Philadelphia Police Directives Pdf: Fill & Download for Free

Yes, everyone could take advantage of learned sex/gender resources, from pre-school and beyond school,… especially for personal service providers such as people who deal with customers, that is, just about everyone, from bureaucratic clerks in government, to over-the-counter retail clerks, sales people, especially of big ticket items like houses and cars, bosses, fellow workers, designers.Hmm … everyone could learn how to better wrestle our prejudices into submission,… and learn to treat everyone with equivalent consideration, the same consideration we want for, or think we give to, ourselves.Let’s all look stuff up: modern gender studies for all ages- - - - - - - - - -In response to others:Prior response:“… Honestly the answer is a resounding NO. What kind of job can you expect to get with that BS? While learning something purely for a job isn’t necessarily the whole purpose, a college class should at least teach the student how to think (not what to think). Gender studies is just PC indoctrination …”Authors, science researchers, and advisors to commerce, manufacturing, advertising ( billions of dollars a year ), government agencies, and so on, earn a great deal of money because they are highly valued, so, yes, “what kind of job” is a great question, already answered by productive employment around the world.No, “gender studies” is NOT “PC Police and Courteous” finishing school, you got yourself some studying to do:“… Gender studies is a field of interdisciplinary study devoted to analysing gender identity and gendered representation. This field includes women's studies (concerning women, feminism, gender, and politics), men's studies and queer studies. Sometimes, gender studies is offered together with study of sexuality …” - Gender studies - WikipediaReferences^ "Gender Studies". Whitman College. Archived from the original on 12 December 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2012.^ Krijnen, Tonny; van Bauwel, Sofie (2015). Gender And Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-69540-4.^ "About – Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality (CSGS)". The University of Chicago. Retrieved 1 May 2012.^ Healey, J. F. (2003). Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Class: the Sociology of Group Conflict and Change.^ "Department of Gender Studies". Indiana University (IU Bloomington). Retrieved 1 May 2012.^ de Beauvoir, S. (1949, 1989). "The Second Sex".^ Garrett, S. (1992). "Gender", p. vii.^ Salime, Zakia. Between Feminism and Islam: Human Rights and Sharia Law in Morocco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.^ Essed, Philomena; Goldberg, David Theo; Kobayashi, Audrey (2009). A Companion to Gender Studies. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-8808-1. Retrieved 7 November 2011.^ Jump up to:a b c Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. pp. 163–71, 177–8.^ Anne-Marie Smith, Julia Kristeva: Speaking the Unspeakable (Pluto Press, 1988).^ Griselda Pollock, "Inscriptions in the Feminine" and "Introduction" to "The With-In-Visible Screen", in: Inside the Visible edited by Catherine de Zegher. MIT Press, 1996.^ Jump up to:a b Ettinger, Bracha L. (2007). "Diotima and the Matrixial Transference: Psychoanalytical Encounter-Event as Pregnancy in Beauty". In Van der Merwe, Chris N.; Viljoen, Hein (eds.). Across the Threshold. NY: Peter Lang.^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (2010). "(M)Other Re-spect: Maternal Subjectivity, the Ready-made mother-monster and The Ethics of Respecting". Studies in the Maternal. 2 (1–2). doi:10.16995/sim.150. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013.^ Understanding the Complexities of Gender: Sam Killermann at TEDxUofIChicago. YouTube. 3 May 2013. Retrieved 26 July 2015.^ Horney, Karen (1973), "On the Genesis of the Castration Complex in Women (1922)", in Miller, J. B. (ed.), Psychoanalysis and Women, New York: Bruner/Mazel.^ Lacan, Jacques (1975). Encore. Paris: Seuil.^ Jump up to:a b Wright, E. (2003). Lacan and Postfeminism (Postmodern Encounters).^ Kristeva, Julia (1982). Powers of Horror.^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (1992). "Matrix and metramorphosis". differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 4 (3): 176–208.^ Bracha L. Ettinger, The Matrixial Borderspace. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006 (articles 1994–99). ISBN 0-8166-3587-0.^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (May 2006). "Matrixial Trans-subjectivity". Theory, Culture & Society. 23 (2–3): 218–222. doi:10.1177/026327640602300247.^ Public lecture at EGS (2012) on YouTube^ Pollock, Griselda (2007). Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive. Routledge.^ Grosz, Elizabeth (1990). Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. London: Routledge.^ Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.^ Ettinger, Bracha L. (2006), "The Matrixial Borderspace", in Ettinger, Bracha L.(ed.), Collected Essays from 1994–1999, University of Minnesota Press^ Gallop, Jane (1993). The Daughter's Seduction: Feminism and Psychoanalysis. Cornell University Press.^ Chaudoye, Guillemine; Cupa, Dominique; Parat, Hélène (2011), "Judith Butler", in Chaudoye, Guillemine; Cupa, Dominique; Parat, Hélène (eds.), Le Sexuel, ses différences et ses genres, Paris: EDK Editions^ Jean-Claude Guillebaud, Armand Abécassis, Alain Houziaux, La psychanalyse peut-elle guérir? Paris: Éditions de l'Atelier, 2005, p. 43.^ Butler, Judith; Fassin, Éric; Wallach Scott, Joan (May 2006). "Pour ne pas en finir avec le 'genre'... table ronde" [For more on 'gender'... round table]. Sociétés & Représentations. 2 (24): 285–306. doi:10.3917/sr.024.0285.^ Beaune, Daniel; Rea, Caterina (2010). Psychanalyse sans Œdipe: Antigone, genre et subversion. Paris: L'Harmattan. p. 78.^ Mica Howe & Sarah A. Aguier (eds). He said, She Says. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2001.^ Jump up to:a b Vanda Zajko & Miriam Leonard (eds). Laughing with Medusa. Oxford University Press, 2006.^ Humm, Maggie, Modernist Women and Visual Cultures. Rutgers University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-8135-3266-3^ Nina Cornietz, Dangerous Women, Deadly Words. Stanford University Press, 1999.^ Grebowicz, M. (2007). Gender After Lyotard. NY: SUNY Press, 2007.^ Zohar, Ayelet (ed.), PostGender. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009.^ Benhabib, S. (1995). "Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange", and Butler, J. (1995), "Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange".^ "Gender and Sexuality Studies – New York University". http://nyu.edu. Retrieved 26 July 2015.^ E. Anthony Rotundo (13 May 1994). American Manhood: Transformations In Masculinity From The Revolution To The Modern Era. ISBN 9780465001699.^ Reeser, Masculinities in Theory, 2010.^ "Lesbian-Feminism and Queer Theory: Another "Battle of the Sexes"?". Amy Goodloe. Retrieved 26 July 2015.^ "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis," American Historical Review 91, No. 5 (December 1986).^ Chafetz, Janet Saltzman. Handbook of the Sociology of Gender. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 1999. Print.^ Jump up to:a b Douglas, Fedwa. Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender. Detroit: Macmillan Reference, 2007. Print.^ Liddington, Jill. "HISTORY, FEMINISM AND GENDER STUDIES". University of Leeds Centre for Interdisciplinary Gender Studies: Working Paper 1 Feminist Scholarship: within/across/between/beyond the disciplines.^ Jaschik, Scott (10 November 2005). "Indiana Creates First Gender Studies PhD". The last decade has seen the number of women's studies PhD programs grow to at least 10 – most of them relatively new. Last week, Indiana University's board approved the creation of a program that will be both similar and different from those 10: the first doctoral program in the United States exclusively in gender studies.^ FaithWorld (26 October 2015). "Kabul University unlikely host for first Afghan women's studies programme". Analysis & Opinion. Retrieved 2 November 2015.^ Laurie, Timothy; Hickey-Moody, Anna (2015). "Geophilosophies of Masculinity: Remapping Gender, Aesthetics and Knowledge" (PDF). Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities. 20 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2015.1017359.^ Jump up to:a b c d The World Bank. "Gender in East Asia and Pacific", Social Development. The World Bank, 2013. Web. March 2015.^ "Gender in East Asia and Pacific". The World Bank.^ Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. p. 9.^ Butler, Judith (2011). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9781136807183.^ Bryan Palmer, Descent into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History, Trent University (Peterborough, Canada) 1990^ Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies. Lexington Books; Expanded edition, 2003.^ Butler, Judith (Summer 1994). "Feminism by any other name (Judith Butler interviews Rosi Braidotti)" (PDF). differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 6(2–3): 44–45.^ Thomas, Calvin, ed., "Introduction: Identification, Appropriation, Proliferation", Straight with a Twist: Queer Theory and the Subject of Heterosexuality. University of Illinois Press, 2000.^ Newsome, John (4 October 2016). "Pope warns of 'ideological colonization' in transgender teachings". CNN.^ Harsin, Jayson (2018), "Tactical Connecting and (Im-)Mobilizing in the French Boycott School Day Campaign and Anti-Gender Theory Movement", Global Cultures of Contestation, Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 193–214, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63982-6_10, ISBN 9783319639819^ Bruno Perreau, Queer Theory: The French Response, Stanford University Press, 2016.