Official Form 16a: Fill & Download for Free

The answer to this question is slightly more complex than what some might have suggested.The story of the Lavi is told in detail in a book published just last year on this very subject:Lavi: The United States, Israel, and a Controversial Fighter Jet: John W Golan: 9781612347226: Amazon.com: BooksThe Lavi made economic sense on a production run of 300 airplanes, as was originally intended. After Israel’s defense budget was slashed during the mid-1980s, however, the Israeli defense planners realized that they could only afford half as fighter jets as they had planned. On such a small production run, the Lavi was no longer cost competitive.But the full answer is still more complicated, however. Israeli developers had contracted to build a large portion of the airplane in the United States, to allow them to use U.S. security assistant funding to help pay for the airplanes. Under the agreement, the primary U.S. contractor, Grumman Corp., has a deal to set up a U.S. assembly line to market the Lavi to the U.S. Air Force. The Lavi was therefore seen as a competitor by General Dynamics, which at that time produced the F-16, for sales to the USAF. Added to this was the determined opposition of certain U.S. officials, under the direction of then Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger, who had made a career of anti-Israel campaigning.The author of the book published last year, which covers the story behind this aircraft in exhaustive detail, has also published a series of blog posts summarizing the program:Lavi - An Engineer's PerspectiveLavi - A Retrospective JourneyThe Lavi was truly a technological marvel, offering an airplane with the empty weight of an early model, Block 15 F-16A, but with the range and payload of a 21st century Block 52+ F-16C. It was truly a tragedy that this spectacular aircraft did not go on to benefit the armed forces of both the United States and Israel.

No. There are federal laws going into more detail than the constitution could. Quite a number of the immigrants are classed as refugees according to the Geneva Refugee Convention. This "official" refugee status puts them outside of Art. 16a (2). Then there's the Dublin III regulation and and and.....long list, by far too complex to detail it here.Besides, considering the "warm welcome" (read: Molotov cocktails thrown at refugee homes) many of them received here, I think they'll prefer going back to Syria once the war there is over.

Form 16A is essentially an income tax certificate that contains details of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) that employers deduct from their employees’ salaries. It is proof of the deposition of the TDS in the official account of the Income Tax department.In addition, this important document comprises the following information –Form 16A carries information related to the name of the employer and employee. Apart from that, it contains official details of the PAN of both the employer and the employee.It reflects the TAN of the employer through which the deducted tax amount is deposited with the government.The form also states the year of tax assessment so that individuals are aware of the period related to their annual income tax return filing. Additionally, it also contains the date of the tax deduction from the individual’s salary.Form 16A also reflects the reference number or acknowledgment code of the TDS payment. As a result, individuals can present this document in case of any dispute related to TDS submission and payment.Form 16A[1][1][1][1] serves as a document for proof of income. Individuals availing financial services such as credit cards and loans can forward this form as a relevant proof of income and employment.Footnotes[1] What is the difference between Form 16, Form 16A and Form 16B? [1] What is the difference between Form 16, Form 16A and Form 16B? [1] What is the difference between Form 16, Form 16A and Form 16B? [1] What is the difference between Form 16, Form 16A and Form 16B?