Notice Of Intent To Sue Pdf: Fill & Download for Free

How incredibly hard Trump and his entire family have been trying to keep hidden even the most basic facts of his”wealth”; far beyond, it seems, the legal or political utility such information could have in the hands of the authorities.So energetic and widely scaled is their effort, that it seems to be a seminal part of Trump’s ego that is really at stake. Here’s a compendium of just how hard a fight has been engaged:(5-13-19): “Trump's legal team tries to slow down subpoena case”"Donald Trump's lawyers want the Washington court fight over Trump's accounting records to slow down.A recent congressional subpoena for the records could reveal financial information about Trump to Democrats in Congress, but the President says a federal judge is moving too quickly.On Monday, private attorneys representing Trump and his companies disagreed with a federal judge's decision to hold a comprehensive court hearing about the subpoena on Tuesday in Washington, according to court filings.The President's attorneys say they are not being given a fair shot in court, and have asked the judge to either narrow the topics covered in the hearing Tuesday or cancel the hearing outright.”(4-30-2019): Trump is terrified that Deutsche Bank records will expose him as ‘a clown living on credit’: Rick Wilson"Anti-Trump Republican strategist Rick Wilson on Tuesday said that the Trump family’s decision to sue Deutsche Bank and Capital One to stop them from turning over Trump-related financial records was very revealing.In particular, he found it notable that the entire Trump family seems to be putting its weight behind trying to stop these financial institutions from giving information to congressional investigators.“The fact that Trump, Large Adult Son Don Jr., Buc-ee’s mascot Eric, and Myrrha are all parties to the suit tells you a lot,” he explained. “This isn’t just another episode of America’s favorite TV reality show, the Dumbass Borgias. Everything for Trump is the brand, the ego, the image. I suspect that as these things reveal, we’ll see the truth of their, flimsy, gimcrack enterprise.”Wilson then explained that the moment when he realized Trump was a financial paper tiger came when a hedge fund manager told him that Trump’s entire empire was largely built on smoke and mirrors.“Trump’s not a billionaire,” the hedge fund manager told him. “I’m a billionaire. Trump is a clown living on credit.”(4-29-19):"Trump court filing to curtail subpoena to Deutsche bank” (pdf doc.):“INTRODUCTION1. This case involves Congressional subpoenas that have no legitimate or lawful purpose. The subpoenas were issued to harass President Donald J. Trump, to rummage through every aspect of his personal finances, his businesses, and the private information of the President and his family, and to ferret about for any material that might be used to cause him political damage. No grounds exist to establish any purpose other than a political one."(4-24-19): “Deutsche Bank starts the process in turning over Trump’s financial records: CNN”"On Wednesday, Deutsche Bank has started the process of turning over President Donald Trump’s financial records, according to CNN.“Deutsche Bank has begun the process of providing financial records to New York state’s attorney general in response to a subpoena for documents related to loans made to President Donald Trump and his business, according to a person familiar with the production,” the report said."(4-22-19): "Court filing against Elijah J Cummings and Peter Kenny, House Committe on Oversight and Reform; re; Subpoena against Mazars USA LLP (.pdf doc.):"Plaintiffs bring this action against Defendants for declaratory and injunctive relief and allege as follows":1. "The Democrat Party, with its newfound control of the House of Representatives, has declared all-out political war against President Donald J. Trump. Subpoenas are their weapons of choice" …(4-12-19): House Committee on Oversight and Reform Chairman Elijah Cummings: Memorandum; "Notice of Intent to Issue Subpoena to Mazars USA LLP" (.pdf doc.) :"This memorandum provides Committe members with notice of my intent to issue a subpoena to Mazars USA LLP for documents the company has informed the Committee it cannot produce without a subpoena.”[See Page 6; titled "Schedule A", for their very revealing detailed listing of evidence being subpoenaed.](3-12-19): "New York Times: New York attorney general subpoenas two banks related to Trump Organization projects.":"Investigators requested financial records from the German lender related to the Trump International Hotel in Washington, the Trump National Doral outside Miami, the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago, and an unsuccessful effort to buy the NFL Buffalo Bills, the Times reported.(...)(...) Deutsche Bank is already the subject of a joint investigation between the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees into Trump's businesses and money laundering involving Russia."(8-11-17): U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services; Letter to: Honorable Jeb Hensarling; Chairman, Committee on Financial Services:Request to have subpoenas sent to Deutsche Bank (.pdf doc.):