^ Harsin, Jayson (1 March 2018). "Post-Truth Populism: The French Anti-Gender Theory Movement and Cross-Cultural Similarities". Communication, Culture and Critique. 11 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1093/ccc/tcx017. ISSN 1753-9129.^ Urban, Rebecca (9 February 2017). "Gender theory banned in NSW classrooms". The Australian. Archived from the original on 9 February 2017. Retrieved 2 November 2017.^ Global, The Conversation (14 October 2016). "How Hungary and Poland have silenced women and stifled human rights". Huffington Post. Retrieved 31 October 2018.^ "Anti-Gender Movements on the Rise?" (PDF). Publication Series on Democracy. 38.^ Ferris-Rotman, Amie. "Putin's War on Women". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 31 October 2018.^ "'Traditional values' for the 99%? The new gender ideology in Russia". Engenderings. 15 January 2018. Retrieved 31 October 2018.^ Oppenheim, Maya (24 October 2018). "Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban bans gender studies programmes". The Independent. Retrieved 17 October 2018.^ Branigan, Tania (20 May 2009). "China voices: the professor of gender studies". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 October 2018.BibliographyArmstrong, Carol; de Zegher, Catherine (27 October 2006). Women Artists at the Millennium. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-01226-3. OCLC 62766150.Berger, Anne Emmanuelle (September 2016). "Gender springtime in Paris: a twenty-first century tale of seasons". differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 27 (2): 1–26. doi:10.1215/10407391-3621685.Boone, Joseph Allen; Cadden, Michael, eds. (1990). Engendering Men: The Question of Male Feminist Criticism. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415902557. OCLC20992567.Butler, Judith (16 December 1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of 'Sex'. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-90366-0. OCLC 27897792.Butler, Judith (Summer 1994). "Feminism by any other name (Judith Butler interviews Rosi Braidotti)" (PDF). differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 6 (2–3): 272–361.Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-92499-3. OCLC 41326734.Cante, Richard C. (March 2008). Gay Men and the Forms of Contemporary US Culture. London: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-7230-2. OCLC 173218594.Cárdenas, Micha and Barbara Fornssler, 2010. Trans Desire/Affective Cyborgs. New York: Atropos press. ISBN 0-9825309-9-4Clark, April K. (March 2017). "Updating the gender gap(s): a multilevel approach to what underpins changing cultural attitudes". Politics & Gender. 13 (1): 26–56. doi:10.1017/S1743923X16000520.Cranny-Francis, Anne; Kirkby, Joan; Stavropoulos, Pam; Waring, Wendy (28 November 2002). Gender studies: terms and debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN978-0-333-77612-4. OCLC 50645644.De Beauvoir, Simone (December 1989). The Second Sex. Translated by Borde, Constance; Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila (Reissue ed.). New York: Vintage. ISBN 978-0-333-77612-4. OCLC 50645644.Ettinger, Bracha L. (30 September 2001). "The Red Cow Effect". In Howe, Mica; Aguiar, Sarah A. (eds.). He Said, She Says: An RSVP to the Male Text. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 57–88. ISBN 978-0-8386-3915-3. OCLC 46472137.Ettinger, Bracha L. (January 2006). Massumi, Brian (ed.). The Matrixial Borderspace (Theory Out of Bounds). Foreword by Judith Butler, Introduction by Griselda Pollock. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-3587-0. OCLC 62177997.Ettinger, Bracha L., 2006. "From Proto-ethical Compassion to Responsibility: Besidedness, and the three Primal Mother-Phantasies of Not-enoughness, Devouring and Abandonment". Athena: Philosophical Studies. Vol. 2. ISSN 1822-5047.Farrell, Warren (31 January 2001) [First published in 1993 as The Myth of Male Power: Why Men are the Disposable Sex]. The Myth of Male Power (Reprint ed.). New York: Berkley Publishing Corporation. ISBN 978-0425181447.Farrell, Warren; Svoboda, Steven; Sterba, James P. (10 October 2007). Does Feminism Discriminate Against Men? A Debate (Point/Counterpoint). Oxford University Press. ASIN B019L52IHW.Foucault, Michel (1 November 1988). The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality. 3(Reprint ed.). Vintage Books USA. ISBN 978-0-394-74155-0. OCLC20521501.Foucault, Michel (31 December 1990). History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-679-72469-8. OCLC 5102034.Foucault, Michel (1 March 1990). The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality. 2. Vintage Books. ISBN 978-0-394-75122-1. OCLC 5102034.Foucault, Michel (1 January 1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Sheridan, Allen. Random House. ISBN 978-0-679-75255-4. OCLC32367111.Fraser, Nancy; Butler, Judith; Benhabib, Seyla; Cornell, Drucilla (6 April 1995). Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-91086-6. OCLC 30623637.Frug, Mary Joe. "A Postmodern Feminist Legal Manifesto (An Unfinished Draft)", in "Harvard Law Review", Vol. 105, No. 5, March, 1992, pp. 1045–1075. ISSN 0017-811XGrebowicz, Margaret, ed. (4 January 2007). Gender After Lyotard. State University of New York Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-6956-9. OCLC 63472631.Healey, Joseph F. (25 March 2003). Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Class: the Sociology of Group Conflict and Change (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN 978-0-7619-8763-5. OCLC 50604843.Kahlert, Heike; Schäfer, Sabine, eds. (2012). Engendering Transformation. Post-socialist Experiences on Work, Politics and Culture. Opladen, Berlin, London, Toronto: Barbara Budrich Publishers. ISBN 9783866494220.Hemmings, Clare (September 2016). "Is Gender Studies Singular? Stories of Queer/Feminist Difference and Displacement" (PDF). differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 27 (2): 79–102. doi:10.1215/10407391-3621721.Khanna, Ranjana (September 2016). "On the Name, Ideation, and Sexual Difference". differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 27 (2): 62–78. doi:10.1215/10407391-3621709.Kristeva, Julia (14 May 1984) [First published 1980 in French as Pouvoirs de l'horreur by Éditions du Seuil]. Powers of Horror. Translated by Roudiez, Leon S. (Reprinted ed.). Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-05347-1. OCLC 8430152.McElroy, Wendy (31 May 2001). Sexual Correctness: The Gender-Feminist Attack on Women. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-0-7864-0226-7. OCLC 34839792.Oyěwùmí, Oyèrónkẹ́, ed. (13 October 2006). African Gender Studies: A Reader. London: Palgrave MacMillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-6283-6.Palmer, Bryan D. (25 January 1990). Descent into Discourse: The Reification of Language and the Writing of Social History (Critical Perspectives on the Past Series) (Reprint ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. ISBN 978-0-87722-720-5. OCLC233030494.Pinker, Susan (29 February 2008). The Sexual Paradox: Extreme Men, Gifted Women and the Real Gender Gap. Random House of Canada Ltd. ISBN 978-0-679-31415-8. OCLC 181078409.Pollock, Griselda (7 March 2001). Florence, Penny (ed.). Looking Back to the Future: 1990-1970: Essays on Art, Life and Death (Critical Voices in Art, Theory and Culture). Routledge. ISBN 978-90-5701-132-0. OCLC 42875273.Pollock, Griselda (22 November 2007). Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-41374-9. OCLC129952714.Pulkkinen, Tuija (September 2016). "Feelings of Injustice: The Institutionalization of Gender Studies and the Pluralization of Feminism". differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 27 (2): 103–124. doi:10.1215/10407391-3621733.Reeser, Todd W. (12 January 2010). Masculinities in Theory: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1405168601.Scott, Joan W. (1 February 2000). Gender and the Politics of History (2nd Revised ed.). Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231118576.Spector, Judith A., ed. (15 December 1986). Gender Studies: New Directions in Feminist Criticism. Bowling Green University Popular Press. ISBN 978-0-87972-351-4.Thomas, Calvin (1 October 1999). "Introduction: Identification, Appropriation, Proliferation". In Thomas, Calvin (ed.). Straight with a Twist: Queer Theory and the Subject of Heterosexuality. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0-252-06813-3.Weed, Elizabeth (September 2016). "Gender and the Lure of the Postcritical". differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 27 (2): 153–177. doi:10.1215/10407391-3621757.Wright, Elizabeth (1 September 2000). Lacan and Postfeminism. Icon Books Ltd. ISBN978-1-84046-182-4. OCLC 44484099.Zajko, Vanda; Leonard, Miriam, eds. (12 January 2006). Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Feminist Thought (Classical Presences). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-927438-3.de Zegher, M. Catherine, ed. (8 May 1996). Inside the Visible: Elliptical Traverse of Twentieth Century Art in, of and from the Feminine (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-54081-0. OCLC 33863951.- - - - - - - - - -In response to others:Prior post:“… In theory there would be value in studying some of the gender related issues you mention. In practice it seems to be mostly misandry and LGBT propaganda …”Please cite any source support for your contention so we can look over your shoulder, see what you see, learn how you learn.Thanks.- - - - - - - - - -Answer requested by and Question added by Wayne Hardy “… Should gender studies be a part of a study program at school? (Should gender studies be a part of a study program at school?) …” #914390643 · Thank · Report · 24 Nov 2019 9:46 PM.

