Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool: Fill & Download for Free

GET FORM

Download the form

A Complete Guide to Editing The Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool

Below you can get an idea about how to edit and complete a Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool in detail. Get started now.

  • Push the“Get Form” Button below . Here you would be brought into a page making it possible for you to make edits on the document.
  • Choose a tool you want from the toolbar that emerge in the dashboard.
  • After editing, double check and press the button Download.
  • Don't hesistate to contact us via [email protected] for additional assistance.
Get Form

Download the form

The Most Powerful Tool to Edit and Complete The Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool

Edit Your Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool Right Away

Get Form

Download the form

A Simple Manual to Edit Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool Online

Are you seeking to edit forms online? CocoDoc can help you with its Complete PDF toolset. You can make full use of it simply by opening any web brower. The whole process is easy and quick. Check below to find out

  • go to the PDF Editor Page of CocoDoc.
  • Upload a document you want to edit by clicking Choose File or simply dragging or dropping.
  • Conduct the desired edits on your document with the toolbar on the top of the dashboard.
  • Download the file once it is finalized .

Steps in Editing Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool on Windows

It's to find a default application able to make edits to a PDF document. However, CocoDoc has come to your rescue. View the Manual below to find out ways to edit PDF on your Windows system.

  • Begin by downloading CocoDoc application into your PC.
  • Upload your PDF in the dashboard and conduct edits on it with the toolbar listed above
  • After double checking, download or save the document.
  • There area also many other methods to edit PDF, you can check this guide

A Complete Guide in Editing a Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool on Mac

Thinking about how to edit PDF documents with your Mac? CocoDoc has got you covered.. It allows you to edit documents in multiple ways. Get started now

  • Install CocoDoc onto your Mac device or go to the CocoDoc website with a Mac browser.
  • Select PDF document from your Mac device. You can do so by clicking the tab Choose File, or by dropping or dragging. Edit the PDF document in the new dashboard which includes a full set of PDF tools. Save the file by downloading.

A Complete Manual in Editing Small-Group Discourse Peer-To-Peer Engagement Tool on G Suite

Intergating G Suite with PDF services is marvellous progess in technology, able to reduce your PDF editing process, making it faster and more cost-effective. Make use of CocoDoc's G Suite integration now.

Editing PDF on G Suite is as easy as it can be

  • Visit Google WorkPlace Marketplace and find CocoDoc
  • install the CocoDoc add-on into your Google account. Now you are all set to edit documents.
  • Select a file desired by hitting the tab Choose File and start editing.
  • After making all necessary edits, download it into your device.

PDF Editor FAQ

Is it a good idea for a homeowner to carry a taser against a potential burglar?