According to the FBI, there were over 1,197,704 Violent Crimes actually committed in the United States in 2016. And of that many cases, fully 15,696 were murders. Over 90,000 were rapes. And over 27,000 were robberies in which a weapon, or the threat of a weapon was used (“I got a gun in my coat pocket!”).I am not talking about suicides or hunting or gun cleaning incidents resulting in deaths. Homicides. Plain and simple.Of those 15,696 murders of another human being, fully 71% took place with the murder weapon being a gun. Legally owned weapons account for LESS THAN 1% OF THIS FIGURE.LESS than 1% of the total of these were usually crimes of passion with lawfully obtained and owned weapons. Lawfully owned fully automatic weapons were NOT USED AT ALL for a homicide in 2016. And lawfully owned “assault weapons” as they are incorrectly termed (AR 15s for instance) account for less than 1% of the total number of homicides committed using lawfully owned firearms in total.What this means is that the vast, overarching majority of crimes committed within the United States were committed by the use of an illegally owned, obtained and therefore usually unlicensable individual, whom NO GUN LAW CAN CONTROL. And who is, by definition and habit, a criminal. Usually a “career criminal”.Are you getting this? No gun control law can control THIS type of individual. The vast majority of firearms owners in the United States own their weapons lawfully, and bear said weapons according to the laws. We Are Not Criminals. And for the most part, neither are we “The Problem”.For many years, the only federal gun law on the books was the 1934 National Firearms Act. This act made it illegal to own or possess a machine gun of any caliber, or a sound suppressor (aka: a silencer), a rifle with a barrel of less than 16″ and/ or any shotgun with a barrel of less than 18″, and finally “any destructive device” of an explosive nature, without first obtaining permission to own the instrument and also paying a $200 transfer tax. In addition, these transfers are recorded and never destroyed, such as is ordinary firearms sale related information. The next body of federal gun laws was the 1968 Gun Control Act.Aptly named, the ’68 GCA's purpose was to stop the interstate commerce, then without regulation, in firearms. Passed in memory of assassinated US President John F Kennedy, the act's purpose was to make it easier for federal agencies to track down and regulate the sale and transfers of all firearms purchased from stores. Anyone wishing to sell weapons would first have to apply for, be investigated for fitness in this commerce, and only then be able to lawfully engage in interstate commerce in weapons. This is a lawful action on the part of the Congress, because the Constitution gives the power to regulate interstate traffic in all merchandise to the Congress, specifically. And it didn't restrict the Second Amendment; the right to keep and bear arms was not infringed. It was made subject to federal investigation. Lee Harvey Oswald, Kennedy's assassin obtained his Mannlicher-Carcano 6.5mm rifle through the US Mails from an outfit that never met or saw or proofed him. In point of fact, Oswald had emigrated to the Soviet Union in 1959 after being discharged as an “undesirable” person from the US Marine Corps. This made Oswald ineligible to re-enlist. In addition, he traveled to the Soviet Union without a proper visa, and while there he went to the US Embassy and told embassy interviewer Richard Snyder of his intention to renounce his United States citizenship. Although he never formally renounced his citizenship, he did have to negotiate his way out of felony charges when, in 1961 he sought to return to the USA.In any event, under all of these problems, Oswald would never have qualified for the lawful purchase of a firearm under the terms of the ’68 GCA. By the way, you can download form 4473 in pdf form on the internet. You will see the questions asked. Answer wrong, and you will leave the store with only your empty hands.If I purchase a weapon from a federally licensed firearms dealer, I have to fill out a form #4473. That form is kept by the dealer for 20 years if the sale goes through (5 years if it doesn't), and only afterward must be destroyed. The NCIC, which is called on each and every sale has 3 days in which to contact the dealer with a “yes or no” about the sale. If NCIC doesn’t answer back within 3 days, a ‘default proceeding’ sale can take place. NCIC can still continue to investigate for 90 days. After that, they must close out their case. If, during the course of the investigation reason to deny the sale is actually found, and the buyer already obtained the lawful weapon from the FFL holding dealer from a default sale, then the FBI must go out and obtain back, UNDER WARRANT the firearm, and proceed according to their operating procedures at that point. The purchaser can sue the government over this, but must prove actual damage to themselves in order to do this.The FBI in Washington gets the successful sale notice back, and after the sale is approved must then destroy all of their records of said sale, and that within 24 hours! But a sale that is denied is never destroyed. And an unsuccessful sale can be used against a parolee or a probationer for violating their terms of parole/probation.The Law Center To Prevent Gun Violence maintains an excellent website. I obtained most of my facts and figures from them for my answer to you.Getting back to the Constitutional side of things, the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is the absolute controlling law on the ownership of firearms. And the purposing of this body of law can be found amongst the Federalist Papers. Jefferson, Franklin, Washington, Hamilton, Madison, Adams and a very large host of others of the nation's Founders placed no trust in the institution of governments in general. They all felt that without the ultimate power to revolt against a possibly tyrannical government, the people of the United States were defenseless. Washington himself felt there was a great need for local militias to be able to train and