Signing Up For Electronic Property Tax Notices From The Boulder County Treasurer: Fill & Download for Free

I’m not sure this is exactly your situation, but hope this helps:7. The Burning TowerPermanent Orders Hearing; Agreement; HouseAt this point Judge Arkin accepted any stipulation signed by David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able at any time without granting me the right to be heard on the subject. She even issued one order on a Sunday. I suspected that she had just finished a lucrative meal out of my part of the marital estate, and went on to issuing orders.My husband could be back in the house at any time and I won't even have a notice. I lived in fear for my life minute by minute. I would wash my clothes daily because every day I was ready to pack and leave. Every day I would watch my clothes drying out in anxiety. I needed to be able to fold them as soon as possible. It was at this point that I got a life-saving call.The CallI met Renate at the Supreme Court Library a few months earlier. It appears that the "mentally incapacitated" regularly swarm the Supreme Court library, silently studying unnecessarily heavy law books.I gave Renate my phone number. I felt that I should advocate for her. I wanted us to share whatever knowledge we acquired about the courts. A few months later Renata dug up theat little piece of paper and was ready to talk. She had lost forty pounds of weight, she shared. At her lowest point she had seriously considered suicide. Renate was 77 years old. She did not get physically assaulted, at least not seriously. But at her age she had to be a wonder woman to survive the severe abuse Virginia Fraser Able was dishing out.Six months prior to her husband's death, Renate's step daughter initiated divorce proceedings. Renate appeared pro-se. The judge in her case ordered her to file a form requesting the appointment of a GAL. Renate was given the impression that by requesting such an appointment she would become entitled to a variety of services at her husband's expense. She obeyed the judge as she had no reason to suspect his motivations or integrity.The fact is that legally, when a party, or their attorney, requests the appointment of a GAL all GAL fees are paid out of their part of the marital estate. However, Renate recounted that the judge ordered her husband to pay $20,000 to Virginia Fraser Able. This came as a surprise to me. I tried to understand, but couldn't make out what happened.I asked Renate to see her Register of Action. It became apparent that the Judge claimed that Renate was incapable of understanding legal proceedings. This was fraud. Renate was a sharp and highly educated woman. She said that the Judge used fast legal jargon, making it hard for her to follow. However, the Judge was not appointing an interpreter to Renate, a German immigrant speaking excellent English. He was appointing a GAL. In contravention of Title 18, without any medical records, and in violation of the Laws of Evidence, he Judge had "diagnosed" Renate as mentally incapacitated. Much like in my case, he later ventured into attributing all four of the mental incapacities and all three mental diseases to Renate. Just to cover all bases. However, he stuck with "Severe Personality Disorder" as his preferred "diagnosis." Mine was "Psychotic Attacks."The "diagnosis" in both cases is never clearly stated. It is insinuated. Its enough to help the courts communicate, but most others will have no idea what was claimed or what laws were involved.Virginia Fraser Able was appointed in response to Renate's pro-se pleading. Things turned ugly quite fast. Renate's husband did not have much time and the courts had to prevent Renate from inheriting the marital estate. At one point Virginia Fraser Able accused Renate of stealing jewelry from her husband. She proceeded to physically remove expensive gold rings from Renate's fingers. She took a ring that Renate's husband gifted her. But she also took a ring that she brought with her when moving to theUnited States. Virginia Fraser Able simply handed the rings to Renate's step daughter.This was just the beginning. Virginia Fraser Able, her husband's attorney and the step daughter entered Renate's personal residence and took anything they pleased. They took precious dresses she brought with her fromBavaria. Most premarital treasures were confiscated.Renate was most;y upset about her banking situation. Something happened. Her account got locked. She can't access her safe either. There are many valuables in the safe, she said. Virginia Fraser Able had access to both Renate's bank account and the safe.Renate got a bill for one thousand dollars from Virginia Fraser Able and paid it off.I asked Renate if she'd had a Permanent Orders Hearing. She said yes, but didn't describe anything that sounded even remotely like a Permanent Orders Hearing. All that happened, she claims, is that a line of people gave negative character testimonies about her. It was terrible and shook her badly. Virginia Fraser Able asked her: "What day was it when you got married?" "Wednesday," Renate replied. "Fraud!!!" Virginia Fraser Able declared - "I checked and it was a Monday!" The minute orders suggested that Renate's financial documents were fraudulent. The Judge, therefore he had no choice but to deprive her of her part of the marital estate.A friendship budded and I started meeting with Renate every few weeks at Yaya's European Bistro. My husband was still paying maintenance at the time and I could relish the friendship as well as Sunday brunches with all-you-can-eat buffet. Renate was gaining weight and becoming her surprisingly stout and strong self again.The Judge had told Renate that she can have a meeting in which she could ask for her dear dresses and other personal items back. She appeared to next our meeting feeling relieved. She now had her beautiful dresses fromBavaria. But now a bill arrived for $20,000 to Virginia Fraser Able.Also, something happened to the title of the house. She owned her marital home jointly with her husband. But something happened. She couldn't quite explain. Renate was now fully divorced, all she got was the dress. Her husband died shortly after and his daughter sold their joint house and kept all proceeds. I now remembered a story about a woman inMinnesotawho sold her home and bought a joint home with her new husband. He died the next year. She got nothing. She was now homeless.I couldn't quite make sense of much of what Renate was recounting. None of my friends reported any of these weird "proceedings." At the time I believed that my case was going a different way. I was going to have a Permanent Order Hearing. It was scheduled for eight hours. I was going to file financial and other documents with the record of the case so the judge can't deny them. I was going to get financial disclosure from my husband to assess the latest value of our joint marital estate. I was going to plead that my husband provides funds for forensic accounting. I was going to have to find a forensic accountant willing to work for an individual, not an attorney. They were going to have to provide me with written reports - none of these partially recorded hearings and jumbled words that get misrepresented at the Ruling Part.Little did I know that Renate was going to save my home, my bank account or my health. And yet, so it was.Illegal Search and SeizureWhen my husband came in to "secure his possession" none of my personal chattels were onsite. I couldn't stay in the home because I didn't have a protection order. The police were not going to prevent my husband from a "friendly hug" - friendly enough to put me in diapers for the rest of my life.David Japha filed another one of his nebulous Motions for Contempt of Court. He could have just signed another Stipulation with Virginia Fraser Able. But I knew why he took the Contempt of Court rout because my friends told me how it worked.The first part of my Contempt of Court Hearings was the Advisory Hearing. There were no witnesses and no recording. I was given a paper to sign, disclosing, among others, that I may choose a judge other than Arkin for this hearing. When I asked for Magistrate Moss, Judge Arkin stated that in my case I may not ask for another judge. She may or may not have given a "reason." It was irrelevant because she was obviously lying. Contempt of Court is used by judges as a measure to incarcerate anyone and everyone foregoing a hearing. I was forced to sign that fraudulent piece of "disclosure."Since witnesses and a Court Deputy were going to be present at main part of the Hearing, Judge Arkin cut it into two mutually antitheticalparts parts. A different Court Deputy was going to be present for each part. The one present for testimonies is not going to know that the Ruling part contradicts all testimonies.The second part included testimonies from some neighbors who said I gave them a bottle for bourbon from our collections, and was concluded mid way as my husband was testifying. In the presence of my neighbors Judge Arkin acted professionally. She was pro-se friendly and explained technical language, laws and procedures. To put me in jail she would have to prove my Contempt of Court beyond any shadow of a doubt, she explained. But there could be civil repremands that only require a more relaxed standard of proof. I did magnificently cross-examining the witnesses my husband designated. There was the police woman from the day my husband entered the unit. All she could say is that my husband appeared unhappy, nothing more. There were my movers. All they could say was they moved some boxes. Virginia Fraser Able sat next to me despite my protests. She would read notes I was making, and motioned for the judge when she should or should not let me speak.Then my husband approached the stand. There was not much that he could say. However, Judge Arkin suddenly started yelling at him loudly. She then calmed down and explained to me that we must end this meeting because the Court Deputy is tired and wants to go home.At the time I thought that Judge Arkin was simply deranged. But then I realized that she was taking advantage of the shortages of transcripts. Judge Arkin was actually trying to generate the impression that it was me who exploded, due to my mental disease of _______________________, not her. To my horror I realized that as she screamed I should have talked to the microphone simultaneously, identifying myself and identifying the screamer. That chance was now gone.For a notion of solace I remembered the court deputy present. He did not sit in the back, detached and listening to dispatch messages. Instead, he sat right by me and appeared entirely involved in everything that was happening. He also seemed senior to me, despite his uniform. Is it possible that communicating with a Douglas County Detective for nearly three years yielded some results? Was it possible that the hearing was, indeed, recorded? Would that Court Deputy testify that it wasn't me screaming? I couldn't tell.The third part continued with my husband's "testimony" for a few minutes and proceeded to the Ruling. Judge Arkin naturally misrepresented all testimonies and occurances in the court found me doubtlessly guilty. Her sentence was that David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able enter my residence along with my husband and take whatever they want. I will not be heard. David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able will then file a report of whether I allowed them to take everything they wanted. Depending on their report, I may be incarcerated.By now I knew quite a bit about the law. I knew what the role of a GAL was. I knew about the error in the law. I knew that this error doesn't apply in my case. I never asked for a GAL. I had already expressed lack of trust and lack of attorney-client relationship before either of my attorneys requested the appointment of a GAL. Therefore, since I never requested a GAL, no error applies to me and theAppeals Courtshould hear my appeal.I also knew that GALs don't sign stipulations. GALs follow instructions from a psychiatrist who had conducted regulated mental evaluations. She does nothing else for the court. So technically, I had a case to claim that a GAL should have never been appointed and none of her stipulations were to be accepted by the court. Hence, the entire situation leading to the Contempt of Court hearing should have never been generated. Additionally, the hearing was partially recorded. At the time this was misconduct which was to result in automatic reversal of rulings, without a need for any further review.If I could file an Appeal before the date in which my husband and the attorneys come to my unit to take everything I own, then Judge Arkin would not have jurisdiction over my case on that date. I could refuse admitting them to my home and hope to take it in appeals. I knew Renate's story of how she lost her dresses and other personal items. I knew these are illegal patterns of conduct by courts in general. That makes my case final and appealable, because the lower court can't be expected to handle my need for justice correctly.My Third AppealI filed my Motion for Appeal along with a Motion to Stay Case.. TheAppeals Courtimmediately issued an Order to Show Cause. This moves the jurisdiction over the case from the lower court to theAppeals Court.At the time when my husband, his attorney and Virginia Fraser Able were at my doorstep the Motion to Stay Case was already issued but had not yet arrived in the mail. The Civil Stand-by policeman called the DA and prevented the party from entering my home. My husband's attorney assured me that they were going to get their way. "It never