1-24-21“In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on it and no address,” Paul said. “Historically those were thrown out, this time they weren't. They made special accommodations. It's a pandemic. They changed the law after the fact. That's wrong, that's unconstitutional.”Twitter will NOT ALLOW dissent.Despite the mountains of evidence of elections fraud you are NO LONGER allowed to discuss this publicly and keep your twitter privileges.Bobby Piton: I think this is the biggest fraud in the history of our constitutional republic. It’s taking place right before our eyes. The corrupt mainstream media and tech oligarchs are colluding in an attempt to assassinate the American public’s true legal vote for our president Donald J. Trump.The Latest1-4-21DATA: Report Shows EVERY Midnight Ballot Dump Boosted BidenA new report from a number of reputable, PhD statisticians analyzes the suspicious floods of ballots trickling in following the November 3rd election, concluding all were in favor of Joe Biden.“The conclusion is that all we were able to find were net Biden Dumps,” the report summary notes.Analysis extends to states both won and lost by President Trump, including Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin.Several states experienced more than one vote dump, but all netted in favor of Biden.In Georgia, which saw dumps net Biden 119,811 votes, there were two “10-sigma jumps” on November 4th at 01:42:47 03:23:48 UTC.“Ten-sigma jumps have a probability of 1 in 1023,” the report notes.Similarly, Michigan saw a vote dump net Biden 135,290 votes, with the probability of such phenomena occurring equating to “1 in 10117 — or 14 Powerball wins in a row” per the report.Exclusive: More Than 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump in Pennsylvania, Data Scientists SayExclusive: More Than 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump in Pennsylvania, Data Scientists SayBY ALLEN ZHONG January 4, 2021 Updated: January 5, 2021biggersmaller PrintPennsylvania election data show that over 432,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump during the November election, data scientists say.1-3-21Jovan Pulitzer, a technology inventor of the Q-code scanner, exposed more evidence of election fraud through kinematic artifacts, which refers to evidence on paper due to bends or folds. He says that he would be able to detect if ballots had been folded, if ballots were filled out by hand or a machine, if ballots were counterfeit, or if ballots were batch-fed over and over. Pulitzer said it is disturbing that there is no paper trail for Georgia’s contested ballots, especially since it is federal law to keep the ballots, which are the property of the taxpayer, for 22 months. He said that, in Fulton County where election workers were captured on video feeding ballots into machines multiple times, there was a 93.67% vote adjudication rate, which is unacceptable because it is impossible. In 2018, the national voting machine adjudication rate was 2.7%. After Pulitzer gave his testimony to the Georgia State Senate Judiciary Subcommittee, they unanimously passed a motion to audit Fulton County’s absentee ballots. It was reported that within four hours, trucks picked up the contested ballots, and they may have been destroyed. -GEGMore Evidence of Election Fraud!Exclusive: Over 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump in Pennsylvania, Data Scientists SayPennsylvania Poll Watcher Describes Election Irregularities, Including 47 Missing USB CardsA laptop computer and encrypted USB flash drives were stolen from an election machine warehouse in Philadelphia, according to officials and the company that makes the machines.“We can confirm that a laptop and encrypted USB drives were stolen from the warehouse at 3500 Scotts Lane,” Nick Custodio, deputy commissioner at the City Commissioner’s Office2017 DR. ERIC COOMER EXPLAINS HOW TO ALTER VOTES IN THE DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMTHIS SEEMS ABSOLUTELY RIPE FOR FRAUD“Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f**king sure of that!” - Dr. Eric Coomer VP of US Engineering for US Dominion Voting CompanyAnd now there is video of Dominion’s Eric Coomer, during that same demonstration, admitting during a demonstration that the Dominion Voting Systems are wireless.This is a direct contradiction to the latest statements by Dominion officials!Via inventor and data analyst Jovan Pulitzer:Senate report warns of Biden family's China dealsSenate report warns of Biden family's China dealsBusiness partners have 'deep connections' to Communist PartyBy Art MoorePublished December 9, 2020 at 7:36pm"Hunter Biden has extensive connections to Chinese businesses and Chinese foreign nationals that are linked to the Communist government. Those contacts bore financial fruit when his father was vice president and after he left office," says the report, which was part of an investigation that produced two previous reports.The new report warns that the "connections and the vast amount of money transferred among and between them don't just raise conflicts of interest concerns, they raise criminal financial, counterintelligence and extortion concerns."Doctors tell Senate they're attacked for saving COVID patients'They should not be ridiculed, vilified, or worse'By Art MoorePublished December 9, 2020 at 8:33pm"This is shocking and unprecedented, but in today’s litigiousenvironment," she said, doctors who "dare prescribe" a drug proven to effectively treat COVID-19 like hydroxychloroquine could be "fired, removed from insurance panels, investigated, or even delicensed."12/10/20Judge Dismisses Kraken Lawsuit Without Looking at EvidenceMajor National Security Issue Identified Related 
To China's Connection To Dominion Vote MachinesTrump - 'The Case Has Been Made...You'll 
See A Lot Of Big Things Happening In The 
Next Couple Of Days'As Expected, Sidney Powell's Kraken Lawsuit
Dismissed By Corrupt Courts In GA And MIDevvy - President Trump, Take Kraken To The 
American People Live On TelevisionReport - Barr Considering Resigning By Year End
Why Wait? Leave NowThird Suspect In State Farm Center 'Suitcase Ballot 
Scandal' Identified As Ralph Jones, Sr Who Was In News 
For Shady Deal With Atlanta Mayor Keisha BottomsSuitcase Ballot Suspect Son, Ralph Jones Jr., Is 
The Official Spokesman For Democrat US Senate 
Candidate Warnock...Linked To Stacey AbramsTucker - The Media RIGGED The Election 
...And The New Hunter Biden ScandalPresident Trump Asks Sen Ted Cruz To Argue 
The Texas Case Before Supreme CourtWatch - Virginia Nov 4th 2am, 3 Vote Dumps And It's Over
(39,369 For Trump And 331,289 For China Joe!)Arizona Joins Texas Supreme Court Lawsuit For 
A Total Of 19 States Suing Over Election IntegrityYears-Long Court Battle In Georgia Reveals 
Dominion's Security Flaws, Weak TestingAnn Coulter - Vote Fraud Never Happens
(Except In These 10,000 Cases)Trump's EO Regarding Foreign Intervention In US
Elections Could Result In Perilous Consequences
For Biden Crime Family And OthersHunter Biden Criminal Probe Bolsters China Scholar's 
Claim Of Beijing Infiltrating 'Top Of America's Core'Newsom, Kemp Both Committed Treason By Colluding
With Communist China In Covid-19 Face Mask Money
Laundering SchemeChi-Com Asset Democrat Eric Swalwell 
REMOVED From House Intel Committee 
After Chinese Honey TrapDemocrat Rep Swalwell Claims Blockbuster 
Axios Chinese Spy Report Is Trump DisInfoSwalwell's Dad, Brother Unfriend On Facebook 
Chinese Spy Fang FangChina Joe Won't Talk About Swalwell's Relationship
With Chinese Honey Trap SpyAfter 4 Years Of Lying, Corrupt FBI Finally Admits 
They're Holding Seth Rich's LaptopSidney Powell - CIA, Mainstream Media, Globalists 
All Part Of A Grand Conspiracy To Rig Elections And 
Defraud We The PeopleCommunist Antifa In Its Most Violent Attack
Yet Against Portland PolicePortland Mayor On 'Autonomous Zone' Says 'Time
For The Encampment And Occupation To End'US Supreme Court Orders 4 States To Reply To 
Texas Election Lawsuit By 10 DecemberHow And When SCOTUS Will Overturn The ElectionGeorgia's Republican Governor Tells Lawmakers 
They Won't Be Picking Electors For TrumpDominion Received $120 Million From 19 States And 
133 Local Governments To Provide Election 'Services'Sidney Powell Drops More Bombshells, Says Election 
Software That Rigged 2020 Elections Has Been Used For
