Department Of Housing And Community Development Division: Fill & Download for Free

Thanks for the A2A Carl Leitz for “Why don't we build flood-proof and fireproof houses and community centers?”I really do not believe that we could build a proofed anything. We could build resistant things. Note that it’s impossible to build destruction (anything)-proof. So to answer the question as it is - The answer is WE CANNOT.Now maybe the intent of the question was - Why don’t we build houses & community centers resistant to flood & fire damage? And the answer to this would be:But we do build houses & community centers resistant to flood & fire damage. The level of resistance is limited by the budget of the client.With regards to flooding, consider the following;The level of flood resistance is controlled by the Town Planning, Environmental & Building Control Departments of the Municipality. Buildings are to be situated above the 1:50 or sometimes 1:100 flood levels.All new buildings are to control storm water in such a way that water volumes leaving the property are kept to the per-development states. This prevent excessive run off from the impervious surfaces of one property negatively affecting the neighbors, rivers & flood plains.All storm water is to be directed away from buildings and no ponding of water is to be allowed around the building. This is controlled by the National Home Builders Registration Council guidelines, the National Building Regulations & Standards Act 103 of 1977 & associated South African National Standards 10400 suite of documents (here in South Africa & some neighbouring countries). Buildings are also to be raised above the surrounding ground (step or ramp up to the entrance)Now the amount of rain (and associated flooding) during Hurricanes / Tropical Cyclones, flash flooding etc (what we call an act of god) is so huge that we cannot design for this. All the rain that Hurricane Harvey dumped on Texas and Louisiana, in one massive water drop, A terrifying size comparison shows how much rain Hurricane Harvey has produced and http://sciencing.com/much-rain-typical-hurricane-5043.html. Also note that the most populated areas are generally in close proximity to nature water bodies, which are low lying areas.This is impossible to design for.Now with regards to Fire;It should firstly be noted that nothing is fire proof. There is fire resistance. & that is what is used in buildings. The resistance to fire is normally measure in hours. This is to allow the building to be safely evacuated in a given time.The Fire Resistance of buildings (here in South Africa, is the control of the National Building Regulations & Standards Act 103 of 1977 & associated South African National Standards 10400 suite of documents (more specifically SANS 10400 T).SANS 10400 T controls for example, the fire resistance / stability of walls & their position in relation to other buildings to prevent the spread for fire & materials used within the building. The position of openings & non-fire resistant walls in relation to other buildings & boundaries, the Occupancy separation & Division separation within a building. This is to control the spread of fire.Fire Fighting is also controlled by SANS 10400 T. This is to bring the fire under control after ignition.Escape, access & warnings is also controlled by SANS 10400 T. This allows people to safely exit a building or emergency personnel to enter a building in the case of a fire.The Fire triangle - Wikipedia required for any fire are essentials required for our living. Therefore creating a fire proof environment would make it unlivable.To kill a fire - break this triangleThink of fire as something alive. It can be used for good - cooking & manufacture. It also can get out of control & then needs to be killed.And Finally: The cost of resistance climbs with the resistance required. These highly fire & flood resistant buildings would be priced out of the range of most people.

