Intimation Letter For Change In Name By The Member: Fill & Download for Free

This are the new rules for Indian passport as declared on 23rd Dec, 2016.In order to streamline, liberalize and ease the process of issue of passport, the Ministry of External Affairs has taken a number of steps in the realm of passport policy which is expected to benefit the citizens of India applying for a passport. The details of these steps are given below:-PROOF OF DATE OF BIRTHAs per the extant statutory provisions of the Passport Rules, 1980, all the applicants born on or after 26/01/1989, in order to get a passport, had to, hitherto, mandatorily submit the Birth Certificate as the proof of Date of Birth (DOB). It has now been decided that all applicants of passports can submit any one of the following documents as the proof of DOB while submitting the passport application:(i) Birth Certificate (BC) issued by the Registrar of Births & Deaths or the Municipal Corporation or any other prescribed authority whosoever has been empowered under the Registration of Birth & Deaths Act, 1969 to register the birth of a child born in India;(ii) Transfer/School leaving/Matriculation Certificate issued by the school last attended/recognized educational board containing the DOB of the applicant;(iii) PAN Card issued by the Income Tax Department with the DOB of applicant;(iv) Aadhar Card/E-Aadhar having the DOB of applicant;(v) Copy of the extract of the service record of the applicant (only in respect of Government servants) or the Pay Pension Order (in respect of retired Government Servants), duly attested/certified by the officer/in-charge of the Administration of the concerned Ministry/Department of the applicant, having his DOB;(vi) Driving licence issued by the Transport Department of concerned State Government, having the DOB of applicant;(vii) Election Photo Identity Card (EPIC) issued by the Election Commission of India having the DOB of applicant;(viii) Policy Bond issued by the Public Life Insurance Corporations/Companies having the DOB of the holder of the insurance policy.Report of the Inter Ministerial CommitteeA three-member Committee comprising of the officials of the Ministry of External Affairs and the Ministry of Women and Child Development was constituted to examine various issues pertaining to passport applications where mother/child has insisted that the name of the father should not be mentioned in the passport and also relating to passport issues to children with single parent and to adopted children. The Report of the Committee has been accepted by the Minister of External Affairs.The following policy changes have been made inter-alia on the basis of the recommendations of this Committee:(i) The online passport application form now requires the applicant to provide the name of father or mother or legal guardian, i.e., only one parent and not both. This would enable single parents to apply for passports for their children and to also issue passports where the name of either the father or the mother is not required to be printed at the request of the applicant.(ii) The total number of Annexes prescribed in the Passport Rule, 1980, has been brought down to 9 from the present 15. Annexes A, C, D, E, J, and K have been removed and certain Annexes have been merged.(iii) All the annexes that are required to be given by the applicants would be in the form of a self declaration on a plain paper. No attestation/swearing by/before any Notary/Executive Magistrate/First Class Judicial Magistrate would be henceforth necessary.(iv) Married applicants would not be required to provide Annexure K or any marriage certificate.(v) The Passport application form does not require the applicant to provide the name of her/his spouse in case of separated or divorced persons. Such applicants for passports would not be required to provide even the Divorce Decree.(vi) Orphaned children who do not have any proof of DOB such as Birth Certificate or the Matriculation Certificate or the declaratory Court order, may now submit a declaration given by the Head of the Orphanage/Child Care Home on their official letter head of the organization confirming the DOB of the applicant.(vii) In case of children not born out of wedlock, the applicant for the passport of such children should submit only Annexure G while submitting the passport application.(viii) In case of issue of passport to in-country domestically adopted children, submission of the registered adoption deed would no longer be required. In the absence of any deed to this effect, the passport applicant may give a declaration on a plain paper confirming the adoption.(ix) Government servants, who are not able to obtain the Identity Certificate (Annexure-B)/ No-Objection Certificate (Annexure-M) from their concerned employer and intend to get the passport on urgent basis can now get the passport by submitting a self-declaration in Annexure-‘N’ that he/she has given prior Intimation letter to his/her employer informing that he/she was applying for an ordinary passport to a Passport Issuing Authority.(x) Sadhus/ Sanyasis can apply for a passport with the name of their spiritual Guru mentioned in the passport application in lieu of their biological parent(s) name(s) subject to their providing of at least one public document such as Election Photo Identity Card (EPIC) issued by the Election Commission of India, PAN card, Adhar Card, etc wherein the name of the Guru has been recorded against the column(s) for parent(s) name(s).

There is certainly a case for Jon’s name being Aegon in the books. However, I don’t think it will be.The justification for his name being Aegon is along the lines of ‘The prince that was promised must be named Aegon’. This name is the most popular and significant Targaryen name. It is akin to Brandon within the Stark family. Rhaegar realised that he does not fulfill the criteria for tPtwP any longer for he did not have the right name. So he passed on the right name to his firstborn. Then, he went on to have a third child. This is where the confusion comes in. If tPtwP was meant to be named Aegon, why does he need two siblings? If Rhaegar’s firstborn was not tPtwP, and he needed a 3rd child with a balanced blood between ice and fire, then the original Aegon’s name being Aegon is a bit odd. Should the trio include two Aegons? The supporting evidence people suggest is that Lyanna knew about the prophecy and he named Jon, Aegon. So that he can fulfill the prophecy.There is a bit of textual evidence to support this too.A man grown with sons of his own, yet in some ways still a boy. Egg had an innocence to him, a sweetness we all loved. Kill the boy within you, I told him the day I took ship for the Wall. It takes a man to rule. An Aegon, not an Egg. Kill the boy and let the man be born." The old man felt Jon's face. Jon II, aDwDMartin loves his parallels. He probably wanted to draw a contrast between Jon and Young Griff. Whilst