Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation: Fill & Download for Free

GET FORM

Download the form

A Stepwise Guide to Editing The Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation

Below you can get an idea about how to edit and complete a Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation hasslefree. Get started now.

  • Push the“Get Form” Button below . Here you would be taken into a page that allows you to make edits on the document.
  • Choose a tool you like from the toolbar that pops up in the dashboard.
  • After editing, double check and press the button Download.
  • Don't hesistate to contact us via [email protected] for additional assistance.
Get Form

Download the form

The Most Powerful Tool to Edit and Complete The Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation

Edit Your Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation At Once

Get Form

Download the form

A Simple Manual to Edit Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation Online

Are you seeking to edit forms online? CocoDoc can be of great assistance with its Complete PDF toolset. You can accessIt simply by opening any web brower. The whole process is easy and convenient. Check below to find out

  • go to the CocoDoc product page.
  • Upload a document you want to edit by clicking Choose File or simply dragging or dropping.
  • Conduct the desired edits on your document with the toolbar on the top of the dashboard.
  • Download the file once it is finalized .

Steps in Editing Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation on Windows

It's to find a default application capable of making edits to a PDF document. Fortunately CocoDoc has come to your rescue. Take a look at the Handback below to find out how to edit PDF on your Windows system.

  • Begin by adding CocoDoc application into your PC.
  • Upload your PDF in the dashboard and make edits on it with the toolbar listed above
  • After double checking, download or save the document.
  • There area also many other methods to edit PDF files, you can check it out here

A Stepwise Handbook in Editing a Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation on Mac

Thinking about how to edit PDF documents with your Mac? CocoDoc can help.. It empowers you to edit documents in multiple ways. Get started now

  • Install CocoDoc onto your Mac device or go to the CocoDoc website with a Mac browser.
  • Select PDF sample from your Mac device. You can do so by pressing the tab Choose File, or by dropping or dragging. Edit the PDF document in the new dashboard which includes a full set of PDF tools. Save the file by downloading.

A Complete Advices in Editing Anthem Long Term Disability Continuation on G Suite

Intergating G Suite with PDF services is marvellous progess in technology, with the potential to reduce your PDF editing process, making it easier and with high efficiency. Make use of CocoDoc's G Suite integration now.

Editing PDF on G Suite is as easy as it can be

  • Visit Google WorkPlace Marketplace and locate CocoDoc
  • install the CocoDoc add-on into your Google account. Now you are in a good position to edit documents.
  • Select a file desired by pressing the tab Choose File and start editing.
  • After making all necessary edits, download it into your device.

PDF Editor FAQ

What is the most extreme political hypocrisy?