fails," he guaranteed. He seemed confident, but I couldn't understand. The law was on my side. TheAppeals Courtintervened timely. They shouldn't be able to enter.I have a fault in always under estimating the court's audacity in violating the law. What Judge Arkin did was to issue orders. She couldn't file them with the case for now, because she was out of jurisdiction. But if she could orchestrate a contact between me and District Court then my case would be over. Her orders would be filed according to the day they were issued or stamped in arrears.I had no access to the Record of my case because I was inBouldernow. My husband's attorneys kept contacting me about a hearing that I must attend with Judge Arkin. I later discovered that she created "An Order to Show Cause Hearing" at her court. She also, simultaneously, filed a warrant for my arrest for "Failure to Show," in other words, for not showing up to the hearing. I would have been arrested at arrival, since the warrant was already issued.The Judge's Division Clerk is regulated by the Chief Judge. I left a message on his answering service complaining that the clerks burrow stamps and stamp their own Judge's orders instead of allowing the Court's Clerk to supervise the legality of procedures. This was the last thing I managed to do before theBoulderpolice came to arrest me. I had completed my Response to Order to Show Cause as well as all other documents. In addition to excluding all transcripts of partially recorded hearings in my Designation of Record, I also excluded any transcripts that I didn't file myself. Virginia Fraser Able filed a fraudulent transcript to our Sorenson Hearing and I had no doubt that many others were coming. Renate had also experienced fraudulent transcripts filed with her case. These documents became valuable later. After jail I was too exhausted to spend any time on writing any legal documents. And yet these were ready to go and were filed with my case, leading to Judge Angela Arkin's eventual downfall.Also, I intended to respond to some pleadings and correct my Permanent Orders hearing. Virginia Fraser Able was no conducting the hearing on my part. She didn't file any financial documents. No other documents. She simply had a list of people who were going to testify in court that day. I did not want to get the same Permanent Orders hearing Renate got. I had nearly a month. I was going to protest in writing and file financial claims.I was arrested two days before my deadline for filing my Response and Designation.Boulderpolice was able to transport me toDouglasCountyon the morning of my deadline. They seemed to believe that the Judge would see me right away and send me on my way to file my documents. Arkin didn't see me until the next day.From Douglas County Jail, using paper-kytes I repeatedly tried to get a copy of my arrest warrant as well as an understanding of what the truth was behind the claims of an out-of-jurisdiction hearing. Judge Arkin intercepted all of my communications. I could get no answers. Although the jail is in the courthouse and the electronic system could be available there fore inmates to use for free, it is simply not available. Indigent inmates like myself get two pieces of paper twice a month, two envelops with local stamps, and a stub of a pencil, unsharpened. That's how they must write their pleadings to the court.Judge Arkin Blunders"You were arrested for not letting your husband into your residence!" Judge Arkin declared as I entered the courtroom, shackled.Unfortunately for Arkin, there was a police officer who was assigned to me more often that she would have on a standard shuffle basis. She was feisty, but petite. Although I was larger than her, I had a confirmed broken back. It was also wise to assign her to people who have supposedly failed to show up to a hearing as opposed to, say, held six people hostage for a week. So that officer was present in quite a few of my hearings and also knew that I was arrested for Failure to Show, rather than any other reason.Regrettably for Judge Arkin, she never seemed to bother to read any of my multiple pleadings. That may be why, when, in one of the hearings, I started talking about attorney corruption in court Arkin got interested. Judge Arkin let me proceed on a long monologue explaining how the attorneys for the wealthy party tell that party to "pay what I say and you will get a judgment you like." Judge Arkin looked at me, appearing entirely disinterested and bored. That officer was present in court that day and may have listened in, perhaps not knowing what to make of my speech.This police officer would have also known that I'm a victim of domestic violence. The officers meet every morning to discuss the previous day's events. So anyone on the team would have heard about my case. In fact, their vigilance over me kept me alive.That Officer was also the one who made me sit on the hard concrete and got scoffed by the nurse. So she knew I was badly injured during the assault. Perhaps she heard me scream after the assault over the radio if she was on patrol that day.As Judge Arkin spoke, the officer stirred. She was not working hard every day to make money for a dangerous predator like Arkin. This may have been the beginning of the end for Arkin.Each time I came before Judge Arkin she seemed more tense and stressed out. She seemed to doubt her own decision to keep me in jail for my Permanent Orders hearing. She did that to prevent any documentation filed with the Register of Record. It was standard procedure.Permanent Orders HearingI was not present for the first part of the hearing on July 16, 2015. The first part was supposedly telephone testimonies from my doctors: an MD and an Osteopath. I'm not sure if the testimonies were ever collected, recorded or discussed. Notably, neither of these doctors are qualified to testify as to my mental state as neither are qualified to even conduct a mental health evaluation or testing.I showed up to my scheduled Permanent Orders Hearing[1] from jail. Permanent Orders, unlike Temporary Orders, constitute the procedures leading to the final Divorce Decree. Based on Internet reviews I realized that typically a court entity doubles up as an attorney to the poorer party. They use a moment of silence to indicate agreement with the other side to the judge as per Rules of Civil Procedure 15.4. This agreement makes all documentation irrelevant to the hearing. The judge allows the party who presumes themselves pro-se to present all of their documentation. She then records herself giving a ruling, completely ignoring all documentation. Appeals Courts can "legally" reject an appeal based on the so-called "law." I knew about CRCP 15.4 and insisted on filing all documentation with the record of the case[2]. So I spent three weeks in jail waiting for my Permanent Orders Hearing instead.I also learned of Renate's type of Permanent Orders hearing. To my relief, the Judge couldn't be bothered to get witnesses on stand. It would not have intimidated me, as I was the riotous party andColoradoenforces no-fault divorces.Instead, the Judge made fraudulent claims. She stated that my husband had 50% of our assets in his possession. She knew he had 100%. He moved back into the marital house when I was arrested. If I tried to disagree with any of her lies Arkin brushed all such disagreements as the disturbance of a mentally ill person. She spoke with my husband and asked him directly what he would like her to order. She could order me to pay him maintenance too, she assured him. She later recorded her agreements with my husband under the heading of Permanent Orders.My husband and his attorneys were going to enter my residence, the Judge Ordered. I'll remain incarcerated in order to allow them to enter. Later I'll have a meeting with a Special Master and I'll be able to ask for some of my possessions back. My husband was ordered to pay $27k to Virginia Fraser Able. As Judge Arkin made this one particular order she was salivating heavily. I developed the conviction that the $27k were Judge Arkin's own payment for her participation in the illegal scheme.I also realized that after the meeting with the "Special Master" I was going to get a bill for the same - $27k. When I exited Jail and before the meeting the Register of Action stated that the GAL was dismissed from the case. Virginia Fraser Able then filed an update to her contact information - except that there was no file enclosed and no contact information. Everyone were going to act as if Virginia Fraser Able was acting as my representation at the meeting.Virginia Fraser Able had sent me a bill for $1000, much like she did with Renate. She claimed to have done some IRS work for me. Of course, since my husband was ordered to file our taxes jointly, he could have hired her. The $1000 would be a Retainer Agreement between the two of us. I didn't pay the bill. I didn't attend the meeting.Apparently after the "Special Master" hearing the party is asked to go to the CFC office at the Courthouse and sign something. My guess is that they sign something like "I agree to accept my dress" or "I agree to accept my nose guard." I suspect that this is then accepted by the judge as a Legal Separation Agreement. One party gets the house and the entire marital estate. The other party gets a nose guard and a large bill from the GAL. A woman I met in jail confirmed this. She was the affluent party. She paid $20k to the GAL and so did her husband, who got no custody of the children and no part of the marital estate. I refused to come to the office or sign anything.My husband's attorneys went for the Special Master's meeting. They came back with a couple of pages full of tautologies as summary of their "discussions": I could agree to accept the car, if I wanted, etc. Since I didn't respond, nor signed anything all was left open.I now suspected that all divorce GALs are triple paid: once by the State, once by the wealthy party and a third time by the poorer party. Judge Arkin was after my husband's payment. Where would my payment have gone?Judge Arkin stated that ________________. It is naturally and purposely misleading. It is the reason Renate sounded so scared when social workers showed up at her door. What it actually means is that should I have possessions anywhere outside of my home the attorneys will access that place at my own expense. It means that my bank account or my storage shed would be locked down for six months while Virginia Fraser Able has free passage.Judge Arkin's minute order may have reflected her own agreements with my husband. Perhaps it claimed that my husband and I reached an agreement during the hearing, instead of a contested hearing. The errant inmate realized that her mischief was not going to lead her to any good, and finally became reasonable. She reached an agreement during her Permanent Orders hearing.I argued that I was no party to any agreements, that any oral agreements can be revoked at any time, that any alleged agreement could not have been acceptable to Arkin due to giving me less than half of the marital estate and due to being achieved under duress.A TruckAt this point a person walked up to the bench and spoke before Judge Arkin. He introduced himself as theCountyAttorney. He stated that he has a truck outside ready to transport me to a mental care facility. Three court deputies were in the courtroom. All looked uneasy. I had several meetings with a mental healthcare professional in jail. Perhaps they knew about those. There were no indications that I should be hospitalized. Perhaps there is no such thing as theCountyAttorneykeeping a truck outside to transport people to mental hospitals. Perhaps trucks don't wait before a court order has been issued. Perhaps onlyMental Health Courtcan order trucks to transport people into mental care facilities. The written record identifies this man not as a Lance Ingalls, theCountyAttorney, but as a CNA from Douglas County Human Service. Perhaps the deputies knew how either one of them looks like. Perhaps they found it disturbing that David Japha, a criminal attorney representing domestic abusers, has "friends" inside Human Services. Women victims of domestic violence will not be able to keep their locations secret from their husbands if David Japha has such friends.Ether because of the deputies' response, or for some other reason, Judge Arkin didn't send me to a mental care facility that day. I was put back in jail for the stated purpose of allowing my husband to enter my personal residence and premarital property and take whatever he wished. I was released after twenty one days of incarceration.I spent the day of the illegal search and seizure helplessly locked up. David Japha claimed that he had the entire day on video and that he intended to shame me by posting it online. I doubted that he would. I doubted that it would be me who'd be shamed. Either way, he wouldn't want the publicity.After the Special Master's meeting David Japha filed a Motion asking that I pay half of my husband's attorney fees. I objected that I have hired no attorneys, participated in no meetings and that as the poorer party would not have to pay the wealthier party's attorney fees.Court DeterminationsJudge Arkin now "determined" that I was "dangerous." She didn't specify whether I was dangerous to myself or to others. This "determination by the court" was not based on any mental evaluation or police records. Courts just don't let the Rules of Evidence bug them. The Federal Supreme Court "determined" that Monsanto-Bayer had a unique product in their GMO produce made of nutritional plants cross bred with deadly bacteria. Hence they were entitled to government subsidies. That same Federal