Notice Orders Received By Mail Must Be Accompanied By The: Fill & Download for Free

The Way of Business: 7 Most Classic Marketing Cases in the WorldGreat marketing is often amazing, let’s take a look, I believe it will be inspiring!1. Get 10% offIt is estimated that everyone likes to buy discounted goods because it feels much cheaper. In fact, discounts are a disguised way of making money for many businesses.Generally, it is very common to have a 70% or 20% discount. However, this one I want to talk about today is 10% off!There is a Ginza gentleman's suit shop in Tokyo, Japan. This is the first store to sell "10% off", which once made a sensation in Tokyo. The product sold at the time was "Japan GOOD".This is how they implemented it. First, they set a discount sales time. The first day is 10% off, the second day is 20%, the third day, the fourth day is 30%, the fifth day, the sixth day, and the seventh day. 50% off on the eighth day, 40% off on a ninth day and tenth day, 3% off on the eleventh day and twelfth day, 20% off on the thirteenth day and fourteenth day, and 1% off on the last two days. It seems like the last two days are the best deals for shopping, right?Then we look at the following:The merchant’s forecast is:Because it is a surprising sales strategy, the effect of the early public opinion promotion will be very good. With a curious mindset, customers will flock to it. Of course, customers can freely choose the day of shopping during this discount sale. If you want to buy it at the cheapest price, you can buy it in the last two days. However, what you want to buy is not necessarily Will stay until the last two days.The actual situation is:There were not many guests who came on the first day. If they came here, they were just for a look. From the third day, a group of people began to visit. On the fifth day, when the 40% discount was offered, the guests flooded in and started to buy. After that, the guests were full every day. Of course, the products were all sold out before the 1% discount.So, did the business lose money?You think that if customers are eager to buy the products they like, it will cause a chain reaction of panic buying. Merchants use unique creativity to sell all their products at a 50 or 60% discount. "10% off" is just a psychological tactic, how can a business lose money?I have seen discounts and promotions, but I have never seen such a magical strategy of "10% off". While admiring the clever business experience of the merchants, I also feel the powerful miracle of online marketing!2. One itemFor businesses buying new products, what attracts customers the most is nothing more than "new". How to continue on "new"?There is a Lyle market in Italy that sells new products. Some new products are very popular. Many customers are rushing to buy and sell. If they are not in hand, they ask the market to restock. The answer is: I’m sorry, this market only sells the first batch.In this regard, some customers did not understand it very much and even told others. But since then, customers who come here will buy what they like without hesitation. It is not difficult to see that the "cutting love" of the Lyle market is a brilliant idea, which can leave a strong impression on customers-the products sold here are all the latest. If you want to buy the latest products, you have to visit the Lyle market.This is really a "new" innovative idea!3. Make a profitMatsumoto Kiyoshi, the former mayor of Matsudo City, Japan, was a flexible businessman. When he ran the "Creative Pharmacy", he sold plasters that were priced at 200 yuan at that time for 80 yuan. Since the price of 80 yuan is too cheap, the "Creative Pharmacy" business has been booming for days.So, where is the secret of his doing this?It turns out that people who come to buy plasters almost always buy other medicines by the way, which of course is profitable. Relying on the profits of other drugs, not only made up for the loss of the plaster but also caused an unprecedented surplus in the operation of the entire pharmacy.This kind of "benefit and loss" idea is to reduce the price of one product, while promoting other products, not only attracts customers but also greatly increases the popularity. Being famous and beneficial. It is a creative idea that kills two birds with one stone!4. "Customer Entry" Sales MethodItaly's Phil Lawrence opened a seven-year-old children's store, which sells goods for children around seven years old.The store stipulates that customers entering the store must be seven-year-old children, and adults must be accompanied by seven-year-old children when entering the store, otherwise, they are not allowed to enter, even local officials are no exception. This trick of the store not only did not reduce business but effectively attracted customers. Some parents with seven-year-old children came in, wanting to see "what kind of medicine is sold" inside, and some parents with children of other ages also lied that their children were only seven years old. More and more prosperous.Later, Phil opened more than 20 similar shops, such as newlyweds and youth shops, seniors shops, pregnant women shops, women shops and so on. In women's stores, male customers are not allowed to enter, which makes many passing women interested, and they are unavoidable to enter the store to take a look. Pregnant women can enter the women's store, but generally infertile women are not allowed to enter the women's store. The spectacle store only accepts customers who wear spectacles, and others have to look at the door and sigh. Left-handed shops only provide a variety of products for left-handers, but they are never opposed to people pretending to be left-handed to enter the store. All of these restrictions on customers have actually played a role in promoting sales.5. Unique "junk" lettersIn the United States, we often receive letters with the words "Important!", "Urgent, please reply immediately!", "Urgent × month × before reply!" These seemingly important letters are just advertisements and orders to promote products and are called "spam letters."These "junk letters" come in all kinds, and in order to attract the attention of consumers and readers, the senders are ingenious.The form of the letter is exquisitely designed and the printing is exquisite. Some letters even pretend to be "official notices". The envelopes are marked with an eagle logo, and the mailing address is "FBI". The letters are printed in boldface with "Detention Notice", but take a closer look. You will find a line of small words: "Notice of receiving cash or prizes." When opening the envelope, it turned out to be "So and so invitation letter." Some can buy discounted goods by mail, and some videotapes can be tried for 15 days. Even steaks can be mailed on dry ice, making it difficult for consumers to push away.6. Breaking into parts has amazing effectsGermany, which was defeated in the war 90 years ago, was desolate. A young German called "Sell radios, sell radios!" on the street. But because Germany was under the occupation of the coalition forces, the manufacture of radios had been banned, and even selling radios was illegal.Later, the young man prepared all the parts of the combined radio, sold box by box as toys for customers to assemble. This practice really worked, hundreds of thousands of units were sold within a year, which laid the foundation for Germany's largest electronics company.7. One dollar sales techniqueThe American Carl opened a small shop. At first, the business was sluggish. Later, after careful calculation, he made a decision that as long as the customer took out one dollar, he could purchase any item in the shop.As a result, a large number of customers were attracted, and sales exceeded those of the nearby major department stores.Later, he switched to operating a silk cloth shop and made a new business method. He decided that every purchase of $10 goods in the shop would receive a white coupon, 5 white coupons could be exchanged for a blue coupon, and 5 blue coupons could be exchanged for red. One coupon, one red coupon can choose any item in the store.This "Karl sales technique" made him a millionaire.