one is a bastard descendant in disguise as prince Aegon, the other is prince Aegon disguised as a bastard.I have always had a different mindset. I don’t think his name will be Aegon in the books. Many tout his name to be any of Jaehaerys, Maekar, or Baelor. He could even be named Jacaerys for he sealed the original pact of ice and fire. I have always felt Jon’s true name will be Aemon, though.My reasoning:We are introduced to Jon Snow very early in the novels. And from the onset, we were given slight hints that Jon is not a bastard but a king."Kings are a rare sight in the north."Robert snorted. "More likely they were hiding under the snow. Snow, Ned!" The king put one hand on the wall to steady himself as they descended. Eddard I, aGoTIf we are provided hints and clues to Jon’s true identity very early on in the novels, it would be quite feasible if his real name was mentioned early on as well.The first Targaryen name that makes an appearance within the text is none other than Aemon.Gared glared at the lordling, the scars around his ear holes flushed red with anger where Maester Aemon had cut the ears away. "We'll see how warm you can dress when the winter comes." He pulled up his hood and hunched over his garron, silent and sullen. Prologue, aGoTJon Snow is first touted as a king in hiding, and the first Targaryen name mentioned is Aemon. It is also the name of the very person Jon builds a deep and intimate connection with. In fact, the only Targaryen Jon has any interaction with. More on that later, though.Jon was definitely named by Ned Stark. Martin makes this obvious in one of his interviews.Since all of their mothers died, who gave Jon Snow, Daenerys Targaryen and Tyrion Lannister their names?Mothers can name a child before birth, or during, or after, even while they are dying. Dany was most like named by her mother, Tyrion by his father, Jon by Ned.[1]This is an interesting quote by Martin. It has multiple implications for the books and Jon’s naming process.Ned named Jon after his foster father, Jon Arryn. The naming of Jon is often synonymous with his heritage and true identity. They go hand in hand. The following in an excerpt from Davos’ time in the Sisters."To get home and call his banners, Stark had to cross the mountains to the Fingers and find a fisherman to carry him across the Bite. A storm caught them on the way. The fisherman drowned, but his daughter got Stark to the Sisters before the boat went down. They say he left her with a bag of silver and a bastard in her belly. Jon Snow, she named him, after Arryn." Davos I, ADWDWhilst the story may be a hoax, the hidden details are not. Ned did truly name Jon for Jon Arryn. It is a sly hint that Ned is not Jon’s true father. Arryn was Ned’s foster father. Ned is Jon’s foster father. It is homage to foster fathers.Since Ned named Jon, his Targaryen name must have been decided by either, or both of Lyanna and Rhaegar.The story of Aemon the Dragonknight is a famous one. Many in the realm are aware of his legend. The Stark children are no different. They have heard the tales and admire Prince Aemon the Dragonknight to a great extent.Bran desires to be a King’sguard, similar to prince Aemon, among many other legends.Bran was going to be a knight himself someday, one of the Kingsguard. Old Nan said they were the finest swords in all the realm. There were only seven of them, and they wore white armor and had no wives or children, but lived only to serve the king. Bran knew all the stories. Their names were like music to him. Serwyn of the Mirror Shield. Ser Ryam Redwyne. Prince Aemon the Dragonknight. The twins Ser Erryk and Ser Arryk, who had died on one another's swords hundreds of years ago, when brother fought sister in the war the singers called the Dance of the Dragons. The White Bull, Gerold Hightower. Ser Arthur Dayne, the Sword of the Morning. Barristan the Bold. Bran II, aGoTSansa also admires Prince Aemon. She basks in the stories of Prince Aemon, his character and his true love for Queen Naerys. She sees her betrothed, Joffrey, in the same ilk as Prince Aemon, initially."It would be my pleasure, Mother," Joffrey said very formally. He took her by the arm and led her away from the wheelhouse, and Sansa's spirits took flight. A whole day with her prince! She gazed at Joffrey worshipfully. He was so gallant, she thought. The way he had rescued her from Ser Ilyn and the Hound, why, it was almost like the songs, like the time Serwyn of the Mirror Shield saved the Princess Daeryssa from the giants, or Prince Aemon the Dragonknight championing Queen Naerys's honor against evil Ser Morgil's slanders. Sansa I, aGoTOld Nan is the narrator of tales to the Stark children. She is quite old. It is possible that she narrated similar stories to the previous Stark generation as she does with the current generation. Lyanna, Benjen and Ned would have heard stories of Prince Aemon the Dragonknight, his character and valour. Lyanna on the surface is compared to Arya often. In fact, she is mix of the two Stark sisters. She is a warrior like Arya, yet a romantic at heart like Sansa. Being a mix of the two girls, it is not unfeasible to think that Lyanna had a fondness for Prince Aemon from the stories and named her Targaryen child, Aemon. Martin is usually quite ambiguous in his quotes. However, his words contain hidden meanings as well. He goes as far as to suggest that “Mothers can name a child before birth, or during, or after, even while they are dying”. He makes it seem like he is referring to Dany. I think he indeed is referring to Jon in the same sentence. The books are almost all about Jon. I think many characters’ journeys are set up in a way to compliment and complete Jon’s arc, this quote is intended to tell us that Lyanna possibly named Jon while she was dying.Rhaegar was obsessed with the prophecy of tPtwP. It seems likely that he divulged it to a few other characters that were close to him. The one person he discussed the prophecy with more than others was maester Aemon. It is possible that Rhaegar realised that a 3rd child with a balanced blood of ice and fire is needed. Maester Aemon may have set him in the right path by clarifying the prophecy to him. Out of respect and admiration, Rhaegar may have planned to name his child after maester Aemon and communicated his desire to Lyanna before leaving her to head to the Trident.Considering Jon’s identity has been subject of numerous clues, and foreshadowing, it is reasonable that Martin would do the same with Jon’s real name. From very early on, we are provided clues that Jon is a prince or a king in waiting. The clues about his real name have been staring us in the face the whole time.Sansa flared. "Father, I only just now remembered, I can't go away, I'm to marry Prince Joffrey." She tried to smile bravely for him. "I love him, Father, I truly truly do, I love him as much as Queen Naerys loved Prince Aemon the Dragonknight, as much as Jonquil loved