Generally, no. There are superior tools to use in this circumstance.First of all, I'm assuming you were actually referring to a TASER, which fires two probe barbs connected to the unit by wires, as opposed to a stun gun, which has two contact points attached to the unit which must be pressed against the skin of the target. Stun guns are a terrible choice here, but even TASERs, despite their ostensible awesomeness, are actually fairly difficult to use effectively under stress. More on that in a minute.Before I get too far into this, a word on the burglary situation as a whole. The first tool you should reach for in the case of a home invasion is a phone. As soon as you know that the sound you heard wasn't the wind after all, you need to call the police immediately. Don't "just go check it out." Don't wait until you're 100% certain it's not your cat. Don't start fashioning yourself as a Navy Ninja Jedi Seal. Call the police. This is not a waste of time, you won't get accused of "filing a false report" or "wasting officers' time" or anything of the sort, and no officer worth the brass in their badge is going to bat an eye about checking this out. I did this all the time, happily, because it was my job. Believe me, out of all the phone calls that could stem from this situation, this is by far the most desirable. Call the police.You need to get them rolling now - if it's an actual burglary, they seldom last more than a scant few minutes. Once you call, the dispatcher will give you instructions and guide you to the point of safely contacting responding officers. In almost every circumstance, you'll be instructed to stay where you are and relay information about what you're hearing in the residence. Typically, the last thing you want to do is actually confront the suspect.Think about it from the standpoint of the suspect. First of all, it's highly likely that he or she thought the residence was unoccupied. The percentage of potential burglars willing to invade an occupied residence is very, very low - the risk/reward ratio is astronomically high for a random hit. Thus, contact of any kind during the commission of the crime is likely to be panic inducing - and panicked criminals are dangerous and unpredictable.Second, in the event of confrontation, the suspect is going to assume the worst case scenario: that you have a firearm. Seeing you holding a dark, pistol shaped object (and holding it as you would a pistol to boot) will do little to quell this fear. It is with this fear coursing through their mind and their veins that they will react to your presence. They may react rationally and make a direct retreat; they may react irrationally and press the attack with whatever is at their disposal - which may be an actual firearm of their own. There are no rules here.All that said, were you to find yourself in the unfortunate circumstance of being truly hemmed in or cornered by a home invasion situation, there are better options than a TASER. For the uninitiated, a (very) 101 primer on TASER functionality:The upper diagram is quite simplified; as a result of this, it looks like the lead wires come out parallel with each other. The lower wire actually fires at a twelve degree angle, which creates probe spread. This spread is important, because the electrical impulse traveling from one probe to the other is what creates motor dysfunction. Thus, the more muscle groups there are between the probes, the more "lock up" you get in your target, which is what you're going for.Now, given this, why are there better options for your hypothetical burglary?Gaining access in the first place. To buy from Taser International what I carried on the street as a police officer......you're going to have to submit to a background check and remit one thousand dollars. Plus tax, I'm sure (though I'm avoiding putting one in the site's shopping cart), bringing the total closer to $1,100. Even if you went with the inferior consumer version, and bought it from an online discounter, you're looking at $330 or so, plus $25 a pop for new cartridges. I hope they're stealing the jewels - otherwise you're in the red.Low light levels. In the case of a home invasion situation at night, you want to keep the lights out in your home. The reasoning is simple: you know the layout of your home, and the suspect doesn't. While movement and paths of travel will be easier for you, though, TASER aim on a moving target probably won't be. And even knowing the layout isn't always a free pass - unless you've never stubbed your toe in your life.Acute stress levels. This will not be a zen moment for you. Your heart will be beating so furiously you'll have legitimate fears the suspect will be able to hear it. Under this level of stress, fine motor function diminishes significantly - so even if you can see to aim your device, it's going to be hard to keep a shaky set of hands trained on the target.Difficulty aiming the device. If your device has a laser sight, that provides the suspect something we in law enforcement called a "hint" that you're there. Oh, and I guarantee getting lit with a laser in a residence will be interpreted as, "I am about to be shot with a firearm." Reactions to this will be hard to predict, except in predicting their unpredictability. And if you're aiming a laserless unit in the dark...well, good luck.Necessity of optimal distance. Remember the mention of "probe spread" earlier? Well, it's both important and dependent upon distance. With the lower probe angled at twelve degrees, simple geometry lets you know that the further away you are from the target, the further the probes are going to spread. Ideally, you'll hit the suspect right below the sternum with the top probe, and in the thigh with the other - this produces what we called an "across the beltline" hit, and usually locked up both the torso and the legs (obviously resulting in the target collapsing). However, to achieve this you'll need loads of skill and luck. First, you need to ensure that you're between nine and twelve feet away. Then, ensure you have proper aim with the top probe. Then, remember to cant the device with a twisting motion - otherwise the bottom probe will go between the suspect's legs. Twenty or thirty degrees ought to do - you did bring a protractor with you, right?Likelihood of clothing disconnect. If you'll look closely at the diagram above, you'll see that what hits you in a TASER firing is a set of sharp barbs, which are designed to penetrate and catch in the skin, holding in place so the electric pulse can do its job. These barbs are very short, however - on the order of one centimeter - and clothing of any thickness presents a challenge, as the impulse has to overcome the impedance of the suspect's clothing to affect his or her motor function. In my experience, street criminals have a tendency to wear multiple layers of clothing, which facilitates discarding the top layer to render descriptions of shirt color immediately stale after a crime. I've experienced what clothing disconnect feels like - in between the impulse breakthroughs, I was fully functional (I was wearing a single layer, by the way). If you pop a cartridge in the dark, under stress, at the perfect distance, and hit someone wearing a hoodie over two or three shirts, they probably won't feel jack. This is a problem, because you'll likely be...One and done (for all intents and purposes). Too bad about that clothing disconnect, because I'll tell you right now, you're not getting another shot off. Do authentic TASER devices have cartridge replacements? Yes. But even if you have one (not likely) and thought to bring it downstairs with you (probably not), the percentage of likelihood of you successfully slamming another cartridge home under stress and getting a second shot off is probably in the low single digits. This was difficult for me to do, and I handled a TASER every day and shot one about once a quarter to re-certify with it in my department. Here is what it looks like performed by a professional, in a well-lit, controlled environment (watch it all for perspective on the training they're doing, or skip to 1:50 for the show): http://blutube.policeone.com/police-tasers-videos/935589336001-taser-iso-drill-1-reload/ . Remember those fine motor skills we decided you don't have at this point? Anything requiring this much use of your fingertips is something you might as well forget about.In the right contexts (in which the user knows what he or she is doing), TASERs are awesome sauce. In this context, though, I think you've got better options. So what would my recommendation be? Generally, this intricate instrument:Now, if you're a gun person, know the Ten Commandments of Firearms Safety, know how to field strip and maintain your firearm of choice, and own a lockable gun safe which is both easily accessible to you in an emergency and impossible for unauthorized people to access, then I would have recommended a small caliber pistol with a high capacity magazine.