Notice Of Parking Violation: Fill & Download for Free

If you drive a Jeep or 4X4 here is another option.See the story here:https://www-yahoo-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.yahoo.com/amphtml/gma/blogs/abc-blogs/jeep-owner-gets-last-laugh-corvette-drivers-greedy-233800315--abc-news-topstories.htmlEdit: Not necessarily an expensive car, but nonetheless an inconsiderate or incompetent driver of this mini van. I did this, when I was frustrated with trying to locate a parking space in a crowded parking lot, See the pictures took. The space to the right of the mini van was not available when I parked but it was as before I left.Notice the “parking violation” I have given this driver, which you can see taped to the driver’s window above …. Below is a close up of that “parking violation”I found these at a gag gift shop and keep them with me at all times, just for situations like this or in cases as asked in this question.Enjoy and if you’re one that takes up two parking spaces, I wish you an early transmission failure on the freeway at about 4:30 PM. Also may the fleas of 1000 camels infest your armpits .

I had a very clever defense attorney who helped me in traffic court. His argument: Unconstitutional Parking Tickets!I'll try to keep this brief, but this story needs some background, so please bear with me.When I was still in college, I stayed overnight at my boyfriend's house pretty regularly. Unfortunately, he lived in an area where parking in the street was prohibited from 2am to 6am, and there wasn't any space in the driveway for my car. At first, I was able to avoid getting ticketed by calling the police station and getting permission in advance. However, I was eventually placed on an “abuse list" with regard to this privilege, so as I continued to park in the street, the tickets began to accumulate.I actually paid quite a few of them, but eventually I was called to court to answer for 23 tickets that had gone unpaid. With late-fees tacked on, I owed the city $2300 for 23 misdemeanors of the fourth degree.In traffic court, I was waiting my turn to settle the debt when the bailiff gently pulled me aside and asked “are you the one with all the parking tickets?” I nodded yes, and he mentioned that he thought I should talk to an attorney about my tickets. In an unusual leap-of-faith—based entirely on his whispered comment—I decided to plead “not guilty" to all 23 charges, and was led to a table where I filled out a request for a public defender.When I eventually met with my attorney, he seemed genuinely excited about being assigned to my parking ticket case. My case would be a “test case” which would serve as precedent for similar cases in the future.He believed the city's process for dealing with parking tickets violated my Fifth (and/or Fourteenth?) Amendment right to due process. He insisted that if the government intended to deprive me of my property (even just $15), at the very least they must provide me with notice of the offense, an opportunity to contest the charge, and a neutral party to decide the outcome. The postcard-like ticket itself (which was determined to be the “complaint") did not provide a means for me to contest the alleged violation. It simply explained when and how to pay the fine, expecting recipients to do so without question.The prosecutor tried to argue that the parking tickets were “civil violations", but my attorney pointed out that 4th degree misdemeanors were punishable by up to 30 days in jail (i.e., not in the realm of civil procedure) and that even if it were a civil suit, the city lacked “standing" because the parking violations did not result in “damages" to the city.The judge agreed with my attorney, and dismissed the case.CASE DISMISSED.THE COURT FINDS THAT THE DEF. WAS CHARGED WITH VIOLATING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE OF THE PARKING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY PURSUANT TO CODIFIED ORDINANCE 351.14 AND 351.03, BOTH VIOLATIONS BEING IDENTIFIED AS MISDEMEANORS OF THE FOURTH DEGREE. THE COURT FURTHER FINDS THAT THE PARKING TICKETS AS ISSUED TO THE DEF. CONSTITUTE BOTH A CHARGING INSTRUMENT (I.E. COMPLAINT) AS THEY ARE CAPTIONED "COMPLAINT-AFFIDAVIT" ACROSS THE TOP AND SUMMONS PURSUANT TO TRAFFIC RULE 3(A). THE COURT FURTHER FINDS THE CHARGING INSTRUMENT IS FATALLY DEFECTIVE IN THAT IT FAILED TO PROVIDE THE DEF. WITH BASIC AND NECESSARY INFORMATION SUCH AS WHEN TO APPEAR IN COURT, WHERE TO APPEAR FOR A HEARING ON THE COMPLAINT AND WHAT PROCESS WAS NECESSARY TO BEGIN OR INSTITUTE A CONTEST OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION. THE COURT FURTHER FINDS THAT THE DEF.'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS WELL TAKEN AND SHOULD BE GRANTED. DEF.'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THIS MATTER SHALL BE DISMISSED AT NO COST (SEE JUDGMENT ENTRY.)Surprisingly, this fiasco did not end there--at least, not for the city.After the judge ruled on my case, this small suburb of Cleveland put a moratorium on parking tickets (lasting almost a year, if I recall correctly) so that they could establish new procedures for enforcing parking laws. Furthermore, the city sent refunds to citizens who had paid for parking violations under the unconstitutional system!I still feel guilty about the way that this turned out. It was never my goal to squeeze all that money from the city's budget, or to exploit such a loophole to avoid accepting responsibility for my actions. Nonetheless, it was an interesting experience, and I think my attorney was incredibly clever in his approach.Tempers hot as South Euclid City Council, police, court discuss how to handle parking ticketsOhio Supreme Court offers to mediate South Euclid parking ticket disputeParking tickets in South Euclid are at center of legal and political battle: Mark Naymik

In the five boroughs of NYC, if you've received an "unjust" red light camera violation, your only recourse is to plead not guilty and have a hearing to contest the alleged violation.It should be noted that red light camera hearings in NYC are held at Parking Violations Bureau offices, not traffic court. You go to traffic court for a red light ticket where you were stopped by a police officer and issued a ticket. A red light camera violation notice is sent by mail to the registered owner of the vehicle.I was a parking violations judge (#2097) for eight years before I transferred to the Traffic Violations Bureau, and I was trained to handle red light camera hearings. From my experience, "unjust" camera violations were violations that occurred because you were in a funeral procession, or a police officer was directing traffic at the location and waved you through -- incidents like that.I'll tell you about the best "unjust" violation I ever saw. This guy came into my hearing room and handed me his notice of violation. On NYC's notices for red light camera violations, you see three photos. One shows the vehicle approaching the intersection (with data indicating how long the light was red when the picture was taken), one shows a close up of the rear license plate, and one shows the vehicle leaving the intersection.On this guy's notice, the pictures showed his car being towed by a flatbed truck, so it was the tow truck driver that committed the violation! I looked at the pictures, then I looked up at the guy, who looked like he was ready to explode. I smiled and said, "You weren't driving, were you?" He threw his hands up and yelled out, "NO! THE GUY TOWED MY CAR AND THEN HE WENT THROUGH THE LIGHT! I DIDN'T DO THIS! YOU GOTTA HELP ME!"I calmed the guy down and told him the case was dismissed. I explained to him that a technician reviews the photos taken by a red light camera before the notice of violation is printed up, and if the tech sees something unusual in the photos (like vehicles in a funeral procession, or this guy's car being towed) he or she is supposed to dispose of them. I guess that didn't happen.