For several years, I’ve taken unpopular stances in defending institutions of the United States that come under heavy criticism. These included defense of the National Anthem when it was called a “racist” anthem of a “racist” country, and more recently, defending the very institution of the police. In both cases, whether it’s about kneeling during the anthem or claiming that the police are racist, the issue we deal with is “systemic racism.”“Systemic racism” isn't racism, as most of us understand it. It isn't when a person is treated differently because of their skin color. That’s the definition we all used to believe.Racism is said to be "systemic" when the negative treatment doesn’t come from an individual, but from the system itself. Think Jim Crow. Jim Crow was systemic racism because treating people differently because of race was literally written into the laws. The systems that existed were clearly and demonstrably systemic racism by design.With systemic racism, you could have institutions filled with otherwise decent people, but because the rules are written in, it will do things that oppress or hold back certain people automatically. For example, Civil Rights was about fighting systemic racism, as in, if there is a rule on the books that is literally written to treat one race different from another, that’s illegal. Once discovered, anyone could challenge it in a court of law and that rule will no longer be a rule.This was the purpose of Civil Rights. It provided the legal framework for fighting systemic racism, as in, if there is a rule on the books that is literally written to treat one race different from another, that’s illegal. You can challenge it a court of law and that rule will no longer be a rule.That was the victory of the Civil Rights movement. It wasn’t that we “fixed racism”. Such high minded ideals will never happen. So long as people themselves are different, someone will come to generalizations and not like them. I prefer that reality to one where we’re all soulless robots. But Civil Rights did create a system whereby people can challenge unfair laws or organizational polices in courts and those organizations could be pressed to change. The organization continues to provide service to the community, but the rule that hurts people is removed. Whatever racism existed in the system is purged and racism itself is disincentivized throughout society. Win-Win, but it takes time.Not days or weeks, but at least a generation. You were born in a time where racism is considered very ugly. 99% of humanity going back tens of thousands of years... thought it was a survival tactic, and it worked. Be thankful for the times you live in, but radical change following every ideological whim will undermine whatever healthy progress we've thus far created.This process, beginning with abolition, continuing through the Civil Right's era, has already been going on now for several succeeding generations. The incentives to be racist, either personally or instructionally are so bad that trying it openly will cost you. In that sort of culture, racism dies.Yea.That’s why racism is the lowest it’s ever been… well, that’s not true. Things were better around 2009, but that's another story for a different day. But in general, the great crime of our education and information dissemination systems is the failure of the average American to know that we are the least racist today than we have ever been, or even that America, when measured against almost anywhere else, is one of the least racist places in the world.That is to say that while finding individual examples of racism isn’t very hard, it’s hard to say that all Americas are racist. Finding an example of a neo-nazi or member of the KKK isn't hard. I mean, it's very hard to find one in person, but the media is very good at making sure you see the few who come out. Did you know that the KKK only consists of about 7,000 members, and that they are mostly just small feuding groups spread across the country with no influence at all? That's not a conservative stance. That's actually sourced from the Southern Poverty Law Center's hate group tracker, and the SPLC has anything but a history of being fair in that regard. That they could only prove about 7,000 disparate people should say something about how much attention they receive.But this is also racism, of the kind that you very rarely see outside of a few select sources.Finding examples of racism that goes the other way isn't difficult either. Seeing things like "Die Whites Die", "All White People are Racist", undermines the notion that racism is a purely white problem.To say nothing of events that should outrage everyone, like the kidnapping and torture of a mentally handicapped man, tied, beaten, and forced to drink from a toilet while denouncing Donald Trump by four black kidnappers. They’re bigotry was so normalized that they broadcast it over Facebook. How normal do you have to think a hate crime is to post it live to Social Media, not realizing this will probably have consequences? Why we aren’t talking about this daily still boggles my mind.(Four charged with hate crimes for torturing mentally disabled teen on Facebook Live)Regardless of these events, or the existence of groups who are hateful, that doesn't define a population of over three hundred million people. We've been told for decades against the evils of overgeneralizing whole populations. Why does that rule apply to some groups, and not to America itself?Measuring objectively, it’s very difficult to prove that racism is actually a defining characteristic of our country. In fact, the more you look elsewhere (save for those special utopian European cities where all the tourists go) you see that America is far more racially tolerant than is normal. That is to say that the presence of racism somewhere in a population does not make the population racist, just like a person of a particular color being in a gang doesn’t make everyone who looks like him gang members. I assume I don’t need to illustrate this point further.But that’s exactly what we’ve done. For reasons that are too extensive for this letter, we’ve taken examples of some people’s racism, mostly a small handful of white supremacists spread across the country in tiny pockets of discontentment, added the fact that racial economic and social disparity still exists, and ignored all other possible explanations for why that could happen, and jumped to the conclusion that white supremacy built and perpetuates a system specifically designed to disenfranchise people of color.What other explanations exist? I’ve written a massive answer on answering just that question: Jon Davis's answer to Why do many white people pretend racism does not exist? There, you’ll see many arguments for why there is racial disparity in America that are not caused by racism. And the people I sourced for that aren’t other white people. They are black conservatives who look to more grounded explanations for why things are as they are in their communities than the simple excuse that the racism of someone who doesn’t live anywhere near them, has no power over them, and has no interest in their lives, is still responsible for most of the disparity in 2020. That’s a massive answer, so if you’re curious, go there, but we’re not going to talk about it, here. What we are going to talk about is how, in spite of many, many well documented examples demonstrating why black disparity exists that have nothing to do with racism, it is believed that whole vital institutions in America are said to be systemically racist.For example, let’s start the police. Currently, we’re just coming down from a months long struggle that culminated with violence towards police and calls for abolishing them everywhere. Why? Because the police, not just some police officers, but the entire institution of policing in the United States is said to be racist at its core.The police, and the justice system itself, are considered to be systemically racist because more blacks are imprisoned than whites per capita. Individual high profile incidents shine a bright blazing beacon on the problem, and point to a system that makes cops actually racist, specifically targeting blacks for arrest, and even killing, some going so far as to accuse the American police forces as literally guilty of black genocide. Those aren’t true. There have been numerous studies done that show that blacks and whites, when in the same situations are treated the same by cops, such as police shootings. In fact, studies have shown that white police officers are less likely to kill minorities than other whites in similar situations. [1][1][1][1]No, the issue is that there are more crimes committed per capita, and particularly violent crimes among those populations than others. That is the disparity, and the criminal justice system should reflect it. Solving for why that happens is something I already addressed here. Simply put, bad policy, which people voted for, that led to destructive unintended consequences on a population like increasing fatherlessness in the home, the decline of education standards, shipping jobs overseas, or piling tens of thousands of people in a few block area (the Projects) was a recipe for the predictable disaster that has fallen on black cities. And it was predicted. People said that we would see a rise in crime and other vices and we did. It's not an aspect of black culture. That is not a natural consequence of a people that gave us Frederick Douglass, the Harlem Renaissance, and Thomas Sowell. It's a consequence of bad policy, and of politicians who refuse to take responsibility for saying, "Our ideas may have meant well, but failed and now we have do the hard thing, and take away programs that people have grown dependent upon. It will cost us votes, but it's the right thing to do." Rather than do that hard thing, those same people blame other people's racism, and the cops.Because there is a demonstrable difference in the outcomes one race experiences, regardless of the initiating events that led to that difference, it is said that there is inequality and when race is involved in that, it is racism. Too often, actually reviewing the specifics of a case undermines the argument that a specific