Commercial Member Claim: Fill & Download for Free

Contrary to all of the initial answers prior to Iran’s admission that they shot down the plane, it now appears the officer who did it wont be given a medal as several members claimed who attempted to draw a parallel between the apparently decent Iranian military and the evil Americans who wallow in blood death and destruction. Iran now claims that even though the officer had approximately 10 seconds to make the decision (which appears to be completely wrong on several levels) he and anyone else responsible will be put on trial and punished as justice (which means Iranian injustice, insanity and two eyes and a hand for an eye brutality) demands. Accordingly his life insurance company if he has one should might as well start processing the policy payment now.You know the apparent expressionS of empathy, sympathy and to some degree approval for a nation that routinely endorses terrorism for murdering 176 people on a commercial airliner that took off from their own airport a few minutes before, and the repeated parallels equating this crazy regime with the United States, while these writers enjoy the benefits that the United States and Western nations provide is more than disturbing. Iran is realistically reported as a nightmare nation in which American tourists are routinely imprisoned on trumped up charges, where women caught in public without the approved Islamic clothing are routinely beaten by government enforcers, where homosexuals are just as routinely murdered, where theoretical and technical deviations from the Mullah approved Islamic line of the day about Mohammed gets their citizen publicly lashed, beaten and imprisoned or murdered if the insult is blatant enough and where crazed Mullahs and a crazier Ayotollah routinely issue death warrants against transgressors inside and outside the country. Yet you would never suspect that when reading these answers because they writers uniformly equate that nightmare insane country with the United States.What is really really disturbing is the American news coverage about this. I just saw CNN coverage about the Iranian Jet Bombing and the Iranian cruise missile strike at the Iraqi base. The coverage was absolutely more favorable than the coverage afforded to Trump and the American military about eliminating a known terrorist after he killed an American Contractor and was in the middle of planning attacks on four American embassies. You really really have to wonder what is going on here? Both with Quora members and with the state of American Journalism. What a shame.

Hello!Interesting question.Let’s go back in time, to 2008 to be exact. Donald Trump Jr. attended a real estate conference, where he stated thatRussians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.As it turns out, that may have been an understatement. Human rights lawyer Scott Horton, whose work in the region goes back to defending Andrei Sakharov and other Soviet dissidents, has gone through a series of studies by the Financial Times to show how funds from Russian crime lords bailed Trump out after yet anther bankruptcy. The conclusions are stark.Among the powerful facts that DNI missed were a series of very deep studies published in the [Financial Times] that examined the structure and history of several major Trump real estate projects from the last decade—the period after his seventh bankruptcy and the cancellation of all his bank lines of credit. …The money to build these projects flowed almost entirely from Russian sources. In other words, after his business crashed, Trump was floated and made to appear to operate a successful business enterprise through the infusion of hundreds in millions of cash from dark Russian sources.He was their man.Yes, even that much seems fantastic, and the details include business agencies acting as a front for the GRU, billionaire mobsters, a vast network of propaganda sources, and an American candidate completely under the thumb of the Kremlin.It reads like a B-grade spy novel, a plot both too convoluted—and too bluntly obvious—for John le Carré. The problem is it may not be a conspiracy theory. It may be a conspiracy.Horton’s analysis comes from piecing together information in three Financial Times “deep reports.” One of these focused on Sergei Millian, the head of the Russian American Chamber of Commerce in the US at the time of Trump Jr.’s “money pouring in from Russia” claim.Mr Millian insists his Russian American Chamber of Commerce (RACC) has nothing to do with the Russian government. He says it is funded by payments from its commercial members alone.Most of the board members are obscure entities and nearly half of their telephone numbers went unanswered when called by the Financial Times. An FT reporter found no trace of the Chamber of Commerce at the Wall Street address listed on its website.Why was RACC’s background filled with so many holes? The Financial Times quotes former Russian MP Konstantin Borovoi in tagging the chamber as a front for intelligence operations that dates back to Soviet times.