When esteemed mathematician and philosopher Kurt Gödel, a refugee from Nazi oppression, was being interviewed for US citizenship, the story goes, he was asked if he thought it was possible for a regime like the Nazi's to take over the United States. Gödel had apparently pored over the Constitution in anticipation of the interview and claimed to have discovered just such a loophole - to the examiner's horror.It's never been revealed what Gödel's loophole was - it's wide open to speculation - and many of the details of the story have been lost to anecdotes and retellings of variable quality. While I won't suggest that this answer is one such possibility, it does strike me as having frightening potential for leading to the kind of fascist regime Gödel escaped.While the patchwork of state and local laws governing political activities and policing would make it difficult for a party-sponsored paramilitary organization to become a national force, the heart of the answer is that there isn’t anything explicit in law to stop something like the SS from emerging in the US.The issue really hinges on the legal status of political parties in the US. They’re not expressly sanctioned by the Constitution, and other than with respect to campaign conduct and finance laws, they aren’t defined in US federal law at all. This is because elections are run at the state level, per the Constitution, and not the national level.The Republican and Democratic National Committees, for example, are private organizations that provide national coordination services to their state chapters for the purposes of selecting and supporting candidates for public office.The definitions and conduct requirements of a political party vary from state to state. In my home state of Virginia, for example a "recognized political party" is:an organization that, for at least six months preceding the filing of its nominee for the office, has had in continual existence a state central committee composed of registered voters residing in each congressional district of the Commonwealth, a party plan and bylaws, and a duly elected state chairman and secretary. [Although to receive automatic ballot access thereafter, they must then receive at least 10 percent of the vote in a statewide election]Whereas Colorado (chosen randomly) goes so far as to define “major” and “minor” political parties:"Major political party" means any political party that at the last preceding gubernatorial election was represented on the official ballot either by political party candidates or by individual nominees and whose candidate at the last preceding gubernatorial election received at least ten percent of the total gubernatorial votes cast."Minor political party" means a political party other than a major political party that satisfies one of [several] conditions set forth [in law] or has submitted a sufficient petition [signed by at least ten thousand registered electors].Now, not being an expert in election laws in all 50 States, I stand to be corrected in saying that there are not explicit prohibitions on political parties having militia or paramilitary wings – or, at the very least, political parties in the states are not defined to exclude the possibility.Going back to Virginia, an upstart political party may have on its legally required central committee a “Director for Party Security.” In the party’s bylaws that role might be defined as something innocuous like, say, “he shall provide for the physical security of party members at official party events or while conducting political duties on behalf of the party.” That could very well get a pass.If challenged, the DPS/central committee might say, “We train our volunteers to keep the peace at our events and to liaise with law enforcement if necessary.” That would probably strike most people as a really, really weird thing for a political party to care about, but there’s nothing wrong with that on its face.So let’s say this fictional party, despite its weird emphasis on the security of the party faithful, does well enough to succeed at the ballot in a couple of states. It forms a national committee (or maybe it formed the national committee first and devolved to the states, whichever), and it begins to accrue a nice little war chest from donations. It’s getting more difficult for the various state DPS’ to keep up with "maintaining security" at the growing events, though – and the quality of volunteers is too variable.One enterprising DPS starts a security consultancy where party volunteers may be sent for rigorous training – or the firm might be contracted to provide security from using its own staff (who happen to have been plucked from the party faithful). He “resigns” from official party duties to avoid the appearance of impropriety, naturally, in accepting security contracts from the party; but he does set up a Political Action Committee to make sure money goes back into the party war chest when possible.On the side, this security firm also puts in tenders for government security contracts – some of which are overseas – and because they offer cheaper rates than other firms (being partially subsidized by a new and emerging political party helps keeps costs down), they’re usually selected.Up to this point, no laws (that I'm aware of) have been broken. The party is merely trying to provide for security at its events, its volunteers are being properly trained and have not taken law enforcement into their own hands, and there is nothing preventing a party from contracting a properly licensed firm for security at its events when relying on volunteers alone is insufficient. Moreover, depending on the state in which the security firm is organized, it's probably not against the law for the senior executives to screen current and prospective employees for their political affiliation, since that is not a class explicitly protected from discrimination.I will take this moment to note that in 2014, the Republican National Committee paid (non-paramilitary) firm Securitas Security Services USA a total of $462,835 to provide security at its events. Obviously I’m not suggesting that the Republicans are starting a covert paramilitary force, just illustrating the point of legality. I’d happily be bipartisan and call out the DNC for doing