Sometimes the devil is in the details. The two countries have broadly similar governmental systems. However, there are numerous differences, some at the constitutional level, and others that are more practical.At The Constitutional Level, What Is Or Isn't Similar?Both countries are federal democracies. In both cases the fundamental law is a constitution. Both have a national legislature, in the national capital. Both have a national bureaucracy, headquartered in the capital. Both countries employ career civil servants, placed in a particular position in a combination of the merit principal and affirmative action.Both countries have sub-national divisions and legislatures, provinces and states, with state and provincial capitals, where their legislatures are located.After that, at the fundamental level, it is mostly different. Canada does not have a constitutional structure that recognizes a “balance of powers”. Parliament is meant to be supreme. In Canada the executive and the legislature are partially fused. There is no separate election for the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister is an elected member of the legislature, with their own parliamentary constituency. There has been concern for some years that the Supreme Court of Canada is trying to assume a legislative role similar to the United States Supreme Court.Both the American and Canadian national legislatures are bicameral. All the Canadian provincial legislatures are unicameral.Unlike the United States legislature, Canada's is only modestly bicameral. The Canadian Senate is an appointive body, patterned to some extent after the British House of Lords. It was meant to be a chamber of “sober second thought”, not a veto power. However, in part because of some very poor quality Senator appointments, the Senate has lost much of its credibility. To a certain extent, it has become the vermiform appendix of Canadian politics. However, because of Supreme Court of Canada ruling several years ago, the Senate is virtually impossible to abolish.At the highest level, there is a very basic difference. Canada is a constitutional monarchy. The head of state is the same monarch as the British one, but she is directly Queen (Or King) of Canada, irrespective of being the monarch of the United Kingdom. So the head of state and the head of the executive are not the same people.Her Majesty the Queen is represented in Canada by the Governor General. The Queen reigns, but does not rule. Her role, and that of the Governor General, is largely ceremonial. However, in some ways, the Queen still has a very important role. For example, when either a federal or a provincial government issues a contract, they issue it on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen. So, a federal contract is issued in the name of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. A provincial government contract issued by Her Majesty the Queen, in Right (for example) of Manitoba, or whatever province it is.Both countries have federal territories in addition to province or states. However, Canada has three geographically very large federal territories in the sparsely-populated north, that contain a large part of Canada's total geographic area.Both countries recognize some special status for indigenous peoples. However, in Canada, the concept of relationships between the indigenous communities has come to be that of nation to nation. So, indigenous governments are another order of government. Indigenous communities have at least partial control over large areas of land. The federal Nunavut Territory, which is enormous, is a cultural and political home for the Inuit people.At the federal level, Canada has no provision for recall elections. British Columbia has such provisions but they are not being used. There is no Canadian equivalent to impeachment. Since the Prime Minister is the head of their party in the House of Commons, in the event of egregious behaviour, his parliamentary caucus could vote to remove him.In fact, the entire federal government, or a provincial government, could change as a result of what is called, in the British system, a “confidence vote”. If the governing party presents a money bill that fails to win the support of the legislature, generally their term of office is finished. For the most part, there will be a new election of the legislature, no matter whether the normal term of office is near completion.Provinces Versus StatesBroadly they have similar powers and behave in similar ways. However, there is a substantial difference in the distribution of powers, if you compare the constitutions of the two countries. In particular, provinces do not have the constitutional authority to pass criminal legislation or charter banks. There is one federal Criminal Code only. And, a banking charter can only be issued by the federal government, which has chosen to create a banking system dominated by five, nation wide, bricks and mortars banks. These major banks are permitted to engage in stock brokering.But, the provinces in some ways are more empowered than the states. They guard their constitutional sovereignty very jealously. The Canadian federal government does not have an equivalent of the United States Department of the Interior or the Bureau of Land Management. Parks Canada is responsible for Canada's national parks. However, in Canada, lands in a province, that are not privately owned, are frequently owned by the provincial governments or more precisely, they control them on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen, in Right of the province concerned. Even at the more practical level, the Canadian government cannot impose something like the Interstate Highway system. If the federal governments wants to offer road improvement money to a province, in the interests of improving