[Edit: I wrote with the masses in mind here - as Ryan Lackey notes below, a larger caliber is more advisable here when it comes to stopping power. I suppose I'll revise this to say 'the largest caliber you're comfortable with, up to and including a shotgun' (you obviously wouldn't use a rifle here, unless it's an assault rifle, in which case I'm guessing you need no home defense tips from me). If you meet the requisite requirements I listed above for gun employment, you'll know where this threshold is.]Knowing that probably describes a sliver of a fraction of a percentage of you, I went with a fancy stick. Why?Gaining access in the first place. If you don't already have one of these lying around, a quick trip to a yard sale or thrift store will net you one of these bad boys for under a five spot. Plus, it's more easily customizable - unless you've got really small stencils, you're only getting "BRUTALIZER" on one of these devices. (Pro Tip: Not the TASER.)Low light levels. The silhouette of this thing is pretty hard to mistake. This might be a silly consideration, but if a home invader saw my shadow, I'd rather them see my bat and think, "Oh God, he's got a bat," than to see my TASER and think, "Oh, God, he's got a gun." Ideally, though, the invader shouldn't know about my bat until I'm bludgeoning his brain stem with it.Acute stress levels. There's no aiming or angles or twelve degrees or canting or probe spread with this thing. Just reach back into Arkansas (or Santa Cruz, for some of my readers) and swing for the fences. This is the very definition of "gross motor skills" - the only thing your fingertips will be doing is making sure the timber stays in your hands.Non-difficulty aiming the device. Field of aim here is "in front of the bat."No necessity of optimal distance. Optimal distance here is not measured in feet or meters, but by asking "Will the bat reach the dude?" If no, you're too far away. If yes, you're optimally distanced.Likelihood of body connection. Instead of relying on connection establishment from a point in space to a point on a plane over a distance of ten feet, all you have to do with a bat is make sure that their body falls within the arc created by your swing. And if it doesn't...Many and continuing. Reloading this thing is as simple as raising your arms again. If you miss, take another whack. If you hit, take another whack. Repeat this process until the suspect flees or stops moving.Remember, all of this assumes that you're truly cornered and have no option but to engage in combat with the intruder in order to escape or survive (an incredibly unlikely scenario, by the way). Given that circumstance, though, in the absence of a firearm I'd much rather have a bat than a TASER - under stress, there are just too many variables working against the deployment of anything requiring fine motor skills.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Edit 1.3.12: After seeing this question go a bit viral and generate some interesting and varied discussion, I feel compelled to address some of the issues raised by other answers:Is a 12 gauge shotgun the quickest, most efficient way to put a ragged, bloody crater in an intruder's body, or to blow their head clean off of their shoulders? Yes. Is it the best choice for the most people? I genuinely do not think so. I'm obviously a gun person, so I know where my fellow gun people are coming from. That said though, my peers must understand that this lifestyle (or interest, or whatever your characterization) is not appropriate for everyone. First of all, the physical heft is formidable for those slight of build or stature. Second, the recoil for such a person would be so severe as to be genuinely dangerous. Third, you have to be positively disposed to firearm ownership in the first place. Fourth, unless you're single, childless, or an empty nester, there are overwhelming safety considerations you have to have contingencies for. Fifth, ownership and use laws are all over the map. Sixth, there is the ever-present possibility of your own gun being used against you (whether after discovery or after disarming you). Seventh...meh, I think I've made my point. If you can handle one of these things and will swear on all your dead grandmothers stretching back to the Spanish Inquisition that you won't kill a kid or get yourself killed with it, then by all means, get one. Put a pistol grip on it. Give it an arctic camo paint job. Discuss shot sizes with your local arms dealer and chamber the round you guys settle on. But if you can't honor your grandmothers here, think long here. Think hard.My endorsement of bats is not absolute - my point was, and is, that they are probably the most versatile weapon (perhaps this side of a flail) that the largest majority of people can use IF they are cornered and pressed into defense during a home invasion. Like I said in my original draft, engagement with the suspect is, in the vast majority of cases, extremely inadvisable - staying in a position of safety or escaping the residence to such a position is likely a better option. As for the hallway objections, if yours is so cramped that you can't get an overhead swing in, you're not going to be able to deploy anything else anyway, save maybe a pistol. And unless you're familiar with the term "combat tuck," you're just as, if not more, likely to get it taken from you than to kill your attacker. But hey, there's always t-ball bats!Dogs are a good layer of defense here, but I wouldn't get one just for home defense if I wasn't predisposed to them. Invest in contact alarms and reinforced door frames and hardware before you go the dog route if you're not - you don't have to feed a deadbolt.Finally, and I'm very sorry if I hurt feelings here - but you should absolutely ignore any advice to not call police during a home invasion. Such advice is egregiously errant - get police rolling first, then take whatever measures are necessary to protect yourself. You don't have to engage in a lengthy discourse with the dispatcher - the words "Home invasion at" followed by your address is enough if you're pressed into action. And unless you live in the middle of a national forest or on an open body of water, the estimates you're seeing below of "twenty minutes" for police response is (in the vast, vast majority of cases) wildly inaccurate. For instance, average emergency response time in Los Angeles in 2004 was 6:42 (http://articles.latimes.com/2005/feb/16/local/me-lapd16); but even Atlanta, with one of the worst metro response averages in the nation, clocks in at just over 11 minutes (http://apbweb.com/featured-articles/1188-response-times-city-to-city.html). Call the police.