maintain a viable military presence, thus obviating the need for a standing army, felt to be a “tool for tyrants”. And so, Jefferson, Franklin and Adams wrote the Bill of Rights to correct oversights in the body of the Constitution.Courts at the federal level have always kicked almost all decisions regarding firearms rights back to the states until the Heller case. And there is a real and Constitutionally based reason for that. In the United States, there is a very strict separation of powers between the federal and state governments, AND THE PEOPLE. The Constitution reserves those powers as enumerated, in Article 10 of the US Constitution:“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or the People”. ‘States Rights’ in other words.This means there are things that the United States government CANNOT DO. And chief among these things is the limiting or curtailing of any right granted by the Constitution to its' targeted recipients. Such as the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. IE: WE The People.The Second Amendment states that “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. Exactly, and in those precise words.Ok, there IS that “militia” statement. Why is it there?We had just revolted against one of the most powerful and wealthy monarchies in the world. The British Navy was nearly unchallengeable. Their troops were truly feared. And very justifiably. But we Americans ALL owned guns back then, and we were VERY well armed. Many towns and counties had real, functional armories of their own, complete with full out military musketry and cannons!And that was what the British were attempting to seize in Lexington and Concord in 1775 when the Colonial Patriots fought the “Redcoats”. And stopped them.Our Founders knew the absolute need for the People to continue to maintain this level of militarism. It's only since the Civil War when the world witnessed the incredible savagery of Americans fighting Americans, that even British officers acting as observers opined they never wanted to have to face our troops on a battlefield. What we lacked in finesse we made up for in sheer firepower.So we are left with that particular anachronism. Or is it really an anachronism? It came in handy in coastal raids by French privateers during the “Quasi War” with France in 1798 to 1800. French privateers (read: Pirates!) ran the Atlantic coast of the United States almost completely unopposed. Only the fact that most of the original militia units formed during the French and Indian War in the 1750′s and again in the Revolution were still very functional gave us any defense at all.No navy, no Marines. No nuthin'. Why? Because the Founders (ALL of them) opposed absolutely any sort of standing army or navy, due to the terrible depredations suffered by Americans at the unrelenting demands of the British armed forces upon the Colonists.We needed our guns again during the War of 1812. Even as late as 1839, with the outbreak of American-British hostilities in the 1838–39 Arostook War between Maine and New Brunswick we experienced this need. And when the Mexican Revolution came north into Arizona in 1909, continuing into 1919 we needed our privately owned weapons to defend ourselves. And in 1942–43, Alaskans found themselves needing their own weapons to fight Japanese troops on the Aleutian Islands of Attu and Kiska. American armed forces included the ‘Alaska Scouts’, a very real militia unit. The Scouts fought mostly a guerilla action against the Japanese Imperial Marines who were merely trying to survive at that point. This was a militia unit, made up mostly of indigenous Alaskan peoples, many of whose families came from Attu and Kiska, and so were uniquely qualified to fight and survive in a potentially deadly climate. And they possessed and maintained their own weapons, including old surplus British Lee-Enfield rifles. Deadly weapons, to a “T”. The Scouts continued to harass and track Japanese forces until the arrival of ill equipped American troops, followed by better equipped Canadian forces, but it took better than six months to assemble regular Army forces to invade and retake American soil. And until that happened, the Alaska Scouts were “It”. And it's interesting to note that by the time the Regular Army finally arrived, there was virtually nothing left of the Japanese unfortunates who faced a people whose word for “Enemy” means about the same as their word for “Prey”.Americans have always preferred not to have large standing armies. Only since World War 2 have we maintained regular and large bodies of forces. The militia was a very real part of American life.In December of 1941, Marshal Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto successfully attacked Pearl Harbor. After going back to Tokyo, he was feted at a party in his honor. The Emperor's cousin, Prince Konoe wanted know “when would Japan invade the continental United States”.It was Yamamoto who was reported saying “I fear all we have done is awaken a sleeping giant, and filled him with a terrible resolve.”, right after the attack on Pearl. In response to this question posed to him, he explained how if he did try to invade, Japanese troops would face annhilation by “Americans behind every tree, every bush, and each blade of grass”.Yamamoto spent nearly ten years in the USA. He spoke, read and wrote fluent English. And it was his experience that every American whose house he stayed in or was a guest in, owned a weapon.Every. One. Of. Them.Do you see how this has helped us? You are looking at “guns as the problem”. But it's really PEOPLE who are “The Problem”. Focus your energy at solving this problem, and the rest will resolve itself.

