Usm Accounting Certificate: Fill & Download for Free

Updated June 2018:Salaries for fresh graduates are unchanged in 2018.Salary of fresh graduates in Malaysia with a Degree but without any working experience or with limited experience :Degree holder from reputable local universities (USM, UM, TAR, etc.) including certain ‘brand name’ overseas Universities : RM2500–3000 per month for Accounting and other general roles (sales, IT desktop support, marketing, HR or Customer Service, Logistics and Operations).Degree in Engineering : RM2800- RM3200 per month. Some specialist roles in IT or engineering may pay up to RM3,500 plus another RM300–500 allowance for a certain skill or foreign language (Japanese, Korean, Mandarin, Thai) or IT certification.If your academic results are good AND you qualified from the top 3 public universities in Malaysia or a reputable overseas university, you may earn a slight premium.The Big 4Professional Accounting firms in Malaysia pay RM3,000 per month for a fresh graduate in Accounting working in Audit ( Assurance) or Taxation. Likewise the banking sector in Malaysia pays the same basic salary, albeit the sector is downsizing at time of writing (Jan 2017).Banks do offer more benefits including more annual leave for example. By comparison, a few smaller audit firms are offering around RM2500 for a fresh graduate.My sources of information : as a HR professional, I know because I interview people, in my personal capacity, I speak to part time Uber drivers who work in those jobs and finally, as an employer, we subscribe for industry remuneration data from reputable consultants such as Mercer. We benchmark and conduct salary surveys annually. The Malaysian job market is slightly soft at present so employers have more leverage.In a few companies, fresh graduate salary can be differentiated by the field of study and /or major. For example, if the job is in an auditing or accounting role, then the accounting graduate may earn slightly more (RM200–300 per month is common, up to RM500 per month in a few situations) than a business administration graduate performing the same role.There's also a lower pay point for Advanced Diploma and Diploma students as compared with a degree holder.Professionally qualified accountants with ACCA or CA or CPA are at times more valued than others but at times, due to a lack of understanding about these qualifications, they may also earn less than a Degree holder.Why does my friend earn so much more than I do?Casual friends and individual employees who speak to one another will tend to inflate their salaries slightly or ‘cherry pick’ - they talk about the highest or best benefits rather than the total remuneration package. For example, they will say: my company offers me a mobile and transport allowance. But they would typically be coy about their basic salaries.Person A: Base salary RM3000 all inclusivePerson B: Base salary RM2500, plus mobile allowance RM100 plus Transport Allowance RM300As you can see, person A has the better deal although it might seem otherwise at first glance.Note to employers:There are other intangibles - millenials enjoy modern and convenient work locations such as near shopping malls with multiple eatery choices. They also like to work in flexible work spaces which look more like cool cafes rather than stacks of workstations while wooden desks and heavy chairs are just viewed as boring.Millennials are less enthusiastic about factory based roles unless there compensating factors such as daily free meals (e.g. canteen), overtime pay, regular staff engagement activities, gym and yoga room, annual company dinner.For specific company's salary information, go to Glassdoor.Facebook Malaysia JobsAll the best with your choices !