person’s white racism was to blame, in the first place. People rioted and destroyed whole cities because of that belief, but the facts don't add up. A thorough look into the history Michael Brown, famous for "Hands up; Don't shoot" is a case study in how an incident can be turned 180 degrees from what actually happened to what people were protesting about. Whatever, the case, that and all the other incidents are still viewed as proof of America's white racism and of the police. The racism is built into the system, regardless of the individual cop in question. Where no individual’s explicit racism can be proven, but some racial inequality exists… then the cause is systemic racism.Put differently, the arguments of systemic racism say that whether or not racism exists in individuals, it exists at the organizational level. This is particularly true if those organizations and institutions were built during more racist times, having inherited the racism of their founders, who subtly built the racism into the system.It really doesn’t matter what events have transpired since then, what reforms have been made, even cases where racist people were purged, or racist policies stricken either by an act of law, or by the institution itself voluntarily. The extremist view that is gaining significant wind is that an organization that in any way held a different standard of ethics than we do today, be that racism, sexism, or otherwise, is irredeemable and must atone or be abolished for past crimes. If the institution existed during a time more racist than today, they are part of whatever problems exist for racial minorities at present and therefore… racist. Worse still, any greater institution, such as the United States itself, which doesn’t solve the problem as the accusers see fit (not being “anti-racist”) then they are racist as well. This was why Collin Kaepernick’s is now famous, as demonstrated in own statements when he refused to stand for the flag of a racist nation. To quote him:"I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color," Kaepernick told NFL Media in an exclusive interview after the game. "To me, this is bigger than football and it would be selfish on my part to look the other way. There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder."[1]Here’s an interesting case to to consider. In 2002, there was a lawsuit which held eight American companies responsible for reparations for blacks in America because of links to slavery over 150 years prior… to the tune of $1.4 trillion dollars.A prayer on a Brooklyn street preceded the filing of an unprecedented $1.4 trillion lawsuit against eight major corporations alleged to have profited from their historical ties to the slave trade more than 137 years ago.Claiming to represent all of the United States' 35 million African-Americans, New York slave reparations activist Deadria Farmer-Paellmann named Aetna Inc., CSX Corp. and FleetBoston Financial Corp., among others, as unjustly profiting from the slave trade before the Civil War ended in 1865."We are going to finally hold corporations accountable for the crimes against humanity that they've committed against my ancestors," Farmer-Paellmann told reporters Tuesday.(Eric Shawn, 2002)[2][2][2][2]Later in the article, more light is given on the fact that the law firm Farmer-Paellmann was the same firm who won over $8 Billion from Swiss banks who held Nazi assets taken from Jews before and during World War II. They base the legitimacy of their 2002 claims on the fact that companies like Aetna had already previously acknowledged that shortly after its founding it insured the lives of slaves in a 2000 acknowledgment expressing their deep regret over any participation at all in this deplorable practice. Likewise, CSX was placed on the list because slave labor was produced to build railways. Beyond that, companies such as New York Life, AIG, J.P. Morgan Chase, Wachovia, and FleetBoston also made the list.Wachovia, it needs to be highlighted, didn’t even exist during slavery. It was founded in 1879. They were held responsible for the actions of two companies they purchased in 1991, the Bank of Charleston and Georgia Railroad and Banking Companies, both of whom owned slaves prior to the Civil War. Yet the burden was pushed to Wachovia, somehow. That’s interesting, because now Wachovia itself no longer exists. Following the collapse of the banking industry in 2008, Wachovia was purchased by Wells Fargo. That said, the argument that Wachovia had any wealth it owed to slavery following 2008, or the numerous other recessions it survived, to say nothing of the Great Depression which preceded it, is a tough sell, particularly when its sin came from two other companies it bought years prior. But give it about 10 more years, and we’ll see if anyone starts looking to Wells Fargo for their slave owning past, by way of the defunct Wachovia, by way of two companies which stopped existing in the 1990s. This is to say that at no point will the apologies or the forms of reparations be enough, so long as someone somewhere has not achieved prosperity and someone somewhere can be linked to some ancestral form of victimhood. [3][3][3][3]This case ended with the expected failure, however numerous companies were forced into some action. J.P. Morgan Chase apologizing for some tie to slavery and the creation of a $5 million scholarship program in 2005. But it didn’t stop with just that case.So that we understand the situation, eight companies were forced in 2002 to defend the notion that they are currently responsible to pay for their participation, or rather, their existence in the vaguest of definitions, in normal market activities of the time, from a 150 years prior… for 1.4 trillion dollars. A rational thinking person would argue that a company which traded slaves prior to the Civil War is doubtfully still profiting from that individual choice. Given the undeniable destruction of the South’s economy from the Civil War, a Great Depression, and numerous recessions since, it’s hard to say that slavery is why these companies remain successful and why they hold some burden of guilt. They don’t. It’s not reasonable.While this case sounded ridiculous, this “original sin” outlook of judging and punishing today’s institutions based on the events of hundreds of years ago is a modern basis for critical race theory. Collin Kaerpernick’s now famous kneeling has awarded him millions based on this idea, but #takeaknee wasn’t even the worst case of original sin critical race theory in action. For that, we should look to the New York Times’ 1619 Project.Immediately after the Trump/Russia collusion story fell through, the New York Times’ very intentionally shifted to a narrative of America’s troubling racist past and it’s implications in today’s world.[4][4][4][4] 1619 Project’s stated aim is to “reframe the country’s history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of [the United States'] national narrative." What it actually does is attempt to paint the America which exists today as being truly founded in 1619 with the first slave trade in what would become the United States, and that America’s legacy, its very essence, is one built on the backs of slaves. The Civil War, the repeal of Jim Crowe, Civil Rights reforms, none of that matters because in the beginning, slavery existed and for all time, that fact will remain… so long as the United States itself does.The 1619 Project has also been widely criticized for a very revisionist interpretation of history, stretching truths to paint the United States, the Revolution, the Civil War, and even Abraham Lincoln through a very cynical lens. Sean Wilentz, an expert on early American History for Princeton University rebuked the 1619 Project for “rendering [Abraham Lincoln] as a white supremacist”.[5][5][5][5] In a post to The Atlantic he also said that "No effort to educate the public in order to advance social justice can afford to dispense with a respect for basic facts". Other criticisms came after accusations that the American Revolution was really fought to protect slavery and other for the intended attacks on capitalism, as 1619 was “construing slavery as a capitalist venture despite documented anti-capitalist sentiment among many Southern slaveholders.” [6][6][6][6]The 1619 Project’s failures make it clear what it was about. It wanted to paint the United States as a nation defined by racism and slavery by reinterpreting its roots. Looking to the timing and stated goals of the editors discovered through leaks, it was also clear that this more about short term political victories (which as news paper shouldn’t be in the business of pursuing anyway). Regardless, this theory of original sin guilt of the past, only makes sense if you follow the central premise that just because a flaw existed in the beginning, that it will therefore be a problem for all time. I don’t.The creators of the 1619 Project aren’t alone. Critical Race Theory perpetuates the notion, arguing that the Anthem of the United States needs to be removed because of an out of context mention of slaves in an all but forgotten second verse. Because it has been branded historically racist, that paints any occurrence of the anthem as “deeply problematic”. Moving on, others have said that the Constitution itself codifies Systemic Racism because it was written by white slave owners. Done. Follow on amendments such as ending slavery and guaranteeing legal rights to all people regardless of skin color simply do not matter. The only context which does matter was the context upon which the foundational document of the United States was written. Many of those men owned slaves, so anything they wrote was white supremacy, and therefore, we live in a racist nation… even if no one can clearly point to the racist people in positions of power, what specifically they have done that was racist, what policies explicitly or implicitly create racist inequality, or which specific parts of which institutions are creating racist outcomes. America was, is, and will always be racist. That’s it.Okay, now that we’ve laid out what systemic racism is, who it affects, and how it is an inescapable and unforgivable burden of guilt on the accused… we need to talk about the