D) Multiple Congressional Nominations: Fill & Download for Free

There were multiple factors, all of which are absent today :The “Solid South” was traditionally a Democratic Party bastion. Apart from flukes like 1920, when Republicans won ONE southern state, and 1928, when they won 5 out of 11 (mostly because the Democrat candidate was Catholic), Democrats could count on the South — not only for the presidency, but at all levels of governance. The only election anybody cared about was the primary. The general election, if it took place at all, was a mere formality; often, it was uncontested, with the Republicans not bothering to nominate a candidate. Even in 1928, when Democrat Al Smith lost half the South, Southern states still provided him with over 80 percent of his electoral vote.Cracks started to appear after World War II, with Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower pulling in several states on the periphery of the south (Texas, Virginia, etc). Even so, the South still provided Adlai Stevenson with most of his electoral vote. Republican Barry Goldwater took five out of 11 Southern states in 1964, as did Richard Nixon in 1968; another five voted for George Wallace of the American Independent Party. But Wallace was regarded as a rebel Democrat, not as a true independent.These cracks were all at the presidential level. At all other levels, the South remained a Democratic Party bastion. A handful of offices in the South started to go Republican in the 1960s —Storm Thurmond defected, Republican Senators and Governors were elected from Texas, Tennessee and Florida, and, in the 1970s, from North Carolina. These were still aberrations in a map that remained overwhelmingly blue.In 1972, Richard Nixon became the first Republican ever to win the entire South. It was a tsunami election, with Nixon winning 69 percent over the 11 Southern states. But apart from picking up a Senate seat in North Carolina and a couple of Congressional seats in Mississippi, his coat-tails were very short.With tsunamis, the tide sweeps in. Then it sweeps out again. As it did four years later, in 1976.Jimmy Carter was a Southerner. Southerners were still very parochial.Jimmy Carter was far less liberal then (at least publicly) than he is now, and far less liberal than the Democratic Party is now.Southern voters, who were still Democrats at heart, saw Jimmy Carter as one of their own.It was not till the 1990s that Republicans clearly gained the upper hand at all levels of government in the South, and as recently as 2002, Louisiana still hadn’t elected a Republican Senator, Georgia still hadn’t had a Republican Governor, and Mississippi still hadn’t had a legislature controlled by Republicans. How did the South flip? It didn’t. It was a transition, which took place much more slowly than most people now realize.

To answer that question, you first have to define the role of a president. You can then measure performance against that definition.Chief of State. Essentially, the president represents the people of the US. The president is a symbol of the people and acts to inspire themHead of the Executive branch. The president is responsible for hiring, firing, setting policy, and acting as a leader for this branch of the government.Chief Diplomat. The president is responsible for being the head diplomat between the US and all other countries.Commander in Chief. The president is the ultimate leader for the US armed services.Chief Legislator of the Executive branch. This one is more difficult for many people to grasp. The Legislative branch makes laws, the Executive enforces them. However, the president’s role involves working with congress to approve (although they can override) legislation and also working with congress to suggest legislation.Chief of Party. The president acts as the head of his party while in office.Chief Citizen. The president represents all citizens of the US and should work for all of their interests.Reading through this list, it sounds impossible to do all of those similarly really, particularly in a country which so diverse. Still, if we rate our current president on all of these roles, i believe we are able to produce a beneficial assessment of his overall performance to date. Remember which he has not been in office for 1\/4 of his term however, this is how I grade him (A-F scale, with C being average).Chief of State. D. President Trump does represent a portion of the US and has not alienated everyone, so he does not quite deserve an F here, but his inspirations have been almost completely based on hate and fear. Perhaps D minus is a better estimate.Head of the Executive branch. D. There are significant holes in his cabinet that are missing nominations or, in cases where Congress is not required for approval, any apparent move to fill them. He has alienated multiple members of his own staff. He has taken definite action to fire when he felt it was needed, though, so an F is not warranted. Still, he is below average in this category.Chief Diplomat. D. War has not yet been declared on the US based on his actions or words. That would warrant an F in this category. But he has alienated many of our allies (hmm, quite a pattern here). Some would argue that action on the TPP and threats on NAFTA are positives in his favor here. I disagree as to how those actions were taken in a very un-diplomatic way. Still, that also helps to keep him above an outright F. But, he is unquestionably below average in this category.Commander in Chief. C. This one is a real mixed bag. Our president has shown support for our armed forces, but has also attempted to take action that he claimed involved the military’s leaders that does affect them, but those claims were refuted by those same leaders. He did take decisive action against Syria. Decisiveness is important. But he has also placed our armed services in more danger by escalating tensions in parts of the world before resolving it in others. Overall, some bad, some some not so bad. I’d call him average on this one.Chief Legislator of the Executive branch. F. Our president has failed to work with Congressional members of his own party, much less those of other parties. Legislation that he has pushed on Congress has not passed, primarily because he has positioned it in way that is too controversial to garner a majority within Congress. Even his Executive Orders have been questioned by the Judicial branch and, at times, overturned.Chief of Party. F. Members of his own party have gone from being supportive to being highly critical of him, his words, and his actions.Chief Citizen. F. Our president has been highly divisive. He has stated that some Nazis are “fine people” while calling peacefully protesting member of the NFL “sons of bitches.” He has not represented the people of the US beyond finding a way to pitch one side against another. His tweets are childish and inflammatory at a time when calm, understanding, and a move toward cooperation is needed.So, three D’s, one C, and 3 F’s. That gives him a complete class of D minus. A grade of D or F is failing. Thus far, as President of the united states of america, Donald Trump is a nearly total failure.Before anybody decides to become incensed and reply with “well, Obama this, or Obama that,” you will need to clarify what Obama did or didn't do has almost anything to do as to what this president does. You have hated Obama, or loved him. Neither evaluation has actually one wit regarding how this president executes. Realize that nothing of this roles suggests activities taken fully to continue or even to cease a predecessor’s history. These are typically defined by how a president acts as a president alone.