the national economy, a province can accept it if they wish. However, road transport is a provincial matter only.In both Canada and the USA there are areas of concurrent constitutional authority, in addition to powers that are exclusively those of the state or provincial, and the federal governments. However, in Canada there is no equivalent of the United States Department of Education nor the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Education and housing, and municipal matters, are under the exclusive authority of the provincial governments.There is another very large difference. As many Americans know, Canada has a socialized system of medical insurance. However, each province has its own system. Private, for profit hospitals are not economically viable, because, when providing care to citizens and permanent residents of Canada, they could only charge according to the provincial government fee schedule. They cannot over bill the patient. The provincial governments are responsible for operating the comprehensive medical and hospital systems. The federal government tries to enable roughly equal standards across Canada by providing some support. There is a federal Department of Health, and a Department of Public Health, but they do not operate the system.Military and PolicingBoth federal governments are responsible for the operation of their militaries. However, there is no Canadian equivalent to the National Guard or the state militias. The Canadian Department of National Defence operates a Reserve Force.Both countries have national police forces, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The RCMP performs some of the national crime prevention and detection functions of the FBI. However, it is different. Most of the smaller Canadian provinces do not maintain the equivalent of State Police forces. Only Quebec, Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador have the equivalents. Other provinces hire the services of the RCMP to do local policing in rural municipalities and small urban centres, on a contract basis. Quite unlike the FBI, the RCMP does highway patrol, issues tickets and intervenes in family disputes.Canada does not have elective sheriffs or judge. They are civil servants here.Canada's Municipalities, A Little DisempoweredBoth countries use municipal governments to provide local services and do land use and business regulation.Canadian municipalities have mayors the way American ones do, and provide similar services. As in the USA, the mayor is frequently elected directly. Only some Canadian municipalities have parliamentary systems, with governing and opposition parties. However, the mayor is frequently a sitting member of City Council, with one vote, just like the rest of the councillors.Canadian municipalities are, constitutionally, the “creatures of the provinces”. The provincial governments control them tightly. Frequently, the municipalities are not allowed to incur their own debt. So, municipal bond issues are rare. Also, Canadian municipalities are not permitted to impose local retail taxes or licence tag fees. The municipalities mostly raise funds through property tax levies, service fees and parking tickets, and approach the provincial governments for grants.Britain Brings Us TogetherThe concepts of habeus corpus, freehold property originate for both Canada and the USA from Britain. Britain went through a very long historic process to impose the supremacy of an elected legislature over the head of state, If you feel free, with civil rights, in either Canada or the US, it is appropriate to turn towards London, and feel some admiration and thanks.So, Is It That Different?An American wouldn't find a provincial office that issues driver and vehicle licences very different from their state Department of Provincial Vehicles. When you get a speeding ticket and demerits, it feels just as bad whether you local elected sheriff gives it to you or an officer of the RCMP. And, when you drive across a provincial boundary, and know you are back in your own province, it feels the same as if you are an American, driving across that last state line that gets you back home.And, if your local Mayor is spouting nonsense, a Canadian mayor is just as irritating as an American one.So, on a day to day basis the governmental system doesn't seem that different. However, if you are a Canadian, you don't wake up saying, “Where has my State Militia gone”? or “Why can't I petition to have the Prime Minister recalled?”But, if you look at a lot of the details, the similarities can start to look a little superficial. It isn't that one system is better or worse. It is that Canada and the USA are two different countries, with no particular reason to be all that similar.Martin Levine

I reproduce the exhaustive list from The National Center for Transgender Equality (The Discrimination Administration)TLDR: About 77 other things listed below like permitting discrimination by homeless shelters (July 23, 2020) - Please Vote!Anti-Transgender and Anti-LGBTQ ActionsJuly 23, 2020: The Department of Housing and Urban Development formally announced the rollback of a previous rule that protected transgender people from discrimination by homeless shelters and other housing services receiving federal funds.June 19, 2020: The Department of Health and Human Services announced that it finalized the extensive rollback of health care discrimination rules, to eliminate the protections for transgender people experiencing discrimination in health care settings and/or by insurance companies denying transition-related care, as well as to weaken nondiscriminatory access to health care for those with Limited English Proficiency.May 15, 2020: The Department of Education issued a letter declaring that the federal Title IX rule requires school to ban transgender