Ser Florian. I want to be his queen and have his babies.""Sweet one," her father said gently, "listen to me. When you're old enough, I will make you a match with a high lord who's worthy of you, someone brave and gentle and strong. This match with Joffrey was a terrible mistake. That boy is no Prince Aemon, you must believe me." Sansa III, aGoTIt is possible that Ned knows Jon’s real name. He specifically mentions that Joffrey is no Prince Aemon. This is because he knows a real Prince Aemon, who is Jon.This passage is filled with clues that relate to other passages within the books foreshadowing Jon’s real identity. Sansa desires love like the fairy tales. She desires a gallant hero like Prince Aemon. In aGoT, post Ned’s demise, Sansa is at court and sees Janos Slynt. She wishes for a hero to kill Janos. A hero does end up beheading Janos. And that hero is none other than Jon Snow. There is always the idea that Jon and Sansa may end up together before the story is over. Jon is the hero Sansa wishes for. Jon has a specific type among the women, too. His first love is Ygritte. A strong willed girl with red hair and blue eyes. Jon suffers from ‘mommy issues’. He has sexual attraction towards women who are similar in appearance to Catelyn Tully, red hair and blue eyes. Sansa is a carbon copy of her mother. She and Jon also live each other’s lives in reverse order. While Jon climbs up the social ladder and become the Lord Commander of the Night’s Watch, Sansa falls down the social ladder and becomes the bastard, Alayne. She goes as far as remembering Jon fondly and imitates him in her quest to play the perfect bastard. If Martin has planned for the two characters to end up together, Jon fulfils the criteria of being the hero Sansa always wishes for, the Prince Aemon she wants. And Sansa has the physical attributes Jon desires. She is also developing into a self sufficient character which Jon admires.Martin often uses Joffrey to draw contrast between a bastard and a prince, and in the process allude to Jon’s true identity. Earlier, in aGoT, Martin reveals Jon’s identity in an ironic method.He gave her a half smile. "Bastards are not allowed to damage young princes," he said. "Any bruises they take in the practice yard must come from trueborn swords." Arya I, aGoTMartin also uses Ned’s conversation with Sansa to reveal Jon’s true name by contrasting Prince Aemon and Joffrey, ‘That boy is no Prince Aemon’. This is a tongue in cheek way for Martin to tell the readers that Ned knows a Prince Aemon. And it is Jon.A great part of Jon’s story happens at the Wall. The novels are filled with symbolism and foreshadowing, with clues planted all over the texts for the future events and secrets. Martin has deliberately placed an old Targaryen maester at the Wall whose name happens to be Aemon. Martin could have chosen any popular Targaryen name for the maester, but he specifically chose Aemon. If Jon’s true name was Aegon, he could have introduced that name first and had the maester as Aegon. However, he chose Aemon so that Jon Snow builds a connection with a Targaryen named Aemon. For when the day comes that his identity is revealed to him, and his true name, he can have an easier time accepting his new found identity and name. The common folk do not perceive the Targaryens in a great light. Jon may know tales of valour from Prince Aemon the Dragonknight, but he is mature now and also understands that they are just tales. The reality is that his grandfather was roasted by a Targaryen king, his uncle strangled, and his aunt was allegedly kidnapped and raped by a Targaryen crown prince. However, his interactions with a Targaryen, more specifically, an Aemon Targaryen gives him a new and different perspective into the Targaryen family. He now realises that there are good Targaryens and he can be one of them. The bloodline is not always evil or cursed. Moreover, Aemon Targaryen is his mentor and Jon learns a great deal about life and leadership from maester Aemon. Jon would have no difficulty falling into the new identity that is Aemon Targaryen.Jon often compares himself to maester Aemon and the choices Aemon had to make. There is a great amount of parallels between Jon and maester Aemon.But he had not left the Wall for that; he had left because he was after all his father's son, and Robb's brother. The gift of a sword, even a sword as fine as Longclaw, did not make him a Mormont. Nor was he Aemon Targaryen. Three times the old man had chosen, and three times he had chosen honor, but that was him. Even now, Jon could not decide whether the maester had stayed because he was weak and craven, or because he was strong and true. Yet he understood what the old man had meant, about the pain of choosing; he understood that all too well.Tyrion Lannister had claimed that most men would rather deny a hard truth than face it, but Jon was done with denials. He was who he was; Jon Snow, bastard and oathbreaker, motherless, friendless, and damned. For the rest of his life—however long that might be—he would be condemned to be an outsider, the silent man standing in the shadows who dares not speak his true name. Wherever he might go throughout the Seven Kingdoms, he would need to live a lie, lest every man's hand be raised against him. But it made no matter, so long as he lived long enough to take his place by his brother's side and help avenge his father. Jon IX, aGoTThis is another excerpt from the first novel that is imbued with clues about Jon and his true identity. Jon reflects on his desertion from the Wall and compares himself to maester Aemon who was tested 3 times on his honour. Interestingly, Jon gets tested on his vows and honour 3 times as well. He passes each test just as maester Aemon did. First, he returns back to the Wall with his friends and abandons the quest of revenge for Ned Stark. Second, he leaves behind Ygritte for his NW’s vows and his black brothers. Third, he refuses Stannis and the offer to be legitimized as Jon Stark, Lord of Winterfell and stays true to his NW vows. According to Jon’s logic, that makes him Aemon Targaryen. I suspect Jon will pass up the opportunity to the Iron Throne in the future, as maester Aemon did. Which would make Jon even more similar to maester Aemon in his trials and tribulations. Aemon and Aemon are not only similar in personality, but also fate.Martin cleverly has added ‘who dares not speak his true name’ in the same sequence where Jon compares himself to maester Aemon. Martin wants us to know that Jon has a true name, and it is Aemon Targaryen.Upon his return to the Wall, Jon has an interaction with maester Aemon where the old man reveals his true identity to Jon. The conversation between the two men is filled with foreshadowing about Jon, his true identity and name.Jon was shocked to see the shine of tears in the old man's eyes. "Who are you?" he asked quietly, almost in dread.A toothless smile quivered on the ancient lips. "Only