likewise, but so far I can’t find any security services expenditures in their financial reporting.The next issue in turning this security force into a pseudo police force would next require the amending of state laws to allow for agents of private security firms to operate as law enforcement officers. All states have statutes governing the certification of private security officers, and these place limitations on how far they can go in preventing criminal activity. Either these restrictions would have to be relaxed, or the state would have to make it legal to privatize its law enforcement responsibilities. Many states already permit this, and the trend has been growing for a while (noting that article was written in 2007).But it’s not enough to say that a politically affiliated security firm that acquires limited police powers is on the same page as the SS. To get to that level of notoriety, there are many more hurdles that need to be considered. Certainly at the state and federal levels there are restrictions concerning voter intimidation or suppression, assaulting journalists, or attempting to “unduly influence” elected officials (much less through violence), which the SS did extensively in order to aid the Nazi Party’s rise to power.The thing about laws, though, is that they’re only as good as the people who choose to enforce them – and that’s where things could get scary, as follows (because of course I was going to accompany this answer with a micro-fiction).Gold Eagle SecurityYou’re a good citizen. You diligently pay your taxes with a sigh, and you vote in most elections – the ones that matter, anyway. You keep your politics to yourself, though, because you don’t think it’s really anybody else’s business.Recently, you heard about a new party that’s organized in your state. Supporting third parties isn’t really your thing, as your preferred party has aligned well with your beliefs, but you look them up out of due diligence.On the surface, you don’t see anything too terribly offensive in their party platform – it’s all boilerplate stuff about making the country great, supporting the individual, and keeping the government out of your business – but nothing to compel you, either. So you ignore them and figure they won’t get far.On Election Day, when you arrive at the polls, you’re a bit surprised to see that this new party has a booth set up next to the Democrats and Republicans (and that lonely Green volunteer who’s been turning up alone since time immemorial). While the other volunteers are casually dressed (the Green maybe a bit too casually), the new guy is wearing a crisp suit over a white collared shirt with an Old Glory tie. You approach him just out of curiosity.Up close, you note his lapel pin. It’s a gold bald eagle on a white background surrounded by an oak wreath. It’s bordered by a blue field with silver five-point stars.You make small talk. He moved here after his time in the Army was done. You reflexively thank him for his service, and point out the lapel pin. Something from the Army? It’s a token the party gives to combat veterans.You think that’s a little weird, but it’s not like the other parties haven’t glorified the military in some manner or another. What are you doing now that you’re out? He’s a police officer – off-duty today to work the polls – and part-time consultant for a security firm.That’s the extent of your conversation before he makes the partisan pitch you’ve been expecting. You politely nod along as he talks. He offers you a sample ballot, and you decline. You were just curious. His demeanour seems to change immediately. He’s a bit gruff when he tells you to “have a nice day” when you walk away from the booth.You give a handshake to the party volunteers you’re used to (even the lady from the “other side” who’s actually very sweet) and you go do your civic duty.When you leave the polling station, you feel like you’re being watched, but you chalk it up to a cold November morning.You check the election returns that night before going to bed, and it looks like this new party has picked up a few seats in your state legislature – mostly from the crazy part of the state (of course). It’s big news, though, because their victories have cost both parties a majority in the lower house, so they’ve become something of a power broker. They weren’t as successful in other states, though, so this might just be a flash in the pan.Your candidate made it in, though, and that’s all that really matters. He can deal with the politics in the capital. Congress hasn’t changed anyway, so what’s really going to change?A few months down the track, and you’re at the mall. The new party has a recruiting booth set up. They’ve drawn a (very) small crowd, and a couple of people are signing up. Off to the side of the young, enthusiastic volunteers, though, you notice someone in a black t-shirt and jeans and you think… A holster? What kind of idiot brings a gun to the mall?As you’re lost in thought contemplating the armed man, you bump into someone. Not just anyone. It’s the officer from the polling station – now very much on duty. You apologize, and he begrudgingly accepts.You ask if he’s here about the armed man, and he curtly reminds you that this is an open carry state, and he’s not breaking any laws. Yeah, but isn’t it weird? He has his rights.You feel a bit uneasy, so you apologize to the officer again and go about your business. As you exit the mall, you see the officer chatting it up to the armed “overseer,” as you dubbed him in your mind. When you walk by the booth, you pick up a couple of pamphlets – earning a smile from the young volunteer.One of the pamphlets touts the party’s commitment to community, including an upcoming youth retreat where children can learn outdoors and “survival” skills, to include marksmanship courses. Another one lists off volunteer opportunities, to include “security.” They all have the boilerplate party information you remember from before, and they’ve obviously co-opted the eagle as their party symbol (which annoys you a bit).As November approaches, you’re reminded that there are local seats up for election, but they’re all non-partisan. Besides, does the county sheriff seat really matter? They’re going to enforce the laws no matter who’s in office. Solidifying your decision to stay home, it rains on Election Day. You’re not even bothered to check the results the next day.Another year goes by, and the upcoming election really matters. Not only is it a presidential year, but the governor’s seat is also up. The new party (well, they’re not so new anymore) is running a candidate who’s been doing marginally well in the polls. He won’t win, but he’s forced the campaign narrative to go in ways that really unsettle you.Your friend’s car is broken, and he asks if you can ride him to the polls on the way home from work. You agree, even though you really prefer to vote in the morning, and at the end of the day the two of you head over together.The moment you pull into the parking lot, you feel like something’s not right.You don’t see that Green volunteer anywhere, but he might have just rolled out. No, that's not it.Your friend points it out. They're here. A lot of them. They're in a group, happily