What does the statement "Teachers must teach the way student learn" mean? Illustrate with a specific example.

LONG READ AHEAD!THE BELOW ARTICLE WILL TELL YOU HOW A TYPICAL TEACHER SHOULD BETop Qualities of an Effective TeacherThe skills needed for effective teaching involve more than just expertise in an academic field. You must be able to interact with people and help them understand a new way of looking at the world. This is not an easy job! Although there are many different ways to teach effectively, good instructors have several qualities in common. They are prepared, set clear and fair expectations, have a positive attitude, are patient with students, and assess their teaching on a regular basis. They are able to adjust their teaching strategies to fit both the students and the material, recognizing that different students learn in different ways. As a teacher, you are a role model who sets the tone for the class. If you are able to show enthusiasm and commitment, your students are more likely to reciprocate. Conversely, when you are negative, unprepared, or impatient, these qualities will be reflected in the attitudes of your students. Undergraduate students at Georgetown have high expectations of their instructors, and they also have many competing interests beyond the course you are teaching. Give them a reason to remember your class as an important part of their college experience!POSITIVEKeep your students engaged with a positive attitude. Teaching is most effective when students are motivated by the desire to learn, rather than by grades or degree requirements. Many first-time TAs are confused by the new authority of being a teaching assistant, and mistake intimidation for respect. Think of your students as teammates, not adversaries. Learning and teaching are challenging, but that doesn't mean that you can't have fun in the classroom. Stay focused, but don't be afraid to be creative and innovative. Allow yourself to be enthusiastic and find ways to let students see what is interesting about your subject.PREPAREDYou should know the course material. If students are required to attend lectures and read assignments, then it seems reasonable that you would do the same. Most faculty expect graduate TAs to attend lectures, especially if they have never taken or taught the course. Review key concepts and ideas if you are unclear about them, particularly if it has been a while since you have worked with the topics you will be teaching. Think about how the material can be most effectively demonstrated and design a strategy. Write an outline or take notes to follow during a lecture, and prepare your overheads, diagrams, handouts and other aids well in advance. Don't wait until the morning of the class!ORGANIZEDHave a plan for what you want to teach. Your job is to illustrate key points and essential context, to help students integrate all of their work (reading, labs, exams, papers, lectures, etc.) for the course. Given that there is never time to teach everything, choose the most important concepts and show how they are related. Explain ideas so students are able to build on material they have already mastered, whether from your course or previous classes. Don't just focus on what you happen to be teaching today. Show students how what they are learning now is connected to material covered later in the course. Keep your long term goals in mind, pace yourself so that you don't run out of time at the end, and try to end every class with a conclusion.CLEAREffective teachers can explain complex ideas in simple ways. As you develop expertise in an academic field, it is easy to forget that students may have no prior knowledge of fundamental concepts that you take for granted. Help students understand and use new terminology, so they can become fluent in the language of your discipline. Many concepts can be more effectively demonstrated with visual aids such as diagrams, drawings, charts, slides, etc. Make sure that they are large enough to see, neat enough to read, and don't stand in the way! Think about the role body language can play. Having your teaching observed by someone else (or even better, having it videotaped) can reveal habits that you would never notice on your own.ACTIVEKeep your students thinking. Unless they are actively using the concepts you are teaching, most students will remember only a small fraction of what you teach. A lecture is an efficient way to deliver information to large numbers of people, but it is an inefficient way to provide students with lasting knowledge and skills. Consider using at least some classroom time for activities other than traditional lectures, discussions or question and answer sessions. Problem solving exercises in small groups can take no more than a few minutes, yet allow students to engage with the material being covered.PATIENTRemember what it is like to learn something for the first time. Give students time to process information and answer questions. Know that it is fine for students to make mistakes if they can learn from them. Realize that learning can be hard work, even for the most motivated students. Rather than blaming students when things don't go right, consider ways you could change your approach to reach them more effectively. Concepts, background information or conclusions that seem obvious to you may not be so clear to someone who is new to the subject. Be patient with yourself, too. Teaching can be difficult and frustrating at times. Give yourself the same opportunity to make mistakes and learn from them.FAIRConsider what it would be like to be one of your students. Chances are you would want an instructor who set clear expectations, applied them consistently and could admit when they were wrong. Whether you mark off points on an exam question, give a low grade on a paper, or penalize someone for a late assignment, you should be able to explain why you did it. Of course it helps if you have already outlined clear policies, both for the entire course and for each assignment. Once you have set standards, it is very important to apply them equally and consistently, otherwise you will lose credibility. On the other hand, if you make a mistake or don't know the answer to a question, it is much better to acknowledge rather than ignore it.TECHNOLOGY TIPSince it is often hard to remember what it is like to encounter your discipline's material at an early stage, peer instruction offers an alternative to the "sage on stage" model. Peer instruction, which usually happens in small group activities or paper response assignments, allows students to get feedback at their own level of discourse and understanding. This provides a helpful complement (not replacement) to instructor feedback. Technology such as the discussion tool in Blackboard helps peer groups stay in contact over long distances and over different periods of time.WHAT'S YOUR LEARNING STYLE?CNDLS has several ways of helping you discover the learning styles you tend to favor. Being more aware of your own tendencies will help you recognize similar or different preferences in your students and react accordingly. Besides the more well-known Myers-Briggs test and visual, auditory, and tactile differences, there are also documented differences in how people problem solve. For instance, you might prefer identifying problems, evaluating solutions, or testing solutions. This might affect what assignments you give, what you focus on in a lecture or discussion, and how you weight grades. Visit us to find out more, either in our suite, Car Barn 314, or online at the CNDLS website.TECHNOLOGY TIPE-mail is an excellent and perfectly acceptable way to give feedback to your students. In fact, several professors ask their students to turn in assignments over e-mail. By having a digital copy of students' work, faculty can make comments using the editing tools in Word, have access to the papers wherever there is an internet connection, and keep up with less paper-work, not to mention having a date and time record of when the student turned in the work.NOW FOR AN ILLUSTRATION ,I AM NOW GRADE 9 WHEN I WAS GRADE 8 OUR SCHOOL SELECTED A COACHING INSTITUTE TO TEACH US THE COACHING INSTITUTE WAS “AVANTI”ALL OF THESE TEACHERS HAVE THE ABOVE MENTIONED QUALITIESONE OF THE VBEST TEACHER IS ALSO A QUORAN HE HIS A GREAT ONE!HIS NAME IS “RAHUL PRAKASH SINGH”.

