Statutory Declaration Form 2020: Fill & Download for Free

Question: If Trump tried to postpone the 2020 election, claiming there was too much risk of voter fraud, could he do it by executive order? If not, what would it take?First, the President has no power to “postpone” the 2020 election. That power is not granted to him anywhere in the United States Constitution.But, suppose he did somehow postpone the election or create enough chaos that the election was corrupted and the Supreme Court did something to invalidate the results….Per the 20th Amendment, Section 1:The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.So, at noon on January 20, 2021, Trump would no longer be President and Pence would no longer be Vice President. He would not even be in the order of succession to be President (minor extremely unlikely caveat below). He would have eliminated his chance to serve another term by postponing the election so he would be unlikely to do what the question suggests.At that time, he would be trespassing if he set foot in the White House except as a visitor and would be physically removed just as you or I would (well, probably slightly more politely - at least at the beginning of the interaction).Who would become President that case? Section 3 of the 20th Amendment addresses this in part:If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.Since there would be no President elect or Vice President elect, statutory law would decide who became the President. The Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (as amended) would be the relevant law and the Speaker of the House would become President (presumably, Nancy Pelosi as I don’t believe she’s indicated she won’t run for re-election in 2020 and it’s unlikely she will lose her Speaker position even if “The Squad” would prefer that AOC or someone similar ended up in that role).Perhaps Congress could change the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 at that time with a simple majority in the House and the Senate to cause someone else to be selected or even to cause a special election to be held to fill the vacancies. They would have to wait 10 days (excluding Sundays) after passage for the non-existent President to veto it (which, of course, could not happen) before the law could take effect.(Why did I just spend so much time responding to a troll…)

Yes, emphatically.The whole point of a census is to learn how many people live in this country and to obtain important direct Information about the makeup of our society.That includes knowing how many people are here who don’t belong here, and where they are. It is estimated that between 11 million and more than 22 million illegal aliens cost American taxpayers between $135 Billion and $300 Billion every year… and yet we have no hard information about who they are, where they live, and other facts that are important to making policy and enforcing our laws.It is also necessary to stop a scheme by California to artificially inflate its residency count in order to obtain more representation in Congress and more Electoral votes for Democrats, by declaring itself a “Sanctuary State” to attract as many illegal aliens as possible. By determining how many residents of each state are illegals, they can be excluded from the count for determining electoral representation, since they have no right to electoral representation at all.So yes, big YES, this questions needs to be on the 2020 Census. The arguments against it are transparent attempts to prevent lawmakers and law enforcement from learning how truly massive this problem is, and doing anything about it. It has been manipulated into yet another attempt at power grab by Democrats who seem to have no scruples left at all when it comes to voting.The other issue is whether a local district judge has the authority to block a completely separate Branch of Government from doing its Constitutional and statutory duty, and to impose their opinions by fiat far outside their own jurisdiction?? I ask, where in the Constitution does it say that a lowly district federal judge is the boss of the President of the United States? I can’t seem to find it. It is the equivalent of a local Congressman from, say, Kansas, telling the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court what cases SCOTUS can hear and how they should decide them. Preposterous, right? No more so than having local judges order the President and his agencies around.Until some judge can show where such hubris has an explicit Constitutional authority, the President is entirely correct to ignore what said judge pronounces, being his or her own opinion and having zero legal authority. It is long past due that this practice of local district judges imposing injunctions, rules, deadlines, and demands on the agencies of a separate and equal Branch of Government cease and desist.

Two weeks ago, a 19-year-old British woman accused 12 Israeli boys of gang raping her in Cyprus.(These are two of the boys pulling their shirts over their faces to avoid having their identity revealed.)Her story: She consented to sex with one of the boys and the other 11 jumped on her and gang raped her.And three of the boys had DNA evidence suggesting a sexual encounter. The woman had bruises on her thighs as well.She lied.She changed her story more than once, was confronted with evidence that at least one of the men had 100% definitely not been there at the time of the incident.And she confessed to lying, but claimed that she made the rape accusation up because the men she consensually had sex with filmed the whole encounter.The woman changed her story AGAIN, saying she had sex with the three boys, but refused to let a fourth join in. Angry and humiliated, she went to her friends who told her to report them.No evidence has risen to confirm her second or third story.They were boys.All of them were aged 15–18. Depending on which ones she had sex with, she could’ve been a statutory rapist.Seven of them were in jail for about a week, only five were released immediately. Despite being kept anonymous, one of the boys even reports:“I am walking in the street and people are calling me a rapist.”And this was in Israel, after returning home.But others were just happy to be out:‘I feel great. The truth came out and I am happy,’Thankfully, the woman is reportedly going to prison for a year, and is probably going to be facing a multi-million dollar fine.What concerns me is EVERYONE who acted like they knew all the facts before the full story leaked.Many women’s organizations in Israel made opinion pieces about “toxic masculinity” in Israeli men before the allegation was revealed to be false.Several of them condemned the boys and sent support to the British woman.It’s insane.It’s insane how much coverage this got before a verdict was declared.And how quickly people were jumping to conclusions, and writing opinion pieces. Even if it turned out that the woman was innocent and the boys were guilty, this shouldn’t have been made public for the sake of both parties’ privacy and sanity.These boys will forever be traumatized by this. But because of the media coverage they’ll be traumatized by the stigma for the rest of their lives.That’s scary.Edit 2020: It looks like the woman was charged and served a 4 month sentence for her actions. Whatever you choose to believe, it’s clear that the media is coverage is wack and their versions of the story changed several times very quickly. The courts made their decision and I will choose to go with that, but don’t trust everything you hear in the news.