a maester of the Citadel, bound in service to Castle Black and the Night's Watch. In my order, we put aside our house names when we take our vows and don the collar." The old man touched the maester's chain that hung loosely around his thin, fleshless neck. "My father was Maekar, the First of his Name, and my brother Aegon reigned after him in my stead. My grandfather named me for Prince Aemon the Dragonknight, who was his uncle, or his father, depending on which tale you believe. Aemon, he called me …""Aemon … Targaryen?" Jon could scarcely believe it. Jon VIII, aGoTJon goes through the process of learning the true identity of a Targaryen. He is shocked to find out. This foreshadows his disbelief and shock when he finds out about his own identity. It will not be the first time where Jon can scarcely believe hearing the name Aemon Targaryen.Prince Aemon was involved in dubious parentage claims, and maester Aemon is named for such a man. Two different passages from aGoT and aCoK can be used to relate to Jon’s real name and his connection with Ned Stark.My grandfather named me for Prince Aemon the Dragonknight, who was his uncle, or his father, depending on which tale you believe. Aemon, he called me …" Jon VIII, aGoT"Maester Aemon was named for the Dragonknight.""So he was. Some say Prince Aemon was King Daeron's true father, not Aegon the Unworthy. Be that as it may, our Aemon lacked the Dragonknight's martial nature. He likes to say he had a slow sword but quick wits. Small wonder his grandfather packed him off to the Citadel. He was nine or ten, I believe . . . and ninth or tenth in the line of succession as well." Jon I, aCoKMaester Aemon suggests that his grandfather named him, a man who wasn’t his real father. This relates to Jon, who is named Jon by a man who is not his real father. His subsequent conversation with Mormont about maester Aemon further hints uncertain parentage claims related to a certain Aemon Targaryen. This relates to Jon, who is supposedly fathered by Ned Stark.As a sidenote, maester Aemon’s parents were Maekar and Dyanna, who sound eerily similar to Rhaegar and Lyanna.In the same conversation, maester Aemon goes on to draw further parallels between himself and Jon Snow during the rebellion.Maester Aemon sighed. "Have you heard nothing I've told you, Jon? Do you think you are the first?" He shook his ancient head, a gesture weary beyond words. "Three times the gods saw fit to test my vows. Once when I was a boy, once in the fullness of my manhood, and once when I had grown old. By then my strength was fled, my eyes grown dim, yet that last choice was as cruel as the first. My ravens would bring the news from the south, words darker than their wings, the ruin of my House, the death of my kin, disgrace and desolation. What could I have done, old, blind, frail? I was helpless as a suckling babe, yet still it grieved me to sit forgotten as they cut down my brother's poor grandson, and his son, and even the little children …" Jon VIII, aGoTMaester Aemon compares himself to a suckling babe during the rebellion where his family were destroyed all around him. Another Aemon Targaryen, who was literally a suckling babe was only just born whilst his paternal family were destroyed and his maternal family were also almost wiped out.Numerous tales and situations in the books are tailored to cater to Jon and his story. The story of Bael the Bard is essentially the tale of the elopement of Rhaegar and Lyanna told to Jon. The story involves a Winterfell girl who escapes with a man, and blue winter roses are involved. The result is a bastard of Winterfell. Jon is the bastard of Winterfell. Another tale within the canon also relates back to Jon and his history. This is the plot of Mance Rayder, and his son. Mance is a king beyond the Wall, similar to Bael the Bard. He has a son with a woman who dies giving birth to that son. The son has king’sblood and is passed off as a bastard with Samwell Tarly to be protected. This is not so subtle reference to Rhaegar and Lyanna who leave behind Jon, and Ned protects him by passing him off as his own bastard. An interesting passage from the 5th book once again brings the name Aemon to the forefront."The night before he died, he asked if he might hold the babe," Gilly went on. "I was afraid he might drop him, but he never did. He rocked him and hummed a song for him, and Dalla's boy reached up and touched his face. The way he pulled his lip I thought he might be hurting him, but it only made the old man laugh." She stroked Sam's hand. "We could name the little one Maester, if you like. When he's old enough, not now. We could.""Maester is not a name. You could call him Aemon, though."Gilly thought about that. "Dalla brought him forth during battle, as the swords sang all around her. That should be his name. Aemon Battleborn. Aemon Steelsong."A name even my lord father might like. A warrior's name. The boy was Mance Rayder's son and Craster's grandson, after all. He had none of Sam's craven blood. "Yes. Call him that." Samwell IV, aFfCThis excerpt is very revealing. The little boy is similar to Jon Snow, whose mother brought him forth during battle, just after the rebellion, and as the swords of Ned and co. sang with the King’sguard. Gilly and Sam decide to name the boy Aemon, just as another little prince was named Aemon 17 years ago. A little prince who turns into a warrior, with a warrior’s name, whose grandfather was very mad similar to Craster. Aerys and Craster were incestuous cruel men, who shared many qualities.Aside from his interactions with maester Aemon, other evidence of Jon being Aemon Targaryen is littered all over the books.Every morning they had trained together, since they were big enough to walk; Snow and Stark, spinning and slashing about the wards of Winterfell, shouting and laughing, sometimes crying when there was no one else to see. They were not little boys when they fought, but knights and mighty heroes. "I'm Prince Aemon the Dragonknight," Jon would call out, and Robb would shout back, "Well, I'm Florian the Fool." Or Robb would say, "I'm the Young Dragon," and Jon would reply, "I'm Ser Ryam Redwyne."That morning he called it first. "I'm Lord of Winterfell!" he cried, as he had a hundred times before. Only this time, this time, Robb had answered, "You can't be Lord of Winterfell, you're bastard-born. My lady mother says you can't ever be the Lord of Winterfell." Jon XII, aSoSJon always desired to be Prince Aemon the Dragonknight, and it turns out that he is a Prince Aemon. Ironically, Robb suggests that Jon can never be Lord of Winterfell, when it is Robb himself who legitimizes Jon and his will will enable Jon to become Lord of Winterfell and King in the North.It is also worth noting that Robb calls himself the Young Dragon, who was Prince Aemon’s cousin. Robb and Jon are cousins, in fact. Jon is Prince Aemon Targaryen.Robb and Jon’s duels are reminiscent of another Stark and Targaryen duel, Cregane Stark vs. Prince Aemon the Dragonknight who went on to label Cregane the finest swordsman who he had ever faced. Martin repeats history and events, but with slight twists. Jon labels Robb the better lance in this instance.I firmly believe Jon to be Aemon Targaryen. Every Aemon in the Targaryen family has had an Aegon for a brother.