Why does the Tamil language always seem to be competing with the Sanskrit language?

The weltanschauung of the Dravidian movement was that the Dravidians, the folk of South India, were systematically expropriated and enslaved by Brahmins and their ideology of Brahminical superiority, which they — originally migrants from north India — derived from the Sanskrit texts of north Indian Hindu injunctive scripture. The Dravidian movement was anti-Brahmin; anti-Sanskrit, the language of Brahminism; anti-north India, the homeland of Brahmins and Brahminism; and anti-Hindi, the Sanskrit-derived language of north India. For the first decade or so of Indian independence, the Dravidian movement was secessionist.[1]Thanks for the A2A, Sagar. This is a long-ass answer.This ‘contest’ over the supremacy and/or antiquity of the Sanskrit and Tamil languages can be attributed to Dravidian politics and the political parties that espouse the divisive ideology of ‘Dravidian Nationalism’. Mutual respect for one another’s beliefs, languages and culture is an important aspect of living in a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, pluralistic nation-state. Sadly, some of us forget this tenet.Ever since the start of the Dravidian movement and the Dravidian Self-Respect Movement in the Madras Presidency in the early 20th century, the political mainstream in Tamil-speaking lands became entrenched with Hinduphobia, anti-Brahminism, linguistic jingoism and anti-Hindi rhetoric. Obviously, not all Tamilians are ‘Dravidian’ jingoists, but the Dravidian parties have almost always dominated the political terrain in pre-independence Madras Province and post-independence Tamil Nadu, drowning out the voices of more inclusive Tamil people and political organisations. This dominant ‘Dravidian’ voice has seeped from the political discourse into popular imagination.The differences between the North and South are very much real, yet much of the animosity and aversion between the two regions is relatively recent and due to historical myth rather than reality. Some European historians and philologists such as Sir John Marshall, George Uglow Pope and Robert Caldwell, in their research and hypotheses provided the basis for a regional historical mythos, which goes back to the days of former power and glory. Dravidian ideology reconstructs history from scanty resources and ample conjecture, recalling an antiquity dating from the Indus Valley Civilisation to the powerful Tamil kingdoms of the South.The Dravidian movement — which seemingly stood for championing the lofty ideals of self-respect, social and economic equality, upliftment of the downtrodden, women’s rights, socialism, atheism and Russellian rationalism — found its way into politics of a foul nature.Brahmins, who were the erstwhile Indian priestly class and who are currently in no way numerically and politically significant in India, and Sanskrit, a language used in liturgy, high culture and secular literature, were targeted and portrayed by the proponents of Dravidian ideology as oppressive and discriminatory against the so-called ‘lower castes’. The Dravidian ideology resulted in the alienation of Brahmins and North Indians in Tamil-speaking lands. North Indians and Tamil Brahmins were (and in some cases, still are) viewed with suspicion & contempt, and were (are?) accused of allegedly imposing their language and culture in an apparent bid to undermine Dravidian/Tamil supremacy.The fierce anti-Brahmin stance of the Dravidian parties post-Independence also led to an exodus of Tamil brahmins from the state of Tamil Nadu from the 1970s to the 1990s.Ironically, most of the men who spearheaded early Dravidian politics were neither poor and nor were they from the lower socio-economic strata of society. Some were not even born in Tamil-speaking families. The Dravidian movement wasn’t a grassroots movement either, although some would like to give it that hue. The pro-British Justice Party, or the South Indian Liberation Federation, was created for the sole purpose of ending Brahmin domination in the politics and civil services of British India’s Madras Presidency. It would be delusional not to call the Justice Party an elite affair presided over by the ‘middle’ castes. One of its co-founders was a lawyer and an industrialist. Another co-founder was a well-settled Nair, who quit the Indian National Congress after his electoral defeat in 1916 and accused the Congress of harbouring caste-based prejudices. The third co-founder was a Mudaliar, from a non-Brahmin family of feudal landlords. Two of the Justice Party’s Presidents were wealthy zamindars (landholders) — the Raja of Panagal and the Raja of Bobbili. The Justice Party and its offshoots — the newly-formed ‘Dravidian parties’ — were also hostile to the Indian Home Rule movement, MK Gandhi’s non-cooperation movement and the Indian National Congress.‘Dravidian’ has never been a racial or a separate anti-‘Aryan’/anti-North Indian cultural identity. It is purely a political identity legitimised by the vague and highly suspect narratives of the “Aryan” Brahmin’s 2000 year-old suppression of the “Dravidian” non-Brahmin by supposed denial of education and other opportunities. This narrative, which is based on conjecture alone, is never questioned and is always assumed to be real.I would like to address a few things regarding the anti-Brahmin narrative of the Dravidian ideology and some other issues mentioned in another answer on this thread.1 — Some pointers about the Hindu caste system’s transformation in the Mughal & Colonial period and the idea of ‘Sanskritisation’There are two terms — varṇa and jāti — which are sometimes used interchangeably. However, these words do not mean the same thing. The Indic varṇa system is perhaps an example of what Dumézil called “Trifunctionalism”. While Dumézil, at the time, limited this organisation of a society along three functional lines to only Indo-European societies, examples of such social arrangements exist in non-Indo-European societies too. These three functions were:Sovereignty — over both the temporal and spiritual realms. Temporal sovereignty was one of order or political organisation, concerning law, the State and administration. The sovereignty over the spiritual or the supernatural was otherworldly, wild, sometimes violent and unpredictable (like nature) and also creative. Sovereignty was also highly ritualistic.Military — connected with force, violence and war.Productivity — herding, farming, crafts, mercantilism or trade, and other activities or services that were necessary for the generation of wealth and resources.The Indo-Europeans had Gods whose functions corresponded with these three functions as well. Trifunctionalism, believed Dumézil, pervaded all aspects of Indo-European life — worldview, mythology, theology, political thought, cosmology and social life.The Indo-Europeans’ gods of the first function tend to include one god who falls into each of these two categories. One is a “magician-creator” who rules “by virtue of [his] creative violence,” while the other is a “jurist-organizer” who rules “by virtue of [his] organizing wisdom.” The two types of sovereign gods form an “antithesis,” but complement one another rather than being in conflict.The second function “carries the trait of physical force in all its manifestations, from energy, to heroism, to courage.” Its “insatiable champions… vanquish demons and save the universe.” In human society, the second function is the class of warriors, who carry out the orders of the first class and fight on behalf of their people. The gods of the second function are warriors whose intellectual abilities are inferior to those of the first, but who possess the necessary strength to actually put the decisions of the intellectual gods into action.The third function “is the generative function. It is the domain of the healers, of youth, of luxury, of fecundity, of prosperity; also the domain of the healing gods, the patron deities of goods, of opulence – and also of the ‘people,’ as opposed to the small number of warriors and kings.” The third function’s human social class consists of the farmers, herders, and other “common people” engaged in productive physical labor, who provide the goods necessary for the sustenance of themselves and of the rest of society. Its gods are those who preside over fertility, abundance, and peace. They tend to be simple but wealthy and fun-loving.The Indo-European vision of a smoothly functioning world required an ‘organization’ in which the representatives of the first function commanded, the second fought for and defended the community, and the third (the greatest number of them) worked and were productive. In their eyes, it was in this hierarchy that one found the harmony necessary to the proper functioning of the cosmos, as well as that of the society. It’s an Indo-European version of the ‘social contract.’Dumézil’s theory isn’t perfect but it does offer some necessary understanding on how ancient societies probably functioned.The origin of the four social orders or the varṇas is usually traced to the Puruṣa sūkta (RV X.90) and is thus said to have had ‘religious sanction’:When they divided Purusa how many portions did they make?What do they call his mouth, his arms? What do they call his thighs and feet?The Brahman was his mouth, of both his arms was the Rajanya made.His thighs became the Vaisya, from his feet the Sudra was produced.