Dallas Police General Orders: Fill & Download for Free

What makes you mad about people that are anti police?My answer will be from the perspective of a police officer in the USA…A vast majority of the people who are anti police, have never been a police officer. They have not walked in our boots, and have no clue what it is like to be in law enforcement. They tend to make assumptions and generalizations, despite any facts to the contrary.Chances are, they have not been shot at by criminals that don’t care about life or property. They have not rescued a child from a burning house, with that child clinging to you for dear life. They have not held a baby that was crying out of hunger, because mom and dad died from a drug overdose, and the baby has not been fed in 12 hours. They have not held someone’s hand that was slowly dying, after being crushed and trapped in a car wreck. They have not performed first aid/CPR on someone that stared into your eyes, begging you to not let them die. They have not had to go do a death notification with a victim’s next of kin.Police officers do these things EVERY SINGLE DAY, and quite often, the same officer will have to do them multiple times over their career. We show up each day to perform our duty to the best of our abilities, but for some people, they hate us no matter what. We could save their entire family from an active shooter, but they would be pissed off because we had to kill the person that was trying to kill them.“Why didn’t you just use a Tazer, or a bean bag round to subdue him?”Because he had a freaking rifle, you idjit. Sorry, but I am not in the mood to die today. I have a family, too. I’d like to go home to them at the end of my shift, not to mention being there for my children for years to come, as they grow up.The Dallas, TX shooter had a rifle. He killed five police officers, and injured several others. That’s not the time to use “less lethal” options. The Dallas police had to use an explosive sent in on a robot, in order to stop that threat from killing any more people.Those same anti police people are quick to jump to conclusions. They have a tendency to lump all police officers into the same group, labeling them as racist murderers, despite the FACTS surrounding a case. They often pass judgment on police officers, before they even know anything about what happened.Could you imagine the backlash if someone said, “Since that Catholic priest is a child molester, all Catholic priests are child molesters.” Or if they said, “Since that black man is a criminal, all black men are criminals.” Those statements are absurd and far from being factual, yet, those people do that very thing when it comes to police officers. Are there some bad apples? Yes. Does that mean everyone with a badge is like that? Hell no! A vast majority are not.The USA has around 1 million law enforcement officers. If we were all a bunch of racist murderers, and we each killed 1 person per year, then there should be 1 million deaths, correct? However, the number of people killed each year is around 1,000 not 1,000,000. One officer out of every thousand may have to kill someone, and a vast majority of those shootings are JUSTIFIED. Let that sink in.When we say, “Put your hands up, don’t reach,” that’s not optional. It’s not a request or a suggestion. It’s a lawful order that is designed to protect YOU from getting shot. Obey it and live. People who refuse to obey that order are most often trying to get to a gun that is in their jacket, pocket, or waistband, ***OR*** that is what we have to assume, because any lawful person would be obeying our orders.When a police officer in question gets acquitted in a court of law, by a jury of 12 people no less, those in the anti police crowd go on a rampage. They smash store windows, loot businesses, set cars on fire, and destroy neighborhoods that had NOTHING to do with what happened. It does not matter what the camera footage showed, the mentality is that the officer was just WRONG and GUILTY of something. They demand justice. What about justice for the person whose business you just burned down?Fortunately, the segment of the population that acts in the manner described above, is small. Most citizens are level headed and wait for the facts of a case. They understand that most police officers are not cold-blooded, racist murders.Addendum:Why do we have to wear riot gear and carry shields? Because people throw stuff at us. That armor is not worn to look scary or intimidating, it’s to protect us from the bottles, rocks, and other crap that is thrown our way.Why do we have to wear bullet proof vests? Because people conceal pistols and shoot at us, quite often on traffic stops. They wait until we get up to the window and then BAM.Why do we have armored vehicles on the city streets? Because people shoot at us with rifles, and we have to have something that can withstand those bullets, in order to get into an area to save lives.Lastly, how do you stand against those that run toward gun fire, when everyone else is running away?