Tell the truth about her in social media.Here is a long story on how a man who was unjustly maligned by his narcissistic ex in social media fought back and got his revenge by exposing the truth. You can find the original here: Bitter, narcissistic Ex fraudulently tarnished my reputation, and turned people against me behind my back. Years later, I give her a taste of her own medicine.This all took place five years ago in the beginning.I've lived my whole life in Russia except for the four and a half years I lived in the Eastern part of the United States, where I went to college for a degree in engineering after completing my one year of national service. There are lots of good schools here but I originally had the intention of moving to America permanently. I have relatives who live in North America so I was invited to stay with them during this time. It turned out I didn't really stay with any of them.Because I am tall and good at sport I also did high jump and basketball while in school. I was never that good, but adequate enough to make the team to such a degree that I was retroactively given a small athletic subsidy while already enrolled. It made my tuition slightly cheaper, which for an international student was a concern, even if my parents were high status regarding money.While enrolled in college I met my soon to be girlfriend Natalia, a girl originally from Connecticut and from a very wealthy family. Her major was fine arts and we met in an English class and began dating. Natalia was a little more than two years ahead of me in her studies age-wise but we became a serious enough couple to where I took an apartment outside of campus, and she moved in with me. Her parents' house wasn't far from campus but she chose to stay in my apartment, mostly because I don't think she wanted to bring me to her house too often. Maybe her parents didn't approve of me, or maybe she did not approve of me enough to show me to her parents very much.We had a good relationship or at least I thought it was good. She never complained and always liked to show off that we are a couple. She was the first person I knew in my circles who owned a selfie-stick and she would take it with us and everything was a photo opportunity. I didn't have any social media at the time but I made one just so that she could "tag" me in her posts. Eventually all her social media friends added me as a friend also. And since many people from my own home country had social media too they saw me and added me as well.Among Natalia's friend group people called me Drago which is dumb because I don't think I look like Ivan Drago. Natalia makes no secret to me of the fact that she is from a wealthy family and she tells me that she has a trust fund that will pay for her lifestyle her whole life and she doesn't even really need to attend college.I'm from a privileged background too but I don't have a trust fund myself. My father owns a small hotel outright, and where we come from that means you're rich like Steve Jobs in a relative sense. So sometimes in the mail, Natalia would get these bank statements that just tell her how much money she has in her trust fund, how much interest it made, and what her dividend, or in other words her allowance, for the month is. It is for this reason that Natalia is in no particular hurry to finish school, which is why at the time she was already twenty-three but only barely a sophomore. Natalia would show these statements to me and leave them lying around the house.They didn't have her whole bank account number listed on them anyway. They just showed balances and the name of her bank. My parents and my athletics paid for a good amount of my expenses but I still worked on campus at the bookstore to earn more money. Natalia didn't work.I didn't really have many issues with Natalia. She seemed friendly enough, was pretty, and good company. We had lots of things to talk about and we had fun together, or at least I had fun and thought she had fun too. I didn't know if I ever wanted to marry her, but I didn't rule out the idea. One thing I didn't like about her was that she was very dramatic and very prone to panic. For example if we were at a department store where she wants to buy a particular thing, and her favorite personal shopper isn't available she'll act like it's the end of the world. She wasn't above making scenes. She'd also be a bit short and rude with restaurant staff.One thing that I thought was a bit disingenuous of her was that although she was a millionaire, she liked to pretend to be poor. Not that there's anything wrong with not flashing your wealth, because there isn't. What I mean is that she'd try to act like she came up rough and that she was making life happen on her own, if I make sense. She tried to act like she was down for the cause as some say. It's kind of like when rich suburban kids try too hard to copy how things happen in a hip hop video. Except Natalia wasn't trying to be White female Tupac, she tried to do this Bohemian artist thing and pretend to some people that she was living on a shoestring.Around me, she was more herself. Or really I don't know which self is her real self. All I know is that she isn't poor but she pretends to be, in certain company.Well moving on.Eventually Natalia tells me, OP what do you think of having an open relationship? I didn't really know anything about open relationships but when Natalia explained what they were, I told her I wasn't