[2] Jon had Aegon for an older half brother. This is a very big piece of the puzzle that is clearly missed by most of the readers. No Aemon has been without an Aegon for a brother. Even the Blackfyre branch had an Aemon who had Aegon as a twin, the sons of Daemon and Rohanne of Tyrosh.[3]Jon being Aemon is very fitting. Jon has no interest in the Iron Throne and he will not pursue it. Another Aemon passes up on the throne. There has never been a king Aemon. The trend will continue.[4]The parallels between Jon and Prince Aemon the Dragonknight are unending. The Dragonknight was initially a member of the White Cloaks when they were touted as the best and most honourable knights in the realm. He then went on to become the Lord Commander of the White Cloaks. Jon is initially a member of the Night’s Watch who are currently more honourable than the King’sguard, and their order is akin to the White Cloaks. Jon then goes on to become the Lord Commander of the Night’s Watch.There is a troubling little quote Martin mentions in one of his interviews that could help shape the future of the books and further confirm Jon as Aemon Targaryen. In one of his interviews, he mentions Daenerys to be very similar in looks to Queen Naerys, although, taller.[5] It is common knowledge that Prince Aemon the Dragonknight was eternally in love and almost obsessed with Queen Naerys. I will not delve into the significance of Daenerys’ name, but I will refer back to my point that most characters’ plots, journeys, appearances, personalities and titles simply exist to complete Jon’s tale. This is where the significance of Daenerys’ name and appearance get interesting. Prince Aemon had a niece named Daenerys, the only Daenerys in the Targaryen family. The second Daenerys is Jon’s aunt. A prince Aemon’s aunt, which echos similar familial relationship to previous history. If Martin has truly planned for Jon and Dany to get together and fall in love as the show has portrayed, then Daenerys’ similarity in appearance to Queen Naerys is an added piece of evidence that Jon is Aemon Targaryen and akin to Prince Aemon the Dragonknight.Why has the show named Jon Snow, Aegon?I can only speculate, but the reasons could be,Aemon is not a popular Targaryen name on the show. Not a warrior’s name either. I don’t think tales of Prince Aemon the Dragonknight made it on the show. It was a better fit to name Jon, Aegon Targaryen, similar to Aegon I who was very popular.The show did not want to create confusion. They had set the precedent with changing Robert Arryn to Robin Arryn in order to eliminate confusion as a Robert and Robb already existed. They also changed Asha to Yarra since there was already an Osha. Aemon to Aegon was easier, since there was already a character named Aemon for the first four seasons.Martin may have not allowed it. Or, the showrunners wanted to keep this a secret so Martin can do the big reveal. Having Jon as Aemon Targaryen on the show would have very little significance. Aegon can at least be justified with the idea that tPtwP had to be named Aegon. However, there were no framework and set up for the reveal of an Aemon Targaryen on the show. In contrast, the books have clearly set it up from the first two chapters of aGoT and Martin has almost hit us over the head with it to hammer the point home. Therefore, I have always believed and still believe that Jon’s name in the books will be Prince Aemon Targaryen, named for maester Aemon and the Dragonknight.A not so interesting personal anecdote:This is a very lengthy post and took me some time. I had to write it twice. This second composition is not as good as the original. When I had nearly completed this post, I was about to write ‘Aegon’ in one of the very last sentences and I pressed (shift + a) to capitalize the first letter. Annoyingly, I accidentally pressed (ctrl + a) and then (e), the second letter of Aegon. The (ctrl + a) did a select all and (e) replaced the whole post. In the blink of an eye, I was left with a single (e) in the place of a 5000 word post. I sometimes hate Quora. It needs an undo button. If you notice spelling and grammar mistakes, suggest edits.Footnotes[1] The Citadel: So Spake Martin - Numerous Questions[2] House Targaryen[3] House Blackfyre[4] Iron Throne[5] The Citadel: So Spake Martin - Naerys Targaryen

Everything is codifiedConstitution of IndiaParliamentary PrivilegesArticle. 105. Powers, privileges, etc., of the Houses of Parliament and of the members and committees thereof1. Subject to the provisions of this Constitution and the rules and standing orders regulating the procedure of Parliament, there shall be freedom of speech in Parliament.2. No member of Parliament shall be liable to any proceeding in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in Parliament or any committee thereof, and no person shall be so liable in respect of the publication by or under the authority of either House of Parliament of any report, paper, votes or proceedings.3. In other respects, the powers, privileges and immunities of each House of Parliament, and the members and the committee of each House, shall be such as may from time to time be defined by Parliament by law, and until so defined, [shall be those of that House and of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of Section 15 of the Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978].4. The provision of clauses (1), (2), and (3) shall apply in relation to persons who by virtue of this Constitution have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, a House of Parliament or any committee thereof as they apply in relation to the members of Parliament.194. Powers, privileges, etc, of the House of Legislatures and of the members and committees thereof(1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution and to the rules and standing orders regulating the procedure of the Legislature, there shall be freedom of speech in the Legislature of every State(2) No member of the Legislature of a State shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in the Legislature or any committee thereof, and no person shall be so liable in respect of the publication by or under the authority of a House of such a Legislature of any report, paper, votes or proceedings(3) In other respects, the powers, privileges and immunities of a House of the Legislature of a State, and of the members and the committees of a House of such Legislature, shall be such as may from time to time be defined by the Legislature by law, and, until so defined, shall be those of that House and of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of Section 26 of the Constitution forty fourth Amendment Act, 1978(4) The provisions of clauses ( 1 ), ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) shall apply in relation to persons who by virtue of this Constitution have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of a House of the Legislature of a State or any committee thereof as they apply in relation to members of that LegislatureRules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok SabhaChapter 20QUESTIONS OF PRIVILEGEConsent of Speaker222. A member may, with the consent of the Speaker, raise a question involving a breach of privilege either of a member or of the House or of a Committee thereof.Notice of question of privilege223. A member wishing to raise a question of privilege shall give notice in writing to the Secretary-General *1 [by 10.00 hours] on the day the question is proposed to be raised. If the question raised is based on a document, the notice shall be accompanied by the document.