[2]Remember that the Vedic texts do not mention the concept of untouchable people nor do they mention any practice of untouchability. Some Vedic rituals, at some point, ask the nobleman or the king to eat from the same vessel , along with the commoner-subject.[3]The caste system goes beyond mere socio-economic stratification, in that it is based more on ever-changing kinship and clan affiliations than on just some permanent social hierarchy with little or no opportunities for advancement. One must also consider the role of sacral kingship in early Vedic society and the fact that there is no fixed ‘caste-origin’ theory.… the caste system [is] an ever-evolving social reality that can only be properly understood by the study of historical evidence of actual practice and the examination of verifiable circumstances in the economic, political and material history of India.[4]19th century and 20th century scholarship on the Indian caste system was more or less based on Louis Dumont’s “structuralism”. It was Dumont who was one of the few people who described what is now popularly known as ‘Sanskritization’. The sociologist MN Srinivas, who later coined the term, had this to say:The caste system is far from a rigid system in which the position of each component caste is fixed for all time. Movement has always been possible, and especially in the middle regions of the hierarchy. A caste was able, in a generation or two, to rise to a higher position in the hierarchy by adopting vegetarianism and teetotalism, and by Sanskritising its ritual and pantheon. In short, it took over, as far as possible, the customs, rites, and beliefs of the Brahmins, and adoption of the Brahminic way of life by a low caste seems to have been frequent, though theoretically forbidden. This process has been called 'Sanskritisation' in this book, in preference to 'Brahminisation', as certain Vedic rites are confined to the Brahmins and the two other 'twice-born' castes.[5]This definition (if you can call it that) of Sanskritisation, in and of itself, indicates in the strongest of terms that there was opportunity for ‘upward mobility’ in the caste system. One should not forget that even a cursory reading of the various Dharma-sūtras and Dharma-śāstras would show that in addition to this ‘upward mobility’, there were also several ways by which an individual from the ‘higher’ castes could lose their caste-status and fall from grace.In another book, Srinivas adds:Sanskritisation is a profound and many-sided cultural process … Village goddesses in most parts of India have been identified with Shakti, who is in turn a manifestation of Parvati, the wife of Shiva. The cobra deity is identified in South India with Subrahmanya, the warrior son of Shiva. The Kaveri river is identified with the Ganga. Rama and Buddha are both regarded as avatars of Vishnu, and so on.[6]By this definition(?), Sanskritisation seems to be a process that has more to do with a broad, inclusive encompassing of non-Vedic cultures and peoples, rather than supposed domination over them.Patrick Olivelle, known for his works on Vedic literature, Dharma-sūtras and Dharma-śāstras, states that ancient and medieval Indian texts do not support the permanent ritual pollution and the premise of ‘purity’ (śuci) and ‘impurity’ (mālinya), which are pretty much implied in Dumont’s theory. While ‘purity-impurity’ is discussed in the Dharma-śāstra texts, it is only in the context of an individual's moral, ritual and biological pollution. There are no instances when a term of pure/impure is used with reference to a group of individuals or a varṇa or caste. Mention of impurity in Śāstra texts from the 1st millennium CE is about people who commit grievous crimes and thereby fall out of their varṇa. These "fallen people" are considered impure in the medieval Indian texts. The texts call for these people to be ostracised. Olivelle says that most of the matters relating to ‘purity’/’impurity’ in the Dharma-śāstra texts concern "individuals irrespective of their varṇa affiliation" and all four varṇas could attain ‘purity’ or ‘impurity’ by virtue of their character, actions, ethics, intent, innocence, ignorance and ritualistic behaviours. [7]In a revised second edition of his book on the Indian caste system, Dumont acknowledged the fact that the ancient varṇa system was not based on some ‘purity-impurity’ ranking principle.[8]How, then, did the caste system transform into what it has become today?There are, of course, several opinions and theories on how, when and why the caste system, as it exists today, developed. The general consensus points towards the fact that this complex system evolved over time from a fluid, dynamic, organic system in Ancient and Classical India into a crystallised, rigid, disparate system in Late Medieval and Early Modern India.I will list out the opinions of some of the scholars here.We do know that, under the Islamic sultanates of medieval India, caste descent and social stratification were used as tools of tax collection and governance.[9]The anthropologist Susan Bayly states that the jāti system emerged because it was advantageous in a pre-Independence society plagued with an unpredictable political environment, poverty, economic insecurity and absolute lack of institutional human rights.[10]Bayly further writes[11]:…until well into the colonial period, much of the subcontinent was still populated by people for whom the formal distinctions of caste were of only limited importance as a source of corporate and individual lifestyles. This would include much of Bengal, the Punjab and Southern India, as well as the far northwest and the central Deccan plain… Even in parts of the so-called Hindu heartland of Gangetic upper India, the institutions and beliefs which are now often described as the elements of traditional caste were only just taking shape as recently as the early eighteenth century - that is the period of collapse of Mughal period and the expansion of western power in the subcontinent.She observes that "caste is not and never has been a fixed fact of Indian life" and the caste system as we know it today, which is a "ritualised scheme of social stratification," evolved in two phases in the post-Mughal era, in 18th and early 19th century. Three sets of value played a significant role in this development, according to Bayly: priestly hierarchy, kingship, and armed ascetics.[12]With the Mughal empire in a state of array and disintegration in the 18th century, the regional post-Mughal ruling elite and new dynasties from varied religious, geographical and linguistic backgrounds tried to assert their power in different parts of India. [13]What happened in the initial phase of this two-stage sequence was the rise of the royal man of prowess. In this period, both kings and the priests and ascetics with whom men of power were able to associate their rule became a growing focus for the affirmation of a martial and regal form of caste ideal. (...) The other key feature of this period was the reshaping of many apparently casteless forms of devotional faith in a direction which further affirmed these differentiations of rank and community.[14]…. strategies of collective classing and ranking proved particularly valuable in circumstances where state power was fluid or insecure, and where large numbers of people had to adjust to the unpredictable in their everyday environments.[15]Dipankar Gupta opines that the various guilds (śreṇis) which developed during the Mauryan era solidified into jātis with members of the guild becoming specialists in one or more related occupations. There were no hierarchies or rankings, however, in how society was then organised and there was no strict separation of these social orders either. With the emergence of ‘feudalism’ (or rather, quasi-feudalism IMO) in India, the social orders finally became rigid during the 7–12th centuries.