interested in anything like that. I asked her if she wanted to be in one and is that why she's asking, but she said no, that she just read something about open relationships.From my now-perspective I know she probably had someone or some people in mind who she wanted to date or have sex with, or she already had been doing these things with one or more people but just hasn't told me about it yet.Natalia had had her inner reproductive organs surgically cut so that she could not have children. I bring this up, because SHE brought it up to me, when she was practically begging me to have unprotected sex with her, and I was worried about maybe getting her pregnant when she didn't want to be. She showed me the actual paperwork for the procedure by emailing me a PDF document that she received from her own doctor.I only thought about it after the whole open relationship discussion because up until then we had been having sex without a condom and I assumed I was her only partner and I knew for a fact I was clean, but now I was worried whether or not SHE was actually clean.But for a couple weeks more things appeared going as normal. She assured me over and over again that she had no other partners, and so like a fool I continued to have unprotected sex with her.Suddenly though within the month, Natalia tells me she needs to move out, that our relationship isn't working out.Okay, I think, I'm sad to see you go, but can we be friends? And her attitude is yeah of course we can be friends! Even then I knew she probably met someone new or had always been with that person and was now just ready to move on from me. My attitude is well most girls come and go, that's life. I'm sure many women have the same approach to guys.She left a lot of her stuff behind like clothes and papers including her bank statements that had her trust fund info on them. I tell her since we're friends why don't you come by and get your stuff? Or I'll bring it all to you. She said oh that's fine I'll get them someday could you please hold them for me? And it's not as though she had that many things at my apartment. I think she especially didn't want to have me bring it to her house or new place where she stayed because she had a new boyfriend. None of my business.I never linked my social media to my phone or went to computers to check it because I just didn't care about that sort of thing and I still don't. But I found out later that Natalia had deleted and blocked me on social media almost immediately after she moved out, and combed through her friends and deleted anyone who appeared to be one of my friends from back home.I was almost done with my degree and over the next year completely lost touch with Natalia, though I never argued with her or had an official falling out. I assumed we just moved on with our lives. I had been accepted at another school one state away from my undergraduate college to complete a masters degree, and didn't want to waste time, so I hired a service to box up some of the less important things at my house and forward them to my new apartment. By this time I had bought a used car and so with one suitcase I could set myself up for a few days while I waited for the bulk of my furniture and other luggage. I sent a text to Natalia and emailed her too, telling her where I was moving. Of course I rerouted all her mail to go to her parents' house not long after she moved out, because for a long time she used my place as her address. She wasn't thinking big picture enough to do it herself, otherwise I could have kept getting her mail for a while.In my new hometown I jumped headfirst right into studying, and hardly even went home except to eat and sleep. I never even opened a few of my boxes that contained things I wouldn't need, like old textbooks or very heavy winter clothing. Those stayed in their moving boxes.So after another year, I have my masters, and move back to Russia. I'm happy because I had managed to get a job right away in my chosen profession. I sell my car and most of my random furniture on the internet. I had written down what was in each moving box, on the outside of the box. Those boxes that contained nothing I needed right away were kept sealed the entire time I was in my second American apartment.When I arrived in my current home, I finally opened all of my boxes and realized that I still had some of Natalia's old clothes from when we were a couple, two and a half, three years ago. I even still had her old trust fund statements. I had over a years' worth of them, which is about the length of time Natalia lived with me.Since it had been such a long time and we hadn't talked in years, I assumed she no longer wanted the things, but I still didn't want to give them away or throw them away without seeing what she had to say.So for the first time in years I check my social media, and am surprised to see that she blocked me from sending her messages. I try to text her but her number has changed or maybe she blocked me there, too. Anyway she doesn't reply. Same thing happens when I email her. Why will she block me? I wonder. I think it must be an internet problem. I log out and just try looking at her social media as a random web user, and have no problem at all.I see that she hasn't really changed. Still pretty, still dressing all quirky and Bohemian. I feel kind of weird but I take a little break from what I'm doing and just see what she's been up to for the last couple of years. She's