hypocrisy.If racism was ever part of the picture in the history of an organization, then it is forever marked by that fact. It can never be anything but an oppressive organization. That's the new rule. We’ve seen that a civil war that was the deadliest in our nation’s history wasn’t enough to pay for the guilt of American slavery. Numerous amendments to the Constitution aren’t either. Civil Rights reforms making laws targeting others didn’t do the job. Now, proving racism is harder than ever before, where we don’t even know what exactly needs to be stricken to somehow make it better. We’re at a point that the sources of racism are so vague that we have to simply look to organizations that existed during times when things were worse than they are today as responsible. It was there at their foundation, so its there for all time. Right?So, where does the hypocrisy come in?Because the people who say these things the most, are Democrats trying to elect Joe Biden as President of the United States.Let’s keep this idea of systemic racism, original sin guilt of America as demonstrated by the 1619 Project, and all the other examples I’ve pointed out, and ask why they don’t apply to some people.In 1977, Biden was a U.S. senator in Delaware. He communicated then that he was against desegregation. One quote now famous among conservatives was that desegregation could result in his children growing up in “a racial jungle with tensions having built so high that it is going to explode at some point.” In 1994, he sponsored a crime bill where-in he called the people it targeted, mostly black men, as “predators”. That legislation, The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, H.R. 3355, Pub.L. 103 — 322, has been explicitly called out by black activists as one of the most demonstrable sources of systemic racism for the way it targeted inner city blacks almost specifically. All that was all before the era of “Joe Biden gaffs” like “poor kids can be just as smart as white kids,” too. Even Kamala Harris, his now running mate, has put him to task on his uncomfortable history of backing actual racist policy makers, and even former members of the KKK.“I also believe — and it’s personal and it was hurtful to hear you talk about the reputations of two United States senators who built their reputations and career on the segregation of race in this country. And it was not only that, but you also worked with them to oppose busing,” Harris said. “There was a little girl in California who was part of the second class to integrate her public schools, and she was bused to school everyday. And that little girl was me.”Taqwa Lee III on Medium explains in “Why We Call Him Jim Crow Joe Biden.”Jim Crow was named after an insulting song lyric regarding American Descendants Of Slavery (ADOS), the laws that existed for about 100 years, from the post-Civil War era until 1968 were meant to return Southern states to an antebellum class structure by marginalizing American Descendants Of Slavery (ADOS). ADOS communities and individuals that defied Jim Crow laws often were murdered or thrown in prison.By the time Joe Biden started his political career his worldview was molded in a time of legalized racial discrimination so he quite naturally wanted to continue the legacy of that American institution of Jim Crow not only by tradition but it helped him and his progeny as well, so he did.From the first time he was elected as a Senator of Delaware in 1973 all the way up to 2009 and still continues to show us that he has never been an ally to Black Americans (ADOS), the only reason Jim Crow Joe is even running for president again, is because people have this perception of ‘uncle joe’ largely because he was Obama’s VP.[7][7][7][7]That sounds very clearly like critical race theory applied in a place it rarely is -- the left.Looking at Biden’s legacy, he has worked as part of the Democratic Party, where blacks have seen a reduction in living standards, harsher conditions, more death from violent crime, increased criminalization, for nearly five decades. These stigmas are most clearly demonstrated in the areas where Democrats have the greatest controls. Conservatives are very quick to point out that when you look to the places where blacks express the greatest resentment about inequality, you find those are far more likely to be devoid of Republican leadership. Look to the recent death of George Floyd. That took place in a city ran by a Democratic police chief, with an all Democrat city council, a Democrat Mayor, in a state with a Democrat governor. And all this has been consistent for decades. But the blame? It always goes to conservative white racism and Donald Trump. But how can that be when conservatives and Republicans are strangely absent from the site of their greatest crimes against humanity? That is the party that Joe Biden has been a leader of for nearly half a century without it getting better for the people it claims to represent the most.Getting off Biden for a while, maybe we should revisit the Democrats and their history, again, keeping in mind the inescapable guilt inherit to arguments of systemic racism.The Democratic party is directly responsible for writing the darkest pages of American history. They began under Andrew Jackson as the party that ordering the exile of the Native Americans. They were the party in defense of slavery, and the party of the Confederacy. They used the Ku Klux Klan as their militant arm to terrorize and repress the black vote during Reconstruction. They were the party of Jim Crow. Later, as “the Progressive party” they were the party of eugenics and then the internment of the Japanese during World War II. And finally, right up until “the Great Switch”, they pushed the hardest against civil rights.Many of those events, such as those relating to the Civil War and black representation, have been framed as owed to “conservatives”. That, however, falls apart when realizing that the Civil War, and all later conflicts resulting around black civil rights were between two different schools of thought, that of “all men are created innately equal in the sight of God” (see Bertrand Russell, a key founder of modern conservative philosophy) and “local sovereignty of the states”. Neither of these are modern progressive ideals, but both are modern conservative values. Simply saying conservativism is “preserving the status quo” is absurd when there exists an entire conservative ideology today that was as much a part of freeing slaves as it was a part of holding them back. So blame conservatism if you like, but just like “Antifa is just an idea”, so is conservatism. But the Democratic party is a real organization and the specific burden of history lies with Democrats.But what about that Great Switch? For those unaware, this was a great enlightenment during the time of Civil Rights, where Democrats today say that everything turned around. The Democrats became the party of justice and equality and the Republicans transformed into the party of racism. Three points are generally given as proof of this switch:In order to compete in the South, Republicans pandered to white racists in the sixties.Angry racist Democrats left their party & joined the Republicans after the Civil Rights act of 1964.This was all part of “the Southern Strategy”, and ever since, the Republicans have dominated the South.These facts are all incorrect.First, it assumes that the Democratic Party could evolve to no longer be racist, but Southerners themselves could not. “You’re from Georgia, and you’re white. Therefore, you’re a racist. Because Science.”Yeah, that’s not how things work. It is how bigotry works, but no other process is involved when looking at the perpetual assumption of racism of anyone born South of Mason Dixon line one hundred and fifty years after its relevance. What actually happened was that, as the South was forced to modernize, the same economic forces that made it stupid to be racist in business in the North then applied to the South. As wealth followed those who embraced blacks both as customers and employees, racism gradually diminished in the South. It’s just really hard to continue being a powerful racist when your competitor down the street is beating you because they aren’t. As racism went away and the economy of the South modernized, a new generation started joining the Republican party for its economic policies. It wasn’t the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Second, angry Democrats leaving their party sounds nice, but in actuality, there was only 1 Democratic Senator who opposed the bill and joined the Republicans. And finally, the belief that ever since, the Republicans have dominated the South ignores the fact that they didn’t hold a majority of Southern seats until 1994. The “Southern Strategy” is what many call this intentional effort to use the South’s racism by the Republicans, and is often said to be “proven” by one staffer in the 1980s who admitted that they did use a Southern Strategy, which those wanting to paint the Republicans as the real party of racism ever since have used ad nauseam. Looking at the actual evolution of the South, one where the world changed and the South changed with it, which Democrats are going to want to admit is possible, the Southern Strategy was to appeal to new values of the South, no longer trapped by an agrarian mode of thinking.In truth, even if a great switch happened, it didn’t happen in 1964, but in the 1920s. Prior to that time, Woodrow Wilson laid the groundwork for some of the most left leaning socialist programs in American history, attempting to solve American problems (for poor whites) through big spending government programs. That is the same Woodrow Wilson, famous for screening the first movie in the White House. That movie, lest it be forgotten, was Birth of a Nation, the Ku Klux Klan recruitment film, popular at the time of the Klan’s history that saw it go from a militant arm of the Democratic party in the South to a mainstream movement across the country. [8][8][8][8]Wilson’s successor was Franklin Roosevelt, who carried on the progressive legacy with the New Deal. The programs of the New Deal were intended to serve as handouts for poor whites, to raise them out of poverty through expensive government works programs and high taxes. This was particularly those still living under the economic consequences of the Civil War. One could call it the actual Southern Strategy. Poor blacks, however, having lived under centuries of actual racial oppression of Jim Crow had very good reasons then for being underserved and underprivileged. As would be naturally expected, they also sought this government relief, as well as voting for the party that wanted more of it. It wasn’t until the 1960s that these programs brought over enough poor blacks, and kept them there, that they comprised a large presence in the Democratic Party. Realizing what they had, the party’s narrative had to follow through. Then the Democrats shifted from a platform of actual white supremacy to one of black patronage, wherein blacks needed the help and patronage of the white race to achieve equal status. It was deeply condescending, but better than the last century.What was a real problem, however was the transactional nature this relationship often took, wherein blacks were given patronage by the new Democrats, but something was expected in return. President Lyndon B. Johnson illustrates that point, rather nicely, according to historian Doris Kearns Goodwin.