[16]There are other scholars as well who trace the formation of the rigid caste system to the Mughal and Colonial era.Barbara Metcalf and Thomas Metcalf write[17]:One of the surprising arguments of fresh scholarship, based on inscriptional and other contemporaneous evidence, is that until relatively recent centuries, social organisation in much of the subcontinent was little touched by the four normative hierarchic categories (varṇas)… Nor were subcastes or jāti (endogamous groups idenitified by varṇas) the building blocks of society. A major stimulus to the use of the Sanskrit categories appears to have been the claims of aspiring dynasts in the Mughal period, who as parvenu kshatriya, in turn identified peasants and soldiery as ranked groups, giving new meanings to old titles that earlier had had only loose regional or occupational meaning.…[instance] of kingly social mobility is that of Shivaji Bhonsle, the pivotal figure in the Maratha insurgency that so plagued Aurangzeb in the Deccan. Shivaji was of cultivator background, from peoples known in western India as Marathas. By the sixteenth century, the term ‘Maratha’ had acquired greater respectability …… the term Rajput had become the symbol of legitimate kshatriya rule … Shivaji [was] determined to acquire that status for himself. He recruited a learned Brahman, … [who] with other Brahmans, provided Shivaji with the ritual genealogical services that legitimized him as a descendant of warrior forebears.Coming to Tamil Nadu, Leslie C. Orr writes:Chola period inscriptions challenge our ideas not only about the situation and activity of women but also about the structuring of society in general. In contrast to what Brahmanical legal texts may lead us to expect, we do not find that caste is the organising principle of society or that boundaries between different social groups is sharply demarcated.[18]In Tamil Nadu the Vellalar (a landholding gentry) were, during the ancient and medieval period, the elite caste who were major patrons of literature.[19][20]They ranked equal to, if not higher than, the Brahmins in the social hierarchy.[21]En masse conversion theories of ‘lower castes’ into Islam under the rule of Delhi Sultans and the Mughal Emperors was not based on historical proof or verifiable sources, but by personal agendas and assumptions of Muslim historians about Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism. Conversions corroborated by historical evidence shows that the few who did convert to Islam were Brahmins.[22][23]Richard Eaton states:Looking at Bengal's Hindu society as a whole, it seems likely that the caste system – far from being the ancient and unchanging essence of Indian civilisation as supposed by generations of Orientalists – emerged into something resembling its modern form only in the period 1200 – 1500. Central to this process, as Ronald Inden has argued was the collapse of Hindu kingship.[24]The 18th and 19th centuries brought colonialism, race science and Christian evangelism to India. This, undoubtedly, brought about a huge change in how caste was seen and how people identified with their caste. The modern caste system was a result of political (often violent) struggles and processes, very much like the modern Indian republic, the modern Indian society and the modern Indian outlook of life.…the colonial intervention…actively removed the politics from colonial societies. It was not merely convenient for the British to detach caste from politics; it was necessary for them to do so in order to rule an immensely complex society by a variety of indirect means. But caste--now disembodied from its former political contexts--lived on. In this dissociated form it was appropriated, and reconstructed, by the British. Paradoxically, they were able to change caste only because caste in fact continued to be permeable to political influence.The study of the history of Orientalism not only reveals clearly the participation of early knowledge about India in the project of conquest and control, it also helps to document some of the most critical aspects of the colonial enterprise in India, an enterprise that was part of the more general documentation and certification project of the nation/colonial state discussed above.—- THE INVENTION OF CASTE: CIVIL SOCIETY IN COLONIAL INDIA by Nicholas B. DirksAnd surprise, surprise! This immense documentation and certification project continues to this day in India.Colin Mackenzie, an admirable British social historian of his time, amassed great numbers of texts and inscriptions on Indian religions, traditions, culture and local histories & narratives from the Deccan and southern India. This vast collection of writings and Mackenzie's own works have very little on caste system in 18th-century India. There are arguably major distinctions between the ethnography of India as envisioned by Mackenzie and some of his peers and the ethnography of India that became sanctioned in the 19th century.[25]Under the colonial regime, the caste system and caste organisation truly became a pivotal mechanism for administration, early forms of such a system already having been utilised in the Medieval period.In the 1881 census and thereafter, colonial ethnographers used caste (jāti) headings, to count and classify people. The 1891 census included 60 sub-groups, each of which were further divided into six occupational and racial categories; these numbers increased in later censuses.Colonial administrator Herbert Hope Risley was an ethnographer and a colonial administrator in British India. A missionary for race science, Risley used the ratio of the width of the nose to its height to divide Indians into the Aryan and Dravidian races; the Indian castes were also divided into seven racial types. Risley formally applied the caste system into the 1901 census, which further cemented caste divide in Indian society and politics.The map of the prevailing "races" of India, based on the 1901 Census of British India | Image from Wikimedia CommonsThe colonial-era census gave birth to ‘caste tables’, which ranked, standardised and cross-referenced jāti indexes for Indians on lines similar to Western classifications in the sciences of zoology and botany. These ‘caste tables’ aimed to determine who was superior to whom by virtue of their supposed purity, occupational origins and the caste’s collective moral worth. Some British officials criticised these exercises of zoological grouping as being little more than a caricature. British colonial officials used this list of census-driven jātis to decide which group of people were qualified for which jobs in the colonial army and government, people of which jātis were to be excluded as unreliable and people of which jātis were to be segregated as criminals.[26]These categorisations were also utilised in the late 19th century and early 20th century, to formulate land tax rates and to often profile and target some social groups as "criminal" castes and castes prone to "rebellion".[27]For instance, the Criminal Tribes Act declared everyone belonging to certain castes to be born with criminal tendencies, be they man, woman, child, aged or even newborn babes. The ‘criminal-by-birth’ castes under this Act initially included Ahirs, Gurjars and Jats, but its enforcement and expansion by the late 19th century led to the inclusion of most shūdras, Chamars, Sannyasis and hill tribes. Castes who practised martial arts, such as the Kallars and Mukkulathor in South India, were included in this list too. Entire caste groups were presumed to be guilty of crime by birth. People were arrested, children were separated from their parents, ‘criminals’ were held in penal colonies or quarantined without conviction or due process. Hundreds of Hindu communities were inserted into the Criminal Tribes Act. By 1931, the colonial government had included 237 criminal castes and tribes in Madras Presidency alone. Also see: The agony of StuartpuramThe Land Alienation Act in 1900 and Punjab Pre-Emption Act in 1913 listed castes that could legally own land and denied equivalent property rights to other census-determined ‘unreliable’ castes. These laws further prohibited the inter-generational and intra-generational transfer of land from land-owning castes to any non-agricultural castes. This prevented economic mobility of property and stunted economic growth, all the while preventing upward social mobility of castes and creating consequent caste barriers in India.Britain's own rigid class system provided the British with a model for understanding Indian society and Indian castes. Indian castes were often equated with British social classes, often viewing caste identities as a hint for occupation, social status and intellect.