The US government is the only authority that can actually performed a true in depth investigation, and has refused to honestly do so.The Warren Commission Report was a rush job, as stated by the US Attorney’s office, to convince the American people that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin with no help. This is the US’s #1 law enforcement agency directing a wing of its departments, the FBI, on how to conduct its investigation. President Johnson seconded this decision, and J Edgar Hoover had his FBI agents carry out this task.Johnson and J Edgar Hoover selected men they could trust to use only the FBI’s findings to sit on the Warren Commission. Essential you have a stacked deck against a true JFK assassination, backed up by impeccable men sitting on a Kangaroo Court. This is the Warren Commission Report, based on the US Attorney Office pre-investigation to determine Oswald guilty. This isn’t made up.US Attorney General (acting- RFK was mourning death of JFK) Nickolas Katzenbach’s memo delivered to President Johnson day after Oswald is killed:The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial.Speculation about Oswald’s motivation ought to be cut off, and we should have some basis for rebutting thought that this was a Communist conspiracy or (as the Iron Curtain press is saying) a right–wing conspiracy to blame it on the Communists. Unfortunately the facts on Oswald seem about too pat — too obvious (Marxist, Cuba, Russian wife, etc.). The Dallas police have put out statements on the Communist conspiracy theory, and it was they who were in charge when he was shot and thus silenced.The matter has been handled thus far with neither dignity nor conviction. Facts have been mixed with rumor and speculation. We can scarcely let the world see us totally in the image of the Dallas police when our President is murdered.RFK Jr. the son of the RFK, said his father did a private investigation into his brother’s assassination and it turned up phone calls made between Ruby and Oswald before the assassination. So the two men knew each other, a fact the WCR denies.Robert Kennedy Jr. also stated his father thought there were other people involved and called the WCR a "shoddy piece of craftsmanship."The simple facts are the evidence doesn’t support the WCR findings. The FBI distorted all its evidence findings to place all guilt on Oswald. President Johnson by Executive order would lock away the JFK assassination files for 75 years, to block any other investigation into the assassination. Not a sign of honesty or open government. Johnson would be shown to be very deceptive, dishonest, and an outright liar, when he went before Congress for war powers based on his lies about the Gulf of Tonkin incident.Further government investigation into the assassination were shallow, one even suggesting there might have been a second assassin, but not delving into the matterFor the government to expose government wrong doing, this is what stops any other true investigationsOne final note. There are WCR diehards out there. I call them Bruces. Bruces call anyone that believes other than the government’s official line, nut jobs, wackos, and then they drift all over the place about Big Foot, aliens, etc.Ask yourselves, are these distorted people representing you. The JFK and RFK family members are saying both the assassinations are flawed. I’ll suffer the name callings because it is a sign of desperation on their part to silence the truth. The poor Bruces, they are lost in the pages of the shoddy craftmanship of the Warren Report.

This is discussed at length in the Warren Report. Basically, it was the usual conflict over “who has jurisdiction?”In general of course, almost any local law enforcement agency tries to cooperate with the feds (such as the Secret Service), and in a situation such as this, the Secret Service basically said “We’re in charge!” and none of the cops at the hospital were likely to step forward and say “No, you are not!”)Plus, in the instance you cite, it was complicated by the fact that Jackie herself obviously had no interest in changing out of that dress (that became an issue, on Air Force One, after they took off. Jackie adamantly refused to change her clothes on the plane.) The Secret Service wanted to get everybody else out, as quickly as possible. Out of the hospital, back to the airport, and in the air. (Think of the moments right after 9/11, where the Secret Service was trying to get the president in the air as quickly as possible).At that moment, nobody knew if this was a lone shooter (which we eventually learned), or a foreign coup by some other government. The Secret Service did not know if there was one assassin, or a hundred. And, they had Lyndon Johnson, remember? And, they did not feel they could protect him in Parkland Hospital, or at the airport, or anywhere else in Dallas. One person did try to stop the Secret Service from removing JFK’s corpse. At the hospital. But, the Secret Service agents overrode them, and literally used brute force to shove the gurney right past that person. It is all there in the Warren Report.I am not taking sides. The Warren Report does note that removing the body was technically also a clear violation of Texas Law. It also interviewed everybody involved, to examine their mindset, and notes the “failures.” You should read it.The dress was one of about a hundred such failures that occurred. It is easy to understand why they occurred, in hindsight. Especially, with a world in panic.If you are a grunt police officer on the street, and you are ordered to Parkland Hospital, or you have been ordered to Love Field, will you have the guts to walk up the First Lady — a grieving widow who has been cradling her husband’s brains for the past hour — and tell her “I am sorry, ma’am, but I am afraid we are going to have to impound that dress — it is evidence.” With tons of Secret Service agents barking “Move aside! Clear the way!”Will you still be a Dallas Police Officer tomorrow, if you dare to try such a thing?