students from participating in school sports, and threatening to withhold funding from Connecticut schools if they do not comply.May 8, 2020: The Department of Health and Human Services published a final rule eliminating collection of sexual orientation data on foster youth and foster and adoptive parents and guardians and rejecting proposals to collect gender identity data.May 6, 2020: The Department of Education published a final rule encouraging schools to dramatically weaken protections for student survivors of sexual violence and harassment, and eliminating a provision that encouraged religiously-affiliated schools to notify the Department and the public of their intent to discriminate on the basis of sex under a Title IX waiver.March 26, 2020: The Department of Justice filed a court brief in the District of Connecticut in opposition to a Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference policy that allows transgender athletes to play sports with their peers.February 27, 2020: The Department of Justice filed another court brief, this time in the Western District of Kentucky, expressing the view of the United States that anti-LGBTQ discrimination is not "a sufficient government interest" to overcome the objections of private businesses who want to deny "expressive" services such as photography services to LGBTQ people, and that these businesses must be permitted to opt out of complying with local nondiscrimination laws.January 16, 2020: Nine federal agencies - Departments of Agriculture, Education, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Justice, Labor, and Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Agency on International Development - all proposed rule changes that would eliminate the rights of people receiving help from federal programs to request a referral if they have a concern or problem with a faith-based provider and to receive written notice of their rights; and that would encourage agencies to claim religious exemptions to deny help to certain people while receiving federal funds.November 5, 2019: The Department of Labor proposed to exempt the TRICARE health care program for military dependents and retirees from requirements not to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. It is not immediately apparent whether TRICARE intends to make any changes in its benefits policies. Currently, TRICARE covers hormone therapy and counseling for transgender retirees and dependents, but DOD interprets the TRICARE statute to exclude transition-related surgery regardless of medical necessity.=November 1, 2019: The Department of Health and Human Services announced it would not enforce, and planned to repeal, regulations prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity, sexual orientation, and religion in all HHS grant programs. These include programs to address the HIV, opioid, and youth homelessness epidemics, as well as hundreds of billions of dollars in other health and human service programs.November 1, 2019: The Department of Education published final regulations permitting religious schools to ignore nondiscrimination standards set by accrediting agencies.September 19, 2019: The Department of Health and Human Services cancelled a plan to explicitly prohibit hospitals from discriminating against LGBTQ patients as a requirement of Medicare and Medicaid funds.August 16, 2019: The Department of Justice filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that federal law “does not prohibit discrimination against transgender persons based on their transgender status.”August 14, 2019: The Department of Labor announced a proposed rule that would radically expand the ability of federal contractors to exempt themselves from equal employment opportunity requirements, allowing for-profit and non-profit employers to impose “religious criteria” on employees that could include barring LGBTQ employees.July 15, 2019: The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security announced an interim final rule that would block the vast majority of asylum-seekers from entering the United States, with deadly consequences for those fleeing anti-LGBTQ violence.July 8, 2019: The Department of State established a “Commission on Unalienable Rights” aimed at narrowing our country’s human rights advocacy to fit with the “natural law” and “natural rights” views of social conservatives, stating it would seek to “be vigilant that human rights discourse not be corrupted or hijacked or used for dubious or malignant purposes.” (Shortly thereafter, the State Department official tasked with coordinating the new commission was fired for “abusive” management including homophobic remarks.)July 3, 2019: The Department of Housing and Urban Development removed requirements that applicants for homelessness funding maintain anti-discrimination policies and demonstrate efforts to serve LGBT people and their families, who are more likely to be homeless.May 24, 2019: The Department of Health and Human Services published a proposed rule that would remove all recognition that federal law prohibits transgender patients from discrimination in health care. Courts across the nation have ruled otherwise.May 22, 2019: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced a plan to gut regulations prohibiting discrimination against transgender people in HUD-funded homeless shelters.May 14, 2019: President Trump announced his opposition to the Equality Act (H.R. 5), the federal legislation that would confirm and strengthen civil rights protections for LGBTQ Americans and others.May 2, 2019: The Department of Health and Human Services published a final rule encouraging hospital officials, staff, and insurance companies to deny care to patients, including transgender patients, based on religious or moral beliefs. This vague and broad rule was