[28][29]Caste, as it is known today, is a modern construct. It is the offspring of a nearly 200-year long abusive relationship between India and colonial rule.All in all, one must not be too hasty in pinning blame for social evils on one particular language or people. Language is a tool of communication, used to communicate identity, ideas and culture; it is not a tool of subjugation. However, ideologies, like the Dravidian ideology or Nazism or Communism, may perhaps be used as tools of subjugation and social & political discord.2 — The antiquity of the Sanskrit and Tamil languagesI’ll just quote Wikipedia on this.Sanskrit - Wikipedia:Sanskrit (/ˈsænskrɪt/; IAST: Saṃskṛtam [sə̃skr̩t̪əm] [note 1] , Sanskrit: संस्कृतम्) is a language of ancient India with a documented history of nearly 3,500 years. [6] [7] [8] It is the primary liturgical language of Hinduism; the predominant language of most works of Hindu philosophyas well as some of the principal texts of Buddhism and Jainism. Sanskrit, in its various variants and dialects, was the lingua franca of ancient and medieval India. [9] [10] [11]Sanskrit is traceable to the 2nd millennium BCE in a form known as the Vedic Sanskrit, with the Rigveda as the earliest surviving text. A more refined and an exact grammatical form called the Classical Sanskrit emerged in mid-1st millennium BCE with the Aṣṭādhyāyītreatise of Pāṇini. [6] Sanskrit, though not necessarily Classical Sanskrit, is the root language of many Prakrit languages. [22] Examples include numerous modern daughter Northern Indian subcontinental languages such as Hindi, Nepali, Bengali, Punjabi and Marathi. [23] [24] [25]Tamil language - Wikipedia:Tamil is one of the longest-surviving classical languages in the world. [16] [17] It is stated as 20th in the Ethnologue list of most-spoken languages worldwide. [18] Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions from 500 BC have been found on Adichanallur [19] and 2,200-year-old Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions have been found on Samanamalai. [20]A recorded Tamil literature has been documented for over 2000 years. [25] The earliest period of Tamil literature, Sangam literature, is dated from ca. 300 BC – AD 300. [26] [27]Now, proto-Tamil or proto-Dravidian isn’t the Tamil that is spoken today, just the same as Sanskrit is not the same as PIE or the proto-Indo-Iranian language which branched out to become Avestan and Vedic Sanskrit. Modern Tamil has a lot of loanwords and colloquialisms from other languages like Sanskrit, Persian, Arabic, etc. Its phonology is different too.Debates on this are usually a quagmire.3 — Standardisation and codification of languageClaiming that standardisation of language — which mainly involves codification and authorisation of a particular form of grammar & dictionaries, a confirmed conventional way of spelling & pronunciation and public approval of these standards — is a way of subjugating a certain part of the populace, is quite absurd, IMO.In fact, Tamil has the second-longest history of standardisation in the Indian subcontinent, , having been codified by the author of Tolkāppiyam (written between the 3rd century BCE and the 5th century CE). The current standard written form of Tamil has been in use for roughly the past 700 years (Nannūl was written around the 13th century).In 1978, the government of Tamilnadu reformed some syllables of the modern Tamil script; does that count as subjugation? EV Ramaswamy, of the Dravidian Self-Respect Movement fame, headed a Script Reform Committee in 1947, whose recommendations were accepted by the Tamilnadu government in 1951.Interested readers may read these links:https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~haroldfs/public/Standardization.pdfStandardization of lexical usages in Tamil: a sociolinguistic study4 — ‘Aryans’ in ancient Tamil landsTamil traditions trace the Tamil language to the venerable sage Agastya. He is regarded as the father of Tamil and the compiler of the first Tamil grammar. Agastya is indeed a culture hero in the oldest of the Tamil narratives and texts. He is also associated with the legendary Tamil sangams. Representations of Agastya abound in ancient and medieval temples in South India and South-east Asia. Agastya is linked with the maritime culture of Southern India too.Oddly enough, Agastya and his wife Lopamudra feature in the Vedas too. The couple are the authors of Rigvedic hymns and other Vedic literature. Agastya is mentioned in all the four Vedas, and makes an appearance in several Vedic and post-Vedic texts. In some Vedic narratives, he is the twin of the Vedic sage Vasiṣṭha and son of the Gods Mitra and Varuṇa. Ikṣvāku, the founder of the Solar Dynasty and ancestor of the God-king Rāma, is associated with the descendants of Agastya in the Rigveda. Vedic hymns attributed to Agastya, known for verbal play, similes, puns and puzzles, have themes of lasting reconciliation and mutual understanding, among others. We must look towards the sage’s compositions, I guess.Footnotes[1] Changing India[2] The Rig Veda/Mandala 10/Hymn 90[3] Interrogating Caste[4] Caste system in India - Wikipedia[5] Religion and Society Among the Coorgs of South India[6] Village, Caste, Gender, and Method[7] https://books.google.co.in/books?id=P_Jx52VYRssC&pg=PA217&lpg=PA217&dq=Caste+and+Purity+in+Collected+essays&source=bl&ots=zjVuHAOPhi&sig=t4Gf2ZQog66MGQ3v41Uup0IONkE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiw6b6y_pzdAhUMo48KHR5xAB0Q6AEwCnoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=moral%20ritual&f=false[8] Homo Hierarchicus[9] https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Essays_in_Indian_History.html?id=foG83i6XPuMC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=tax%20collection%20caste&f=false[10] Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age[11] https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HbAjKR_iHogC&pg=PA59&lpg=PA59&dq=well+into+the+colonial+period&source=bl&ots=U_Hm4UaihJ&sig=7BOlBQMqX-WRtbrQL1vvbQ82Bv4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwivkITUtJXdAhUKRo8KHRMrDM4Q6AEwDHoECAMQAQ#v=onepage&q=well%20into%20the%20colonial%20period&f=false[12] https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HbAjKR_iHogC&pg=PA59&lpg=PA59&dq=well+into+the+colonial+period&source=bl&ots=U_Hm4UaihJ&sig=7BOlBQMqX-WRtbrQL1vvbQ82Bv4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwivkITUtJXdAhUKRo8KHRMrDM4Q6AEwDHoECAMQAQ#v=onepage&q=priestly%20hierarchy&f=false[13] Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age[14] Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age[15] Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age[16] Interrogating Caste[17] https://books.google.co.in/books/about/A_Concise_History_of_Modern_India.html?id=iuESgYNYPl0C&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=fresh%20scholarship&f=false[18] https://books.google.co.in/books?id=F___xKcP8lMC&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=Chola+period+inscriptions+challenge+our+ideas+about+the+structuring+of&source=bl&ots=iVRw9qzNdX&sig=gmUomsv1AQNzbDi0E5-Bj5UFGfg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj1q4KhzqDdAhUR448KHTjMBJEQ6AEwAXoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=Chola%20period%20inscriptions%20challenge%20our%20ideas%20about%20the%20structuring%20of&f=false[19] https://books.google.co.in/books/about/The_New_Cambridge_History_of_India.html?id=OpxeaYQbGDMC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=vellalar&f=false[20] Donors, Devotees, and Daughters of God[21] Aspects of Caste in South India, Ceylon and North-West Pakistan[22] https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Religion_and_Society_in_Arab_Sind.html?id=xxAVAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=conversions&f=false[23] https://books.google.co.in/books/about/The_Rise_of_Islam_and_the_Bengal_Frontie.html?id=H76-23A9GUYC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=conversions&f=false[24] The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204-1760[25] https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Castes_of_Mind.html?id=G0D1K4Zn_9QC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=mackenzie%20caste&f=false[26] https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HbAjKR_iHogC&pg=PA125&lpg=PA125&dq=ranked,+standardised+and+cross-referenced+jati+listings+for+Indians+on+principles+similar+to+zoolo&source=bl&ots=U_Hn_XagjQ&sig=XP1y-YLU049XkbQd8zKImmmrLq8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjd8c7x9aHdAhXZbX0KHfTXChcQ6AEwAXoECAkQAQ#v=snippet&q=rank%20botany%20zoology&f=false[27] https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Colonial_Subjects.html?id=R9YPYpVE64wC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=criminal%20caste&f=false[28] https://books.google.co.in/books?id=I8OuIjo6KOAC&pg=PA102&dq=indian+caste+system+%22equatE%22&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=indian%20caste%20system%20%22equatE%22&f=false[29] https://books.google.co.in/books?id=rrSEAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA18&dq=british+class+system+india+origin&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=british%20class%20system%20india%20origin&f=false

Feedbacks from Our Clients

I love e forms!! Five out of five stars!! Easy to use at a great price!!

Justin Miller