“The chamber of commerce institutions are the visible part of the agent network . . . Russia has spent huge amounts of money on this.”Millian helped arrange for Trump to visit Moscow in 2007, and had other outings with Trump in the states, including a visit to horse races in Miami. Millian claims that he had the right to market Trump properties in Russia.“You could say I was their exclusive broker,” he told Ria. “Then, in 2007-2008, dozens of Russians bought apartments in Trump properties in the US.” He later told ABC television that the Trump Organisation had received “hundreds of millions of dollars” through deals with Russian businessmen.Despite documents and photos showing Trump with Millian, Trump denied their association during the campaign.Hope Hicks, Mr Trump’s campaign spokeswoman, said Mr Trump had “met and spoke” with Mr Millian only “on one occasion almost a decade ago at a hotel opening”.The second Financial Times article puts Trump at the middle of a money laundering scheme, in which his real estate deals were used to hide not just an infusion of capital from Russia and former Soviet states, but to launder hundreds of millions looted by oligarchs. All Trump had to do was close his eyes to the source of the money, and suddenly empty apartments were going for top dollar.Among the dozens of companies the Almaty lawyers say the Khrapunov laundering network used were three called Soho 3310, Soho 3311 and Soho 3203. Each was a limited liability company, meaning their ownership could easily be concealed.The companies were created in April 2013 in New York. A week later, property records show, they paid a total of $3.1m to buy the apartments that corresponded with their names in the Trump Soho, a 46-storey luxury hotel-condominium completed in 2010 in a chic corner of Manhattan.Why would Trump’s organization make such a good means of laundering funds? Because real estate has an arbitrary value. Is that apartment worth $1 million? Two million? Why not $3 million for a buyer who really wants it? When the whole transaction is just one LLC with undisclosed ownership paying another LLC with undisclosed ownership, it’s even neater than hiding the money in an offshore account. And while some businesses require due diligence in looking at the source of funds, real estate is a bit more … flexible.The laws regulating US real estate deals are scant, experts say. Provisions against terrorism financing in the Patriot Act, passed in the aftermath of the September 11 2001 attacks, obliged mortgage lenders to conduct “know your customer” research. But money launderers pay in cash. Sales such as those of the Trump Soho apartments have passed through this loophole, which was partially closed only this year.Converting funds stolen overseas into property in the US and cash in the account of an LLC represented a win for both the oligarchs and Trump. Best of all, Trump’s sole requirement was that he pay scant attention to the deal—something at which he was already a proven master. For example, the actual owners of the Trump Soho were another limited liability company, Bayrock. Trump was a partner in the LLC and Bayrock cut the checks Trump received when those apartments were sold. And yet ...In a 2011 deposition, given in a dispute over the Fort Lauderdale project, Mr Trump said he had “never really understood who owned Bayrock”. Jody Kriss, a former Bayrock finance director, has claimed in racketeering lawsuits against his former employer that Bayrock’s backers included “hidden interests in Russia and Kazakhstan”. Bayrock has denied Mr Kriss’s allegations but declined to answer questions about the source of its funds and its relationship with the Khrapunovs.The third article digs more deeply into the origins of Bayrock and its connection with Trump. That connection … was very close.The Republican presidential nominee and Bayrock were both based in Trump Tower and they joined forces to pursue deals around the world — from New York, Florida, Arizona and Colorado in the US to Turkey, Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Their best-known collaboration — Trump SoHo, a 46-storey hotel-condominium completed in 2010 — was featured in Mr Trump’s NBC television show The Apprentice.This is the same group about which Trump said he “never really understood” the ownership.