Supreme Court later "determined" that Monsanto-Bayer did not have a unique product. Hence they would not be asked to label their GMO produce cross bred with deadly bacteria. Court "determinations," much like anything an attorney says, mean absolutely nothing.Something Happened to the TitleMy husband took half of what I bought during the marriage and most of what I brought into it. I'm not sure whose idea it was to take my social security card away. It was a costly mistake on their part. I panicked. Whoever had my card can claim power of attorney. Perhaps my husband would show up to the sale of our home with nothing but my card? Perhaps Virginia Fraser Able will just take over my bank accounts and spend them?My first thought was of my two premarital condos. Would Virginia Fraser Able take them for herself? I filed a Warning with the Boulder County Assessor. I explained that attorneys inColoradodon't require contracts. I denied giving Power of Attorney to anyone. I disclosed that my Social Security Card was stolen and that I was worried. I stated that I would never free willingly show up along with my husband unless a police officer was to escort us. Then I gave a physical description of myself and some photos. I asked that no changes be made to my Titles unless I was physically present with my own driver's license in hand. The next year ourCountyAssessoroffered a free service by which any property owner can be alerted as soon as anything is filed on their titles.On a hunch I called the Douglas County Assessor. Something was filed on my titles, I was told. But the Assessor needs a Court Order. She can't transfer the title. She sent a letter in this regard.I stopped by the Assessor's office. Virginia Fraser Able had indeed filed a Quit Claim Deed in my name. She represented herself as a "Court Appointed GAL and Conservator." The title to the house was in joint tenancy - not in a Trust. Therefore Virginia Fraser Able was not a conservator.Well, now he may have considered herself a conservator of my nose guard and swim suit - taken out of my residence. Not only would the Courts accept her as a Conservator, they would also accept that there is Trust. So if I claim that I don't have to pay her bills because there is no attorney-client relationships and no trust, my appeal would be denied, no explanations.I contacted the police. I was able to speak to a detective. I wasn't aware of any immediate results, but this couldn't have been good for either Arkin or Virginia Fraser Able. The Assessor had apparently seen the warning filed with my twoBouldercondos. It was supposed to pop up with my name, rather than property titles. She reasoned that if I was able to own and manage two premarital condos, then why should she pay for a GAL out of her own tax money? And if a GAL was required, shouldn't I become entitled to all kinds of benefits - such as the house? Assessors aren't usually aware of any reason to doubt attorneys as they file documents. They probably read the title, skim the page to see who's giving the title to who, and that's it. Actually reading Virginia Fraser Able's presentation must have left no doubt in her mind that something is awry.It became clear to me that under the garb of divorces, wills and foreclosures attorneys file fraudulent quit claim deeds in anyone's name to transfer title. A few years back friends told me that during foreclosures attorneys take homes for themselves. I believed them but wasn't sure how it all worked. I now met with a friend in Church who was ready to pay the debt on her home during the period given to her by law. Somehow, for some reason, she was informed the house was no longer hers and she couldn't pay the debt. She advocated with our legislators and did everything she could to save her home. She couldn't.Most people are confused by the foreclosure process - mostly because attorneys are unregulated. They lie and keep people ill informed. They don't always realize that by looking up the Reception Number for their property they can see all documents that were filed with that property. That's where you get the name of the attorney who took your home and the name of the entity that owns it now.So attorneys have a financial interest in foreclosures. That certainly explains the repeated waves of foreclosures and financial downturns. There is an author who claims that our government is repeating all of the steps that lead to the financial crisis of 1929. Now I knew why.Arkin RetiresAt this point in my case I filed copies of all of the documents I prepared for my third Appeal. All of Angela Arkin's misdeeds were property explained there, up to the point at which I was arrested.I then filed a Motion for a Mistrial Investigation due to Judicial Misconduct. This allowed me to describe her misdeeds including an incarceration under fraudulent conditions. As soon as I turned it in the Clerk indicated that Judge Angela Arkin is likely to retire. The same was later confirmed.A Judge can moot an investigation against them by retiring. This prevents the publicity as well as cumulative public knowledge. I was happy that I cost Judge Arkin her career.It usually takes the Chief Judge two months to appoint a new judge to a case. I felt that Judge Whitaker took over right away - but it could have just been me trying to recover from my jail ordeal.Fearlessly, Whitaker simply took over where Judge Arkin left off. The first, and only thing I heard from him was a judgment against me to pay my husband $6000. David Japha wanted me to make out the check to him, but those were not the court orders. The last thing I need is a retainer for me with David Japha. I paid the judgment and felt that I was successfully intimidated. I remained silent and nothing happened on my case for over two years.ChildrenI can't imagine enduring all of the third world atrocities imposed on me through judicial greed while trying to protect a new born, a baby, a toddler or a young child. And yet, that is exactly what countless mothers suffer through.Based on what women tell me the judge appoints a GAL to the poorer party. The wealthy party gets exclusive custody along with the right to move the child anywhere. The poorer party is 'determined' mad and criminally minded by the court and is prevented from any unsupervised visits with the children. The spouse has to watch her children become needy, clingy, depressed or suicidal without being able to respond. This is all a result of public ignorance that presumes that civil rights and statutory entitlements are being enforced. I hope this book transforms the situation.If I were a spouse presented with a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage I would let the wealthier party know that I will sign anything they wish. I would then object to coming before the Magistrate and insist to present my illegal Legal Separation Agreement before a judge. If the judge elects to accept such Legal Separation Agreement than there is no loss. I would end up with whatever I would anyway, or perhaps a little better. Additionally I would save myself from the intimidation, abuse and expenses involved in trying to uphold my civil rights. It would allow me to communicate with my children in calm and protected environments and without sharing any uncertainties with them.If judges realize that too many constituents are aware that the courts won't uphold their civil rights then judges may elect to reject illegal Legal Separation Agreements and to force themselves on the case. In that case, the judge would have to make good of her word that she'd like to see the poorer party get a better deal. I would not hire an attorney and would not object to anything a judge does. She won't be able to award me less than what I started with. At the same time, I would be aware that the judge can't award me too much, or the wealthier party would elect to offer that to me freely. Let the Supreme Court figure out this conundrum. They will likely force both sides to pay for all kinds of court appointed experts who will "hear" both sides indefinitely before coming up with some type of Permanent Orders. This may produce just as much revenue to judges, and may be just as time consuming and expensive, but the result should be better for the poorer party. At worst, their financial contribution to the judge should equal what they receive at dissolution. Custody will likely be shared in most cases, since the wealthier party has no incentives to pursue aggressive litigation.[2] Replace the C forColoradowith the first one or two letters of your state and get the Rules of Civil Procedure for your state.

When I was 12 in Israel my dad gave me that “Attorney 101″ lesson. I was convinced I should stay away from the courts.Then when my husband filed for a divorce I met Magistrate Moss, who is a very intelligent and honest and great person. Then I went to the self-help center and saw the laws. I realized some good people are trying their best, so I fell for it.My husband’s attorney objected to the Magistrate and I was brought before Judge Angela Arkin who ended up admitting to a bribe scheme in the Triple Paid Guardian ad Litem Court Scam. I lived in fear for my life and fear for my health and fear for my survival for so many years because of these crooks….Here’s chapter 7 of a book I’ll never write for fear for my life:7. The Burning TowerPermanent Orders Hearing; Agreement; HouseAt this point Judge Arkin accepted any stipulation signed by David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able at any time without granting me the right to be heard on the subject. She even issued one order on a Sunday. I suspected that she had just finished a lucrative meal out of my part of the marital estate, and went on to issuing orders.My husband, Harlan Leigh Stein, could be back in the house at any time and I won't even have a notice. I lived in fear for my life minute by minute. I would wash my clothes daily because every day I was ready to pack and leave. Every day I would watch my clothes drying out in anxiety. I needed to be able to fold them as soon as possible. It was at this point that I got a life-saving call.The CallI met Renate at the Supreme Court Library a few months earlier. It appears that the "mentally incapacitated" regularly swarm the Supreme Court library, silently studying unnecessarily heavy law books.I gave Renate my phone number. I felt that I should advocate for her. I wanted us to share whatever knowledge we acquired about the courts. A few months later Renata dug up theat little piece of paper and was ready to talk. She had lost forty pounds of weight, she shared. At her lowest point she had seriously considered suicide. Renate was 77 years old. She did not get physically assaulted, at least not seriously. But at her age she had to be a wonder woman to survive the severe abuse Virginia Fraser Able was dishing out.Six months prior to her husband's death, Renate's step daughter initiated divorce proceedings. Renate appeared pro-se. The judge in her case ordered her to file a form requesting the appointment of a GAL. Renate was given the impression that by requesting such an appointment she would become entitled to a variety of services at her husband's expense. She obeyed the judge as she had no reason to suspect his motivations or integrity.The fact is that legally, when a party, or their attorney, requests the appointment of a GAL all GAL fees are paid out of their part of the marital estate. However, Renate recounted that the judge ordered her husband to pay $20,000 to Virginia Fraser Able. This came as a surprise to me. I tried to understand, but couldn't make out what happened.I asked Renate to see her Register of Action. It became apparent that the Judge claimed that Renate was incapable of understanding legal proceedings. This was fraud. Renate was a sharp and highly educated woman. She said that the Judge used fast legal jargon, making it hard for her to follow. However, the Judge was not appointing an interpreter to Renate, a German immigrant speaking excellent English. He was appointing a GAL. In contravention of Title 18, without any medical records, and in violation of the Laws of Evidence, he Judge had "diagnosed" Renate as mentally incapacitated. Much like in my case, he later ventured into attributing all four of the mental incapacities and all three mental diseases to Renate. Just to cover all bases. However, he stuck with "Severe Personality Disorder" as his preferred "diagnosis." Mine was "Psychotic Attacks."The "diagnosis" in both cases is never clearly stated. It is insinuated. Its enough to help the courts communicate, but most others will have no idea what was claimed or what laws were involved.Virginia Fraser Able was appointed in response to Renate's pro-se pleading. Things turned ugly quite fast. Renate's husband did not have much time and the courts had to prevent Renate from inheriting the marital estate. At one point Virginia Fraser Able accused Renate of stealing jewelry from her husband. She proceeded to physically remove expensive gold rings from Renate's fingers. She took a ring that Renate's husband gifted her. But she also took a ring that she brought with her when moving to theUnited States. Virginia Fraser Able simply handed the rings to Renate's step daughter.This was just the beginning. Virginia Fraser Able, her husband's attorney and the step daughter entered Renate's personal residence and took anything they pleased. They took precious dresses she brought with her fromBavaria. Most premarital treasures were confiscated.Renate was most;y upset about her banking situation. Something happened. Her account got locked. She can't access her safe either. There are many valuables in the safe, she said. Virginia