“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don’t move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there’ll be no way of stopping them, we’ll lose the filibuster and there’ll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It’ll be Reconstruction all over again.”Another statement, attributed to Ronald M. MacMillan, a former Air Force One steward:“I’ll have those ni**ers voting Democratic for 200 years.”He also called the Civil Rights Act of 1957 the “ni**er bill” to Senatorial colleagues and said of appointing African-American judge Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court:“Son, when I appoint a ni**er to the court, I want everyone to know he’s a ni**er.”So… it seems not all the racist Democrats fled to the Republican Party. At least one stayed on as President. That said, given the “switch” from a supremacist outlook to one of patronage, which in hindsight unironically achieved the same conditions for those involved, it left anyone consistently believing that people should just be free to prosper on their own merit rather than being judged based on the color of their skin suddenly and miraculously going from “for black equality” to “not doing enough for blacks” to “the real white supremacists.”All that to say that the Democratic Party cannot escape it’s own history by passing the blame on to conservatives and Republicans. They can’t suddenly decree that everyone they disagree with are fascists and Nazis to overshadow their own past. And they can’t pretend that suddenly deciding they speak for the downtrodden absolves them from the responsibility of being most responsible of the problems they blame on others.While this answer appears to be a scathing indictment of the Democratic Party and Joe Biden, it actually isn’t.It’s illustrating a point.If many of you believe as you say you say believe, that systemic racism is an inescapable sin, that the consequences of history upon which an institution is founded are to forever define the innate character of that institution and all within it, then the Democratic Party is the most irredeemable institution in all of American history. If reparations for crimes of generations past are to be paid, it is not America’s debt to be paid, but the Democrats. No one should kneel through the American anthem or call the abolition of the police if they have not already lobbied for the banning the Democratic Party, first. If America is a racist country because of it’s founders, or the times in which it was formed, or racist things it has done in the past, and nothing that has happened since matters at all, then what does that make the Democratic party? If America, or the police, white people, modern companies who bought old companies, or anyone else holds a candle of guilt, and that that guilt should burn their reputation forever, then the Democrats are unpardonable inferno.If America can’t be forgiven, then the Democratic Party has no right to exist.And Joe Biden? By the rationale of once a racist; always a racist, then someone who literally began his career pushing the last of the Jim Crow legislation and white supremacy, who pushed criminal law that targeted black “predators”, who says things like “poor kids can be just as smart as white kids”, then that person has no right to lead the party that says that centuries of systemic racism is the cause of so much social harm we face today.But… if you believe as I do, that anyone who sins is worthy of forgiveness, that everyone makes mistakes, or even that people of the past can’t be judged by today’s standards, then there’s hope. Through hard work, sacrifice, and the willingness to do better, one can unburden themselves of the guilt of past wrongs. If you believe these things, then and only then can Joe Biden be your nominee. Likewise, the Democratic Party need not always be the party of slavery, of the KKK, of lynchings, and genocide. Like America, which has suffered greatly to correct its past failures, both through shed blood and the pain of self-reformation, the Democrats can be better, too.“For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.”Of course, it only works if forgiveness is possible. If we live in a time without forgiveness, where the guilt of people long since dead is used to bludgeon the living and mostly for short term political gain, then Joe Biden’s failures are the failures of everyone who votes for him. All of them are now guilty. Every one of them who votes for him are complicit in the unforgivable crimes of his past and of the party he represents. That’s if you believe as you say you believe.Whether we’re talking about liberals, leftists, progressives, or Democrats, one side continually pushes a narrative that “America was never great.” You can quote New York's Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo on that. Those are his exact words. “America was never great.” This accusation is based on the notion that America is forever guilty of anything wrong that ever happened in its past, and that today’s “good people” have the right to judge others for past wrongs when it is politically advantageous to do so. For some people to say that, it would be one thing. But for anyone of the Democratic party to say such a thing of anyone else ever, is… well, hypocritical is the nicest word to call it. For the people who are the most responsible for the worst events in America’s history to say that America is flawed demands someone to say, “Now wait just a minute.”No. America is great. It was great. It has been great from the start because it put to paper the rights that allowed for the greatest freedom and prosperity available to anyone anywhere in history. Was it perfect? No, and it never will be. But it started off great and continues to get better. In a constant struggle to look inward at places where we have failed to live up to our own ideals, we’ve fought to make ourselves better. Perfect isn’t possible, but a process to perpetually be better is the best anyone could ever hope for. That process, the intentionally designed method of self-renewal and self-accountability, that is perhaps our greatest attribute of all.In closing, I’ll never accept someone who calls themselves a Democrat say that America was never great, that we are a racist nation because of our racist legacy. They are the last people who should ever have the right to say such a thing. If, however, that Democrat were to say to me, “Yeah, we’ve all done some messed up things. My side really has some skeletons in the closet. But I think I have some good ideas and I would like your help,” then I think we can get past this era of intense cross the aisle hatred that seems to be all anyone ever sees.You must have humility and you must have forgiveness, and the rules must be the same for everyone.Either we are all defined by a racist legacy or none of us are. Either you can be redeemed by trying to be better, or you can’t. But you can’t pick and choose who gets forgiveness and who is unworthy based on other political views. That, to me, is the greatest political hypocrisy in America today.Relaxed. Researched. Respectful. - War ElephantFootnotes[1] New Study Says White Police Officers Are Not More Likely To Shoot Minority Suspects[1] New Study Says White Police Officers Are Not More Likely To Shoot Minority Suspects[1] New Study Says White Police Officers Are Not More Likely To Shoot Minority Suspects[1] New Study Says White Police Officers Are Not More Likely To Shoot Minority Suspects[2] Lawsuit Chases Companies Tied to Slavery[2] Lawsuit Chases Companies Tied to Slavery[2] Lawsuit Chases Companies Tied to Slavery[2] Lawsuit Chases Companies Tied to Slavery[3] Wachovia apologizes for ties to slavery[3] Wachovia apologizes for ties to slavery[3] Wachovia apologizes for ties to slavery[3] Wachovia apologizes for ties to slavery[4] New York Times chief outlines coverage shift: From Trump-Russia to Trump racism[4] New York Times chief outlines coverage shift: From Trump-Russia to Trump racism[4] New York Times chief outlines coverage shift: From Trump-Russia to Trump racism[4] New York Times chief outlines coverage shift: From Trump-Russia to Trump racism[5] American Slavery and ‘the Relentless Unforeseen’[5] American Slavery and ‘the Relentless Unforeseen’[5] American Slavery and ‘the Relentless Unforeseen’[5] American Slavery and ‘the Relentless Unforeseen’[6] Twelve Scholars Critique the 1619 Project and the New York Times Magazine Editor Responds[6] Twelve Scholars Critique the 1619 Project and the New York Times Magazine Editor Responds[6] Twelve Scholars Critique the 1619 Project and the New York Times Magazine Editor Responds[6] Twelve Scholars Critique the 1619 Project and the New York Times Magazine Editor Responds[7] Why We Call Him Jim Crow Joe Biden[7] Why We Call Him Jim Crow Joe Biden[7] Why We Call Him Jim Crow Joe Biden[7] Why We Call Him Jim Crow Joe Biden[8] Ku Klux Klan - Wikipedia[8] Ku Klux Klan - Wikipedia[8] Ku Klux Klan - Wikipedia[8] Ku Klux Klan - Wikipedia