chatting and having a laugh. You immediately spot the officer, who seems to be leading the pack. Surely he's off duty, so why's he in uniform? The rest of his group are in matching long-sleeve shirts and dark slacks – a casual uniform of sorts.They're hanging out by the entrance, so there's no way to avoid them. As you pass, you note one of the long-sleeved young men has the same lapel pin as the officer. You also notice that the police officer isn’t wearing the local sheriff’s patch on his uniform. He’s with a private security outfit. What is he doing guarding a polling station?Just as you think you're going to walk past without recognition, your friend mutters something aloud about "fucking jackbooted assholes," and their laughter stops. You swear you can hear the air crack as they turn their heads towards you and your friend.You stammer out something about that not being cool and quicken your step. When you approach the usual bunch of partisan volunteers, you can tell that they look a bit stressed and wary - even that sweet lady. Your friend makes a show of taking one of their sample ballots, and you two go in to vote.When you leave, you try to walk on the other side of the parking lot, but your friend stridently passes the group of partymen with his sample ballot in hand.Unlike a few years back, you know you're being watched. You leave quickly with your friend, who won't stop ranting about those assholes until you drop him off at his place.When you get home, you immediately switch on the news. The party's candidate hasn't made it to the Governor's House, but he did better than expected. Other candidates were more successful, though. One state's legislature is now dominated by the party.You sleep uneasily.In the morning, the tires of your car are slashed, and its windshield has been broken out. Your insurance company requires a police report. That's fine, because you know exactly whom you want to report for the crime.The officer from the polling station responds to your call. Send someone from the actual police department! This is a non-violent crime, which we’re contracted for. I want someone else. Nobody’s available right now. I want a supervisor.Why are you being hostile? His interview of you proceeds along that theme. What's wrong with you? What have you done that would upset someone? If you were asleep, how could you be so sure who did it? You'll get a copy of the report in the mail.After he leaves, it occurs to you to call your friend and check on him.He doesn't answer.You call the sheriff's office to lodge a complaint, but you’re referred to his firm’s customer service line. No, that’s not good enough. They invite you to come in and lodge a complaint in person. You're angry enough to go and give them a piece of your mind. They get you in with a deputy sheriff.That cop is a jerk! He doesn’t work for us, and besides, you’d be his first complaint. He's got a perfect service record. Yeah, well, don’t send them to my house again. Have to, unless it’s a violent crime. Why do you let your officers engage in politics? Their own time is their own business. What are you going to do about the people who trashed my car? You don't have any evidence of who did it.While the deputy is taking down your complaint, you take a brief scan of his desk. He has a golden eagle lapel pin. Your blood boils.Why do you have a political pin in your office? It was a gift, not political. So you're not in the party? What party do you belong to? None of your business! Likewise.You leave, and on your way to work (now very late), your friend calls you back. He's in the hospital. Someone jumped him when he was leaving his house. He was on the ground and out cold before he could get a look at who was responsible. But he's sure of who it was that got in a few blows – or one of them, anyway.You both are. This has to stop.You check when your county board is meeting, and you intend to raise the issue of the privatization of the police force. As you build your case by cruising around online, you find allegations that the security firm running “non-violent” crimes in your county has deep connections to the emerging political party. They’ve even been contracted by the Federal government to conduct security operations overseas. There are rumors that they’re looking to expand into private prison services.You’ve seen enough.When you’re given your five minutes to make your presentation to the county board, you try to keep yourself from coming off as a conspiracy theorist as you lay out your concerns. Still, you can tell that the panel is not entirely persuaded. At the end of your speech, the Chairman insincerely thanks you, reminds you that this was put up to a vote in the last election, and it passed, and this has freed up the county sheriff to pursue more serious crimes.I want to put it back on the ballot. The law doesn’t authorize this to be put up by popular referendum. Then make a motion! We’ll consider it.You leave the hall dejected. The county board doesn’t act.The Midterms are coming up. You're out mowing your yard when you spot a college-aged kid going door-to-door, dropping off pamphlets. It strikes you as a bit unusual, because normally your district isn't competitive enough to warrant volunteers showing up.As he approaches your house, a pair of volunteers from the ascending party also walk up the street. One of them is a particularly burly looking fellow. When they spot the other volunteer, they stop going house to house and approach him. You get a bad feeling and go inside to get your phone to call the police.By the time you're back outside, the two thugs are wailing on the volunteer. You charge into the fray, shouting at them to back off. You've got the police on the line, and you've taken their picture, so they'd best stick around.They're smirking as you read them your version of the Riot Act, and help the battered volunteer in your house. It turns out he's not from your party, but it doesn't matter.The contracted officer you've encountered now too many times shows up.I thought you only did non-violent crimes. Our services were expanded. Did you see who started the fight? No, but of course it was them. They say the volunteer pushed them first. Bullshit. But you didn't see it.He arrests the volunteer. You threaten to call the news and highlight this perversion of the law. "Do what you have to do."The paper already has a reporter assigned to cover the spate of election-related violence. She comes over and interviews you. You don’t care if you sound like a nut job as you run through your personal history of unease about the state of politics since the party showed up. She seems entirely sympathetic.You're called to court as a witness a few days down the track. The reporter is there, too. The thugs argue self-defense - they just wanted to talk, and he lashed out. The volunteer says they had been harassing him all day. You can't say who threw the first punch, but you know the thugs showed up looking for a fight. The contracted officer says he's responded to your house before, where you had a paranoid go at party members and probably weren't an unbiased observer.The judge tosses the case.The reporter's story runs a few days later, alleging "volunteers" of the