Fraser Able had access to both Renate's bank account and the safe.Renate got a bill for one thousand dollars from Virginia Fraser Able and paid it off.I asked Renate if she'd had a Permanent Orders Hearing. She said yes, but didn't describe anything that sounded even remotely like a Permanent Orders Hearing. All that happened, she claims, is that a line of people gave negative character testimonies about her. It was terrible and shook her badly. Virginia Fraser Able asked her: "What day was it when you got married?" "Wednesday," Renate replied. "Fraud!!!" Virginia Fraser Able declared - "I checked and it was a Monday!" The minute orders suggested that Renate's financial documents were fraudulent. The Judge, therefore he had no choice but to deprive her of her part of the marital estate.A friendship budded and I started meeting with Renate every few weeks at Yaya's European Bistro. My husband was still paying maintenance at the time and I could relish the friendship as well as Sunday brunches with all-you-can-eat buffet. Renate was gaining weight and becoming her surprisingly stout and strong self again.The Judge had told Renate that she can have a meeting in which she could ask for her dear dresses and other personal items back. She appeared to next our meeting feeling relieved. She now had her beautiful dresses fromBavaria. But now a bill arrived for $20,000 to Virginia Fraser Able.Also, something happened to the title of the house. She owned her marital home jointly with her husband. But something happened. She couldn't quite explain. Renate was now fully divorced, all she got was the dress. Her husband died shortly after and his daughter sold their joint house and kept all proceeds. I now remembered a story about a woman inMinnesotawho sold her home and bought a joint home with her new husband. He died the next year. She got nothing. She was now homeless.I couldn't quite make sense of much of what Renate was recounting. None of my friends reported any of these weird "proceedings." At the time I believed that my case was going a different way. I was going to have a Permanent Order Hearing. It was scheduled for eight hours. I was going to file financial and other documents with the record of the case so the judge can't deny them. I was going to get financial disclosure from my husband to assess the latest value of our joint marital estate. I was going to plead that my husband provides funds for forensic accounting. I was going to have to find a forensic accountant willing to work for an individual, not an attorney. They were going to have to provide me with written reports - none of these partially recorded hearings and jumbled words that get misrepresented at the Ruling Part.Little did I know that Renate was going to save my home, my bank account or my health. And yet, so it was.Illegal Search and SeizureWhen my husband came in to "secure his possession" none of my personal chattels were onsite. I couldn't stay in the home because I didn't have a protection order. The police were not going to prevent my husband from a "friendly hug" - friendly enough to put me in diapers for the rest of my life.David Japha filed another one of his nebulous Motions for Contempt of Court. He could have just signed another Stipulation with Virginia Fraser Able. But I knew why he took the Contempt of Court rout because my friends told me how it worked.The first part of my Contempt of Court Hearings was the Advisory Hearing. There were no witnesses and no recording. I was given a paper to sign, disclosing, among others, that I may choose a judge other than Arkin for this hearing. When I asked for Magistrate Moss, Judge Arkin stated that in my case I may not ask for another judge. She may or may not have given a "reason." It was irrelevant because she was obviously lying. Contempt of Court is used by judges as a measure to incarcerate anyone and everyone foregoing a hearing. I was forced to sign that fraudulent piece of "disclosure."Since witnesses and a Court Deputy were going to be present at main part of the Hearing, Judge Arkin cut it into two mutually antitheticalparts parts. A different Court Deputy was going to be present for each part. The one present for testimonies is not going to know that the Ruling part contradicts all testimonies.The second part included testimonies from some neighbors who said I gave them a bottle for bourbon from our collections, and was concluded mid way as my husband was testifying. In the presence of my neighbors Judge Arkin acted professionally. She was pro-se friendly and explained technical language, laws and procedures. To put me in jail she would have to prove my Contempt of Court beyond any shadow of a doubt, she explained. But there could be civil repremands that only require a more relaxed standard of proof. I did magnificently cross-examining the witnesses my husband designated. There was the police woman from the day my husband entered the unit. All she could say is that my husband appeared unhappy, nothing more. There were my movers. All they could say was they moved some boxes. Virginia Fraser Able sat next to me despite my protests. She would read notes I was making, and motioned for the judge when she should or should not let me speak.Then my husband approached the stand. There was not much that he could say. However, Judge Arkin suddenly started yelling at him loudly. She then calmed down and explained to me that we must end this meeting because the Court Deputy is tired and wants to go home.At the time I thought that Judge Arkin was simply deranged. But then I realized that she was taking advantage of the shortages of transcripts. Judge Arkin was actually trying to generate the impression that it was me who exploded, due to my mental disease of _______________________, not her. To my horror I realized that as she screamed I should have talked to the microphone simultaneously, identifying myself and identifying the screamer. That chance was now gone.For a notion of solace I remembered the court deputy present. He did not sit in the back, detached and listening to dispatch messages. Instead, he sat right by me and appeared entirely involved in everything that was happening. He also seemed senior to me, despite his uniform. Is it possible that communicating with a Douglas County Detective for nearly three years yielded some results? Was it possible that the hearing was, indeed, recorded? Would that Court Deputy testify that it wasn't me screaming? I couldn't tell.The third part continued with my husband's "testimony" for a few minutes and proceeded to the Ruling. Judge Arkin naturally misrepresented all testimonies and occurances in the court found me doubtlessly guilty. Her sentence was that David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able enter my residence along with my husband and take whatever they want. I will not be heard. David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able will then file a report of whether I allowed them to take everything they wanted. Depending on their report, I may be incarcerated.By now I knew quite a bit about the law. I knew what the role of a GAL was. I knew about the error in the law. I knew that this error doesn't apply in my case. I never asked for a GAL. I had already expressed lack of trust and lack of attorney-client relationship before either of my attorneys requested the appointment of a GAL. Therefore, since I never requested a GAL, no error applies to me and theAppeals Courtshould hear my appeal.I also knew that GALs don't sign stipulations. GALs follow instructions from a psychiatrist who had conducted regulated mental evaluations. She does nothing else for the court. So technically, I had a case to claim that a GAL should have never been appointed and none of her stipulations were to be accepted by the court. Hence, the entire situation leading to the Contempt of Court hearing should have never been generated. Additionally, the hearing was partially recorded. At the time this was misconduct which was to result in automatic reversal of rulings, without a need for any further review.If I could file an Appeal before the date in which my husband and the attorneys come to my unit to take everything I own, then Judge Arkin would not have jurisdiction over my case on that date. I could refuse admitting them to my home and hope to take it in appeals. I knew Renate's story of how she lost her dresses and other personal items. I knew these are illegal patterns of conduct by courts in general. That makes my case final and appealable, because the lower court can't be expected to handle my need for justice correctly.My Third AppealI filed my Motion for Appeal along with a Motion to Stay Case.. TheAppeals Courtimmediately issued an Order to Show Cause. This moves the jurisdiction over the case from the lower court to theAppeals Court.At the time when my husband, his attorney and Virginia Fraser Able were at my doorstep the Motion to Stay Case was already issued but had not yet arrived in the mail. The Civil Stand-by policeman called the DA and prevented the party from entering my home. My husband's attorney assured me that they were going to get their way. "It never fails," he guaranteed. He seemed confident, but I couldn't understand. The law was on my side. TheAppeals Courtintervened timely. They shouldn't be able to enter.I have a fault in always under estimating the court's audacity in violating the law. What Judge Arkin did was to issue orders. She couldn't file them with the case for now, because she was out of jurisdiction. But if she could orchestrate a contact between me and District Court then my case would be over. Her orders would be filed according to the day they were issued or stamped in arrears.I had no access to the Record of my case because I was inBouldernow. My husband's attorneys kept contacting me about a hearing that I must attend with Judge Arkin. I later discovered that she created "An Order to Show Cause Hearing" at her court. She also, simultaneously, filed a warrant for my arrest for "Failure to Show," in other words, for not showing up to the hearing. I would have been arrested at arrival, since the warrant was already issued.The Judge's Division Clerk is regulated by the Chief Judge. I left a message on his answering service complaining that the clerks burrow stamps and stamp their own Judge's orders instead of allowing the Court's Clerk to supervise the legality of procedures. This was the last thing I managed to do before theBoulderpolice came to arrest me. I had completed my Response to Order to Show Cause as well as all other documents. In addition to excluding all transcripts of partially recorded hearings in my Designation of Record, I also excluded any transcripts that I didn't file myself. Virginia Fraser Able filed a fraudulent transcript to our Sorenson Hearing and I had no doubt that many others were coming. Renate had also experienced fraudulent transcripts filed with her case. These documents became valuable later. After jail I was too exhausted to spend any time on writing any legal documents. And yet these were ready to go and were filed with my case, leading to Judge Angela Arkin's eventual downfall.Also, I intended to respond to some pleadings and correct my Permanent Orders hearing. Virginia Fraser Able was no conducting the hearing on my part. She didn't file any financial documents. No other documents. She simply had a list of people who were going to testify in court that day. I did not want to get the same Permanent Orders hearing Renate got. I had nearly a month. I was going to protest in writing and file financial claims.I was arrested two days before my deadline for filing my Response and Designation.Boulderpolice was able to transport me toDouglasCountyon the morning of my deadline. They seemed to believe that the Judge would see me right away and send me on my way to file my documents. Arkin didn't see me until the next day.From Douglas County Jail, using paper-kytes I repeatedly tried to get a copy of my arrest warrant as well as an understanding of what the truth was behind the claims of an out-of-jurisdiction hearing. Judge Arkin intercepted all of my communications. I could get no answers. Although the jail is in the courthouse and the electronic system could be available there fore inmates to use for free, it is simply not available. Indigent inmates like myself get two pieces of paper twice a month, two envelops with local stamps, and a stub of a pencil, unsharpened. That's how they must write their pleadings to the court.Judge Arkin Blunders"You were arrested for not letting your husband into your residence!" Judge Arkin declared as I entered the courtroom, shackled.Unfortunately for Arkin, there was a police officer who was assigned to me more often that she would have on a standard shuffle basis. She was feisty, but petite. Although I was larger than her, I had a confirmed broken back. It was also wise to assign her to people who have supposedly failed to show up to a hearing as opposed to, say, held six people hostage for a week. So that officer was present in quite a few of my hearings and also knew that I was arrested for Failure to Show, rather than any other reason.Regrettably for Judge Arkin, she never seemed to bother to read any of my multiple pleadings. That may be why, when, in one of the hearings, I started talking about attorney corruption in court Arkin got interested. Judge Arkin let me proceed on a long monologue explaining how the attorneys for the wealthy party tell that party to "pay what I say and you will get a judgment you like." Judge Arkin looked at me, appearing entirely disinterested and bored. That officer was present in court that day and may have listened in, perhaps