How do you think Donald Trump should handle the Covid-19 pandemic?

Well? Let’s see.This is a better question than a lot of questions I’ve read because instead of pointing and complaining about what has been or has not been done, it examines what could have been.We can look at what has happened in the US, and argue, or we can compare it to what has happened in South Korea, and make a comparison between one country which took this seriously from the start, and another which … well… didn’t.One more thing. Yes, I know the United States has a larger population than South Korea’s. Every time I talk about numbers in South Korea, I’m going to then multiply those numbers by 6.3 and show you the “US population equivalent.”Looking at today, in order to account for the larger population, the comparison is 793K cases and 42.5K deaths in the US vs 68K cases and 1,506 deaths in a South Korea, 6.355 times as populous. Make sense?Let’s get started.The United StatesThe United States in 2018 and 2019 slashed more than 2/3 of its staff at the Beijing office of the CDC as part of a larger pullback of US-funded health and science experts on the ground in China. (Exclusive: U.S. slashed CDC staff inside China prior to coronavirus outbreak.)On May 10, 2018, Trump Fired Rear Adm. R.Timothy Zeimer, the administration’s senior director for Global Health Security and biodefense, the official responsible for leading US Response in the event of a Pandemic and the global health security team he oversaw. — Note: The date on that linked article is May 10, 2018, so you understand it’s not a criticism in hindsight. That article was saying “WTF” a year and a half before this virus first showed up in Wuhan.ChinaOn Dec 31, 2019, China reported a cluster of cases of pneumonia in Wuhan, Hubei Province. As of January 3rd, a total of 44 patients with pneumonia, - 33 stable, 11 severely ill- were reported to the WHO by the national authorities in China. On January 5th, the WHO released this statement: Pneumonia of unknown cause – ChinaOn January 7, Chinese authorities confirmed that the virus is a novel coronavirus. The WHO initially named it 2019-nCOV.On January 10, the WHO issued a package of technical guidance to all countries on how to detect, test and manage potential cases based on what was known at the time.On January 11, Chinese authorities acknowledged that a 61-year-old man, exposed to the virus at the seafood market in Wuhan, had died from respiratory failure caused by severe pneumonia on January 9.On January 12, China publicly shared the genetic sequence of COVID-19.On January 13, officials confirmed a case of COVID-19 in Thailand, the first recorded case outside of China.South KoreaOn January 3 - Based on information shared between the South Korean CDC Chinese liaison office and the Chinese Government, South Korea began enhanced Quarantine and screening measures for individuals entering from Wuhan. (This is why it’s a good idea to have a fully staffed office in China.)On January 20, the first case of COVID-19 was detected during a screening at Incheon International Airport in South Korea. The Republic of Korea Government updated its infectious disease Alert National Crisis Management System from Blue to Yellow. News & Welfare Services > Press Release View ContentOn January 21, all individuals traveling to Korea within 14 days of visiting Wuhan were required to submit a health Questionaire and report fever or respiratory symptoms to a Quarantine officer.The United StatesOn January 21, US Officials in Washington State confirmed the first Case on US soil, one day after the first case was detected in South Korea.On January 22 - Asked by a CNBC reporter if there were any worries about a potential pandemic, Trump replied: “No. Not at all. And-- we’re-- we have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China, and we have it under control. It’s—going to be just fine.”On January 24 - Trump praised China for its efforts to prevent the spread of the virus in a tweet: Donald J. Trump on Twitter"China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus. The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!"South KoreaOn January 27, The South Korean government (to make it easier on my wrists, I will begin using “ROK” for “Republic of Korea”) changed its infectious disease alert category from yellow to orange. South Korean health officials convened representatives from over 20 medical companies at a train station in Seoul to discuss the urgency of an effective test and to guarantee expedited regulatory approval. Special Report: How Korea trounced U.S. in race to test people for coronavirusOn January 28, ROK Ministry of Health and Welfare announced full inspections for all Koreans and foreigners who had entered Korea from Wuhan in the previous 14 days. The KCDC expanded it’s case definition of contaminated areas to include all of Mainland China.On January 29, The KCDC and the National Health Insurance Service opened 1339 Call Centers as an expansion of resources available to the Public to handle an increased number of consultation calls. The KCDC recommended that anyone presenting signs of fever or respiratory symptoms after visiting the Hubei provinces should consult a health facility or the call center, and avoid being outdoors.The United StatesJanuary 27 - Joe Biden wrote an editorial for wide publication. In it he warned Americans about what was coming, pointed out the problems with the Administration's response to that point and laid out how he would have dealt with it differently. Joe Biden: Trump is worst possible leader to deal with coronavirus outbreakOn January 29 - The White House announced a task force that would help monitor and contain the spread of the virus and provide Americans with accurate and up to date health and Travel Information.On January 30 - First case of person-to-person transmission of Wuhan virus in the US confirmed At an Iowa Campaign rally, Trump talked about the US partnering with China to control the disease."We only have five people. Hopefully, everything's going to be great. They have somewhat of a problem, but hopefully, it's all going to be great. But we're working with China, just so you know, and other countries very, very closely. So it doesn't get out of hand."That same day, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus described the outbreak as "public health emergency of international concern over the global outbreak of novel coronavirus."On January 31 - The Trump Administration announced it would deny entry to foreign nationals who had traveled to China in the last 14 Days. The ban, which Trump continues to call a “very strong ban” does not include anyone but non-US Citizens or residents or their families coming from China. If you are a permanent US resident or even just a family member of a permanent resident, even if you have been in Wuhan for the last month, you are free to return to the US. The same people would have been sent through an entirely separate Airport terminal in Korea, immediately screened for symptoms, tested for the virus and required to self quarantine for a minimum of 2 weeks. Here, no checks are made on your health, no restrictions placed on your movement. The “very strong ban” only blocks foreigners from entering the country.South KoreaOn January 30 - Approximately 250 people from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Ministry of National Defense and the Korean National Police Agency were stationed at Incheon International Airport's quarantine checkpoints.The Ministry of Health and Welfare announced that the Epedimic Prevention Budget fo 20.8 BillionKRW ($17M USD) would be swiftly executed to “ensure preemptive epidemic prevention.” The Ministry also announced that ROK would be sending chartered flights to Wuhan and surrounding areas to bring Korean citizens back home.On January 31 - The first chartered plane From Wuhan returned 368 people to Korea. 2 tested positive for the virus. Korean pharmacies were given the ability to check patients’ travel histories through the National health care system’s Patient Status Checking System.On February 1 - As the second chartered flight landed, the Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency began supplying 720,000 masks to workplaces that may be more vulnerable to infectious diseases, including construction, manufacturing and the service industries.On February 2 - The Ministry of Health and Welfare required anyone who had been in contact with patients who had tested Positive for COVID-19 to self-isolate for 14 days, and required all travelers from China in the past 13 days who were symptomatic to undergo diagnostic exams. All travellers from China were directed to a separate arrival hall at Incheon International Airport and were required to submit their domestic addresses and contact numbers. Restrictions were placed on Visa issuance. All foreigners from Hubei province were denied entry.The United StatesOn February 2 - Trump’s executive order banning anyone who has been in China in the past 14 days went into effect. It excluded US residents and their families or spouses of US residents or citizens. It was Superbowl Sunday. Trump was interviewed by Sean Hannity, and when asked says "We pretty much shut it down coming in from China."South KoreaOn February 3 - The Ministry of Interior and Safety announced it would spend 4.8 billion KRW on emergency aid. The Ministry of Health and Welfare released “Guidelines on the Operation of Group Facilities and Facilities Frequented by Large Groups of People.” Social welfare facilities including daycare centers, senior care facilities and disability facilities were directed to temporarily close if they were informed of any occupants or visitors who tested positive for COVID-19 or were in contact with individuals who tested positive.On February 4 - The ROK Government announced the approval of test kits manufactured by KoGene Biotech Co LTD. It was a risky move, the tests had only been briskly vetted, but they circled back later to spot check effectiveness. All foreigners who had been in Hubei in the last 14 days were banned from entering Korea until further notice. Special screening was added to immigration procedures requiring the rise of a self-diagnosis mobile app.On February 7 - A newly developed test kit capable of producing results in 6 hours was made available at 50 health facilities. Private health care providers and city and Province level public health and environmental research institutes were designated as additional testing facilities. the daily diagnostic test supply was increased from 200 to 3000. The number of screening clinics was increased to 556, up from 288 set up by January 28.The United StatesOn February 10 - Trump spoke at a campaign rally in Manchester NH."Looks like by April, you know, in theory, when it gets a little warmer, it miraculously goes away. I hope that's true. But we're doing great in our country. China, I spoke with President Xi, and they're working very, very hard. And I think it's going to all work out fine."That same day, The Royal Caribbean ship “Anthem of the Seas,” set sail from Bayonne, New Jersey after a coronavirus scare had kept it docked and passengers waiting for days.On February 13 - In an interview with Geraldo Rivera, Trump downplayed the threat of the coming pandemic:"In our country, we only have, basically, 12 cases, and most of those people are recovering and some cases fully recovered. So it's actually less."South KoreaOn February 12 - Seegene Inc becomes the second South Korean company to receive government approval for its test kits. A Self Diagnosis Mobile App, allowing users to monitor health and access information such as follow up action and clinic locations became available to the public. The KCDC announced stricter quarantine screening measures for travelers from Hong Kong and Macao. A third chartered flight brought 147 more people home to Korea from Wuhan.On February 13 - The Ministry of Health and Welfare announced that it would partner with companies producing test kits and private testing institutions to increase test kit supply and daily diagnostic test capacity to 10,000 tests within the coming weeks.South KoreaOn February 16 - Daily testing limit was increased to 5000.On February 18 - A new COVID-19 patient was confirmed, a member of the Shincheonji Church in Daegu City known as “Patient 31” became known as a “super spreader.” A massive spike in patients came over the next few days. The patient had never traveled abroad. COVID-19 was now seeing community spread in Daegu.On February 19 - The KCDC and the Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) dispatched a task force to Daegu to implement disease control measures with the local government.On February 20 - The first death related to COVID-19 was recorded in South Korea.February 23 - ROK Government increased the Infectious Disease Alert from Orange to Red. The MOHW requested all citizens of Daegu to voluntarily self-quarantine for at least two weeks and anyone displaying symptoms to be tested as soon as possible. They also launched a “Public Reassurance Hospital Program” which separated respiratory patients from non, and allowed patients to consult physicians and receive prescriptions virtually. Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital began operating the first Drive Through Testing Checkpoint.The United StatesOn February 24 - Trump tweeted:"The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA. We are in contact with everyone and all relevant countries. CDC & World Health have been working hard and very smart. Stock Market starting to look very good to me!"On February 26 - CDC officials said that a California patient being treated for novel coronavirus was the first US case of unknown origin. The patient did not have any travel history to infected areas nor exposure to another known patient, and was the first possible US case of "community spread." Trump placed Vice President Mike Pence in charge of the US Government response to the outbreak. In a news conference he said:"When you have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that's a pretty good job we've done."60 people in the United States were infected.South KoreaOn February 26 - Daegu officials announced that every member of the Shincheonji Church where “Patient 31” was a member would be tested whether or not they were displaying symptoms. Goyang City began operating a drive through Testing Station, the first such station operated by a local government. The Ministry of Interior and Safety announced 51.3 B KRW (About $42M) in aid to 17 cities including about $8M to DaeguOn February 28 - Ministry of Economy and Finance announced that the rent cost for small and medium enterprises would be reduced by 20–35% for the next 6 months. The KCDC began collecting chronological epidemiological data from investigations and quarantine related measures KCDC. South Korea’s political candidates halted political campaigning for the April elections and moved all campaigning efforts to Social Media and other platforms.On February 29 - South Korea hit its peak in daily new cases with 909. The equivalent in the US would have been 5,777. South Korea: COVID-19 daily new cases 2020 | Statista The KCDC advised all ROK citizens to maintain personal hygiene and practice “Social Distancing” until early March.The United StatesOn February 29 - A state health official announced a patient infected with COVID-19 in Washington State had died, the first death due to the Virus in the US. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee declared a state of emergency, directing state agencies to use all resources necessary to respond to the outbreak.On March 1 - Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis declared a Public Health Emergency in Florida. Kentucky, New York, Maryland, Utah, and Oregon follow suit over the course of the next few days.On March 3 - The Fed cut interest rates by half a percentage point in an effort to jolt the economy.On March 4 - The CDC removed earlier restrictions that limited COVID-19 testing of the general public to people in the hospital. According to the CDC, clinicians should now "use their judgment to determine if a patient has signs and symptoms compatible with COVID-19 and whether the patient should be tested."On March 5 - In a Fox News town hall, Trump said:"It's going to all work out. Everybody has to be calm. It's all going to work out."South KoreaOn March 5 - ROK Government announced it would buy 80% of the national mask supply starting March 6, and implement a 5-day rotation allowing only 2 masks to be purchased per person.On March 7 - ROK Government announced a GPS-based app to enforce self-quarantine measures. The app monitors the locations of individuals who are quarantined and sets off an alarm if they leave their designated quarantine location.On March 9 - Special immigration measures that previously applied to Korean citizens and foreigners from China were expanded to include Japan.On March 10 - Deagu officials announced they had tested almost all 10,000 members of the church in the immediate area and that 40% had tested positive. The Ministry of Education postponed the start of the new school year until March 23.The United StatesOn March 10 - In a meeting with Republican senators at the U.S. Capitol, Trump said:"This was unexpected. ... And it hit the world. And we're prepared, and we're doing a great job with it. And it will go away. Just stay calm. It will go away."On March 11 - Trump in an Oval Office address: "The vast majority of Americans, the risk is very, very low." The same day, the WHO characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic. Trump announced he was restricting travel from Europe to the US for 30 days in an attempt to slow the virus. The ban applied only to foreign nationals. US Citizens and permanent residents would be screened before entering the country.On March 13 - Trump declared a national emergency to free up $50 billion in federal resources.South KoreaOn March 15 - Special immigration procedures were expanded to travelers from most of Europe and the Middle East.On March 16 - Travelers who visited Europe prior to entry were instructed to minimize movement, adhere to personal hygiene measures and keep watch for fever or respiratory symptoms for the next 14 days.On March 17 - The ROK Government declared Daegu city, Gyeongsan City, Cheongdo-Gun and Bonghwa-Gun as special disaster areas due to the high number of cases in the area. The MOHW postponed reopening child care centers to April 5. The Ministry of Education delayed school openings to April as well. The NEC suspended election-related affairs in Wuhan, China, meaning South Korean citizens in the Wuhan area would be unable to vote.On March 18 - The Ministry of Interior and Safety announced an additional 51.9B KRW (about $42M) in aid would be provided to 10 cities. The KCDC advised postponing or canceling all non-urgent International travel.On March 19 - Special Immigration procedures were expanded to everyone entering Korea.The United StatesOn March 16 - At a press briefing, Trump issued orders to control the spread of the virus in the US."My administration is recommending that all Americans, including the young and healthy, work to engage in schooling from home when possible. Avoid gathering in groups of more than 10 people. Avoid discretionary travel. And avoid eating and drinking at bars, restaurants, and public food courts. If everyone makes this change or these critical changes and sacrifices now, we will rally together as one nation and we will defeat the virus. And we're going to have a big celebration all together. With several weeks of focused action, we can turn the corner and turn it quickly."On March 17 - Trump told reporters:"This is a pandemic. ... I felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic."On March 18 - Congress passed a small coronavirus relief package and Trump signed it into law. It included provisions for Free testing for COVID-19 and paid emergency leave.South KoreaOn March 22 - The KCDC announced all inbound travelers from Europe would be tested for COVID-19. Korean citizens and foreigners planning for long-term stays were asked to self-quarantine for 14 days, and foreigners planning for short-term stays were asked to remain under active monitoring.On March 23 - the KCDC advised all individuals in the ROK to observe an “Enhanced Social Distancing Campaign” through April 5 by staying home other than “going to work, visiting a health care provider or purchasing necessities.”On March 24 - The KCDC expanded its entry testing program. Korean citizens who were asymptomatic would be required to self-quarantine at home and get tested at their local public health center within three days of arrival. Foreigners would be tested and isolated at quarantine facilities. Individuals planning for long-term stays who tested negative were required to self-quarantine at their domestic address for 14 days.On March 25 - The KCDC announced all travelers arriving from the US would be tested for COVID 19 at the airport. Individuals who tested positive would be transferred to a hospital or "Life Treatment Center," while Korean citizens and foreigners with a domestic address who were asymptomatic and tested negative would be required to self-quarantine at home for 14 days. Foreigners planning for short-term stays without a domestic address would be tested at a facility, and individuals who test negative would be granted entry under "enhanced active monitoring."The United StatesOn March 24 - Trump said:"Easter is a very special day for me. And I see it sort of in that timeline that I'm thinking about. And I say, wouldn't it be great to have all of the churches full?"On March 25 - Congress and the White House agreed on a massive $2 Trillion economic stimulus package to offset the economic damage of the coronavirus.On March 27 - Trump signed the stimulus package into law.South KoreaMarch 28 - The number of Recovered COVID-19 patients in South Korea surpassed the number of patients in Quarantine or Isolated Treatment. South Korea had effectively flattened the curve.Cases in the US were already double Korea’s US Equivalent number. Even when Korea’s numbers were multiplied by 6.3 to account for the difference in population, twice as many people had died, and it was only Mar 28.It has been 23 days since South Korea’s intensive testing and aggressive quarantining policies flattened their curve.In that time, 1,205 more people in South Korea have been diagnosed and 93 more people have died.In that same time, 670,306 people in the US have fallen ill, and 40,294 have died.In case you missed this link before, hit it now: Special Report: How Korea trounced U.S. in race to test people for coronavirus.Read this timeline and tell me again “No one could have done better.”Horseshit. I just showed you that it WAS done better.To the tune of 41008 fewer people DEAD. And we’re still climbing. Here’s what our numbers look like since South Korea flattened their curve:Look at that and ask your question again. Did Trump fail on coronavirus?Look again and see something that should scare the shit out of you. Those numbers are still going UP.Does that look like anyone is doing a good job?Because it scares the shit out of me.