Years To Steal House, Senate And Governor Races12/9/20Georgia Gov. Kemp calls for legitimate signature audit of mail-in ballots after damning CCTV video exposes massive election fraudMonday, December 07, 2020 by: JD HeyesVIEWSPresident Donald Trump’s legal team will never get the credit they deserve from left-wing historians who will write a revisionist version of current political events for future textbooks.But in reality, they deserve to be considered heroes for what they are doing to expose the biggest and most blatant election fraud since 1824 when Andrew Jackson was robbed of the presidency.Lawyers working on behalf of the president to expose the fraud have been taking his case directly to state legislators in recent weeks after being shut out and shut down by left-wing judicial activists and cowards on state and federal courts — men who refused to even look at the troves of evidence the campaign has collected.And on Thursday, Trump’s Georgia-based legal team presented damning video evidence that could actually serve to turn that state back around and give the president the victory he earned there.—————————————————————What You May Not Know about The Network Behind Vote-Machine FraudWhat You May Not Know about The Network Behind Vote-Machine FraudDecember 8, 2020 F. William Engdahl 0WikiThe “Help America Vote Act of 2002” created the United States Election Assistance Commission that led to the replacement of punch-card paper ballots as states outsourced election management to private companies like ES&S, Dominion, and Smartmatic. Today, these vote-counting companies control more than 92% of US elections.In 2020, Dominion Voting Systems, which supplied the machines at the heart of the Biden vote-stealing scandal, bought Sequoia Voting Systems that contained Smartmatic software. In the 2020 election, Dominion was responsible for 50% of all votes in 30 states and was dominate in every state where the outcome was contested by the Trump legal teams.Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, chairman of SGO Smartmatic, has been on the board of the Davos World Economic Forum, the prime driver behind the dystopian ‘Great Reset’ agenda of UN Global 2030; he was a Deputy Secretary General of the UN; and was Vice President of the World Bank; Malloch-Brown is also a member of the highly secret Privy Council, an elite of some 500+ people selected by the Queen of England to run affairs of state. Last week, George Soros announced that Malloch-Brown will be Open Society’s new president.Two of four board members of Smartmatic USA were head of the US Government agency delegated to develop guidelines for voting systems and two were Obama Democrat appointees. One is a Biden adviser.Any questions?———————————————————————12–8-202012–8-2020See A Lot Of Big Things Happening In The 
Next Couple Of Days'CNN Admits Trump Will Likely Get His Second TermDevvy - President Trump, Take Kraken To The 
American People Live On TelevisionMAGA Heads To The Supreme Court With A
Chance To Win PennsylvaniaWatch - Sidney Powell Explains What Happened 
In Court Today...AND Her Next Step...MI Federal Judge Who Dismissed Sidney Powell's MI 
Lawsuit Is A Far-Left, Anti-Cop, Pro-Affirmative 
Action Obama AppointeeBush-Appointed GA Judge Dismisses Sidney Powell 
Lawsuit - 'We Can't Turn Back The Clock' - Total IdiotDevvy - President Trump, Take Kraken To The 
American People Live On TelevisionReport - Prominent Chinese Prof Says Biden Presidency
Will Reconnect China To 'Core Circle Inside US Real Power'China Owns DOMINION And Controls All The Officials 
Who Run The Machines At Every Level Of GovernmentTrump - 'The Case Has Been Made...You'll 
See A Lot Of Big Things Happening In The 
Next Couple Of Days'Trump Won - Supreme Court Voted 9-0 In 1997 
That Elections Undecided By Midnight Are Void 
And Preempted By Federal Law – (Foster V Love 1997)Sidney Powell to Newsmax TV: Our Case Was Prejudged | Sidney Powell to Appeal Dismissal of Georgia LawsuitTexas Asks Supreme Court to Rule Election in Four Battleground States UnconstitutionalBY IVAN PENTCHOUKOV December 8, 2020 Updated: December 8, 2020PrintThe state of Texas on Tuesday filed an election lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, alleging that the states unconstitutionally changed election laws, treated voters unequally, and triggered significant voting irregularities by relaxing ballot-integrity measures.“Plaintiff State respectfully submits that the foregoing types of electoral irregularities exceed the hanging-chad saga of the 2000 election in their degree of departure from both state and federal law,” the Supreme Court motion (pdf) states. “Moreover, these flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections.”……The Trump campaign and third-party groups have pending legal challenges in all of the states, but to date, only a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania Republicans has escalated to the nation’s highest court. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito ordered briefs for that case to be submitted by Tuesday morning, signaling that a decision on a temporary restraining order is imminent.Arizona High Court to Hear GOP-Led Suit Alleging Mail-In Ballot DefectsThe Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to hear an election lawsuit filed by state Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward over alleged irregularities with mail-in ballots.A lower court judge had dismissed Ward’s case last week. But, according to the Washington Examiner, she took an appeal up to the state’s highest court.The Examiner said that court will now decide the matter without oral argument.Ward's case aims to reverse the state's certification of its election results to the Arizona Supreme Court, local news station KTAR reports.A judge in Maricopa County Superior Court ruled against Ward last Friday, finding she failed to prove election fraud that would reverse President Donald Trump's loss in the state.Tuesday December 08, 2020HomePlatinumNewsfrontAmericaPoliticsOpinionThe WireBooksBest ListsSpecialsSci & Tech<p> <img src="" height="1" width="1" alt="*"> </p>Home | AmericaTags: 2020 Elections | Law Enforcement | Media Bias | federalist | mollie hemmingway | video | georgiaFederalist's Hemingway: Ga. Video Not DebunkedBy Brian Trusdell | Monday, 07 December 2020 10:03 PMThe Federalist's senior editor Mollie Hemingway is ridiculing several news outlets that claim Republican accusations of questionable behavior by Fulton County election officials at State Farm Arena, purportedly caught on video, had been debunked, rebutting the reports with affidavits and even other news reports.Hemingway, 46, the author of "Justice on Trial," about the Senate hearings of Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court, dismissed a report by "Lead Stories" and then The Washington Post, Newsweek, and others, which appeared to anoint government officials as the sole arbiters of whether anything nefarious occurred.At issue: a video that purportedly showed a handful of election workers telling observers and other ballot counters to leave State Farm Arena in the evening because of burst water pipe. Once the room was cleared, the remaining election officials uncovered suitcase-like containers from under draped tables — containers alleged to contain thousands of ballots that were then processed without the observers on hand.Lead Stories, The Washington Post, and others quoted election officials as saying no one was asked to leave and characterizing the activity as normal."Leaving aside whether relying solely and uncritically on government officials' claims constitutes anything close to a 'fact check,' let's look at the claim that party observers were never told that counting was over for the night," Hemingway wrote.She then noted how two Republican poll observers swore under oath they observed a woman they assumed was the supervisor "yell out" to most workers after 10 p.m. to stop counting and return at 8:30 a.m. the next morning.This, she said, was buttressed by an ABC News report which said ballot counters were told to go home and counting had stopped. Their source was Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections.However, Lead Stories quoted Frances Walton, chief investigator for the Georgia Secretary of State, as saying no was asked to leave, according to information provided to the "media liaison who was present that night.""While Lead Stories doesn't name the media liaison, the media liaison who was present that night, according to the affidavits, was Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections," Hemingway wrote."OK, so on the one hand you have sworn affidavits from observers saying that supervisors told ballot counters to go home for the evening shortly after 10 p.m., and a video showing everyone leaving en masse at that time."And on the other hand, you have two government officials promising that no one was told that counting was over."