not knowing what to make of my speech.This police officer would have also known that I'm a victim of domestic violence. The officers meet every morning to discuss the previous day's events. So anyone on the team would have heard about my case. In fact, their vigilance over me kept me alive.That Officer was also the one who made me sit on the hard concrete and got scoffed by the nurse. So she knew I was badly injured during the assault. Perhaps she heard me scream after the assault over the radio if she was on patrol that day.As Judge Arkin spoke, the officer stirred. She was not working hard every day to make money for a dangerous predator like Arkin. This may have been the beginning of the end for Arkin.Each time I came before Judge Arkin she seemed more tense and stressed out. She seemed to doubt her own decision to keep me in jail for my Permanent Orders hearing. She did that to prevent any documentation filed with the Register of Record. It was standard procedure.Permanent Orders HearingI was not present for the first part of the hearing on July 16, 2015. The first part was supposedly telephone testimonies from my doctors: an MD and an Osteopath. I'm not sure if the testimonies were ever collected, recorded or discussed. Notably, neither of these doctors are qualified to testify as to my mental state as neither are qualified to even conduct a mental health evaluation or testing.I showed up to my scheduled Permanent Orders Hearing[1] from jail. Permanent Orders, unlike Temporary Orders, constitute the procedures leading to the final Divorce Decree. Based on Internet reviews I realized that typically a court entity doubles up as an attorney to the poorer party. They use a moment of silence to indicate agreement with the other side to the judge as per Rules of Civil Procedure 15.4. This agreement makes all documentation irrelevant to the hearing. The judge allows the party who presumes themselves pro-se to present all of their documentation. She then records herself giving a ruling, completely ignoring all documentation. Appeals Courts can "legally" reject an appeal based on the so-called "law." I knew about CRCP 15.4 and insisted on filing all documentation with the record of the case[2]. So I spent three weeks in jail waiting for my Permanent Orders Hearing instead.I also learned of Renate's type of Permanent Orders hearing. To my relief, the Judge couldn't be bothered to get witnesses on stand. It would not have intimidated me, as I was the riotous party andColoradoenforces no-fault divorces.Instead, the Judge made fraudulent claims. She stated that my husband had 50% of our assets in his possession. She knew he had 100%. He moved back into the marital house when I was arrested. If I tried to disagree with any of her lies Arkin brushed all such disagreements as the disturbance of a mentally ill person. She spoke with my husband and asked him directly what he would like her to order. She could order me to pay him maintenance too, she assured him. She later recorded her agreements with my husband under the heading of Permanent Orders.My husband and his attorneys were going to enter my residence, the Judge Ordered. I'll remain incarcerated in order to allow them to enter. Later I'll have a meeting with a Special Master and I'll be able to ask for some of my possessions back. My husband was ordered to pay $27k to Virginia Fraser Able. As Judge Arkin made this one particular order she was salivating heavily. I developed the conviction that the $27k were Judge Arkin's own payment for her participation in the illegal scheme.I also realized that after the meeting with the "Special Master" I was going to get a bill for the same - $27k. When I exited Jail and before the meeting the Register of Action stated that the GAL was dismissed from the case. Virginia Fraser Able then filed an update to her contact information - except that there was no file enclosed and no contact information. Everyone were going to act as if Virginia Fraser Able was acting as my representation at the meeting.Virginia Fraser Able had sent me a bill for $1000, much like she did with Renate. She claimed to have done some IRS work for me. Of course, since my husband was ordered to file our taxes jointly, he could have hired her. The $1000 would be a Retainer Agreement between the two of us. I didn't pay the bill. I didn't attend the meeting.Apparently after the "Special Master" hearing the party is asked to go to the CFC office at the Courthouse and sign something. My guess is that they sign something like "I agree to accept my dress" or "I agree to accept my nose guard." I suspect that this is then accepted by the judge as a Legal Separation Agreement. One party gets the house and the entire marital estate. The other party gets a nose guard and a large bill from the GAL. A woman I met in jail confirmed this. She was the affluent party. She paid $20k to the GAL and so did her husband, who got no custody of the children and no part of the marital estate. I refused to come to the office or sign anything.My husband's attorneys went for the Special Master's meeting. They came back with a couple of pages full of tautologies as summary of their "discussions": I could agree to accept the car, if I wanted, etc. Since I didn't respond, nor signed anything all was left open.I now suspected that all divorce GALs are triple paid: once by the State, once by the wealthy party on behalf of the judge in the lower courts, and a third time by the poorer party on behalf of the chief judge and justices. Judge Arkin was after my husband's payment. Where would my payment have gone?Judge Arkin stated that ________________. It is naturally and purposely misleading. It is the reason Renate sounded so scared when social workers showed up at her door. What it actually means is that should I have possessions anywhere outside of my home the attorneys will access that place at my own expense. It means that my bank account or my storage shed would be locked down for six months while Virginia Fraser Able has free passage.Judge Arkin's minute order may have reflected her own agreements with my husband. Perhaps it claimed that my husband and I reached an agreement during the hearing, instead of a contested hearing. The errant inmate realized that her mischief was not going to lead her to any good, and finally became reasonable. She reached an agreement during her Permanent Orders hearing.I argued that I was no party to any agreements, that any oral agreements can be revoked at any time, that any alleged agreement could not have been acceptable to Arkin due to giving me less than half of the marital estate and due to being achieved under duress.A TruckAt this point a person walked up to the bench and spoke before Judge Arkin. He introduced himself as theCountyAttorney. He stated that he has a truck outside ready to transport me to a mental care facility. Three court deputies were in the courtroom. All looked uneasy. I had several meetings with a mental healthcare professional in jail. Perhaps they knew about those. There were no indications that I should be hospitalized. Perhaps there is no such thing as theCountyAttorneykeeping a truck outside to transport people to mental hospitals. Perhaps trucks don't wait before a court order has been issued. Perhaps onlyMental Health Courtcan order trucks to transport people into mental care facilities. The written record identifies this man not as a Lance Ingalls, theCountyAttorney, but as a CNA from Douglas County Human Service. Perhaps the deputies knew how either one of them looks like. Perhaps they found it disturbing that David Japha, a criminal attorney representing domestic abusers, has "friends" inside Human Services. Women victims of domestic violence will not be able to keep their locations secret from their husbands if David Japha has such friends.Ether because of the deputies' response, or for some other reason, Judge Arkin didn't send me to a mental care facility that day. I was put back in jail for the stated purpose of allowing my husband to enter my personal residence and premarital property and take whatever he wished. I was released after twenty one days of incarceration.I spent the day of the illegal search and seizure helplessly locked up. David Japha claimed that he had the entire day on video and that he intended to shame me by posting it online. I doubted that he would. I doubted that it would be me who'd be shamed. Either way, he wouldn't want the publicity.After the Special Master's meeting David Japha filed a Motion asking that I pay half of my husband's attorney fees. I objected that I have hired no attorneys, participated in no meetings and that as the poorer party would not have to pay the wealthier party's attorney fees.Court DeterminationsJudge Arkin now "determined" that I was "dangerous." She didn't specify whether I was dangerous to myself or to others. This "determination by the court" was not based on any mental evaluation or police records. Courts just don't let the Rules of Evidence bug them. The Federal Supreme Court "determined" that Monsanto-Bayer had a unique product in their GMO produce made of nutritional plants cross bred with deadly bacteria. Hence they were entitled to government subsidies. That same Federal Supreme Court later "determined" that Monsanto-Bayer did not have a unique product. Hence they would not be asked to label their GMO produce cross bred with deadly bacteria. Court "determinations," much like anything an attorney says, mean absolutely nothing.Something Happened to the TitleMy husband took half of what I bought during the marriage and most of what I brought into it. I'm not sure whose idea it was to take my social security card away. It was a costly mistake on their part. I panicked. Whoever had my card can claim power of attorney. Perhaps my husband would show up to the sale of our home with nothing but my card? Perhaps Virginia Fraser Able will just take over my bank accounts and spend them?My first thought was of my two premarital condos. Would Virginia Fraser Able take them for herself? I filed a Warning with the Boulder County Assessor. I explained that attorneys inColoradodon't require contracts. I denied giving Power of Attorney to anyone. I disclosed that my Social Security Card was stolen and that I was worried. I stated that I would never free willingly show up along with my husband unless a police officer was to escort us. Then I gave a physical description of myself and some photos. I asked that no changes be made to my Titles unless I was physically present with my own driver's license in hand. The next year ourCountyAssessoroffered a free service by which any property owner can be alerted as soon as anything is filed on their titles.On a hunch I called the Douglas County Assessor. Something was filed on my titles, I was told. But the Assessor needs a Court Order. She can't transfer the title. She sent a letter in this regard.I stopped by the Assessor's office. Virginia Fraser Able had indeed filed a Quit Claim Deed in my name. She represented herself as a "Court Appointed GAL and Conservator." The title to the house was in joint tenancy - not in a Trust. Therefore Virginia Fraser Able was not a conservator.Well, now he may have considered herself a conservator of my nose guard and swim suit - taken out of my residence. Not only would the Courts accept her as a Conservator, they would also accept that there is Trust. So if I claim that I don't have to pay her bills because there is no attorney-client relationships and no trust, my appeal would be denied, no explanations.I contacted the police. I was able to speak to a detective. I wasn't aware of any immediate results, but this couldn't have been good for either Arkin or Virginia Fraser Able. The Assessor had apparently seen the warning filed with my twoBouldercondos. It was supposed to pop up with my name, rather than property titles. She reasoned that if I was able to own and manage two premarital condos, then why should she pay for a GAL out of her own tax money? And if a GAL was required, shouldn't I become entitled to all kinds of benefits - such as the house? Assessors aren't usually aware of any reason to doubt attorneys as they file documents. They probably read the title, skim the page to see who's giving the title to who, and that's it. Actually reading Virginia Fraser Able's presentation must have left no doubt in her mind that something is awry.It became clear to me that under the garb of divorces, wills and foreclosures attorneys file fraudulent quit claim deeds in anyone's name to transfer title. A few years back friends told me that during foreclosures attorneys take homes for themselves. I believed them but wasn't sure how it all worked. I now met with a friend in Church who was ready to pay the debt on her home during the period given to her by law. Somehow, for some reason, she was informed the house was no longer hers and she couldn't pay the debt. She advocated with our legislators and did everything she could to save her home. She couldn't.Most people are confused by the foreclosure process - mostly because attorneys are unregulated. They lie and keep people ill informed. They don't always realize that by looking up the Reception Number for their property they can see all documents that were filed with that property. That's where you get the name of the attorney who took your home and the name of the entity that owns it now.So attorneys have a financial interest in foreclosures. That certainly explains the repeated waves of foreclosures and financial downturns. There is an author who claims that our government is repeating all of the steps that lead to the financial crisis of 1929. Now I knew why.Arkin RetiresAt this