immediately challenged in court.April 19, 2019: The Department of Health and Human Service announced a proposed rule to abandon data collection on sexual orientation of foster youth and foster and adoptive parents and guardians.April 12, 2019: The Department of Defense put President Trump’s ban on transgender service members into effect, putting service members at risk of discharge if they come out or are found out to be transgender.March 13, 2019: The Department of Defense laid out its plans for implementing its ban on transgender troops, giving an official implementation date of April 12.January 23, 2019: The Department of Health & Human Services' Office of Civil Rights granted an exemption to adoption and foster care agencies in South Carolina, allowing religiously-affiliated services to discriminate against current and aspiring LGBTQ caregivers.November 23, 2018: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) erased critical guidance that helped federal agency managers understand how to support transgender federal workers and respect their rights, replacing clear and specific guidance reflecting applicable law and regulations with vaguely worded guidance hostile to transgender workers. While this guidance change did not change the rights of transgender federal workers under applicable law, regulations, Executive Orders, and case law, it is likely to cause confusion and promote discrimination within the nation's largest employer.November 19, 2018: The Department of State appealed a court order directing it to issue a passport with a gender-neutral designation to a non-binary, intersex applicant.October 25, 2018: U.S. representatives at the United Nations worked to remove references to transgender people in UN human rights documents.October 24, 2018: The Department of Justice submitted a brief to the Supreme Court aruging that it is legal to discriminate against transgender employee, contradicting court rulings that say protections under Title VII in the workplace don’t extend to transgender workers.October 21, 2018: The New York Times reported that the Department of Health and Human Services proposed in a memo to change the legal definition of sex under Title IX, which would would leave transgender people vulnerable to discrimination.August 10, 2018: The Department of Labor released a new directive for Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) staff encouraging them to grant broad religious exemptions to federal contractors with religious-based objections to complying with nondiscrimination laws. It also deleted material from an OFCCP FAQ on LGBT nondiscrimination protections that previously clarified the limited scope of allowable religious exemptions.June 11, 2018: Attorney General Jeff Sessions ruled that the federal government would no longer recognized gang violence or domestic violence as grounds for asylum, adopting a legal interpretation that could lead to rejecting most LGBT asylum-seekers.May 11, 2018: The Bureau of Prisons in the Department of Justice adopted an illegal policy of almost entirely housing transgender people in federal prison facilities that match their sex assigned at birth, rolling back existing protections.April 11, 2018: The Department of Justice proposed to strip data collection on sexual orientation and gender identity of teens from the National Crime Victimization Survey.March 23, 2018: The Trump Administration announced an implementation plan for its discriminatory ban on transgender military service members.March 20, 2018: The Department of Education reiterated that the Trump administration would refuse to allow transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms based on their gender identity, countering multiple court rulings reaffirming that transgender students are protected under Title IX.March 5, 2018: The Department Housing and Urban Development Secretary announced a change to its official mission statement by removing its commitment of inclusive and discrimination-free communities from the statement.February 18, 2018: The Department of Education announced it will summarily dismiss complaints from transgender students involving exclusion from school facilities and other claims based solely on gender identity discrimination.January 26, 2018: The Department of Health and Human Services proposed a rule that encourages medical providers to use religious grounds to deny treatment to transgender people, people who need reproductive care, and others.January 18, 2018: The Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Civil Rights opened a "Conscience and Religious Freedom Division" that will promote discrimination by health care providers who can cite religious or moral reasons for denying care.December 29, 2017: President Trump fired the White House Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS. The transgender community is disproportionately affected by HIV.December 20, 2017: President Trump nominated Gordon P. Giampietro to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Giampietro called marriage equality “an assault on nature.” Giampietro's nomination was eventually withdrawn.December 14, 2017: Staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were instructed not to use the words “transgender,” “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “fetus,” “evidence-based,” and “science-based” in official documents.October 6, 2017: The Justice Department released a sweeping "license to discriminate" allowing federal agencies, government contractors, government grantees, and even private businesses to engage in illegal discrimination, as long as they can cite religious reasons for doing so.October 5, 2017: The Justice Department released a memo instructing Department of Justice attorneys to take the legal position that federal law does not protect transgender