(My comment: Democrats try lying in the face of direct overwhelming evidence. There is nothing they won’t do.)Related Stories:• Video Alleged to Show Ga. Ballots Counted After Poll Watchers Were Ousted• Georgia Gov. Kemp Urges Signature Audit After 'Smoking Gun' Video Emerges11-8-2020• Georgia Secretary of State Affirms Election Results in Favor of Biden After Recounts• Powell: American Elections Just as Rigged as in Third World Countries• Trump: Giuliani Is ‘Doing Very Well’ After Virus Diagnosis• Sen. Cruz Agrees to Argue Pennsylvania Election Case If Taken Upby Supreme CourtTrump Campaign Asks Michigan Supreme Court to Declare That Election Process Violated State ConstitutionArizona• FBI investigating voter data theft - Forbes• Data expert: between 120,000 and 306,000 fake people cast ballots - NTD Television• Maricopa GOP chairwoman: Trump votes credited to Biden - Capitol Times• Anonymous: 35,000 illegal votes for Democratic candidates - Daily SignalGeorgia• Trump campaign files suit seeking new statewide election - Reuters• House Republicans seek mail-ballot process review before Jan. 5 runoff - Epoch Times• Dekalb County can’t find chain of custody records for absentee ballots - Epoch Times• Trump campaign: Video shows ballot-counting from suitcases after poll workers sent home - Townhall, Twitter• Chief investigator: No 'mystery ballots' seen in security video - Washington Examiner• Attorney L. Lin Wood: All 900 Fulton Co. military ballots for Biden - SDFish.com - San Diego Fishing Reports, Forums, News and Intel• Wood: Video shows ballots shredded - Cobb County Courier• Data analyst: 40,000 ballots illegally cast by people who had moved - NTD video• Ex-gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams group investigated for seeking to “register “ineligible, out-of-state, or deceased voters” before Jan. 5 Senate runoffs - Fox NewsMichigan• Judge allows probe of Dominion machines in Antrim County - Fox News• Four takeaways from the state Senate's vote fraud hearing - Daily SignalNevada• Nevada GOP to appeal judge’s refusal to nullify Biden win - Associated Press• Native American voter advocacy group “handed out gift cards, electronics, clothing” in tribal areas, and on Facebook some recipients documented the exchanges for votes while wearing Biden campaign gear - The Federalist• Trump legal team: Audit finds 2 percent of ballots cast in the name of people who said they never received a ballot and 1 percent by those who said they never filled one out - PJ Media• Mail ballots were sent to abandoned businesses - Public Interest Legal Foundation• Trump representatives said more than 1,500 ballots may have been cast by dead voters and that 42,248 people voted “multiple times” - Washington Examiner• Witness: Early voting tallies in Carson County were inexplicably changed on election night - Hearing transcript• Whistleblower affidavit: Clark County supervisors accepted ballots despite concerns regarding required signatures - Washington ExaminerPennsylvania• Justice Alito moves up Supreme Court deadline in mail ballot case - Epoch Times• Lawsuit: Up to 280,000 ballots ‘disappeared’ after postal contractor's trip from New York - Epoch Times• Tens of thousands of ballots returned earlier than sent date, researcher says - Epoch Times• Mail carrier says he was ordered to collect late ballots for backdating. - Washington Times• Abnormally low number of rejected ballots - Just the News• Pittsburgh ballots sent to vacant lots - Public Interest Legal FoundationWisconsin• State Supreme Court deals Trump challenges third defeat in 30 hours - Milwaukee Journal SentinelSidney Powell• A former member of Trump’s legal team, Powell has filed lawsuits in Arizona, Georgia and Michigan alleging, as ABC News put it, “a complex plot involving shadowy foreign interests” (including Venezuela, China and Iran) as well as Dominion Voting Systems; Republican elected officials, and Democratic poll workers – "all allegedly in cahoots to steal the election from Trump.” This graphic details other claims made by Powell.The U.S. Attorney General• Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change vote outcome - Associated PressEarlier: Week of Nov. 22-28California• Los Angeles prosecutors uncover scheme in which thousands of fraudulent ballots were cast - Just the NewsMichigan• Detroit worker swears she witnessed thousands of ballots being falsified - Just the NewsPennsylvania• Large numbers of voters say their absentee votes weren't counted or someone else requested their mail-in ballot - Just the NewsAlsoWhatever happened to the deepfake threat to the election? - WiredNov. 15-21Pennsylvania• State rejected far fewer mail ballots than in the past - Just the NewsNov. 8-14Georgia• A sudden surge of some 20,000 mail-in votes for Joe Biden in the greater Atlanta area while some 1,000 votes for President Trump mysteriously disappeared - Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigationsNevada• Election supervisors in Clark County counted mail-in ballots despite concerns that the signatures were invalid, according to a whistleblower's affidavit - Washington Examiner• People inside a Biden-Harris van were witnessed opening, filling out, and resealing mail ballots, a whistleblower alleged - Epoch TimesPennsylvania• Tens of thousands of ballots returned earlier than sent date: Researcher - Epoch TimesTexas• Social worker accused of 134 counts of fraudulently casting ballots for intellectually challenged clients - Attorney General's OfficeWisconsin• Election officials used potentially illegal administrative policies that could disqualify tens of thousands of ballots - Just the NewsNov. 1-7Pennsylvania• Supervisors ordered a mail carrier to collect and submit late ballots, the carrier alleged, which supervisors then backdated so that they appeared to have been mailed in time - Washington TimesTexas• Bid to toss nearly 127,000 votes cast via drive-through voting during early voting period in Harris County - SCOTUS BlogMore• Coverage of election irregularities and challenges - Epoch Times• 2020 Election Litigation Tracker - SCOTUSblog, Election Law at Ohio State• A Guide to 2020 Election Laws and Lawsuits - ProPublica[Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Investigations.]Texas Asks Supreme Court to Rule Election in Four Battleground States UnconstitutionalBY IVAN PENTCHOUKOV December 8, 2020 Updated: December 8, 2020PrintThe state of Texas on Tuesday filed an election lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, alleging that the states unconstitutionally changed election laws, treated voters unequally, and triggered significant voting irregularities by relaxing ballot-integrity measures.“Plaintiff State respectfully submits that the foregoing types of electoral irregularities exceed the hanging-chad saga of the 2000 election in their degree of departure from both state and federal law,” the Supreme Court motion (pdf) states. “Moreover, these flaws cumulatively preclude knowing who legitimately won the 2020 election and threaten to cloud all future elections.”……The Trump campaign and third-party groups have pending legal challenges in all of the states, but to date, only a lawsuit brought by Pennsylvania Republicans has escalated to the nation’s highest court. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito ordered briefs for that case to be submitted by Tuesday morning, signaling that a decision on a temporary restraining order is imminent.Arizona High Court to Hear GOP-Led Suit Alleging Mail-In Ballot DefectsThe Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to hear an election lawsuit filed by state Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward over alleged irregularities with mail-in ballots.A lower court judge had dismissed Ward’s case last week. But, according to the Washington Examiner, she took an appeal up to the state’s highest court.The Examiner said that court will now decide the matter without oral argument.Ward's case aims to reverse the state's certification of its election results to the Arizona Supreme Court, local news station KTAR reports.A judge in Maricopa County Superior Court ruled against Ward last Friday, finding she failed to prove election fraud that would reverse President Donald Trump's loss in the state.Tuesday December 08, 2020HomePlatinumNewsfrontAmericaPoliticsOpinionThe WireBooksBest ListsSpecialsSci & Tech<p> <img src="" height="1" width="1" alt="*"> </p>Home | AmericaTags: 2020 Elections | Law Enforcement | Media Bias | federalist | mollie hemmingway | video | georgiaFederalist's Hemingway: Ga. Video Not DebunkedBy Brian Trusdell | Monday, 07 December 2020 10:03 PMThe Federalist's senior editor Mollie Hemingway is ridiculing several news outlets that claim Republican accusations of questionable behavior by Fulton County election