point in my case I filed copies of all of the documents I prepared for my third Appeal. All of Angela Arkin's misdeeds were property explained there, up to the point at which I was arrested.I then filed a Motion for a Mistrial Investigation due to Judicial Misconduct. This allowed me to describe her misdeeds including an incarceration under fraudulent conditions. As soon as I turned it in the Clerk indicated that Judge Angela Arkin is likely to retire. The same was later confirmed.A Judge can moot an investigation against them by retiring. This prevents the publicity as well as cumulative public knowledge. I was happy that I cost Judge Arkin her career.It usually takes the Chief Judge two months to appoint a new judge to a case. I felt that Judge Whitaker took over right away - but it could have just been me trying to recover from my jail ordeal.Fearlessly, Whitaker simply took over where Judge Arkin left off. The first, and only thing I heard from him was a judgment against me to pay my husband $6000. David Japha wanted me to make out the check to him, but those were not the court orders. The last thing I need is a retainer for me with David Japha. I paid the judgment and felt that I was successfully intimidated. I remained silent and nothing happened on my case for over two years.ChildrenI can't imagine enduring all of the third world atrocities imposed on me through judicial greed while trying to protect a new born, a baby, a toddler or a young child. And yet, that is exactly what countless mothers suffer through.Based on what women tell me the judge appoints a GAL to the poorer party. The wealthy party gets exclusive custody along with the right to move the child anywhere. The poorer party is 'determined' mad and criminally minded by the court and is prevented from any unsupervised visits with the children. The spouse has to watch her children become needy, clingy, depressed or suicidal without being able to respond. This is all a result of public ignorance that presumes that civil rights and statutory entitlements are being enforced. I hope this book transforms the situation.If I were a spouse presented with a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage I would let the wealthier party know that I will sign anything they wish. I would then object to coming before the Magistrate and insist to present my illegal Legal Separation Agreement before a judge. If the judge elects to accept such Legal Separation Agreement than there is no loss. I would end up with whatever I would anyway, or perhaps a little better. Additionally I would save myself from the intimidation, abuse and expenses involved in trying to uphold my civil rights. It would allow me to communicate with my children in calm and protected environments and without sharing any uncertainties with them.If judges realize that too many constituents are aware that the courts won't uphold their civil rights then judges may elect to reject illegal Legal Separation Agreements and to force themselves on the case. In that case, the judge would have to make good of her word that she'd like to see the poorer party get a better deal. I would not hire an attorney and would not object to anything a judge does. She won't be able to award me less than what I started with. At the same time, I would be aware that the judge can't award me too much, or the wealthier party would elect to offer that to me freely. Let the Supreme Court figure out this conundrum. They will likely force both sides to pay for all kinds of court appointed experts who will "hear" both sides indefinitely before coming up with some type of Permanent Orders. This may produce just as much revenue to judges, and may be just as time consuming and expensive, but the result should be better for the poorer party. At worst, their financial contribution to the judge should equal what they receive at dissolution. Custody will likely be shared in most cases, since the wealthier party has no incentives to pursue aggressive litigation.[2] Replace the C forColoradowith the first one or two letters of your state and get the Rules of Civil Procedure for your state.

In three years of divorce, 2013–2015, Judge Angela Arkin did so many illegal things that I was not the only one scratching her head…. In the end I filed a Motion for Mistrial Investigation, properly identified the bribe scheme in the Triple Paid Guardian Ad Litem Court Scam, and Judge Angela Arkin retired in admission of this bribe scheme…Judge Arkin would cut her “hearings” in parts because there was a court deputy in the courtroom. One of them would hear the testimonies - then the next time another one would hear her Ruling - completely contradicting what was going on during the hearings.One of the most strange parts was when a CNA from Douglas County Human Services made a dramatic entrance into the courtroom, representing himself as the County Attorney. 4–5 police officers were there and recognized him. He said he had a truck outside ready to shuttle me to a mental hospital. Its not how it is done….. The police had already heard that Judge Arkin is lying from a court deputy, and now could not believe their ears…..Here’s a book that I decided not to write in order not to be killed. Every once in a while I get a reporter who thinks they can write about it and they get threats so they won’t.7. The Burning TowerPermanent Orders Hearing; Agreement; HouseAt this point Judge Arkin accepted any stipulation signed by David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able at any time without granting me the right to be heard on the subject. She even issued one order on a Sunday. I suspected that she had just finished a lucrative meal out of my part of the marital estate, and went on to issuing orders.My husband could be back in the house at any time and I won't even have a notice. I lived in fear for my life minute by minute. I would wash my clothes daily because every day I was ready to pack and leave. Every day I would watch my clothes drying out in anxiety. I needed to be able to fold them as soon as possible. It was at this point that I got a life-saving call.The CallI met Renate at the Supreme Court Library a few months earlier. It appears that the "mentally incapacitated" regularly swarm the Supreme Court library, silently studying unnecessarily heavy law books.I gave Renate my phone number. I felt that I should advocate for her. I wanted us to share whatever knowledge we acquired about the courts. A few months later Renata dug up theat little piece of paper and was ready to talk. She had lost forty pounds of weight, she shared. At her lowest point she had seriously considered suicide. Renate was 77 years old. She did not get physically assaulted, at least not seriously. But at her age she had to be a wonder woman to survive the severe abuse Virginia Fraser Able was dishing out.Six months prior to her husband's death, Renate's step daughter initiated divorce proceedings. Renate appeared pro-se. The judge in her case ordered her to file a form requesting the appointment of a GAL. Renate was given the impression that by requesting such an appointment she would become entitled to a variety of services at her husband's expense. She obeyed the judge as she had no reason to suspect his motivations or integrity.The fact is that legally, when a party, or their attorney, requests the appointment of a GAL all GAL fees are paid out of their part of the marital estate. However, Renate recounted that the judge ordered her husband to pay $20,000 to Virginia Fraser Able. This came as a surprise to me. I tried to understand, but couldn't make out what happened.I asked Renate to see her Register of Action. It became apparent that the Judge claimed that Renate was incapable of understanding legal proceedings. This was fraud. Renate was a sharp and highly educated woman. She said that the Judge used fast legal jargon, making it hard for her to follow. However, the Judge was not appointing an interpreter to Renate, a German immigrant speaking excellent English. He was appointing a GAL. In contravention of Title 18, without any medical records, and in violation of the Laws of Evidence, he Judge had "diagnosed" Renate as mentally incapacitated. Much like in my case, he later ventured into attributing all four of the mental incapacities and all three mental diseases to Renate. Just to cover all bases. However, he stuck with "Severe Personality Disorder" as his preferred "diagnosis." Mine was "Psychotic Attacks."The "diagnosis" in both cases is never clearly stated. It is insinuated. Its enough to help the courts communicate, but most others will have no idea what was claimed or what laws were involved.Virginia Fraser Able was appointed in response to Renate's pro-se pleading. Things turned ugly quite fast. Renate's husband did not have much time and the courts had to prevent Renate from inheriting the marital estate. At one point Virginia Fraser Able accused Renate of stealing jewelry from her husband. She proceeded to physically remove expensive gold rings from Renate's fingers. She took a ring that Renate's husband gifted her. But she also took a ring that she brought with her when moving to theUnited States. Virginia Fraser Able simply handed the rings to Renate's step daughter.This was just the beginning. Virginia Fraser Able, her husband's attorney and the step daughter entered Renate's personal residence and took anything they pleased. They took precious dresses she brought with her fromBavaria. Most premarital treasures were confiscated.Renate was most;y upset about her banking situation. Something happened. Her account got locked. She can't access her safe either. There are many valuables in the safe, she said. Virginia Fraser Able had access to both Renate's bank account and the safe.Renate got a bill for one thousand dollars from Virginia Fraser Able and paid it off.I asked Renate if she'd had a Permanent Orders Hearing. She said yes, but didn't describe anything that sounded even remotely like a Permanent Orders Hearing. All that happened, she claims, is that a line of people gave negative character testimonies about her. It was terrible and shook her badly. Virginia Fraser Able asked her: "What day was it when you got married?" "Wednesday," Renate replied. "Fraud!!!" Virginia Fraser Able declared - "I checked and it was a Monday!" The minute orders suggested that Renate's financial documents were fraudulent. The Judge, therefore he had no choice but to deprive her of her part of the marital estate.A friendship budded and I started meeting with Renate every few weeks at Yaya's European Bistro. My husband was still paying maintenance at the time and I could relish the friendship as well as Sunday brunches with all-you-can-eat buffet. Renate was gaining weight and becoming her surprisingly stout and strong self again.The Judge had told Renate that she can have a meeting in which she could ask for her dear dresses and other personal items back. She appeared to next our meeting feeling relieved. She now had her beautiful dresses fromBavaria. But now a bill arrived for $20,000 to Virginia Fraser Able.Also, something happened to the title of the house. She owned her marital home jointly with her husband. But something happened. She couldn't quite explain. Renate was now fully divorced, all she got was the dress. Her husband died shortly after and his daughter sold their joint house and kept all proceeds. I now remembered a story about a woman inMinnesotawho sold her home and bought a joint home with her new husband. He died the next year. She got nothing. She was now homeless.I couldn't quite make sense of much of what Renate was recounting. None of my friends reported any of these weird "proceedings." At the time I believed that my case was going a different way. I was going to have a Permanent Order Hearing. It was scheduled for eight hours. I was going to file financial and other documents with the record of the case so the judge can't deny them. I was going to get financial disclosure from my husband to assess the latest value of our joint marital estate. I was going to plead that my husband provides funds for forensic accounting. I was going to have to find a forensic accountant willing to work for an individual, not an attorney. They were going to have to provide me with written reports - none of these partially recorded hearings and jumbled words that get misrepresented at the Ruling Part.Little did I know that Renate was going to save my home, my bank account or my health. And yet, so it was.Illegal Search and SeizureWhen my husband came in to "secure his possession" none of my personal chattels were onsite. I couldn't stay in the home because I didn't have a protection order. The police were not going to prevent my husband from a "friendly hug" - friendly enough to put me in diapers for the rest of my life.David Japha filed another one of his nebulous Motions for Contempt of Court. He could have just signed another Stipulation with Virginia Fraser Able. But I knew why he took the Contempt of Court rout because my friends told me how it worked.The first part of my Contempt of Court Hearings was the Advisory Hearing. There were no witnesses and no recording. I was given a paper to sign, disclosing, among others, that I may choose a judge other than Arkin for this hearing. When I asked for Magistrate Moss, Judge Arkin stated that in my case I may not ask for another judge. She may or may not have given a "reason." It was irrelevant because she was obviously lying. Contempt of Court is used by judges as a measure to incarcerate anyone and everyone foregoing a hearing. I was forced to sign that fraudulent piece of "disclosure."Since witnesses and a Court Deputy were going to be