with some new guy now who looks a little bit like me but with longer hair and less responsible haha. Well good for her.I can see that she really puts her whole life out there on social media. Every little thing is worth an update from her. She is as dramatic as ever. I do notice she's a lot more political than she was before. Well that's good. It's always nice to believe in something passionately. I am not at all surprised to see that as usual she portrays herself as a struggling artist who's making a way for herself in the big bad city. Whatever works for you, Natalia, work it! She talks trash about high fashion brands, how she never had anything growing up, how she ate stew from grass as a child because she was so poor. She is really laying it on thick, and also she ripped off that story from ME, because I was telling her about how my relatives were forced to eat grass stew during the patriotic war because there wasn't much other food.All of this is just her being a poseur, which doesn't affect me, but what does affect me is when I see a post that mentioned me by name. "Nat, this is SO like your abusive ex OP, OMG!"Her friend was referring to a picture of how verbal abuse is just as damaging as physical abuse. Natalia had replied,"yeah, OP really tried to destroy my self esteem. He was also not shy about threatening me."Lots of guys who were her friends on social media commented that they'd kill me or kick my ass if they ever saw me. For most of them I would laugh because I would smash them like so many ants, especially how most of them are like wearing women's blue jeans I mean really are you sure about that, stick legs sir?... but right now I am furious because Natalia lied about me. Some of them were even seriously talking about naming me to school administrators about having my degree canceled or having me put on some kind of offender list.None of them bothered to keep in contact with me so they didn't know I moved back to Russia, but they were also talking about reporting me to the police and having me arrested.In other posts Natalia also mention me by name and actually accuse me of assaulting her in various ways, that I cheated through school, that my parents are in the Russian mob (LOL oh-kaaaaay).In every post Natalia tried to come off like she was taking the high road by not reporting me to authorities and that it was her "cross to bear" as a survivor. Her friends were like lemmings giving her electronic back pats about how courageous she was. Barf.By a little digging I saw that she broke up with the guy who I figured out was the man she moved onto after me, and he was getting slammed, too, and I'll assume he was also blocked on social media. From piecing together what Natalia says to her friends on social media, it's clear she's built up an image of being a struggling artist, and her current boyfriend also appears to believe she's a struggling artist, and they share an apartment together. I piece it together that the boyfriend works a 9 to 5 but he looks like a hipster type so maybe he is an artist too. He looks like he's struggling to keep it all together. They are totally into the activist scene. They're always talking about online funding for all kinds of charitable work. Noble stuff. Not being sarcastic.Natalia smears me across platforms. The book of many faces, the grams that are instant, the stupid blue bird app where people unknowingly brag about how worthless their existences are.Right away I think of the bank statements I have that show Natalia is anything but struggling. Because according to the statements I have, unless Natalia developed a $10,000 a day coke habit over the past two years and bought a Bentley and crashed it into Taylor Swift and lost a court case, she's getting just over six figures a year just sitting on her ass and will continue to earn these funds in perpetuity.But then I think, I've moved on and am happy, I don't even know Natalia anymore, I don't REALLY care what these social media losers think of me...Until I see yet another post where Natalia makes this dramatic statement about how she is unable to have babies as a result of a traumatic assault. To her credit, she didn't blame ME for this imaginary attack, but she was still trying to score social points by pretending to be a victim.I was even more convinced when she and her friends actually altered some of the pics of me online that Natalia had once taken with her selfie stick, and X'ed out my face using Photoshop paint. The photos were captioned with all kinds of untrue slurs. Really harsh, criminal accusations. Funny, how all of them are so eager to accuse me of being a criminal and are talking about how they will kick my ass if they see me, but none of them think of telling the police about any supposed crimes I committed.Seems really lazy.She also blamed PTSD for the fact that she was near thirty and still not graduated from college.I thought about somehow faking an account and getting her to add me as a friend, but then while looking through her friend list (and she had like a thousand friends), I saw that one of my friends was still on there. My friend doesn't speak any English and he doesn't spend much time on social media either, so he had no idea what any of these people were even saying.I noticed even long ago that it was weird that Natalia didn't include her own parents on her "friends" list, but she explained that away by saying they were too old and didn't do