workers from discrimination.October 2, 2017: President Trump nominated Kyle Duncan to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Duncan has dedicated his career to limiting the rights of transgender people, and even defended the anti-trans parties in the North Carolina’s infamous HB2 debacle and the school district that discriminated against Gavin Grimm.September 7, 2017: The Justice Department filed a legal brief on behalf of the United States in the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing for a constitutional right for businesses to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and, implicitly, gender identity.September 7, 2017: President Trump nominated Gregory G. Katsas to serve as a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Katsas played a central role in helping Trump ban qualified transgender people serving in the miiltary.September 7, 2017: President Trump nominated Matthew J. Kacsmaryk to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Kacsmaryk opposes LGBTQ protections in housing, employment, & and health care, and called transgender people a “delusion.”September 7, 2017: President Trump nominated Jeff Mateer to become a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Mateer called transgender children part of “Satan’s plan” and openly supported debunked and dangerous “conversion therapy.” Mateer’s nomination was eventually withdrawn.August 25, 2017: President Trump released a memo directing Defense Department to move forward with developing a plan to discharge transgender military service members and to maintain a ban on recruitment.July 26, 2017: President Trump announced, via Twitter, that "the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military."July 26, 2017: The Justice Department filed a legal brief on behalf of the United States in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, arguing that the 1964 Civil Rights Act does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or, implicitly, gender identity.July 13, 2017: President Trump nominated Mark Norris to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. Norris has worked to make it easier to discriminate against LGBTQ people, and even worked to discriminate specifically against transgender kids.June 14, 2017: The Department of Education withdrew its finding that an Ohio school district discriminated against a transgender girl. The Department gave no explanation for withdrawing the finding, which a federal judge upheld.May 2, 2017: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a plan to roll back regulations interpreting the Affordable Care Act’s nondiscrimination provisions to protect transgender people.April 14, 2017: The Justice Department abandoned its historic lawsuit challenging North Carolina’s anti-transgender law. It did so after North Carolina replaced HB2 with a different anti-transgender law known as “HB 2.0.”April 4, 2017: The Departments of Justice and Labor cancelled quarterly conference calls with LGBT organizations; on these calls, which had happened for years, government attorneys shared information on employment laws and cases.March 31, 2017: The Justice Department announced it would review (and likely seek to scale back) numerous civil rights settlement agreements with police departments. These settlements were put in places where police departments were determined to be engaging in discriminatory and abusive policing, including racial and other profiling. Many of these agreements include critical protections for LGBT people.March 2017: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) removed links to four key resource documents from its website, which informed emergency shelters on best practices for serving transgender people facing homelessness and complying with HUD regulations.March 28, 2017: The Census Bureau retracted a proposal to collect demographic information on LGBT people in the 2020 Census.March 24, 2017: The Justice Department cancelled a long-planned National Institute of Corrections broadcast on “Transgender Persons in Custody: The Legal Landscape.”March 13, 2017: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that its national survey of older adults, and the services they need, would no longer collect information on LGBT participants. HHS initially falsely claimed in its Federal Register announcement that it was making “no changes” to the survey.March 13, 2017: The State Department announced the official U.S. delegation to the UN’s 61st annual Commission on the Status of Women conference would include two outspoken anti-LGBT organizations, including a representative of the Center for Family and Human Rights (C-FAM): an organization designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.March 10, 2017: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced it would withdraw two important agency-proposed policies designed to protect LGBT people experiencing homelessness. One proposed policy would have required HUD-funded emergency shelters to put up a poster or "notice" to residents of their right to be free from anti-LGBT discrimination under HUD regulations.The other announced a survey to evaluate the impact of the LGBTQ Youth Homelessness Prevention Initiative, implemented by HUD and other agencies over the last three years. This multi-year project should be evaluated, and with this withdrawal, we may never learn what worked best in the project to help homeless LGBTQ youth.March 8, 2017: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) removed demographic questions about LGBT people that Centers for Independent Living must fill out each year in their Annual Program Performance Report. This report helps HHS evaluate programs that serve people with disabilities.March 2, 2017: The Department of Justice abandoned its request for a preliminary injunction