Ics 203 Example: Fill & Download for Free

NFC tags can store upwards of 8kB of data depending on the IC, but the larger memory payloads can get expensive.More commonly you'll encounter the following sizes:64 Bytes (NXP MiFare Ultralight)168 Bytes (NXP NTAG 203)512 Bytes (Innovision Topaz-512)1 kB (MiFare Classic)Note: these values represent the full tag memory size - not all of which is user writable. For example, when you sub out the locked pages, NDEF formatting, and other meta information the 64 byte MiFare Ultralight can only store 46 bytes of user data.

This paper does an excellent job of “defending” evolution and natural selection with specific reference to IC:A Classification of Possible Routes of Darwinian Evolution Richard H. Thornhill and Daviud W. Uussery J. theor. Biol. (2000) 203, 111-116 available online at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/CBS/courses/genomics_course/2000_ClassDarwin.pdfBehe made a Straw Man version of natural selection. Natural selection works by 4 routes. IC structures as defined by Behe cannot be made by 1 of them. The other 3 routes will make IC.Then, of course, Behe cut the ground out from under his own idea that IC structures cannot arise by naturalistic processes:"Let me inject a note of caution: some systems require several pieces but not ones that need to be closely matched. For example, suppose you were walking in the woods and came across an old log, where the wind had blown a tree branch onto it, and the branch was perpendicular to the log. Here you have an irreducibly complex system -- a lever and a fulcrum. If there were a boulder nearby, you possibly could use the lever and fulcrum to move it. So some systems require several parts but not closely matched ones." Michael Behe, Intelligent design theory as a tool for analyzing biochemical systems in Mere Creation, Science, Faith, and Intelligent Design edited by William A. Dembski, 1998, page 179Look at that closely: simple IC can easily arise by chance. Once that IC structure exists, then even Behe’s Straw Man version can make the parts be closely matched and even add more parts. Behe wants to argue that IC can only be made by an intelligent being, but here he refutes his own argument.Finally, all the “IC” biochemical systems used by Behe in Darwin’s Black Box had evolutionary/natural selection pathways worked out before Behe published his book. IC as a challenge to evolution/natural selection had already been tested and refuted before Behe published.

No. Between them, Jeremy Teman and Justin Eiler have provided the answer and references I would have. I would add only one more reference refuting that the flagellum (or cilium) is "irreducibly complex": Finding Darwin's God by Kenneth Miller.In general, "irreducible complexity" fails as a refutation of evolution by natural selection. One of the problems with IC has been noted by none other than the author of IC Michael Behe:"Let me inject a note of caution: some systems require several pieces but not ones that need to be closely matched. For example, suppose you were walking in the woods and came across an old log, where the wind had blown a tree branch onto it, and the branch was perpendicular to the log. Here you have an irreducibly complex system -- a lever and a fulcrum. If there were a boulder nearby, you possibly could use the lever and fulcrum to move it. So some systems require several parts but not closely matched ones." Michael Behe, Intelligent design theory as a tool for analyzing biochemical systems in Mere Creation, Science, Faith, and Intelligent Design edited by William A. Dembski, 1998, page 179Look closely at this: Behe says an irreducibly complex system can come into existence by chance. That refutes Behe's whole argument about IC can only be made by deity! It can be made by chance. It's not closely matched, but Behe is very clear that natural selection can take an existing system and make it closely matched.Behe made his argument by making a strawman version of natural selection. It turns out that natural selection can indeed make irreducibly complex systems -- including flagella -- because natural selection can work by "routes" that Behe ignored. If you want a full discussion of that, go here: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/staff/dave/articles/jtb.pdfA Classification of Possible Routes of Darwinian Evolution Richard H. Thornhill and Daviud W. Uussery J. theor. Biol. (2000) 203, 111-116