*2[Provided that notices received after 10.00 hours shall be deemed to have been received at 10.00 hours on the next day on which the House sits.]Admissibility of questions of privilege224. The right to raise a question of privilege shall be governed by the following conditions, namely:-(i) not more than one question shall be raised at the same sitting;(ii) the question shall be restricted to a specific matter of recent occurrence; and(iii) the matter requires the intervention of the House.Mode of raising questions of privilege225. (1) The Speaker, if he gives consent under rule 222 and holds that the matter proposed to be discussed is in order, shall call the member concerned, who shall rise in his place and, while asking for leave to raise the question of privilege, make a short statement relevant thereto:Provided that where the Speaker has refused his consent under rule 222 or is of opinion that the matter proposed to be discussed is not in order, he may, if he thinks it necessary, read the notice of question of privilege and state that he refuses consent or holds that the notice of question of privilege is not in order: Provided further that the Speaker may, if he is satisfied about the urgency of the matter, allow a question of privilege to be raised at any time during the course of a sitting after the disposal of questions.(2) If objection to leave being granted is taken, the Speaker shall request those members who are in favour of leave being granted to rise in their places, and if not less than twenty-five members rise accordingly, the Speaker shall declare that leave is granted. If less than twenty-five members rise, the Speaker shall inform the member that he has not the leave of the House.Questions of privilege to be considered by House or Committee226. If leave under rule 225 is granted, the House may consider the question and come to a decision or refer it to a Committee of Privileges on a motion made either by the member who has raised the question of privilege or by any other member.Reference of questions of privilege to Committee by Speaker227. Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, the Speaker may refer any question of privilege to the Committee of Privileges for examination, investigation or report.Power of Speaker to give directions228. The Speaker may issue such directions as may be necessary for regulating the procedure in connection with all matters connected with the consideration of the question of privilege either in the Committee of Privileges or in the House.INTIMATION TO SPEAKER REGARDING ARREST, DETENTION ETC. AND RELEASE OF MEMBERIntimation regarding arrest, detention etc. of member229. When a member is arrested on a criminal charge or for a criminal offence or is sentenced to imprisonment by a court or is detained under an executive order, the committing judge, magistrate or executive authority, as the case may be, shall immediately intimate such fact to the Speaker indicating the reasons for the arrest, detention or conviction, as the case may be, as also the place of detention or imprisonment of the member in the appropriate form set out in the Third Schedule.Intimation regarding release of member230. When a member is arrested and after conviction released on bail pending an appeal or otherwise released, such fact shall also be intimated to the Speaker by the authority concerned in the appropriate form set out in the Third Schedule.Treatment of communications regarding arrest, detention, release etc.231. As soon as may be, the Speaker shall, after he has received a communication referred to in rule 229 or rule 230, read it out in the House if in session, or if the House is not in session, direct that it may be published in the Bulletin for the information of the members:Provided that if the intimation of the release of a member either on bail or by discharge on appeal is received before the House has been informed of the original arrest, the fact of his arrest, or his subsequent release or discharge may not be intimated to the House by the Speaker.PROCEDURE REGARDING ARREST AND SERVICE OF LEGAL PROCESS WITHIN PRECINCTS OF THE HOUSEArrest within precincts of House232. No arrest shall be made within the precincts of the House without obtaining the permission of the Speaker.Service of legal process233. A legal process, civil or criminal, shall not be served within the precincts of the House without obtaining the permission of Speaker.[For rules relating to Committee of Privileges, see Chapter XXVI of these rules.]___________________________[*1] Sub. by L.S. Bn. (II) dated 9-5-1989, par2930.[*2] Added ibid.CHAPTER XXVIPARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEESGENERAL RULESParliamentary Committee253. In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, 'Committee' means and includes 'Parliamentary Committee' as defined in sub-rule (1) of rule 2.Appointment of Committee254. (1) The members of a Committee shall be appointed or elected by the House on a motion made, or nominated by the Speaker as the case may be.(2) No member shall be appointed to a Committee if he is not willing to serve on it. The proposer shall ascertain whether the member whose name is proposed by him is willing to serve on the Committee.(3) Casual vacancies in a Committee shall be filled by appointment or election by the House on a motion made, or nomination by the Speaker, as the case may be, and any member appointed, elected or nominated to fill such vacancy shall hold office for the unexpired portion of the term for which the member in whose place he is appointed, elected or nominated would have normally held office.Objection to membership of Committee255. Where an objection is taken to the inclusion of a member in a Committee on the ground that the member has a personal, pecuniary or direct interest of such an intimate character that it may prejudicially affect the consideration of any matters to be considered by the Committee, the procedure shall be as follows:(a) The member who has taken objection shall precisely state the ground of his objection and the nature of the alleged interest, whether personal, pecuniary or direct, of the proposed member in the matters coming up before the Committee.