party have been implicated in numerous acts of violence in the run-up to the election. To your disappointment, though, there’s no mention in the article of their connection to the party-sponsored security firm. The state and national party organizations denounce politically motivated violence, though insist on their volunteers' innocence. The other parties are working together to discredit them, they counter, because they're afraid of how quickly they've come to power.Because of the danger to their volunteers, they say, they're going to increase security at their events. If elected, they also promise to clamp down on "un-American" politically motivated violence through strict laws at the state and federal level.Like hell you're going to let them be elected!The day of the Midterms, you leave your house and find a group of men at your car.They ask if you need a lift to the polls. Fuck off! You see that your tires are slashed. I'm calling the cops!You don't see the fist that knocks you out.You miss the election while in the hospital. Turnout for your (and the other) party is at an "historic low." Your incumbent Congressman has narrowly lost; and while the Senator won, it was by the lowest margin in his career. The ascending party has secured power in numerous states.When you get home, you try to call the reporter who covered your day in court. She died in a hit-and-run accident months ago. The car that struck her was stolen, and the driver fled the scene. Despite pleas from her family, the police closed the investigation with no suspects.This can't be happening. Not in America! There are laws against this bullshit!Still, you know you're on the party's shit list, and you'll be damned if you let this happen to you again. Words from years earlier pop into your head, "This is an open carry state."You buy a gun.Local elections are coming up again. The sheriff's seat is up. You're damned sure you're going to vote him out of office. You'll vote for whomever promises to fire whatever’s left of the goddamned police force! That’s how you feel, anyway, until you see who’s opposing him for the office.It’s your favourite officer.Oh, fuck no!Well, surely you can at least clean up the County Board! That will be one way to sort out this mess. When you look up the "non-partisan" candidates, though, almost all of them are tied to the party in some manner.Still, there are some who have no apparent affiliation with the party – even if that means they’re affiliated with the other party. You don’t care. Anybody else is good. You even recognize the old lady from your polling station among the candidates. Surely she’ll get your vote!On Election Day, you hurry past the large group of partymen – to your relief, you don’t see that “officer” around – ignoring the sample ballots they thrust at you on the way and get feel relieved once you get into the booth. Once you’ve voted for the local candidates, or at least the ones you can stomach, you flip over to some of the state-wide ballot propositions.One of them is to amend the state’s constitution to define a “hate crime” to include crimes based on political affiliation.You vote in favour of that one without hesitation.When the results come in that night, your heart sinks. There’s a new sheriff in town, and you’re pretty sure he hates you. The new County Board doesn’t look much better. The lady from across the aisle seems to be the only person affiliated with the established parties to make it in. The security party expanded its hold in the state legislature.The party is running a candidate for President, and your stomach churns in thinking what his victory might mean for the country. You decide that you can’t keep your politics to yourself anymore, and so for the first time in your life you volunteer for a political campaign.They’re elated to have you on the team! Finding volunteers this year has been difficult to say the least. They recommend you also become a precinct captain for the party to help corral other volunteers. You try, but you find out for yourself just how hard it is to get people to sign up to help with the campaign – even using the party’s list of stalwart supporters.As you’re out canvassing one day, you notice a car has been following you from block to block. You immediately recall the incident from two years ago, and start on your way home. The car follows you. Even though your house is just two miles away, you take an hour to get there as you take the most convoluted route you can imagine to get there – the car following you the whole way.You want to call the police, but you know how useless that will be.You finally get home. The tailing car parks in front of your house. You run inside and grab your gun, and emerge with it in hand just as three people step out of the car. You raise the pistol as you warn them off, peppering your threat with all manner of slurs. It works – the men back down, get back in their car, and drive off.An hour later, there’s a knock on your door. The sheriff is here to arrest you personally.It’s an open carry state!That doesn’t give you the right to wave your gun around like a lunatic. They were following me! That’s not what they say – and in any case, you didn’t call us. I want a lawyer! You have your rights.Your lawyer does the best job he can, really, but your documented history of hostility towards party volunteers makes it seem pretty obvious that you have a bias against them. The three of them testify that they were doing nothing more than what you allege to have been doing – supporting your candidate for office, as the Constitution allows you to do freely and without harassment.Thanks to the Constitutional amendment that you supported last election, you are convicted of a politically motivated hate crime, which has been aggravated by your use of a firearm. Neither you nor your lawyer are aware that the judge presiding over your case is receiving kickbacks from both the party and the state to ensure that the newly opened private prison meets the occupancy quota guaranteed by its contract, and that contributed more to your harsh sentencing than anything else.You watch from your prison cell, guarded by men with gold eagle lapel pins, as the party locks up majorities Congress, and its presidential candidate achieves one of the greatest electoral landslides in modern US history.And you were once such a good citizen.Thanks to Jon for the A2A (and my apologies for spending too much time on this and let the request expire).