What are the best sources of current affairs for the SSB? I don't read newspapers but I refer to study IQ and others who deeply discuss a current affair. What should be the approach here, a deep knowledge or just a newspaper overview?

Please read a copy of my blog from my website:nofrillsacademy.com:GENERAL KNOWLEDGE: TOPICSIt is a misconception to equate GK with knowledge of current affairs. 80% of GK is of a static nature & only 20% is related to current knowledge. If you understand the geography and economy of India well it will make it easier for you to understand the nature of problems facing India and also the possible solutions. To develop insight into “stone pelting” by Kashmiri youth it is vital to know what all had happened in the past in Kashmir since independence. To help students prepare for competitive exams a list of GK topics is given below.India SpecificGeography: Physical features, states, capitals & major rivers.Major ministries and their performance.Indian economy. Contributions of Services, Manufacturing & Agriculture Sectors to GDP. % population engaged in various sectors. What are the ways to encourage growth? How can inflation be controlled?Ranks of Services.Chiefs of Services, current, past, future, if due to take over soon.Pakistan: President, Army chief. Problem areas with India, future of relations.China: President, Premier; future of relations.Relations with US.Relations with EU & Japan.Relations with Russia.New schemes started by PM Modi.Relevance of MNREGA.Relevance of crop insurance scheme.Utility of Gold schemes.PVC awardees.Knowledge about Service opted for.Relations with Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan & Myanmar.India’s act East Policy.Discuss OBOR, CPEC and impact on India.Discuss the relevance of SAARC. How can other India and other SAARC countries overcome the problem posed by Pakistan?Comment on India contemplating abrogation of ‘Indus Water Treaty’.GeneralISIS problem & how it concerns India.G7 nations.Syrian crisis.European refugees’ crisis.Impact of Iran’s nuclear deal on the world.Iran- Saudi Arabia struggle in West Asia.Fourth Industrial revolution.Changing approach of America towards the world.Discuss India and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.How to tackle the menace of global terrorism?Implications of International Tribunal rejecting China’s claim on South China Sea. What is the likely future in the region?How to solve the problem of Global terrorism?Discuss implications of Trump as US President for the US and the world.Discuss the major progress in the recent BRICS meet and comment on the future of BRICS.Discuss the importance of Kigali agreement.Comment on the “Heart of Asia” Conference in 2017.Discuss the significance of Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement between US and India.Is NAM irrelevant?Should India worry about Pakistan’s nuclear threat?Indian public wants strikes against Pakistani terrorist camps in POK. Should India be deterred by China in doing so?Discuss the Doklam standoff.Topics related to Economics:Problems of world economy.Why ‘Make in India’ is important?Why reduction in RBI interest rates is important for growth?Why domestic reforms are important for India?What is disinvestment? Why it is important for India?What is fiscal deficit?How can India reduce fiscal deficit?Comment on the future of agriculture sector in India.India & WTO.Budgeting process. Why deficit budget is sensible for developing economies.Will a larger fiscal deficit be good for India?What reasons have caused a slowdown in Global economy?How China became the manufacturing hub of the World?Why China likes to keep the value of yuan low?Why subsidies do not make economic sense?The growing significance of Africa for India.Impact of falling commodity prices on the world’s economy.How can India reduce dependence on coal for power generation?Analyze the economic stupidity of ‘Demonetization’.Is ‘Bullet Train’ good for India?Is GST good for India?Discuss: For sustainable development inclusive growth is essential for India.The planning commission has been replaced by NITI Ayog. Comment on the concept and efficacy of NITI Ayog.How to reduce India’s dependence on monsoon rains?Why entry into the NSG is important for India?Was it sensible to scrap the Rail Budget?Should India introduce GM Mustard?Global analysis on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), health performance has ranked India 143/188 among nations. Should India do something about it?Write in favour of Globalization.Write in favor of protectionism.India has moved one rank up to the 130th position in the World Bank’s ‘ease of doing business’ ranking for 2017. What should India do?India has approximately only 24 lac tax payers, while 25 lac cars are bought each year, including 35,000 luxury cars. Analyze the problem and suggest solutions.Is implementation of Universal Basic Income (UBI) in India a good idea?Is the proposal to abolish Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) a good idea?Why corporate houses are keen on the defence sector?Social & General TopicsAre introduction of a strong Lokpal and transparency in funding of political parties and election expenses the biggest reforms needed by India?Discuss euthanasia.Is juvenile justice in India okay?What are the advantages for China being a communist country?Why communism failed in erstwhile USSR?Why ordinances are not considered a good way of making laws?Why politicians & elections are the prime reason for creation of black money?Discuss the drug menace in Punjab.Discuss the “Khap panchayats” of Haryana.Discuss the matrilineal societies of Kerala & Meghalaya.Discuss the feudal culture in UP, Bihar & MP.Why the North Eastern states were not enthusiastic about independence in 1947?What are the problems of Meiteis in Manipur?Why there is rampant illegal immigration from Bangladesh & cattle smuggling from India into Bangladesh?Is the growing population of India a major problem?Why it make sense to take care of our environment?What are the unique challenges for women in Defence Services?Why girl education is vital for population control, development of the society & economic growth?Why AFSPA cannot be removed from Kashmir or Manipur in the foreseeable future?Are castes relevant in India today?What is the future of communists in India?Why is the study of history relevant?Is reservation required for women in Parliament?Why it is difficult to remove caste/tribe based reservations?How can sports be promoted in India?Why illegal constructions often get legalized in India?What is the problem of making laws through ordinances?Should minimum education be a criterion for elected posts?Discuss India’s skewed sex ration.Discuss the problem of crime against women in India.Was odd-even policy in Delhi a sensible way to reduce pollution?Discuss criminalization of politics in India.Match fixing in IPL- is there a permanent solution?Why India is unable to get medals in track and field in Olympics?What will be the long term effects of promotion of ‘Hindutva’ and divisive politics of BJP?Comment on the promotion of prohibition in states.Benefits of organic farming.Discuss: Road accidents the biggest killer in India.Discuss implications of declaration of ‘Triple Talaaq’ illegal by the Supreme Court.What lessons emerged from the BHU incident of violence against women students?How to increase women participation in India’s economy?Discuss India’s hosting of the under-17 Football World Cup.Why government must focus more on health and education?How should India respond to the Rohingya crisis?How can a common man discern the truth when Modi & ministers lie consistently to the nation and media pursues economic agenda rather than factual reporting?Does the information age pose a threat to our culture and society?How can we permanently resolve inter-state water disputes?Is the nexus between doctors and pharmaceutical companies a concern for the government?Discuss acid attacks on women.Discuss the misuse of Article 356.Discuss the socio-economic impact of migration from other countries into India.Why local militants are heroes for Kashmiris?Suggest measures to fight the problem of droughts in India.How to resolve the problem of pending cases in Indian courts?How to resolve the problem of grant of reservations in India?Discuss India’s own GPS.Can elections be won by buying votes?Discuss the problem of caring for the old in India.Discuss the problem of child obesity in India.Parrikar had proposed, “All women battalion and girls in Sainik Schools”. Discuss.Discuss: “Government allocates Rs 12,000 crore to skill one crore people.”Discuss the Supreme Court’s control of BCCI.Discuss the use of drugs in sports.Discuss the implications of legalization of betting in sports in India.Chief Justice of India TS Thakur had told government on 12 Aug 2016: “Break logjam soon or we will step in, CJI tells government” on the issue of appointment of judges. Discuss reasons for delay in appointment of judges by Modi government.Is Phelps the greatest athlete ever?Discuss the “Surrogacy Bill”.Government has accepted the recommendations of a parliamentary panel to impose stringent accountability on celebrities for endorsing products and for misleading advertisements. Discuss the subject.Discuss India’s poor performance in Olympic Games. What should we do?Is India ready for a uniform civil code?Is the charge of sedition being misused by ‘self- styled nationalists’ in India under the present government?Analyze the Maratha agitation in 2016.Is it time for India to have a uniform civil code?Is it correct to ban Pakistani artists from working in India?How to reduce Diwali pollution in India?Significance of burning schools in Kashmir.Is forcing citizens to stand and listen to the “National Anthem” in cinema halls in India a good idea?Comment on the revival of Hockey in India.Discuss the promotion of Kabaddi in India.Discuss the impact of high tax on petrol and diesel in India.Discuss the Disabilities Bill.Discuss: 10th board exam is back.Discuss: Agni-V tested.Section 123(3) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 was in news recently for a judgment. Please discussIs the demand for delay in presentation of budget by the opposition parties justified?Does India need a regulatory body for media content as argued by Prashant Bhushan recently in the Supreme Court?Comment on the “Jallikattu” problem in Tamil Nadu in Feb 2017.Army Chief,Gen Rawat said: “While our aim has been to conduct people-friendly operations, the manner in which the local population is preventing us from conducting the operations, at times even supporting the terrorists to escape, it is these factors which are leading to higher casualties among the security forces. We would now request the local population, local boys if they want to continue with the acts of terrorism, displaying flags of IS and Pakistan, then we will treat them as anti-national elements and go helter-skelter for them… If they do not relent and create hurdles, then we will take tough action.” Please comment.Jayalalithaa deserved to be punished for corruption. However, now Sasikala, her partner in corruption will be alone in jail. Please comment.Discuss: PSLV-C37 successfully launches 104 satellites in a single flight.Discuss: Violence in Ramjas College.Discuss the politics of vandalism of statues.Discuss the politics of bans on books and movies.

Feedbacks from Our Clients

This is a great program that is more than just a Cocodoc program. It is great to send files, work on files across a group, and to edit PDFs. Very helpful!

Justin Miller