technology. Maybe, Natalia, but chill, your parents are like 52. I suspect now (even then, I suspected it) it's because she wanted to build up a different persona online, and her rich parents would ruin that image.Through lots of digging, I figure out where Natalia works. It's a non profit.I finally decide to return Natalia's things.I put her old clothes, many of them really expensive designer shoes and purses) into a box with her bank statements, and address them to her non-profit. I don't actually write Natalia's name on the outside.I write her name on the inside, explaining in a note that these items are all things that she bought while she lived with me when I was still in the USA.I figure they could raise many thousands of dollars if they sell these things on Eb∆y. I mean if Natalia, the owner, was willing to part with them of course. It would be great for their non profit. Could you ask her about it?A couple of days later...As for Natalia's actual bank statements, before mailing them in the box I collected some of her greatest hits online where she posted pictures of herself at rallies bemoaning the 1%, complaining about her hard knock life, about how much she cared for others' suffering. And I combined these photos on a photo editor with scans of her bank statements, with red highlighter around her monthly allowance, how much she had in total, and how the funds would last forever. I also made sure to highlight the name of the originator of the trust, a quite well known name in American industry who is identified as her great grandfather.For each of the twelve statements, I add one of Natalia's hypocritical posts about being poor, struggling, living check to check, how she depends on her art to survive.My favorite salvo is where I screen cap her post about how she is unable to have children due to an attack. I merge this with my PDF she sent me where she paid over $10,000 to have her tubes wrecked. I made sure to highlight her parents' state and zip code on the invoice, though I crossed off their exact address.I made my point though, that the procedure, which took place a few years ago, was when she still lived with her parents in one of the most titanically expensive locations on planet Earth.My Russian friend and I spent the next fun hours spamming the walls of all Natalia's friends with these pictures that show she is rich and a liar. All of them he had access to, anyway, and it was well over three hundred. We make sure to fire similar, battleship broadsides to her over-filtered and photoshopped account where she's always thinking she has to lie to kick it, and also send her and all her friends lots of bird calls on that other app.The fallout was hilarious.The denials sad and pathetic, but mostly hilarious too.Credibility?Oh that credibility!Oh, Natalia, it's destroyed.Why is your boyfriend so mad at you?Did all the organizations you've "liked" on social media "like" it when they saw you were sitting on a fortune and yet claiming "I don't have any money, starving artist LOL! But can I offer my time or homemade brownies teehee?"Day one: Friend count: 1,234, Subscribers, 2,740, Followers, 1,080A week later: Friend count: 620, Subscribers, 895, Followers, 466Natalia are you sure you're not James Charles?My friend doesn't speak English, but he and I are waiting to see if he'll be the last one eventually. And anyway, social castration and death needs no translation.Months after that...I was curious to see later if she was online anymore. POOF! Her profiles were gone or at least the ones she had been using for years. I hope her boyfriend enjoyed his sudden comeuppance! It was probably an amazing day at the office for him to come home and learn that his Bohemian hipster girlfriend was sitting on millions of dollars.To this day I have no real idea why Natalia would do this to me to begin with. I was always nice to her and never even raised my voice to her. I can't remember even one occasion where we actually argued. It's a mystery.What isn't a mystery, is, the fact that the non profit actually called me long distance to thank me for the box, and they made sure Natalia got it. I didn't try to make any secret that these items came from me, so if Natalia wants to sue me for finishing a war she started, she can go right ahead.She will drown in her bunker beneath her lies and I will be break-dancing and cripwalking, planting my flag on her Reichstag.Anyway they said Natalia tried to deny the things were hers at first, but later when she saw the bank statements she tried to say I bought those things and was trying to smear her.Yeah ok. I bought a bunch of €9,000 purses and mailed them to strangers on the off chance it might embarrass you.Eventually she took the papers making some dumbass claim that they were forgeries but left the big ticket items pretending they weren't hers. For what it's worth, the people at the nonprofit knew the statements were legit and told me so. The girl who called me from the nonprofit was asking me if she and the other girls could have the items. I reminded her that the items were Natalia's but if she abandoned them then I say go to town.I asked if Natalia still worked there and if I could talk to her.Oh no, sorry they tell me, Natalia moved back home with her parents.Must be nice, having such a luxurious, eight bedroom fallback trench.Live by the sword Natalia?Enjoy getting IMPALED on it.I hope you enjoyed finally getting your stuff back.From Russia,With Love.