Hmm… noYou can’t file a police report because you are not a policeman and the question would really be could you convince a policeman to file a police report because you claim that someone has been verbally harassing you at some time over some issue and that answer is almost a certain yes:You could probably find some cop somewhere who would file a police report concerning your claim that you not only say Bigfoot but you think it was a girl Bigfoot and she might be pregnant now but… why would you waste your time because a police report is of no use to you in any way.It sounds as if what you want to know is can you cause criminal charges to be filed against someone for saying something that you didn’t want to hear and the initial answer to that would be no and that is a good thing and maybe but only if well… first let’s talk about the bizarre modern idea that as an American you have a right to not be bothered or upset in any way for any reason at any time.This has never been true and in fact the very first of the amendments one hears so much about includes freedom of speech and speech can be sort of abusive at times but um… that would be a good thing right?As with just about everything there are exceptions of course: a spouse who constantly cuts down the other person doesn’t need to be charged with verbally abusing a spouse but needs to be an x-spouse or at least shown that this will soon occur if the behavior isn’t corrected as soon as possible.And then credit should be given when the attempt is made with the understanding that changing behavior that is often not conscious but formed by bad habits will be a work in progress for at least as long as it took for the habit to form.It is also a possibility that what is really being asked is can you do anything to stop someone from harassing you and the answer to that is SURE… why not?609.748 HARASSMENT; RESTRAINING ORDER.Subdivision 1.Definition.For the purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them in this subdivision.(a) "Harassment" includes:(1) a single incident of physical or sexual assault, a single incident of harassment under section 609.749, subdivision 2, clause (8), a single incident of nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images under section 617.261, or repeated incidents of intrusive or unwanted acts, words, or gestures that have a substantial adverse effect or are intended to have a substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of another, regardless of the relationship between the actor and the intended target;(3) a pattern of attending public events after being notified that the actor's presence at the event is harassing to another.(This bullshit of course is troubling because had I known it could be done I would have filed a restraining order against Hillary Clinton attending any of the Democratic ralley(s) on the basis that every time she did she was harrassing me! Sound stupid well yes it does doesn’t it?)(b) "Respondent" includes any adults or juveniles alleged to have engaged in harassment or organizations alleged to have sponsored or promoted harassment.(And again Jehovah's Witnesses knocking on the door come on people!)(c) "Targeted residential picketing" includes the following acts when committed on more than one occasion:(1) marching, standing, or patrolling by one or more persons directed solely at a particular residential building in a manner that adversely affects the safety, security, or privacy of an occupant of the building; or(2) marching, standing, or patrolling by one or more persons which prevents an occupant of a residential building from gaining access to or exiting from the property on which the residential building is located.Subd. 2.Restraining order; court jurisdiction.A person who is a victim of harassment may seek a restraining order from the district court in the manner provided in this section. The parent, guardian, or stepparent of a minor who is a victim of harassment may seek a restraining order from the district court on behalf of the minor. An application for relief under this section may be filed in the county of residence of either party or in the county in which the alleged harassment occurred. There are no residency requirements that apply to a petition for a harassment restraining order.Subd. 3.Contents of petition; hearing; notice.(a) A petition for relief must allege facts sufficient to show the following:(1) the name of the alleged harassment victim;(2) the name of the respondent; and(3) that the respondent has engaged in harassment.A petition for relief must state whether the petitioner has had a previous restraining order in effect against the respondent. The petition shall be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath stating the specific facts and circumstances from which relief is sought. The court shall provide simplified forms and clerical assistance to help with the writing and filing of a petition under this section and shall advise the petitioner of the right to sue in forma pauperis under section 563.01. The court shall advise the petitioner of the right to request a hearing. If the petitioner does not request a hearing, the court shall advise the petitioner that the respondent may request a hearing and that notice of the hearing date and time will be provided to the petitioner by mail at least five days before the hearing. Upon receipt of the petition and a request for a hearing by the petitioner, the court shall order a hearing. Personal service must be made upon the respondent not less than five days before the hearing. If personal service cannot be completed in time to give the respondent the minimum notice required under this paragraph, the court may set a new hearing date. Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring a hearing on a matter that has no merit.(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), the order for a hearing and a temporary order issued under subdivision 4 may be served on the respondent by means of a one-week published notice under section 645.11, if:(1) the petitioner files an affidavit with the court stating that an attempt at personal service made by a peace officer was unsuccessful because the respondent is avoiding service by concealment or otherwise; and(2) a copy of the petition and order for hearing and any temporary restraining order has been mailed to the respondent at the respondent's residence or place of business, if the respondent is an organization, or the respondent's residence or place of business is not known to the petitioner.(c) Regardless of the method of service, if the respondent is a juvenile, whenever possible, the court also shall have notice of the pendency of the case and of the time and place of the hearing served by mail at the last known address upon any parent or guardian of the juvenile respondent who is not the petitioner.(d) A request for a hearing under this subdivision must be made within 20 days of service of the petition.Subd. 3a.Filing fee; cost of service.The filing fees for a restraining order under this section are waived for the petitioner and the respondent if the petition alleges acts that would constitute a violation of section 609.749, subdivision 2, 3, 4, or 5, or sections 609.342 to 609.3451. The court administrator and any peace officer in this state shall perform their duties relating to service of process without charge to the petitioner. The court shall direct payment of the reasonable costs of service of process if served by a private process server when a peace officer is unavailable or if service is made by publication.Subd. 4.Temporary restraining order; relief by court.(a) The court may issue a temporary restraining order that provides any or all of the following:(1) orders the respondent to cease or avoid the harassment of another person; or(2) orders the respondent to have no contact with another person.