officials at State Farm Arena, purportedly caught on video, had been debunked, rebutting the reports with affidavits and even other news reports.Hemingway, 46, the author of "Justice on Trial," about the Senate hearings of Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court, dismissed a report by "Lead Stories" and then The Washington Post, Newsweek, and others, which appeared to anoint government officials as the sole arbiters of whether anything nefarious occurred.At issue: a video that purportedly showed a handful of election workers telling observers and other ballot counters to leave State Farm Arena in the evening because of burst water pipe. Once the room was cleared, the remaining election officials uncovered suitcase-like containers from under draped tables — containers alleged to contain thousands of ballots that were then processed without the observers on hand.Lead Stories, The Washington Post, and others quoted election officials as saying no one was asked to leave and characterizing the activity as normal."Leaving aside whether relying solely and uncritically on government officials' claims constitutes anything close to a 'fact check,' let's look at the claim that party observers were never told that counting was over for the night," Hemingway wrote.She then noted how two Republican poll observers swore under oath they observed a woman they assumed was the supervisor "yell out" to most workers after 10 p.m. to stop counting and return at 8:30 a.m. the next morning.This, she said, was buttressed by an ABC News report which said ballot counters were told to go home and counting had stopped. Their source was Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections.However, Lead Stories quoted Frances Walton, chief investigator for the Georgia Secretary of State, as saying no was asked to leave, according to information provided to the "media liaison who was present that night.""While Lead Stories doesn't name the media liaison, the media liaison who was present that night, according to the affidavits, was Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections," Hemingway wrote."OK, so on the one hand you have sworn affidavits from observers saying that supervisors told ballot counters to go home for the evening shortly after 10 p.m., and a video showing everyone leaving en masse at that time."And on the other hand, you have two government officials promising that no one was told that counting was over."(My comment: Democrats try lying in the face of direct overwhelming evidence. There is nothing they won’t do.)Related Stories:• Video Alleged to Show Ga. Ballots Counted After Poll Watchers Were Ousted• Georgia Gov. Kemp Urges Signature Audit After 'Smoking Gun' Video Emerges11-8-2020• Georgia Secretary of State Affirms Election Results in Favor of Biden After Recounts• Powell: American Elections Just as Rigged as in Third World Countries• Trump: Giuliani Is ‘Doing Very Well’ After Virus Diagnosis• Sen. Cruz Agrees to Argue Pennsylvania Election Case If Taken Upby Supreme CourtTrump Campaign Asks Michigan Supreme Court to Declare That Election Process Violated State ConstitutionArizona• FBI investigating voter data theft - Forbes• Data expert: between 120,000 and 306,000 fake people cast ballots - NTD Television• Maricopa GOP chairwoman: Trump votes credited to Biden - Capitol Times• Anonymous: 35,000 illegal votes for Democratic candidates - Daily SignalGeorgia• Trump campaign files suit seeking new statewide election - Reuters• House Republicans seek mail-ballot process review before Jan. 5 runoff - Epoch Times• Dekalb County can’t find chain of custody records for absentee ballots - Epoch Times• Trump campaign: Video shows ballot-counting from suitcases after poll workers sent home - Townhall, Twitter• Chief investigator: No 'mystery ballots' seen in security video - Washington Examiner• Attorney L. Lin Wood: All 900 Fulton Co. military ballots for Biden - SDFish.com - San Diego Fishing Reports, Forums, News and Intel• Wood: Video shows ballots shredded - Cobb County Courier• Data analyst: 40,000 ballots illegally cast by people who had moved - NTD video• Ex-gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams group investigated for seeking to “register “ineligible, out-of-state, or deceased voters” before Jan. 5 Senate runoffs - Fox NewsMichigan• Judge allows probe of Dominion machines in Antrim County - Fox News• Four takeaways from the state Senate's vote fraud hearing - Daily SignalNevada• Nevada GOP to appeal judge’s refusal to nullify Biden win - Associated Press• Native American voter advocacy group “handed out gift cards, electronics, clothing” in tribal areas, and on Facebook some recipients documented the exchanges for votes while wearing Biden campaign gear - The Federalist• Trump legal team: Audit finds 2 percent of ballots cast in the name of people who said they never received a ballot and 1 percent by those who said they never filled one out - PJ Media• Mail ballots were sent to abandoned businesses - Public Interest Legal Foundation• Trump representatives said more than 1,500 ballots may have been cast by dead voters and that 42,248 people voted “multiple times” - Washington Examiner• Witness: Early voting tallies in Carson County were inexplicably changed on election night - Hearing transcript• Whistleblower affidavit: Clark County supervisors accepted ballots despite concerns regarding required signatures - Washington ExaminerPennsylvania• Justice Alito moves up Supreme Court deadline in mail ballot case - Epoch Times• Lawsuit: Up to 280,000 ballots ‘disappeared’ after postal contractor's trip from New York - Epoch Times• Tens of thousands of ballots returned earlier than sent date, researcher says - Epoch Times• Mail carrier says he was ordered to collect late ballots for backdating. - Washington Times• Abnormally low number of rejected ballots - Just the News• Pittsburgh ballots sent to vacant lots - Public Interest Legal FoundationWisconsin• State Supreme Court deals Trump challenges third defeat in 30 hours - Milwaukee Journal SentinelSidney Powell• A former member of Trump’s legal team, Powell has filed lawsuits in Arizona, Georgia and Michigan alleging, as ABC News put it, “a complex plot involving shadowy foreign interests” (including Venezuela, China and Iran) as well as Dominion Voting Systems; Republican elected officials, and Democratic poll workers – "all allegedly in cahoots to steal the election from Trump.” This graphic details other claims made by Powell.The U.S. Attorney General• Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change vote outcome - Associated PressEarlier: Week of Nov. 22-28California• Los Angeles prosecutors uncover scheme in which thousands of fraudulent ballots were cast - Just the NewsMichigan• Detroit worker swears she witnessed thousands of ballots being falsified - Just the NewsPennsylvania• Large numbers of voters say their absentee votes weren't counted or someone else requested their mail-in ballot - Just the NewsAlsoWhatever happened to the deepfake threat to the election? - WiredNov. 15-21Pennsylvania• State rejected far fewer mail ballots than in the past - Just the NewsNov. 8-14Georgia• A sudden surge of some 20,000 mail-in votes for Joe Biden in the greater Atlanta area while some 1,000 votes for President Trump mysteriously disappeared - Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigationsNevada• Election supervisors in Clark County counted mail-in ballots despite concerns that the signatures were invalid, according to a whistleblower's affidavit - Washington Examiner• People inside a Biden-Harris van were witnessed opening, filling out, and resealing mail ballots, a whistleblower alleged - Epoch TimesPennsylvania• Tens of thousands of ballots returned earlier than sent date: Researcher - Epoch TimesTexas• Social worker accused of 134 counts of fraudulently casting ballots for intellectually challenged clients - Attorney General's OfficeWisconsin• Election officials used potentially illegal administrative policies that could disqualify tens of thousands of ballots - Just the NewsNov. 1-7Pennsylvania• Supervisors ordered a mail carrier to collect and submit late ballots, the carrier alleged, which supervisors then backdated so that they appeared to have been mailed in time - Washington TimesTexas• Bid to toss nearly 127,000 votes cast via drive-through voting during early voting period in Harris County - SCOTUS BlogMore• Coverage of election irregularities and challenges - Epoch Times• 2020 Election Litigation Tracker - SCOTUSblog, Election Law at Ohio State• A Guide to 2020 Election Laws and Lawsuits - ProPublica[Editor's note: This story originally was published by Real Clear Investigations.]

