inspectors missed these problems during the construction of the home.COMPLAINTS AGAINST DWIGHT SCHAR’S COMPANIESIn the final judgment from the FTC, the company Must Cure Obesity was accused by the judge as “deceptively failed to disclose their financial relationship to testimonialists who worked for them, and their control of a supposedly independent and objective information website that they used to promote their products.”Four families have gone public with tales of intimidation, bullying, nonstop harassment, unwarranted texts, lawsuits, and threats from Dwight Schar’s staff at Bella Collina. They are the Juravins, the Heckenbergs, the Sheltons, and the Sutherins. Only one family has stayed in Bella Collina thus far, the other three have fled to safety found in normal neighborhoods.In 2017, three of these families filed lawsuits with Bella Collina, as reported by the Orlando Sentinel.To be clear, the three companies were bought after the court ruling. Dwight Schar and Paul Simonson were fully aware of the companies’ deceptive standings and yet assume ownership via Wilmington Financial Services, LLC (Delaware). When a business buys another business, they assume the reputation and the responsibility attached to that company.SCHAR’S CORRUPT LEGAL RESOURCE, ATTORNEY MARC RANDAZZAAttorney Marc Randazza, who was fired by InfoWars’ Alex Jones because a Connecticut judge accused him of “serious misconduct,” is Ryan Homes and NVR Inc., founder Dwight Schar’s attorney. Dwight Schar also chose a corrupt Marc Randazza to represent his Bella Collina in Florida. Randazza has been disciplined by the state bars in four out of the five states he is licensed to practice law.Randazza was issued a public reprimand by The Florida Bar on Sept. 3, 2020, DISCIPLINE CASE #201500718 against Marc Randazza. The reprimand was related to his ethical violations in Nevada, where Randazza, as a porn attorney, was sued by the State Bar of Nevada on nine charges of violations.Paul Simonson Got Bella Collina and Dwight Schar Even Further In TroubleIn a class action lawsuit filed against Bella Collina, Dwight Schar, DCS Capital Investments, Randall Greene, Paul Simonson, and Richard Arrighi, a connection was made between Paul Simonson and another failed business.“On information and belief, Simonson and Greene became skillful at defrauding creditors, use of legal entities to launder money, use of legal proceedings to harass victims, and various illegitimate accounting practices while employed by Catalfumo Construction Inc., during its massive fraud of business partners and creditors, and, at all relevant times, were the authorized agents and employees of Schar, using these practices in the management of his assets and companies including those at Bella Collina,” said the lawsuit.Press releases from Catalfumo, which folded in 2012, confirm that Simonson and Greene did work for the company.Ghost TownThere are over 900 lots in Bella Collina. However, only 70 of those lots are filled. That’s less than 10 percent residency in a gated community noted for luxury and convenience.Could it be that Bella Collina is unable to attract potential customers because something is wrong?Bella Collina has 70 homeowners. That would not be terrible if the neighborhood was only beginning. But Bella Collina has been around for 17 years. The community was started in 2002. For a neighborhood that offers a golf course, a club, and such luxury, why isn’t it popular? How come Bella Collina cannot gain more than 10% capacity?Perhaps the hundreds of lawsuits inflicted on homeowners by the POA have something to do with it. Over 500 lawsuits have been filed involving Bella Collina. The lawsuits against the staff have accusations ranging from harassment to racketeering to fraud.Using Dwight Schar’s massive attorney army, the staff at Bella Collina have fired back with a few lawsuits of their own. They have targeted and abused homeowners, charging with property violations even before notifying the homeowners of lawsuits. They have endangered families and children with their desperate attempts at retaliation.HOAs and POAs are notorious in the news for being unfair and for scheming to sue homeowners. Don Juravin has battled with this particular POA for more than four years. The difference between Bella Collina’s POA and any normal neighborhood is that Bella Collina is in fact, a ghost town.The POA has many slots for homeowner representation. However, in a neighborhood that has 900 lots but only 70 homeowners, the property managers are kings. Therefore, when Don Juravin penned his one negative review of Bella Collina, revenge was swift and sudden.He was sued several times. The Bella Collina staff was so eager to harass Mr. Juravin and his family that they sued him before even notifying him that he had supposedly violated the POA terms. They banned him and his children from using the property club.Four years later, they refuse to leave him and his family alone.