(b) The court may issue an order under paragraph (a) if the petitioner files a petition in compliance with subdivision 3 and if the court finds reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has engaged in harassment. When a petition alleges harassment as defined by subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clause (1), the petition must further allege an immediate and present danger of harassment before the court may issue a temporary restraining order under this section. When signed by a referee, the temporary order becomes effective upon the referee's signature.(c) Notice need not be given to the respondent before the court issues a temporary restraining order under this subdivision. A copy of the restraining order must be served on the respondent along with the order for hearing and petition, as provided in subdivision 3. If the respondent is a juvenile, whenever possible, a copy of the restraining order, along with notice of the pendency of the case and the time and place of the hearing, shall also be served by mail at the last known address upon any parent or guardian of the juvenile respondent who is not the petitioner. A temporary restraining order may be entered only against the respondent named in the petition.(d) The temporary restraining order is in effect until a hearing is held on the issuance of a restraining order under subdivision 5. The court shall hold the hearing on the issuance of a restraining order if the petitioner requests a hearing. The hearing may be continued by the court upon a showing that the respondent has not been served with a copy of the temporary restraining order despite the exercise of due diligence or if service is made by published notice under subdivision 3 and the petitioner files the affidavit required under that subdivision.(e) If the temporary restraining order has been issued and the respondent requests a hearing, the hearing shall be scheduled by the court upon receipt of the respondent's request. Service of the notice of hearing must be made upon the petitioner not less than five days prior to the hearing. The court shall serve the notice of the hearing upon the petitioner by mail in the manner provided in the Rules of Civil Procedure for pleadings subsequent to a complaint and motions and shall also mail notice of the date and time of the hearing to the respondent. In the event that service cannot be completed in time to give the respondent or petitioner the minimum notice required under this subdivision, the court may set a new hearing date.(f) A request for a hearing under this subdivision must be made within 20 days of the date of completed service of the petition.Subd. 5.Restraining order.(a) The court may issue a restraining order that provides any or all of the following:(1) orders the respondent to cease or avoid the harassment of another person; or(2) orders the respondent to have no contact with another person.(b) The court may issue an order under paragraph (a) if all of the following occur:(1) the petitioner has filed a petition under subdivision 3;(2) a peace officer has served respondent with a copy of the temporary restraining order obtained under subdivision 4, and with notice of the right to request a hearing, or service has been made by publication under subdivision 3, paragraph (b); and(3) the court finds at the hearing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent has engaged in harassment.A restraining order may be issued only against the respondent named in the petition; except that if the respondent is an organization, the order may be issued against and apply to all of the members of the organization. If the court finds that the petitioner has had two or more previous restraining orders in effect against the same respondent or the respondent has violated a prior or existing restraining order on two or more occasions, relief granted by the restraining order may be for a period of up to 50 years. In all other cases, relief granted by the restraining order must be for a fixed period of not more than two years. When a referee presides at the hearing on the petition, the restraining order becomes effective upon the referee's signature.(c) An order issued under this subdivision must be personally served upon the respondent.(d) If the court orders relief for a period of up to 50 years under paragraph (a), the respondent named in the restraining order may request to have the restraining order vacated or modified if the order has been in effect for at least five years and the respondent has not violated the order. Application for relief under this paragraph must be made in the county in which the restraining order was issued. Upon receipt of the request, the court shall set a hearing date. Personal service must be made upon the petitioner named in the restraining order not less than 30 days before the date of the hearing. At the hearing, the respondent named in the restraining order has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that there has been a material change in circumstances and that the reasons upon which the court relied in granting the restraining order no longer apply and are unlikely to occur. If the court finds that the respondent named in the restraining order has met the burden of proof, the court may vacate or modify the order. If the court finds that the respondent named in the restraining order has not met the burden of proof, the court shall deny the request and no request may be made to vacate or modify the restraining order until five years have elapsed from the date of denial. An order vacated or modified under this paragraph must be personally served on the petitioner named in the restraining order.Subd. 5a.Short-form notification.(a) In lieu of personal service of a harassment restraining order, a peace officer may serve a person with a short-form notification. The short-form notification must include the following clauses: the respondent's name; the respondent's date of birth, if known; the petitioner's name; the names of other protected parties; the date and county in which the temporary restraining order or restraining order was filed; the court file number; the hearing date and time, if known; the conditions that apply to the respondent, either in checklist form or handwritten; and the name of the judge who signed the order.The short-form notification must be in bold print in the following form:"The restraining order is now enforceable. You must report to your nearest sheriff's office or county court to obtain a copy of the restraining order. You are subject to arrest and may be charged with a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony if you violate any of the terms of the restraining order or this short-form notification."(b) Upon verification of the identity of the respondent and the existence of an unserved harassment restraining order against the respondent, a law enforcement officer may detain the respondent for a reasonable time necessary to complete and serve the short-form notification.(c) When service is made by short-form notification, it may be proved by the affidavit of the law enforcement officer making the service.(d) For service under this section only, service upon an individual may occur at any time, including Sundays and legal holidays.