Hillary Clinton was going to win the presidential election. The only real questions left were how high above 300 electoral votes was Clinton going to get and how many Congressional seats the Democrats were going to pick up. Donald Trump was being significantly outspent by the Clinton campaign plus Trump had truly awful debate performances and had gone through a couple of campaign managers. It was really tough for the campaign to stay on message for more than a week and Trump kept continuously brewing up controversies. The polls consistently put Clinton a few percent ahead of Trump. It was obvious that Clinton was going to win and rightfully so because it was her turn and Trump was one of the most repugnant presidential candidates ever.Let’s dwell on Trump a little more…This is a man who literally started off his presidential campaign with this:Thank you. It’s true, and these are the best and the finest. When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.Grammatically speaking, Trump apparently assumes that some rapists are good people. Although this may seem plausible to some, it is more likely that Trump merely intended to say that people sent from Mexico to the United States are mostly undesirable troublemakers who occasionally have a good person or two mixed in among the rest of the group. In the same speech, Trump vowed to build a wall on the US-Mexican border and get Mexico to pay for the wall. It’s surprising that such statements about the United States’ southern neighbor didn’t sink Trump’s candidacy right there, yet he went on to propose the creation of a “Deportation Force” which could effectively engage in the mass deportation of all illegal immigrants, “in a very humane way.”In the first Republican presidential debate, news anchor Megyn Kelly asked Trump about his temperament when, “You’ve called women you don’t like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals.” After the debate on an interview on CNN, Trump said about the anchor:Certainly, I don’t have a lot of respect for Megyn Kelly. She’s a lightweight and y’know, she came out there reading her little script and trying to be tough and be sharp. And when you meet her you realize she’s not very tough and she’s not very sharp. She gets out there and she starts asking me all sorts of ridiculous questions, and you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.This left little doubt in many people’s minds that Trump was sexist.Later in the year, Trump called for, "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States." When Trump accepted the Republican party’s nomination in late July of 2016, he declared, “we immediately suspend immigration from any nation that has been compromised by terrorism until such time it's proven that vetting mechanisms have been put in place." That seems awfully worrisome, but in his defense, the Trump campaign has cited the internment of Japanese Americans as one of the legal justifications for such an action. Indeed, Korematsu v. United States is legally legitimate to this very day because the United States Supreme Court has never overturned the decision despite the findings of lower courts which indicated that the original decision was in error due to intentional deception by the US government. Unfortunately, it isn’t much more of a logical jump that Trump could ask for Congress to formally declare war on the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, then proceed to follow in Franklin D. Roosevelt’s footsteps and intern all persons who may be sympathetic to ISIL. Such an action would be legal, but morally wrong.On a related matter, Trump has expressed that he would be fine with using military tribunals at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base to try American citizens accused of terrorism. On multiple occasions, Trump has expressed the desire to increase the number of people incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay. Additionally, Trump has supported the use of waterboarding and other forms of torture on suspected terrorists because, "Believe me, it works. And you know what? If it doesn't work, they deserve it anyway, for what they're doing. It works."In regards to nuclear weapons, Trump makes statements like these:Such statements from a presidential candidate are concerning to say the least. It would appear that Trump believes that the only reason why the use of nuclear weapons should be avoided is due to potential political complications.Relatively early on at his rallies, Trump began to encourage his crowds to rough up and eject protesters. As time went on, the Trump campaign increasingly embraced white supremacist groups and their leaders, often spreading the rhetoric used by the groups on Twitter. Combined with Trump’s other positions, this kind of alliance was disturbing at best.This list of Trump’s deplorable qualities, actions, and positions could go on and on. But the point is that there wasn’t any way the American people would vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton… and they didn’t. Hillary Clinton received 2865075 more votes than Donald Trump.But Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election anyways.Donald Trump ran on a record of exploiting the system his entire business career for his personal benefit. In the ultimate exploit of the American political system, Donald Trump managed to get 77 more electoral votes than Hillary Clinton. People took to the streets to protest. Various groups engaged in vandalism. Hate crimes surged.The election of Donald Trump made a lot of people rethink life. Some people began to ask themselves interesting and uncomfortable questions.“Will there be an economic collapse?”“Will there be a nuclear war?”“Will there be an attack on the US electrical grid?”“Will white supremacists attack me or my family?”“Will the US government become an authoritarian entity which jails citizens without a trial in the name of security?”“Will society collapse?”If you thought that disaster and unrest was about to strike or that the government might refuse to protect you or actively try to hurt you or your family, would you buy a gun so you had the option of defending yourself? Many individuals which comprise the American Left decided that question was relevant to their lives and their answer to that question was “yes”… so they went out and bought guns. These individuals wish to safeguard their futures due to the likelihood of bad things happening to the American people during Donald Trump’s presidency.