Actually if you look up into news Meritocracy has been implemented for ages in university application. The only thing count is 90% performance in academic and 10% in co-curriculum. In UM, USM, UKM and the rest critical courses like medicine, pharmacy, accounting, business and engineering were dominated by non-bumiputra students or 50–50. But still on average public institution enrollment in our country Malay and bumiputera student still much higher than Chinese and Indian this due to several factors.1 - Population: Bumiputera is around 60–70% of Malaysian Population so more Bumiputera in universities isn’t shocking news perhaps.2 - Entry Requirement; Bumiputera applicants come from government Matriculation, Foundation, Diploma, STAM and STPM. While 90% Indian and Chinese using STPM as channel. By far, STPM is much harder compare to others academic channel and STPM leavers rate for accepted is priority to be taken as number 1 certificate if student want to apply for public universities. So number of Chinese and Indian to be accepted is higher rates or possibility to be selected due to taking STPM alone compare to others pre-universities certificate.3 - Malay-Islamic based universities vs ordinary universities; UiTM, USIM, UIAM some universities that strictly only accepted student if Bumiputera and Muslim as entry requirement such as Bahasa Arab and Pendidikan Islam so this university did not promote diversity among Malaysian but they accept diversity by admitting international student by large . Catholic university or Christian university around the world doing this but it’s not so big problem because most of Christian university exist in dominated christian majority countries. The rest of non-Islamic university in Malaysia enrollment from other races is balance such as UUM, UMT, UNIMAP, UTHM,UMS, UNIMAS, UMP etc.3 - Numbers of private institution; general stigma for private universities is it bring much quality and demand graduate into market so much of races actually prefer private compare to public university even it’s cheaper. But still, among hundred private colleges out there with so many Malays student and this due to Malays and Bumiputera is majority most of them fail to go into public universities or just simply prefer to private institution. Telling being Malay is auto-win into public institution is a big shallow i might say. Malay also experience struggle to get a place into university as much as Chinese and Indian.4 - Studying abroad; some just give up trust in the entire system and choose to study abroad. Not just Chinese Malay and Indian are moving abroad by thousand to choose tertiary education overseas.To say racial quota and discrimination into public university is old story just don’t judge quickly because there is still hundred institution that intensively looking for Chinese and Indian applicant to make campus diversity such as Polytechnic, Community College, Vocational college and TEVT institution but the application from them is almost ‘rare’.

Ms. Kulpa.I have answered this same type of question many times over the past few days, and will continue to, so people can hopefully learn.YES, it is legal — and here’s why.Once detained/arrested — I guarantee one of the SACs (special agent-in-charge) is showing credentials and telling the person(s) why — that’s just how they do things.I will place words and references in BOLD that specifically show the validity of this answer, and sentences or phrases in italics for emphasis, and provide links where applicable.This is the State of Oregon’s Arrest Powers Granted to Federal Law Enforcement Officers Statute:ORS 133.245 Arrest by Federal Officer —(1) A federal officer may arrest a person:(a) For any crime committed in the federal officer’s presence if the federal officer has probable cause to believe the person committed the crime.(b) For any felony or Class A misdemeanor if the federal officer has probable cause to believe the person committed the crime.(c) When rendering assistance to or at the request of a law enforcement officer, as defined in ORS 414.805 (Liability of individual for medical services received while in custody of law enforcement officer).(d) When the federal officer has received positive information in writing or by telephone, telegraph, teletype, radio, facsimile machine or other authoritative source that a peace officer holds a warrant for the person’s arrest.(2) The federal officer shall inform the person to be arrested of the federal officer’s authority and reason for the arrest.(3) In order to make an arrest, a federal officer may use physical force as is justifiable and authorized of a peace officer under ORS 161.235 (Use of physical force in making an arrest or in preventing an escape), 161.239 (Use of deadly physical force in making an arrest or in preventing an escape) and 161.245 (“Reasonable belief” described).(4)(a) A federal officer making an arrest under this section without unnecessary delay shall take the arrested person before a magistrate or deliver the arrested person to a peace officer.(b) The federal officer retains authority over the arrested person only until the person appears before a magistrate or until the law enforcement agency having general jurisdiction over the area in which the arrest took place assumes responsibility for the person.(5) A federal officer when making an arrest for a non-federal offense under the circumstances provided in this section shall have the same immunity from suit as a state or local law enforcement officer.