(b) after the objection has been stated, the Speaker shall give an opportunity to the member proposed on the Committee against whom the objection has been taken to state the position:(c) if there is dispute on facts, the Speaker may call upon the member taking objection and the member against whose appointment on the Committee objection has been taken, to produce documentary or other evidence in support of their respective cases;(d) after the Speaker has considered the evidence so tendered before him, he shall give his decision which shall be final;(e) until the Speaker has given his decision the member against whose appointment on the Committee objection has been taken shall continue to be a member thereof if elected or nominated and take part in discussion, but shall not be entitled to vote; and(f) if the Speaker holds that the member against whose appointment objection has been taken has a personal, pecuniary or direct interest in the matter before the Committee, he shall cease to be a member thereof forthwith:Provided that the proceedings of the sitting of the Committee at which such member was present shall not in any way be affected by the decision of the Speaker.Explanation.- For the purpose of this rule the interest of the member should be direct, personal or pecuniary and separately belong to the person whose inclusion in the Committee is objected to and not in common with the public in general or with any class or section thereof or on a matter of State policy.Term of office of Committee nominated by Speaker256. A Committee nominated by the Speaker shall, unless otherwise specified in the rules contained in this Chapter, hold office for the period specified by him or until a new Committee is nominated.*1 [ Resignation from Committee257. (1) A member may resign his seat from a Committee by writing under his hand, addressed to the Speaker, in the following form:'ToThe Speaker,Lok Sabha, New Delhi.Sir, I hereby tender my resignation from the membership of the Committee on ............................. with effect from.........................Yours faithfully,Place..........…………….Date......…………………….. (Name of the Member)'(2) The resignation shall take effect from the date of resignation specified in the letter of resignation.(3) If the date from which the resignation should take effect is not specified in the letter, the resignation shall take effect from the date of the letter.(4) If the letter of resignation does not bear any date, the resignation shall take effect from the date of receipt of the letter in the Lok Sabha Secretariat.]Chairman of Committee258. (1) The Chairman of a Committee shall be appointed by the Speaker from amongst the members of the Committee: Provided that if the Deputy Speaker is a member of the Committee, he shall be appointed Chairman of the Committee.(2) If the Chairman is for any reason unable to act, the Speaker may appoint another Chairman in his place.(3) If the Chairman is absent from any sitting the Committee shall choose another member to act as Chairman for that sitting.Quorum in Committee259. (1) The quorum to constitute a sitting of a Committee shall be, as near as may be, one-third of the total number of members of the Committee.(2) If at any time fixed for any sitting of the Committee, or if at any time during any such sitting, there is no quorum the Chairman of the Committee shall either suspend the sitting until there is a quorum or adjourn the sitting to some future day.(3) When the Committee has been adjourned in pursuance of sub-rule (2) on two successive dates fixed for sittings of the Committee, the Chairman shall report the fact to the House:Provided that where the Committee has been appointed by the Speaker, the Chairman shall report the fact of such adjournment to the Speaker.Discharge of members absent from sittings of Committee260. If a member is absent from two or more consecutive sittings of a Committee without the permission of the Chairman, a motion may be moved in the House for the discharge of such member from the Committee:Provided that where the members of the Committee are nominated by the Speaker such member may be discharged by the Speaker.Decisions in Committee261. All questions at any sitting of a Committee shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting.Casting vote of Chairman262. In the case of an equality of votes on any matter, the Chairman or the person acting as such, shall have a second or casting vote.Power to appoint Sub-Committees263. (1) A Committee may appoint one or more sub-Committees, each having the powers of the undivided Committee, to examine any matters that may be referred to them, and the reports of such sub-Committees shall be deemed to be the reports of the whole Committee, if they are approved at a sitting of the whole Committee.(2) The order of reference to a sub-Committee shall clearly state the point or points for investigation. The report of the sub-Committee shall be considered by the whole Committee.Sittings of Committee264. The sittings of a Committee shall be held on such days and at such hour as the Chairman of the Committee may fix:Provided that if the Chairman of the Committee is not readily available, the Secretary-General may fix the date and time of a sitting:Provided further that in the case of Select or Joint Committee on a Bill, if the Chairman of the Committee is not readily available, the Secretary-General may, in consultation with the Minister concerned with the Bill, fix the date and time of a sitting.Committee may sit whilst House sitting265. A Committee may sit whilst the House is sitting provided that on a division being called in the House, the Chairman of the Committee shall suspend the proceedings in the Committee for such times as will in his opinion enable the members to vote in a division.Sittings in private266. The sittings of a Committee shall be held in private.Venue of sittings267. The sittings of a Committee shall be held within the precincts of the Parliament House, and if it becomes necessary to change the place of sitting outside the Parliament House, the matter shall be referred to the Speaker whose decision shall be final.Strangers to withdraw when Committee deliberates268. All persons other than members of the Committee and officers of the Lok Sabha Secretariat shall withdraw whenever the Committee is deliberating.Power to take evidence or call for documents269. (1) A witness may be summoned by an order signed by the Secretary-General and shall produce such documents as are required for the use of a Committee.(2) It shall be in the discretion of the Committee to treat any evidence given before it as secret or confidential.