(e) The superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension shall provide the short form to law enforcement agencies.[See Note.]Subd. 5b.Service by others.In addition to peace officers, corrections officers, including but not limited to probation officers, court services officers, parole officers, and employees of jails or correctional facilities, may serve a temporary restraining order or restraining order.Subd. 6.Violation of restraining order.(a) A person who violates a restraining order issued under this section is subject to the penalties provided in paragraphs (b) to (d).(b) Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (c) and (d), when a temporary restraining order or a restraining order is granted under this section and the respondent knows of the order, violation of the order is a misdemeanor.(c) A person is guilty of a gross misdemeanor who violates the order within ten years of a previous qualified domestic violence-related offense conviction or adjudication of delinquency.(d) A person is guilty of a felony and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both, if the person violates the order:(1) within ten years of the first of two or more previous qualified domestic violence-related offense convictions or adjudications of delinquency;(2) because of the victim's or another's actual or perceived race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability as defined in section 363A.03, age, or national origin;(3) by falsely impersonating another;(4) while possessing a dangerous weapon;(5) with an intent to influence or otherwise tamper with a juror or a judicial proceeding or with intent to retaliate against a judicial officer, as defined in section 609.415, or a prosecutor, defense attorney, or officer of the court, because of that person's performance of official duties in connection with a judicial proceeding; or(6) against a victim under the age of 18, if the respondent is more than 36 months older than the victim.(e) A person who commits violations in two or more counties may be prosecuted in any county in which one of the acts was committed for all acts in violation of this section.(f) A person may be prosecuted at the place where any call is made or received or, in the case of wireless or electronic communication or any communication made through any available technologies, where the actor or victim resides, or in the jurisdiction of the victim's designated address if the victim participates in the address confidentiality program established under chapter 5B.(g) A peace officer shall arrest without a warrant and take into custody a person whom the peace officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order issued under subdivision 4 or 5 if the existence of the order can be verified by the officer.(h) A violation of a temporary restraining order or restraining order shall also constitute contempt of court.(i) Upon the filing of an affidavit by the petitioner, any peace officer, or an interested party designated by the court, alleging that the respondent has violated an order issued under subdivision 4 or 5, the court may issue an order to the respondent requiring the respondent to appear within 14 days and show cause why the respondent should not be held in contempt of court. The court also shall refer the violation of the order to the appropriate prosecuting authority for possible prosecution under paragraph (b), (c), or (d).Subd. 7.Copy to law enforcement agency.An order granted under this section shall be forwarded by the court administrator within 24 hours to the local law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the residence of the applicant. Each appropriate law enforcement agency shall make available to other law enforcement officers through a system for verification, information as to the existence and status of any order issued under this section.Subd. 8.Notice.(a) An order granted under this section must contain a conspicuous notice to the respondent:(1) of the specific conduct that will constitute a violation of the order;(2) that violation of an order is either (i) a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for up to 90 days or a fine of up to $1,000, or both, (ii) a gross misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of up to $3,000, or both, or (iii) a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to five years or a fine of up to $10,000, or both; and(3) that a peace officer must arrest without warrant and take into custody a person if the peace officer has probable cause to believe the person has violated a restraining order.(b) If the court grants relief for a period of up to 50 years under subdivision 5, the order must also contain a conspicuous notice to the respondent that the respondent must wait five years to seek a modification of the order.Subd. 9.Effect on local ordinances.Nothing in this section shall supersede or preclude the continuation or adoption of any local ordinance which applies to a broader scope of targeted residential picketing conduct than that described in subdivision 1.§Subd. 10.Prohibition against employer retaliation.(a) An employer shall not discharge, discipline, threaten, otherwise discriminate against, or penalize an employee regarding the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, location, or privileges of employment, because the employee took reasonable time off from work to obtain or attempt to obtain relief under this section. Except in cases of imminent danger to the health or safety of the employee or the employee's child, or unless impracticable, an employee who is absent from the workplace shall give 48 hours' advance notice to the employer. Upon request of the employer, the employee shall provide verification that supports the employee's reason for being absent from the workplace. All information related to the employee's leave pursuant to this section shall be kept confidential by the employer.(b) An employer who violates paragraph (a) is guilty of a misdemeanor and may be punished for contempt of court. In addition, the court shall order the employer to pay back wages and offer job reinstatement to any employee discharged from employment in violation of paragraph (a).(c) In addition to any remedies otherwise provided by law, an employee injured by a violation of paragraph (a) may bring a civil action for recovery of damages, together with costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, and may receive such injunctive and other equitable relief, including reinstatement, as determined by the court.Yea there you go: or maybe just telling the person to step off or having someone else do it but then no… that means that the verbal abuser would just file a harassment order against the person who told him/her to stop harassing and that would require the second harassment order recipient to then be forced to file a harassment order against the filer of that order and eventually someone in my family will come along and simply choose to spend some time in jail or prison just to stop the madness and teach a few lessons about tolerance and the rights and duties concerning civil discourse and my head is aching just thinking of the drama that quite frankly doesn’t really have to exist.