(6) A federal officer is authorized to make arrests under this section upon certification by the Department of Public Safety Standards and Training that the federal officer has received proper training to enable that officer to make arrests under this section. [1981 c.808 §3; 1993 c.254 §2; 1995 c.79 §48; 1997 c.853 §34]Furthermore, Federal Statutes define Federal Officers and their Powers of Arrest:28 U.S. Code § 533 Investigative and other officials; appointment by US Attorney GeneralSpecifically Agents and Officers of the Department of Homeland Security — (below)40 U.S. Code § 1315 Law enforcement authority of Secretary of Homeland Security for protection of public property(A) In General.—To the extent provided for by transfers made pursuant to the Homeland Security Act of 2002, [the] Secretary of Homeland Security (in this section referred to as the “Secretary”) shall protect the buildings, grounds, and property that are owned, occupied, or secured by the Federal Government (including any agency, instrumentality, or wholly owned or mixed-ownership corporation thereof) and the persons on the property.(B) Officers and Agents —(1) Designation —[The] Secretary may designate employees of the Department of Homeland Security, including employees transferred to the Department from the Office of the Federal Protective Service of the General Services Administration pursuant to the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as officers and agents for duty in connection with the protection of property owned or occupied by the Federal Government and persons on the property, including duty in areas outside the property to the extent necessary to protect the property and persons on the property.(2) Powers —While engaged in the performance of official duties, an officer or agent designated under this subsection may—(A) Enforce Federal laws and regulations for the protection of persons and property;(B) Carry firearms;(C) Make arrests without a warrant for any offense against the United States committed in the presence of the officer or agent or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if the officer or agent has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing a felony;(D) Serve warrants and subpoenas issued under the authority of the United States;(E) Conduct investigations, on and off the property in question, of offenses that may have been committed against property owned or occupied by the Federal Government or persons on the property; and(F) Carry out such other activities for the promotion of homeland security as the Secretary may prescribe.At the federal level, there is NO REQUIREMENT in federal statute that federal law enforcement officers identify themselves or display identifying information on their person when acting in public or operate MARKED vehicles, or DISPLAY government license plates. Period.At the state and local level, requirements for public law enforcement officer identification vary by jurisdiction. For example, the State of California has a general statutory requirement that “uniformed peace officer[s] . . . wear a badge, nameplate, or other device which bears clearly on its face the identification number or name of the officer,” this requirement excludes Investigators, Detectives, Plainclothes officers and Tactical teams.Read this carefully:[T]he Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution may require that an officer publicly identify him or herself as an officer, though not necessarily provide his or her name or badge number, in certain situations.[T]he Fourth Amendment requires “searches and seizures” by law enforcement to be reasonable. A “seizure” for purposes of the Amendment can include a “stop” made “without any physical contact, such as when an officer makes certain displays of force like pointing a weapon or using language or a tone of voice that indicates compliance is mandatory.”When a seizure occurs, its reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment will depend on the facts and circumstances of the particular case. Nevertheless, because the reasonableness of a seizure is ultimately fact-dependent, failure to identify might not always be considered unreasonable. As the same court noted, “certain dangerous circumstances may permit plainclothes officers to initiate stops without identifying themselves.”ALL federal law enforcement officers and special agents of the US government (except FBI and DEA who have their own Academies) attend the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) and are well versed in Constitutional Rights taught by the Legal Division of the FLETC.The special agents of DHS protecting the federal properties and it’s surrounding area(s) (and there are many within the immediate area of the US District Courthouse in Portland) are enforcing federal property crime and assault on federal officers statutes. They are displaying, on their shoulders, agency specific patches of the DHS, the word POLICE, (see image(s) below) and are making detentions/arrests in accordance with both Federal and State laws as pointed out thoroughly above. They are not vigilantes, military or secret police as some would make others believe. They are USMS SOG, FPS, DHS, and USBP SOG (special operations groups).Here’s what assault on federal law enforcement officers with a commercial-grade laser looks like in the real world. This device is intended to do damage to the law enforcement officer’s eyes. (below)Federal DHS SOG Agents and FPS Officers (above) — obviously marked uniforms.Federal DHS SOG Agents, FPS Police, and US Marshal SOG (below) — obviously marked uniforms.Yes, there are many peaceful protestors, as there should be, but DHS isn’t after those folks — they are AFTER the militant, rioting, violent people attacking feds, police, the federal courthouse and federal office buildings — the ones that want to fight — the ones observed and photographed committing vandalism and damage to these properties and assaulting fedral law enforcement agents/officers — NOT random peaceful protestors.Watch some of these videos from the official DHS Twitter account — Homeland Security (@DHSgov) | Twitter.If this doesn’t answer the question — no answer will.