“I don’t know who owns Bayrock,” Mr Trump said. “I never really understood who owned Bayrock. I know they’re a developer that’s done quite a bit of work. But I don’t know how they have their ownership broken down.”At the very least, Trump confessed to partnering with, taking money from, and acting as a representative for a corporation whose ownership he didn’t know, in deals that totaled hundreds of millions in countries around the world. However, it seems far more likely that Trump knowingly worked with oligarchs, groups associated with the Russian government, and plain old mobsters. Why? Because he was desperate.By the 2000s, the property developer and casino owner with ready access to the capital markets and the biggest New York banks was no more. A series of corporate bankruptcies had limited his financing options. Mr Trump had become an entertainer who portrayed a tycoon on television and licensed his name to businesses looking for a brand, leading to fee-making opportunities as disparate as Trump University and Trump Vodka.The Trump Organization was a hollow shell and Trump was bankrupt, but Donald Trump the public figure was a “successful businessman,” a screen behind which criminal activity could be carried out on a massive scale. Throwing his name at every scheme in existence wasn’t a strategy, it was a fire sale on Trump’s respectability. Steaks? Water? Vodka? Fake real estate school? You pony up the cash, and Trump will slap his name on it. Because by the early 2000s, Trump wasn’t just broke, he had nothing left to pawn. He wasn’t a successful businessman, but he still played one on TV. His image had more value than his real estate portfolio.But the apartments and buildings where Trump held some degree of ownership could be turned into value again. All it took was partnering with foreign crime bosses looking for a place to stash their cash. To inflate the value of his portfolio, Trump had to do nothing other than look away as the dirty money poured in from one LLC to the next. Citizens in Russia, Kazakhstan, and other former Soviet states lost hundreds of millions, but Trump got a cut as looted funds flowed through offices and apartments in buildings that carried those critical gold letters.Horton’s evaluation of this material in coordination with the declassified DNI report is that Trump actively worked with and for Russian interests.What these exposes showed, is that Trump pursued the projects hand in glove with Russian mobsters who worked closely with Putin’s Kremlin ...But based on the information in the Financial Times report, it appears that there are actually two possible answers. Trump may have been actively involved with and working for Russian sources. He might also have simply played the role of useful idiot, displaying his readiness to feign ignorance about any deal … so long as it generated some funds to float his sinking boat.In the end, there’s not a lot of difference in the outcome. Trump got money. Oligarchs cleaned their cash. Russia got their man!Sources: everyone linked in the tekst and Mark Sumner (@Devilstower) | Twitter

Race 1 was of the World Championship was held at Silverstone, 1950.One of only two countries to have hosted at least one GP annually.Many teams have been based here.Six of the teams with permanent bases here. Haas, an American team have a base here.Keys engineers, management, technical staff. Key commercial members involved in the top part of the staff.Had some key technical innovators in sporting history (Colin Chapman, Ken Tyrrell, Ross Brawn, John Barnard, Adrian Newey etc).English is the major used language so the media have an advantage in that area.We have quite a decent junior formulae programmes. We are generally knowledgable about when a decent young driver is rising through the lower formulae.British World ChampionsMike Hawthorn 1958Graham Hill 1962, 68 (only driver to win Monaco GP/Indy 500/Le Mans 24 hours)Jim Clark 1963, 65John Surtees 1964 (only four and two wheel WC)Jackie Stewart 1969,71,73James Hunt 1976Nigel Mansell 1992Damon Hill 1996 (Son of Graham. First father/son combination to be WDCs)Lewis Hamilton 2008, 14,15,17,18,19.Jenson Button 2009Britain 19/70 WC (27%) Only decade a British didn’t win a title was the 80s.Many constructor titles.There has been 1016 races (sort of). British drivers have won 287 GPs between them (28%). 288 wins because Stirling Moss and Tony Brookes shared British GP 1957.The French invented motor racing.Alain Prost 4 WDCs and French drivers have claimed 79 wins. Last WDC (1993), last winner (Panis, Monaco 1996)Current man of the moment Lewis Hamilton 6 WDC, 83 wins.Hamilton has won more GP than many countries have managed individually.French invented it, British perfected it.