(3) No document submitted to the Committee shall be withdrawn or altered without the knowledge and approval of the Committee.Power to send for persons, papers and records270. A Committee shall have power to send for persons, papers and records:Provided that if any question arises whether the evidence of a person or the production of a document is relevant for the purposes of the Committee, the question shall be referred to the Speaker whose decision shall be final:Provided further that Government may decline to produce a document on the ground that its disclosure would be prejudicial to the safety or interest of the State.Counsel for witness271. A Committee may, under the direction of the Speaker, permit a witness to be heard by a counsel appointed by him and approved by the Committee.Evidence on oath272. (1) A Committee may administer oath or affirmation to a witness examined before it.(2) The form of the oath or affirmation shall be as follows:'I, A.B., swear in the name of God/solemnly affirm that theevidence which I shall give in this case shall be true, that I will conceal nothing, and that no part of my evidence shall be false'.Examination of witnesses273. The examination of witnesses before a Committee shall be conducted as follows:-(i) The Committee shall, before a witness is called for examination, decide the mode of procedure and the nature of questions that may be asked of the witness.(ii) The Chairman of the Committee may first ask the witness such question or questions as he may consider necessary with reference to the subject matter under consideration or any subject connected therewith according to the mode of procedure mentioned in clause (i) of this rule.(iii) The Chairman may call other members of the Committee one by one to ask any other questions.(iv) A witness may be asked to place before the Committee any other relevant points that have not been covered and which a witness thinks are essential to be placed before the Committee.(v) A verbatim record of proceedings of the Committee shall, when a witness is summoned to give evidence, be kept.(vi) The evidence given before the Committee may be made available to all members of the Committee.Record of decisions274. A record of the decisions of a Committee shall be maintained and circulated to members of the Committee under the direction of the Chairman.Evidence, report and proceedings treated as confidential275. (1) A Committee may direct that the whole or a part of the evidence or a summary thereof may be laid on the Table.(2) No part of the evidence, oral or written, report or proceedings of the Committee which has not been laid on the Table shall be open to inspection by any one except under the authority of the Speaker.(3) The evidence given before a Committee shall not be published by any member of the Committee or by any other person until it has been laid on the Table:Provided that the Speaker may, in his discretion, direct that such evidence be confidentially made available to members before it is formally laid on the Table.Special report276. A Committee may, if it thinks fit, make a special report on any matter that arises or comes to light in the course of its work which it may consider necessary to bring to the notice of the Speaker or the House, notwithstanding that such matter is not directly connected with, or does not fall within or is not incidental to, its terms of reference.Report277. (1) Where the House has not fixed any time for the presentation of a report by a Committee the report shall be presented within one month of the date on which reference to the Committee was made:Provided that the House may at any time, on a motion being made, direct that the time for the presentation of the report by the Committee be extended to a date specified in the motion.(2) Reports may be either preliminary or final.(3) The report of the Committee shall be signed by the Chairman on behalf of the Committee:Provided that in case the Chairman is absent or is not readily available the Committee shall choose another member to sign the report on behalf of the Committee.Availability of report to Government before presentation278. A Committee may, if it thinks fit, make available to Government any completed part of its report before presentation to the House. Such reports shall be treated as confidential until presented to the House.Presentation of report279. (1) The report of a Committee shall be presented to the House by the Chairman or in his absence by any member of the Committee.(2) In presenting the report the Chairman or, in his absence, the member presenting the report shall, if he makes any remarks, confine himself to a brief statement of fact, but there shall be no debate on that statement at this stage.Printing, publication or circulation of report before presentation280. The Speaker may, on a request being made to him and when the House is not in session, order the printing, publication or circulation of a report of a Committee although it has not been presented to the House. In that case the report shall be presented to the House during its next session at the first convenient opportunity.Power to make suggestions on procedure281. A Committee shall have power to pass resolutions on matters of procedure relating to that Committee for the consideration of the Speaker, who may make such variations in procedure as he may consider necessary.Power to make detailed rules282. A Committee may with the approval of the Speaker make detailed rules of procedure to supplement the provisions contained in the rules in this Chapter.Power of Speaker to give directions283.(1) The Speaker may from time to time issue such directions to the Chairman of a Committee as he may consider necessary for regulating its procedure and the organization of its work.(2) If any doubt arises on any point of procedure or otherwise, the Chairman may if he thinks fit, refer the point to the Speaker whose decision shall be final.Business before Committee not to lapse on prorogation of House284. Any business pending before a Committee shall not lapse by reason only of the prorogation of the House and the Committee shall continue to function notwithstanding such prorogation.Unfinished work of Committee285. A Committee which is unable to complete its work before the expiration of its term or before the dissolution of the House may report to the House that the Committee has not been able to complete its work. Any preliminary report, memorandum or note that the Committee may have prepared or any evidence that the Committee may have taken shall be made available to the new Committee.Applicability of general rules to Committees286. Except for matters for which special provision is made in the rules relating to any particular Committee, the general rules in this Chapter shall apply to all Committees; and if and so far as any provision in the special rules relating to a Committee is inconsistent with the general rules, the former rules shall prevail.