against North Carolina’s anti-transgender House Bill 2, which prevented North Carolina from enforcing HB 2. This was an early sign that the Administration was giving up defending trans people (later, on April 14, it withdrew the lawsuit completely).March 1, 2017: The Department of Justice took the highly unusual step of declining to appeal a nationwide preliminary court order temporarily halting enforcement of the Affordable Care Act’s nondiscrimination protections for transgender people. The injunction prevents HHS from taking any action to enforce transgender people's rights from health care discrimination.February 22, 2017: The Departments of Justice and Education withdrew landmark 2016 guidance explaining how schools must protect transgender students under the federal Title IX law.January 31, 2017: President Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. Gorsuch has a history of anti-transgender rulings.January 20, 2017: On President Trump’s inauguration day, the adminstration scrubbed all mentions of LGBTQ people from the websites of the White House, Department of State, and Department of Labor.Other Harmful Trump Administration ActionsThe Trump administration has taken many other actions to roll back civil rights and health care protections and target vulnerable communities. While not specifically directed at transgender people or gender identity protections, we list them here because it is critically important that we view our quest for transgender equality as intertwined with other social justice movements. These include attacks on reproductive rights, the Affordable Care Act, refugees and other immigrants and the enforcement of civil rights laws. Many of these actions will also disproportionately harm transgender people. These are just a few examples:Kicking Americans off Medicaid and Food Stamps: The Trump Administration has taken numerous actions to kick Americans in need off of Medicaid and SNAP coverage. On April 10, Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to push for work requirements for low-income people in America who receive federal assistance, including Medicaid and SNAP.Targeting Reproductive Rights: On October 6, 2017, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a regulation allowing employers and insurers to deny coverage for birth control, as long as they can cite religious reasons for doing so. In April, President Trump and Congress overturned a regulation that protected Planned Parenthood, one of the nation’s largest providers of care for transgender people, and other family planning clinics from funding discrimination by states.Harming Sexual Assault Survivors. On September 7, 2017, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos announced she would withdraw historic guidance on schools' and universities' responsibilities to address sexual assault and sexual harassment. On September 27, 2017, the Department replaced this guidance with flawed and dangerous “interim guidance” tipping the scales against student survivors seeking protection on campus. This is especially dangerous for transgender students, because 47% of transgender adults in the US Transgender Survey were sexual assault survivors.Cruel and Relentless Attacks on Immigrant Communities. On September 5, 2017, President Trump acted to strip hundreds of thousands of Americans and their families of security, stability, and safety by ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. On April 6, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a “zero tolerance” policy that separated hundreds of immigrant children from their families. On April 10, a federal official announced that the Department of Justice was halting the Legal Orientation Program, which offers legal assistance to immigrants. On June 11, Attorney General Sessions ruled that domestic or gang violence are not grounds for asylum in the United States. These are just a few of many anti-immigrant actions that are especially dangerous for many LGBT immigrants who could face life-threatening violence if deported.Putting Health Care Out of Reach: On April 13, 2017, the Department of Health and Human Services rolled back numerous Affordable Care Act rules to reduce protections for people seeking and using health insurance. These actions make it harder to enroll in health care plans, allow plans to sharply raise deductibles, and weaken requirements for insurance plans to have in-network providers that serve low-income communities. These changes disproportionately affect people of color and any one with lower incomes, including transgender people. These changes make getting health care coverage harder for people who lose coverage or who depend on community clinics.Expanding Immigration Detention: The Department of Homeland Security is vastly expanding the number of immigrants held in immigration detention centers nationwide, while also eliminating protections for health and safety in detention centers. Reducing these protections for immigrants who are being detained is wrong, and it's especially dangerous for vulnerable transgender immigrants, many of whom are asylum-seekers who risk extreme abuse.Banning Muslims and Refugees: On January 27, 2017 and again on March 6, President Trump signed executive orders seeking to ban entry by refugees and travelers from certain Muslim-majority countries and drastically reduce the number of refugees allowed to seek safety in the United States. We cannot stand for a world where people in danger are denied entry because of who they are, including where they come from or whether they are Muslim or any other religion. LGBT refugees are among the many who are fleeing life-threatening persecution because of who they are or what they believe. While the bans were allowed to take effect by the Supreme Court, court cases challenging them continue.