Letter Of Explanation For Address: Fill & Download for Free

Here is a sample of how one can start the letter of explanation for Canadian study Visa.Name{Address}{Phone Number}Subject: Letter of Explanation – {Appropriate Section}Attached: (1) {document name 1}, (2) {document name 2}, (3) {document name 3}{City, Date}Dear Officer,I am writing you this letter to explain some points that might have caught your attention when considering the attached documents relating to {Appropriate Section}. Please find the explanations below:§ {Problem statement and Explanation 1}§ {Problem statement and Explanation 2}§ {Problem statement and Explanation 3}I am of course at your disposal to provide you with any additional documents that you deem useful for the processing of my electronic Application for Permanent Residence (e-APR).Thank you in advance for the time devoted to the treatment of my e-APR.{Name}SignatureHope this helps,Best.Note: I am associated with Achievers Point.

In my time in the service of Soviet propaganda, the rulebook for addressing our failures was quite straightforward.Right premiseTo start with, never admit any “failures”. This is a stopword. Marxism is an infallible theory, both scientifically and morally. “The teaching of Marx is all-powerful, because it’s correct” (V.I.Lenin).What enemies of Communist call “failures” is in effect “temporary difficulties”, “missteps” or “excessive zeal” on the part of “some comrades”. Sometimes they accumulate to a degree of “grave errors”, or “lasting damage” that ultimately can lead to a “defeat” of “fall” of the proletarian power, like it happened in 1991 in the USSR.Ad hominemTalking about “failures” of Communism, you always must start with stating who points at them. You must always include personal attacks on the source. For example, modern critics of writer Alexander Sozhenitsnyn often invoke the fact that he served his Gulag term in considerably less harsh terms of confinement than most of other inmates. Several people connected to the same case were sentenced to longer terms. From this it’s invoked that he probably ratted on them in order to get a milder sentence. Solzhenitsyn also had regular contacts with Western diplomats in the USSR when he worked on his magnum opus “Gulag Archipelago”. They helped smuggle out his manuscript. The publication caused a major PR disaster for the USSR and the cause of Communism.These things can be used for showing Solzhenitsyn’s wicked essence as a human being and traitor of his nation. You can’t trust wicked traitors, therefore his work doesn’t deserve much attention.Acts of GodMuch in our lives is determined by pure luck and vagaries of nature. Thus, the droughts and excessive rains were always the perfect explanations for shortfalls of agricultural production and catastrophic famines under Real Socialism.The same is true of acts of human stupidity. The Chernobyl catastrophe—both the reactor’s explosion and the subsequent attempts to cover it up—were chalked up to the stupidity and incompetence of a few individuals. It would be totally wrong to fault Communism on behalf of them, wouldn’t it?Enemies of the QueenCommunism is a combative ideology. It proclaims class struggle a constant of human history. The Communist anthem “Internationale” says, “we’ll destroy the world of violence”. Lenin and other classics warned, time after time, that it would be stupid to expect the exploitative classes to give up without a bitter fight.Therefore, wherever possible, attribute the acts of blatant stupidity and systemic incompetence to harmful actions of the class enemy. Invisible saboteurs are everywhere. Uncover any possible connection with the aggressive block of NATO, CIA, the Zionist secret service, or radical ethnic nationalism. Pick quotes, signs, memorabilia, clothes that remind of the Nazis or other known rogues and outcasts—this would uncover the hateful, evil nature of anti-Communist critics.Break with the ScripturesLenin’s theoretical works mostly explained how logically whatever he was doing followed the writings of Marx and Engels. Conversely, how the comrades who disagreed with him were perverting the spirit and letter of Marxism.This reveals our next rule for explaining failures of Communism. Whatever bad happened on their watch, was caused by people’s departing from the letter and spirit of Marxism. This is the favorite tool of modern Marxists who talk about the USSR: they discard Real Socialism, saying that Stalinism was a perversion of the “true Marxist legacy”.I can confirm that the “true Scot” argument about Communism is the safest one. It drags your opponents into a territory of exhausting scholastic discussions where you can always find a quote from the vast library of classical Marxism for whichever point you’re trying to score.Below, a Soviet poster from the 1960s imploring our citizens to watch out for foreign spies when handling work documents. The text says “It’s risky to trust a careless person with office files”. The ubiquitous cult of secrecy in the USSR indicated that one of the major reasons of our deficiencies were the Americans who were stealing too many of our secrets.

Good advice from others all around. If you have good to great GRE scores, some relevant research experience (particualrly imporant in sciences and social sciences) and strong letters of recommendation from professors, ideally who have supervised you in relevant reserarch you may be ok.By the time you apply you can't change much about your record. What you can control is a personal statement if the application requires one, and I've always advised students to deal with their early academic problems there. Just get in and get out. "I had a couple of bad semesters because I was young and immature -- hadn't found an intellectual passion yet, was having personal problems which now thankfully are well behind me., etc." You're not looking for sympathy (and won't get any) but you have a right to offer an explanation (not an excuse exactly) for what will be obvious from your record. One sentence or at the most two and work the explanation into a context that shows you've learned, grown, have become passionate, whatever. Not a stand alone sentence but one that fits in nicely to the rest of the document.As someone who has written approximately 10000 letters of recommendation (or so it seems), I have on occasion provided an explanation for a student's seeming shortcomings. I always wrote honest letters, warts and accolades both, and I was always willing to explain why I thought a student's warts were minor or were not so bad in context -- if, of course, I felt that I could write a sensible explanation and that the earlier failures were not diagnostic about future performance .Sometimes students ask for letters based on god knows what "I had you freshman year in a class of 200 students and you probably don't remember me but I got an A in your course..." In such cases I usually declined to write the letter or at least advised the student that my letter would be fairly meaningless. Ditto if I thought the student was weak and that my letter would be fairly negative. There are times for honesty, and this is one of them. I always tried to keep in mind that I had seen only part of a given students skill set, and I felt an obligation to tell him/her that I couldn't write a letter than would help although others might. And by the way you have every right, in my opinion, to ask whether the professor will be able to write a helpful letter. You're not entitled to ask about specifics, but it's a perfectly reasonable question. Just, "Do you think you could write a letter than will help me get into X." And if the profesor who is writing the letter knows you well, she/he probably already has some inkling about your uneven record. In such cases, you can, at least in my opinion, ask if the professor would be willing to address that issue in the letter. Some might say no, but it's worth a try. Such a letter ought not come from a professor who doesn't know you well and can't sepak with considerable authority to your present strengths.