The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a PresidentThe Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a PresidentJerome L. KrollJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online June 2018, 46 (2) 267-271; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003750-18ArticleInfo & MetricsPDFEdited by Bandy X. Lee, MD, MDiv. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, St. Martin's Press, 2017. 384 pp. $27.99 hardcover.Just between the time that an email request from the book review editor of the Journal arrived (November 28, 2017) to the time of sitting down to begin writing a first draft of this review (January 14, 2018), there was a flood of print and electronic media opinions on the interrelated topics of President Donald Trump's mental health and perceived dangerousness. Further, elucidated during this discussion has been the controversy about the American Psychiatric Association's (APA's) position on the Goldwater Rule, which declares unethical and forbids all public opinions by psychiatrists about diagnoses and mental health status of public figures whom the opining party has not directly examined according to accepted standards for psychiatric evaluation.1Keeping up with the media and print publications about President Trump seriously hampered writing this review, as events of each day threatened to overrun whatever I had written. This experience reminded me of occurrences during the presidential campaign. Mr. Trump the candidate presented himself as embodying several traits that many thought of as incompatible with the task of serving as the president of our country. All of this was brought out publicly and repeatedly during the long campaign. With each howler, liberals and moderates were convinced that surely this latest gaff would be the candidate's undoing; U.S. citizens would never stand for it. With each such attack, his supporters grew more certain that he was their man; even women supporters defended this man who demeaned and made nasty sexual comments about women. His base did not reject him as the liberals expected or hoped. In late January 2018, President Trump made some of his most offensive statements when referring to Haiti and other African nations in derogatory terms.2While nations around the world and many of us at home were outraged, his approval rating climbed to almost 40 percent on domestic polls, higher than it had been in months.To many psychiatrists, President Trump's statements and behaviors were patently symptomatic of one or several mental disorders. The facts of the case and the serious risks of erosion of our constitutional democracy and possible nuclear annihilation of the world demanded that psychiatrists warn the public. The analogy to the silence of Germany's educated and professional classes during Hitler's ascendancy to power was too obvious to ignore; but roughly 40 percent of the country does not agree that the president is evil or dangerous.Bandy Lee's edited book, a compilation stemming from the presentations at a similarly themed conference that took place in New Haven, CT, in April 2017, is a sincere act of conscience. The authors of the 28 chapters (including Prologue, Introduction, and Epilogue) are not in full agreement as to the details of what they believe ails President Trump, but all concur that he is mentally ill or dangerous (by virtue of being president) or both. There is discordance as to the nature or the diagnosis of the mental illness that makes him dangerous, and the various authors take their shots as to which descriptive terms and which diagnoses fit best. Along the way, the authors acknowledge the heavy presence of the Goldwater Rule and the intimidation to silence psychiatrists that the APA leadership and Ethics Committee have imposed.3,4I think that the critically important question taken up in this volume is Mr. Trump's fitness to serve as president and that the furor over the Goldwater Rule will become a footnote in the history of this presidency and this era.It is clear that the president's dangerousness is the most important concern to our country, especially to those poor and disenfranchised persons who will be most damaged by his policies5and to the global environment that may be irrevocably affected. I was also interested to see how deeply the authors would take on and debate the Goldwater Rule. One could assume that the authors' willingness to make public diagnostic, descriptive, or psychological statements about a public figure of whom they have not personally conducted a formal diagnostic assessment serves to challenge the APA's long-held principle. This notwithstanding, I was also hoping to read a thoughtful debate in which the Goldwater Rule was placed in broader social and intellectual context. I hoped to see a dissection of the arguments given by the APA considering the common experience that the community standard for doing psychiatric assessments in the trenches of a community health center, a homeless shelter or an emergency room differs substantially from the ideal of an extended personal interview: particularly as this idealized version is often complete with medical records and a rational subject who can provide a linear life history. Further, I hoped there would be discussion of why a personal psychiatric interview is considered more trustworthy than, say, watching hours of videotapes of a subject engaged in a range of activities.At this point, in the interest of transparency and declaration of possible conflict of interest, I have to say that I have serious misgivings about Donald Trump's fitness to serve as President of the United States and also that I have been strongly opposed to the Goldwater Rule since well before his candidacy and election. Claire Pouncey and I co-chaired a symposium at the 2008 APA meeting debating the Goldwater Rule6and subsequently published a related article in the Journal in June 2016 that did not have Mr. Trump in mind, but benefitted from the relevance that his campaign behavior lent to our article.7In reading the book, I hoped to find a process of reflection about the history and context of diagnostic practices in psychiatry, including the tentative nature of psychiatric diagnoses which are often considered a work in progress. Further, it is critical to consider the sociohistorical, political, and scientific contexts in which diagnostic systems are developed, discarded, or altered based on considerations less scientific than political, or opportunistic, or prejudicial, or accepted, pending the next rewriting of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). The list of formal and informal diagnoses that have fallen by the wayside (homosexuality, pseudoneurotic schizophrenia, sluggish schizophrenia, inadequate personality, hysterical neurosis, and neurasthenia) or of those that have made belated appearances (posttraumatic stress disorder, tobacco use disorder, and narcissistic personality disorder) is sufficient to lend some humility to the diagnostic process or to diagnostic pronouncements in psychiatry. I also hoped to find discussion of various neurological and medicinal possibilities suggested by President Trump's apparently declining cognitive skills and lack of impulse control, although the latter may be less a case of frontal lobe disinhibition than lifelong asocial habits.Moreover, I hoped to find an in-depth discussion of the controversies attached to attempts by a governing board or administrative managers to regulate important moral positions that are core to one's personal identity and being in the world. Ethics-related matters should not be decided by a vote of our peers, let alone by committee members who, by virtue of their medical degrees or their election to important posts in a professional organization, have no special claims or expertise in moral theory. It seemed to me that the present Goldwater Rule controversy came about because the APA leadership misunderstood that an admonitory statement reflecting disapproval of offering diagnoses of a public figure in the absence of a personal interview is a technical rule, not an ethics-based one. It relates to the empirical question of the best method for making a valid diagnosis. Alasdair MacIntyre, in discussing the role in modern society of the “manager, the bureaucratic expert,” whose status is based upon a claim of effectiveness in controlling certain aspects of social reality, states that this claimed effectiveness is not a morally neutral value. The manager's claim of effectiveness is “inseparable from a mode of human existence in which the contrivance of means is in central part the manipulation of human beings into compliant patterns of behavior” (Ref. 8, p 74).The first thing one notices about the text itself is the title The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump. It is ambiguous but not innocent. When a doctor speaks of a case, the term references a clinical case in which a person becomes a patient, with a history, symptoms, laboratory findings, medical conditions, and a life lived in a community, but here in the title of the book sits one of the key disputed points: the psychiatrist has to deny that Mr. Trump's case is one of a patient while simultaneously providing a diagnosis that is claimed not to be a diagnosis; otherwise, all the Hippocratic and legal, medical, and ethics-related problems arise: confidentiality, privacy, respect, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and some sort of mutual contract. So, if he is not a patient, which he is not, in what sense is he a “case,” and why is the term used in the title of the book? It is left unclear, purposely, I assume. If there was any doubt that convening a conference that assesses the mental health of a president and publishing a book of the papers given at the conference sticks a finger in the eye of the APA leadership, then the labeling of President Trump as a case throws down the gauntlet.There are three sections to this book. The first, entitled “The Trump Phenomenon,” takes up questions of diagnoses. The second section, entitled “The Trump Dilemma,” should really be titled “The Psychiatrists' Dilemma.” Trump has no dilemma; psychiatry does. This section discusses the problem that psychiatry has in deciding what stance to take about his dangerousness, especially in light of the Goldwater Rule. The third section, “The Trump Effect,” examines the impact of his personality and policies on various segments of the population (often white middle-class citizens in therapy) and on the psychiatric profession.The heart of the book is Section One, because it engages the descriptive and diagnostic issues head-on. In these chapters, the offerings are restricted to various combinations of narcissistic personality (sometimes combined with antisocial personality), malignant narcissism, bipolar disorder, paranoid personality and paranoid psychosis, and some form of cognitive impairment reflecting early dementia. Long behavioral lists of self-aggrandizing, lying, snarly criticizing, boasting, bullying, blaming others for troubles, and needing constant praise are paraded out to the readership. We are familiar with these lists; they have been exhibited in Mr. Trump's public rhetoric and are indicative of narcissistic personality traits if his public persona is to be taken at face value. In a few instances, authors of chapters create, in my view, a questionable link from narcissism to paranoia, not just to suspiciousness but to actual delusional thinking. This notion comes as close to junk science as I have seen and does not advance the credibility of the case for his mental illness or dangerousness.Section Two, “Trump's Dilemma,” which I have renamed “The Psychiatrists' Dilemma,” takes up the subject of dangerousness. The focus is less on arguing for a diagnosis and more on Mr. Trump's own provocative statements across a wide arena, statements that have undermined