present at main part of the Hearing, Judge Arkin cut it into two mutually antitheticalparts parts. A different Court Deputy was going to be present for each part. The one present for testimonies is not going to know that the Ruling part contradicts all testimonies.The second part included testimonies from some neighbors who said I gave them a bottle for bourbon from our collections, and was concluded mid way as my husband was testifying. In the presence of my neighbors Judge Arkin acted professionally. She was pro-se friendly and explained technical language, laws and procedures. To put me in jail she would have to prove my Contempt of Court beyond any shadow of a doubt, she explained. But there could be civil repremands that only require a more relaxed standard of proof. I did magnificently cross-examining the witnesses my husband designated. There was the police woman from the day my husband entered the unit. All she could say is that my husband appeared unhappy, nothing more. There were my movers. All they could say was they moved some boxes. Virginia Fraser Able sat next to me despite my protests. She would read notes I was making, and motioned for the judge when she should or should not let me speak.Then my husband approached the stand. There was not much that he could say. However, Judge Arkin suddenly started yelling at him loudly. She then calmed down and explained to me that we must end this meeting because the Court Deputy is tired and wants to go home.At the time I thought that Judge Arkin was simply deranged. But then I realized that she was taking advantage of the shortages of transcripts. Judge Arkin was actually trying to generate the impression that it was me who exploded, due to my mental disease of _______________________, not her. To my horror I realized that as she screamed I should have talked to the microphone simultaneously, identifying myself and identifying the screamer. That chance was now gone.For a notion of solace I remembered the court deputy present. He did not sit in the back, detached and listening to dispatch messages. Instead, he sat right by me and appeared entirely involved in everything that was happening. He also seemed senior to me, despite his uniform. Is it possible that communicating with a Douglas County Detective for nearly three years yielded some results? Was it possible that the hearing was, indeed, recorded? Would that Court Deputy testify that it wasn't me screaming? I couldn't tell.The third part continued with my husband's "testimony" for a few minutes and proceeded to the Ruling. Judge Arkin naturally misrepresented all testimonies and occurances in the court found me doubtlessly guilty. Her sentence was that David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able enter my residence along with my husband and take whatever they want. I will not be heard. David Japha and Virginia Fraser Able will then file a report of whether I allowed them to take everything they wanted. Depending on their report, I may be incarcerated.By now I knew quite a bit about the law. I knew what the role of a GAL was. I knew about the error in the law. I knew that this error doesn't apply in my case. I never asked for a GAL. I had already expressed lack of trust and lack of attorney-client relationship before either of my attorneys requested the appointment of a GAL. Therefore, since I never requested a GAL, no error applies to me and theAppeals Courtshould hear my appeal.I also knew that GALs don't sign stipulations. GALs follow instructions from a psychiatrist who had conducted regulated mental evaluations. She does nothing else for the court. So technically, I had a case to claim that a GAL should have never been appointed and none of her stipulations were to be accepted by the court. Hence, the entire situation leading to the Contempt of Court hearing should have never been generated. Additionally, the hearing was partially recorded. At the time this was misconduct which was to result in automatic reversal of rulings, without a need for any further review.If I could file an Appeal before the date in which my husband and the attorneys come to my unit to take everything I own, then Judge Arkin would not have jurisdiction over my case on that date. I could refuse admitting them to my home and hope to take it in appeals. I knew Renate's story of how she lost her dresses and other personal items. I knew these are illegal patterns of conduct by courts in general. That makes my case final and appealable, because the lower court can't be expected to handle my need for justice correctly.My Third AppealI filed my Motion for Appeal along with a Motion to Stay Case.. TheAppeals Courtimmediately issued an Order to Show Cause. This moves the jurisdiction over the case from the lower court to theAppeals Court.At the time when my husband, his attorney and Virginia Fraser Able were at my doorstep the Motion to Stay Case was already issued but had not yet arrived in the mail. The Civil Stand-by policeman called the DA and prevented the party from entering my home. My husband's attorney assured me that they were going to get their way. "It never fails," he guaranteed. He seemed confident, but I couldn't understand. The law was on my side. TheAppeals Courtintervened timely. They shouldn't be able to enter.I have a fault in always under estimating the court's audacity in violating the law. What Judge Arkin did was to issue orders. She couldn't file them with the case for now, because she was out of jurisdiction. But if she could orchestrate a contact between me and District Court then my case would be over. Her orders would be filed according to the day they were issued or stamped in arrears.I had no access to the Record of my case because I was inBouldernow. My husband's attorneys kept contacting me about a hearing that I must attend with Judge Arkin. I later discovered that she created "An Order to Show Cause Hearing" at her court. She also, simultaneously, filed a warrant for my arrest for "Failure to Show," in other words, for not showing up to the hearing. I would have been arrested at arrival, since the warrant was already issued.The Judge's Division Clerk is regulated by the Chief Judge. I left a message on his answering service complaining that the clerks burrow stamps and stamp their own Judge's orders instead of allowing the Court's Clerk to supervise the legality of procedures. This was the last thing I managed to do before theBoulderpolice came to arrest me. I had completed my Response to Order to Show Cause as well as all other documents. In addition to excluding all transcripts of partially recorded hearings in my Designation of Record, I also excluded any transcripts that I didn't file myself. Virginia Fraser Able filed a fraudulent transcript to our Sorenson Hearing and I had no doubt that many others were coming. Renate had also experienced fraudulent transcripts filed with her case. These documents became valuable later. After jail I was too exhausted to spend any time on writing any legal documents. And yet these were ready to go and were filed with my case, leading to Judge Angela Arkin's eventual downfall.Also, I intended to respond to some pleadings and correct my Permanent Orders hearing. Virginia Fraser Able was no conducting the hearing on my part. She didn't file any financial documents. No other documents. She simply had a list of people who were going to testify in court that day. I did not want to get the same Permanent Orders hearing Renate got. I had nearly a month. I was going to protest in writing and file financial claims.I was arrested two days before my deadline for filing my Response and Designation.Boulderpolice was able to transport me toDouglasCountyon the morning of my deadline. They seemed to believe that the Judge would see me right away and send me on my way to file my documents. Arkin didn't see me until the next day.From Douglas County Jail, using paper-kytes I repeatedly tried to get a copy of my arrest warrant as well as an understanding of what the truth was behind the claims of an out-of-jurisdiction hearing. Judge Arkin intercepted all of my communications. I could get no answers. Although the jail is in the courthouse and the electronic system could be available there fore inmates to use for free, it is simply not available. Indigent inmates like myself get two pieces of paper twice a month, two envelops with local stamps, and a stub of a pencil, unsharpened. That's how they must write their pleadings to the court.Judge Arkin Blunders"You were arrested for not letting your husband into your residence!" Judge Arkin declared as I entered the courtroom, shackled.Unfortunately for Arkin, there was a police officer who was assigned to me more often that she would have on a standard shuffle basis. She was feisty, but petite. Although I was larger than her, I had a confirmed broken back. It was also wise to assign her to people who have supposedly failed to show up to a hearing as opposed to, say, held six people hostage for a week. So that officer was present in quite a few of my hearings and also knew that I was arrested for Failure to Show, rather than any other reason.Regrettably for Judge Arkin, she never seemed to bother to read any of my multiple pleadings. That may be why, when, in one of the hearings, I started talking about attorney corruption in court Arkin got interested. Judge Arkin let me proceed on a long monologue explaining how the attorneys for the wealthy party tell that party to "pay what I say and you will get a judgment you like." Judge Arkin looked at me, appearing entirely disinterested and bored. That officer was present in court that day and may have listened in, perhaps not knowing what to make of my speech.This police officer would have also known that I'm a victim of domestic violence. The officers meet every morning to discuss the previous day's events. So anyone on the team would have heard about my case. In fact, their vigilance over me kept me alive.That Officer was also the one who made me sit on the hard concrete and got scoffed by the nurse. So she knew I was badly injured during the assault. Perhaps she heard me scream after the assault over the radio if she was on patrol that day.As Judge Arkin spoke, the officer stirred. She was not working hard every day to make money for a dangerous predator like Arkin. This may have been the beginning of the end for Arkin.Each time I came before Judge Arkin she seemed more tense and stressed out. She seemed to doubt her own decision to keep me in jail for my Permanent Orders hearing. She did that to prevent any documentation filed with the Register of Record. It was standard procedure.Permanent Orders HearingI was not present for the first part of the hearing on July 16, 2015. The first part was supposedly telephone testimonies from my doctors: an MD and an Osteopath. I'm not sure if the testimonies were ever collected, recorded or discussed. Notably, neither of these doctors are qualified to testify as to my mental state as neither are qualified to even conduct a mental health evaluation or testing.I showed up to my scheduled Permanent Orders Hearing[1] from jail. Permanent Orders, unlike Temporary Orders, constitute the procedures leading to the final Divorce Decree. Based on Internet reviews I realized that typically a court entity doubles up as an attorney to the poorer party. They use a moment of silence to indicate agreement with the other side to the judge as per Rules of Civil Procedure 15.4. This agreement makes all documentation irrelevant to the hearing. The judge allows the party who presumes themselves pro-se to present all of their documentation. She then records herself giving a ruling, completely ignoring all documentation. Appeals Courts can "legally" reject an appeal based on the so-called "law." I knew about CRCP 15.4 and insisted on filing all documentation with the record of the case[2]. So I spent three weeks in jail waiting for my Permanent Orders Hearing instead.I also learned of Renate's type of Permanent Orders hearing. To my relief, the Judge couldn't be bothered to get witnesses on stand. It would not have intimidated me, as I was the riotous party andColoradoenforces no-fault divorces.Instead, the Judge made fraudulent claims. She stated that my husband had 50% of our assets in his possession. She knew he had 100%. He moved back into the marital house when I was arrested. If I tried to disagree with any of her lies Arkin brushed all such disagreements as the disturbance of a mentally ill person. She spoke with my husband and asked him directly what he would like her to order. She could order me to pay him maintenance too, she assured him. She later recorded her agreements with my husband under the heading of Permanent Orders.My husband and his attorneys were going to enter my residence, the Judge Ordered. I'll remain incarcerated in order to allow them to enter. Later I'll have a meeting with a Special Master and I'll be able to ask for some of my possessions back. My husband was ordered to pay $27k to Virginia Fraser Able. As Judge Arkin made this one particular order she was salivating heavily. I developed the conviction that the $27k were Judge Arkin's own payment for her participation in the illegal scheme.I also realized that after the meeting with the "Special Master" I was going to get a bill for the same - $27k. When I exited Jail and before the meeting the Register of Action stated that the GAL was dismissed from the case. Virginia Fraser Able then filed an update to her contact information - except that there was no file enclosed and no contact information. Everyone were going to act as if Virginia Fraser Able was acting as my representation at the meeting.Virginia