U.S. intelligence communities and incited assaults upon political opponents and journalists, casual comments about use of nuclear weapons, insults directed toward leaders of friendly nations, and juvenile challenging taunts of leaders of less friendly ones. Some of the psychiatrists in this book invoke the Tarasoff duty to warn as justification for speaking out, but this seems to misrepresent the wording of Tarasoff and is a legalistic argument that sidesteps a direct confrontation with the Goldwater Rule. I think the Goldwater Rule is poorly conceived and deleterious to psychiatry and that Tarasoff is largely irrelevant to the types of dangers that President Trump represents. Leonard Glass, in commenting on Tarasoff in his chapter in this book, states that “Our duty to warn is an expression of our concern as citizens possessed of a particular expertise; not as clinicians who are responsible for preventing predictable violence from someone under our care [italics his].” (p 153).Section Three, “The Trump Effect,” presents various chapters that discuss the effects of the president's rhetoric upon the collective psyche and individual psyches of those who are unhappy with him. Some of these chapters come very close to diagnosing half of the American population as victims of his hyperbolic and hectoring behaviors. I see this defeatist stance as very unfortunate, since the organized marches on Washington, DC, and state capitols are anything but the behavior of victims. Underlying some of these chapters are the unhappy attempts to explain or explain away Mr. Trump's election and the indigestible fact that a very vocal and sizable minority of Americans strongly supports his policies, including his anti-immigrant and racist stances. To this faction, he is the president who is doing what he promised to do in his campaign speeches and tweets.Interspersed within these chapters are direct references to and indirect awareness of the looming Yeti, a.k.a. the Goldwater Rule. The Goldwater Rule controversy should be placed in proper perspective as related but secondary to the Trump phenomenon. There are timeless principles involved in the APA's insistence that it is within its rights to establish rules prohibiting public commentary on public figures by its membership and to justify such rules by categorizing breaches as unethical, rather than merely imprudent or misguided. Even if psychiatric opinion on Mr. Trump is unlikely to change the public outcome in this international high-stakes moment, the basic question of whether a professional organization such as the APA should move to curtail free speech of its membership under the aegis of an ethics mandate deserves scrutiny and, for some, resistance. Furthermore, it was the APA itself, in adopting DSM-III in 1980,9that established a new standard for making diagnoses based primarily upon observable data (including speech content and patterns) rather than (unobservable) inner workings and psychodynamics. This emphasis on measurable and replicable behavioral observations downgrades the importance of the personal interview in making diagnoses. Now the APA seeks to resuscitate the legitimacy of looking inside the person for diagnostic purposes, but lacks the accompanying psychodynamic theory to support it.Dr. Lee is to be commended both for hosting the conference in which these papers were presented and for the hard work of turning conference papers into finished chapters for a book, all in a short amount of time. It is not easy to persuade presenters at a conference to do the disciplined work of taking the rough outline of a paper and converting it into proper sentences, paragraphs, and coherent thoughts. The ongoing controversies that the book engages and, in turn further generates, are important to understanding the context of the book historically and in the present moment, including my own being swept up as a participant–observer and, now, reviewer.However, our appreciation for the courage and effort to take on the APA ethics police and the Trump lobby should not cause us to overlook some of the weaknesses in arguments, logic, perspective, and evidence. I recognize the pressures to get this book out in a timely fashion, but an index would have been helpful. It is difficult to go back and forth and see what several of the authors had to say about narcissism or dangerousness or the Goldwater Rule. On a more substantial note, there is too often a lack of critical thinking about concepts and causality, which seriously weakens the credibility of what the authors wish to get across. For example, there are too many outdated and simplistic assumptions about the psychodynamics of narcissism. The reader is told that persons are narcissistic to hide their shame or overcompensate for their inadequacies; they stifle their conscience and their compassion. I do not know if any of these generalizations are true of Mr. Trump, nor do I have confidence that if I asked him directly, I would get a trustworthy answer. It does not help the advancement of our field to proffer rote explanations, and it certainly does not help to use such arguments in trying to persuade anyone to view the situation differently.Moving on, the lack of critical thinking and the presence of inexact comparisons are distressing. Is it helpful to call Presidents Clinton and Kennedy narcissists, because they are said by some to be womanizers? How many women does one have to be casually involved with to be a womanizer? Is it the number or quality of relationships that supports such a label? Would the APA come down on psychiatrists as heavily if they called a political figure they had not personally examined a womanizer rather than a narcissist? Are there reasons, other than narcissism, to consider why an individual might be a womanizer?On a different but related note, the 2006 article by Davidson et al.10on a survey of mental illnesses in U.S. presidents from 1776 to 1974 (George Washington began his first term in 1789) is cited without hesitation. However, when looking more closely, several concerns arise about its methodology, biases, historical context, the validity of secondary sources, and the pattern of using descriptions of character traits and stormy or moody incidents. Those concerns are related to establishing a firm basis for DSM diagnoses of illness. Davidson and colleagues are a little more circumspect in acknowledging levels of confidence in the jump from anecdote to diagnosis. However, by the time the reference appears in the tertiary literature (such as some chapters in the book under review), all nuances and subtleties are erased. We are left with the bald statistic that 49 percent of presidents met criteria for at least one mental illness. Based on my reading of the historical literature, I always thought Thomas Jefferson was shy and found public speaking difficult. He preferred the quiet of his study at Monticello to the raucous political environments of Philadelphia and Washington, DC (Ref. 11, pp 52–3). How does this morph into social phobia? Teddy Roosevelt was well known for extraordinary energy and stamina after a sickly childhood.12Certainly, high energy and high activity are seen in some manic individuals, but in many nonmanic ones as well. To move into diagnosis while ignoring the diagnostic criteria of “marked impairment” and much else makes me wonder whether the Goldwater Rule has a point or people are uncritical historians, but since the chapters under consideration here relate to making diagnoses of presidents, the 49 percent statistic spuriously serves to support the case in doing so for Mr. Trump.Finally, the lack of a scholarly discussion of the controversial relationship between personality disorders and major mental illnesses is noteworthy. As mentioned earlier, the quick slide from Mr. Trump's public displays of narcissism to a diagnosis of paranoia is almost a sleight of hand. There is some mention that he is a master of presentation management, a skilled presentation artist, such that one never quite knows what to make of any single outrageous or scary statement. This is not to scrub him of all psychiatric or psychological problems, but much of what he says is for public consumption. My point here is that he may be chameleon-like and therefore difficult to pigeonhole into a single category. The entire list of personality disorders is often hijacked as a way of expressing moral disapproval of a person. The noted German philosopher–psychiatrist Karl Jaspers, in discussing abnormal personalities, which he considers as variants of human nature and not indicative of sickness, describes one type of abnormal personality as craving “to appear, both to themselves and others, as more than they are and to experience more than they are ever capable of. The place of genuine experience and natural expression is usurped by a contrived stage-act, a forced kind of experience” (Ref. 13, p 443). Descriptive labels change over the decades, but the basic condition is recognizable.In summary, this book addresses two publicly noted deficits. One the lack of learned psychiatric commentary on the nature of Mr. Trump's dramatically unpresidential, mercurial, and troubling behaviors and his fitness to serve as president. The second is the lack of a substantial challenge to the APA's Goldwater Rule, which seems to stifle psychiatrists from publicly commenting on his mental state. There has been excellent and thoughtful commentary on Mr. Trump from a variety of journalists, public intellectuals both liberal and conservative, and others, but our profession has been largely silent as a result of the Goldwater Rule. Dr. Lee, in this edited book has moved psychiatry into the public forum and, in doing so, has issued a challenge to the APA to open these critically important questions to public debate.FootnotesDisclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.© 2018 American Academy of Psychiatry and the LawReferences1.↵American Psychiatric Association: The Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2009 Revised EditionGoogle Scholar2.↵Davis JH, Stolberg SG, Kaplan T: Trump alarms lawmakers with disparaging words for Haiti and Africa.New York Times, Thursday January 11, 2018, p 1Google Scholar3.↵Lieberman J: The dangerous case of psychiatrists writing about the POTUS's mental health. Psychiatr News. November 15, 2017. Psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.pn.2017.11b13/. Accessed December 11, 2017Google Scholar4.↵Moran M: AMA goes beyond ‘Goldwater Rule’ in ethics guidelines on media interaction. Psychiatr NewsDecember 15, 2017Google Scholar5.↵Ahmed A: A ban by any other name. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 44:226–35, 2016Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar6.↵Kroll J: APA's Goldwater Rule: Ethics of Speaking Publicly about Public Figures. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry. Washington, DC, May 3, 2008Google Scholar7.↵Kroll J, Pouncey C: The ethics of APA's Goldwater Rule. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 44:226–35, 2016Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar8.↵MacIntyre A: After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984Google Scholar9.↵American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Third Edition.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1980Google Scholar10.↵Davidson JRT, Connor KM, Swartz M: Mental illness in US Presidents between 1776 and 1974: a review of biographical sources. J Nerv Ment Dis 194:47–51, 2006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar11.↵Ellis JJ: American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson. New York, NY: Random House, 1997Google Scholar12.↵Morris E: Theodore Rex. New York, NY: Random House, 2002Google Scholar13.↵Max HamiltonJaspers K: General Psychopathology. Translated by Max Hamilton. Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press, 1913/1963Google Scholar