Fraser Able had sent me a bill for $1000, much like she did with Renate. She claimed to have done some IRS work for me. Of course, since my husband was ordered to file our taxes jointly, he could have hired her. The $1000 would be a Retainer Agreement between the two of us. I didn't pay the bill. I didn't attend the meeting.Apparently after the "Special Master" hearing the party is asked to go to the CFC office at the Courthouse and sign something. My guess is that they sign something like "I agree to accept my dress" or "I agree to accept my nose guard." I suspect that this is then accepted by the judge as a Legal Separation Agreement. One party gets the house and the entire marital estate. The other party gets a nose guard and a large bill from the GAL. A woman I met in jail confirmed this. She was the affluent party. She paid $20k to the GAL and so did her husband, who got no custody of the children and no part of the marital estate. I refused to come to the office or sign anything.My husband's attorneys went for the Special Master's meeting. They came back with a couple of pages full of tautologies as summary of their "discussions": I could agree to accept the car, if I wanted, etc. Since I didn't respond, nor signed anything all was left open.I now suspected that all divorce GALs are triple paid: once by the State, once by the wealthy party and a third time by the poorer party. Judge Arkin was after my husband's payment. Where would my payment have gone?Judge Arkin stated that ________________. It is naturally and purposely misleading. It is the reason Renate sounded so scared when social workers showed up at her door. What it actually means is that should I have possessions anywhere outside of my home the attorneys will access that place at my own expense. It means that my bank account or my storage shed would be locked down for six months while Virginia Fraser Able has free passage.Judge Arkin's minute order may have reflected her own agreements with my husband. Perhaps it claimed that my husband and I reached an agreement during the hearing, instead of a contested hearing. The errant inmate realized that her mischief was not going to lead her to any good, and finally became reasonable. She reached an agreement during her Permanent Orders hearing.I argued that I was no party to any agreements, that any oral agreements can be revoked at any time, that any alleged agreement could not have been acceptable to Arkin due to giving me less than half of the marital estate and due to being achieved under duress.A TruckAt this point a person walked up to the bench and spoke before Judge Arkin. He introduced himself as theCountyAttorney. He stated that he has a truck outside ready to transport me to a mental care facility. Three court deputies were in the courtroom. All looked uneasy. I had several meetings with a mental healthcare professional in jail. Perhaps they knew about those. There were no indications that I should be hospitalized. Perhaps there is no such thing as theCountyAttorneykeeping a truck outside to transport people to mental hospitals. Perhaps trucks don't wait before a court order has been issued. Perhaps onlyMental Health Courtcan order trucks to transport people into mental care facilities. The written record identifies this man not as a Lance Ingalls, theCountyAttorney, but as a CNA from Douglas County Human Service. Perhaps the deputies knew how either one of them looks like. Perhaps they found it disturbing that David Japha, a criminal attorney representing domestic abusers, has "friends" inside Human Services. Women victims of domestic violence will not be able to keep their locations secret from their husbands if David Japha has such friends.Ether because of the deputies' response, or for some other reason, Judge Arkin didn't send me to a mental care facility that day. I was put back in jail for the stated purpose of allowing my husband to enter my personal residence and premarital property and take whatever he wished. I was released after twenty one days of incarceration.I spent the day of the illegal search and seizure helplessly locked up. David Japha claimed that he had the entire day on video and that he intended to shame me by posting it online. I doubted that he would. I doubted that it would be me who'd be shamed. Either way, he wouldn't want the publicity.After the Special Master's meeting David Japha filed a Motion asking that I pay half of my husband's attorney fees. I objected that I have hired no attorneys, participated in no meetings and that as the poorer party would not have to pay the wealthier party's attorney fees.Court DeterminationsJudge Arkin now "determined" that I was "dangerous." She didn't specify whether I was dangerous to myself or to others. This "determination by the court" was not based on any mental evaluation or police records. Courts just don't let the Rules of Evidence bug them. The Federal Supreme Court "determined" that Monsanto-Bayer had a unique product in their GMO produce made of nutritional plants cross bred with deadly bacteria. Hence they were entitled to government subsidies. That same Federal Supreme Court later "determined" that Monsanto-Bayer did not have a unique product. Hence they would not be asked to label their GMO produce cross bred with deadly bacteria. Court "determinations," much like anything an attorney says, mean absolutely nothing.Something Happened to the TitleMy husband took half of what I bought during the marriage and most of what I brought into it. I'm not sure whose idea it was to take my social security card away. It was a costly mistake on their part. I panicked. Whoever had my card can claim power of attorney. Perhaps my husband would show up to the sale of our home with nothing but my card? Perhaps Virginia Fraser Able will just take over my bank accounts and spend them?My first thought was of my two premarital condos. Would Virginia Fraser Able take them for herself? I filed a Warning with the Boulder County Assessor. I explained that attorneys inColoradodon't require contracts. I denied giving Power of Attorney to anyone. I disclosed that my Social Security Card was stolen and that I was worried. I stated that I would never free willingly show up along with my husband unless a police officer was to escort us. Then I gave a physical description of myself and some photos. I asked that no changes be made to my Titles unless I was physically present with my own driver's license in hand. The next year ourCountyAssessoroffered a free service by which any property owner can be alerted as soon as anything is filed on their titles.On a hunch I called the Douglas County Assessor. Something was filed on my titles, I was told. But the Assessor needs a Court Order. She can't transfer the title. She sent a letter in this regard.I stopped by the Assessor's office. Virginia Fraser Able had indeed filed a Quit Claim Deed in my name. She represented herself as a "Court Appointed GAL and Conservator." The title to the house was in joint tenancy - not in a Trust. Therefore Virginia Fraser Able was not a conservator.Well, now he may have considered herself a conservator of my nose guard and swim suit - taken out of my residence. Not only would the Courts accept her as a Conservator, they would also accept that there is Trust. So if I claim that I don't have to pay her bills because there is no attorney-client relationships and no trust, my appeal would be denied, no explanations.I contacted the police. I was able to speak to a detective. I wasn't aware of any immediate results, but this couldn't have been good for either Arkin or Virginia Fraser Able. The Assessor had apparently seen the warning filed with my twoBouldercondos. It was supposed to pop up with my name, rather than property titles. She reasoned that if I was able to own and manage two premarital condos, then why should she pay for a GAL out of her own tax money? And if a GAL was required, shouldn't I become entitled to all kinds of benefits - such as the house? Assessors aren't usually aware of any reason to doubt attorneys as they file documents. They probably read the title, skim the page to see who's giving the title to who, and that's it. Actually reading Virginia Fraser Able's presentation must have left no doubt in her mind that something is awry.It became clear to me that under the garb of divorces, wills and foreclosures attorneys file fraudulent quit claim deeds in anyone's name to transfer title. A few years back friends told me that during foreclosures attorneys take homes for themselves. I believed them but wasn't sure how it all worked. I now met with a friend in Church who was ready to pay the debt on her home during the period given to her by law. Somehow, for some reason, she was informed the house was no longer hers and she couldn't pay the debt. She advocated with our legislators and did everything she could to save her home. She couldn't.Most people are confused by the foreclosure process - mostly because attorneys are unregulated. They lie and keep people ill informed. They don't always realize that by looking up the Reception Number for their property they can see all documents that were filed with that property. That's where you get the name of the attorney who took your home and the name of the entity that owns it now.So attorneys have a financial interest in foreclosures. That certainly explains the repeated waves of foreclosures and financial downturns. There is an author who claims that our government is repeating all of the steps that lead to the financial crisis of 1929. Now I knew why.Arkin RetiresAt this point in my case I filed copies of all of the documents I prepared for my third Appeal. All of Angela Arkin's misdeeds were property explained there, up to the point at which I was arrested.I then filed a Motion for a Mistrial Investigation due to Judicial Misconduct. This allowed me to describe her misdeeds including an incarceration under fraudulent conditions. As soon as I turned it in the Clerk indicated that Judge Angela Arkin is likely to retire. The same was later confirmed.A Judge can moot an investigation against them by retiring. This prevents the publicity as well as cumulative public knowledge. I was happy that I cost Judge Arkin her career.It usually takes the Chief Judge two months to appoint a new judge to a case. I felt that Judge Whitaker took over right away - but it could have just been me trying to recover from my jail ordeal.Fearlessly, Whitaker simply took over where Judge Arkin left off. The first, and only thing I heard from him was a judgment against me to pay my husband $6000. David Japha wanted me to make out the check to him, but those were not the court orders. The last thing I need is a retainer for me with David Japha. I paid the judgment and felt that I was successfully intimidated. I remained silent and nothing happened on my case for over two years.ChildrenI can't imagine enduring all of the third world atrocities imposed on me through judicial greed while trying to protect a new born, a baby, a toddler or a young child. And yet, that is exactly what countless mothers suffer through.Based on what women tell me the judge appoints a GAL to the poorer party. The wealthy party gets exclusive custody along with the right to move the child anywhere. The poorer party is 'determined' mad and criminally minded by the court and is prevented from any unsupervised visits with the children. The spouse has to watch her children become needy, clingy, depressed or suicidal without being able to respond. This is all a result of public ignorance that presumes that civil rights and statutory entitlements are being enforced. I hope this book transforms the situation.If I were a spouse presented with a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage I would let the wealthier party know that I will sign anything they wish. I would then object to coming before the Magistrate and insist to present my illegal Legal Separation Agreement before a judge. If the judge elects to accept such Legal Separation Agreement than there is no loss. I would end up with whatever I would anyway, or perhaps a little better. Additionally I would save myself from the intimidation, abuse and expenses involved in trying to uphold my civil rights. It would allow me to communicate with my children in calm and protected environments and without sharing any uncertainties with them.If judges realize that too many constituents are aware that the courts won't uphold their civil rights then judges may elect to reject illegal Legal Separation Agreements and to force themselves on the case. In that case, the judge would have to make good of her word that she'd like to see the poorer party get a better deal. I would not hire an attorney and would not object to anything a judge does. She won't be able to award me less than what I started with. At the same time, I would be aware that the judge can't award me too much, or the wealthier party would elect to offer that to me freely. Let the Supreme Court figure out this conundrum. They will likely force both sides to pay for all kinds of court appointed experts who will "hear" both sides indefinitely before coming up with some type of Permanent Orders. This may produce just as much revenue to judges, and may be just as time consuming and expensive, but the result should be better for the poorer party. At worst, their financial contribution to the judge should equal what they receive at dissolution. Custody will likely be shared in most cases, since the wealthier party has no incentives to pursue aggressive litigation.[2] Replace the C forColoradowith the first one or two letters of your state and get the Rules of Civil Procedure for your state.