Form 5 For Sec: Fill & Download for Free

Thanks for A2A.Total subjects to be passed for non Diploma candidate:01. 10 subjects in Sec-A02. 09 subjects in Sec-B03. Project work (Part of Sec-B)04. Lab work (Part of Sec-B)Here are semester wise performance for Shortest possible time to completely pass the subjects:Semester 01 : Passed 4 subjects from Sec-ASemester 02 : Passed 4 subjects from Sec-ASemester 03 : Passed 2 subjects from Sec-ACompletely passed Sec-A and applied for Sec-B examinations…Semester 04 : Passed 4 subjects from Sec-BSemester 05 : Passed 4 subjects from Sec-BSemester 06 : Passed 1 subjects from Sec-B along with Lab and project work.Hence you can completely pass and get elected as an AMIE in minimum 3 years.Points to be noted:01. You can maximum attend up to 4 subject each semester.02. You have to be very quick to fill form and apply for Sec-B examinations just after passing Sec-A examinations to attend Sec-B exams in coming semester.03. You are eligible to attend Lab and Project work only after passing minimum 5 subjects from Sec-B.

Hello Joanne!Very interesting and relevant question!As of now, there are four. Richard Burr, Jim Inhofe, Ron Johnson and Kelly Loeffler. Burr’s share in this scandal I already explained in this answer: Roland Temmerman's answer to Why did Senator Richard Burr warn wealthy members of a business club that a pandemic was coming 5 weeks ago?This is what Inhofe sold, second tweet:Here's some stock sales in that same time frame by Sen. Jim Inhofe R-OK pic.twitter.com/5npBsEtciH— Jamie Dupree (@jamiedupree) March 20, 2020Up next is Ron Johnson. Senator Johnson, who has a net worth estimated at over $36 million, made a major transaction.The exact amount is unknown, as ethics forms only require disclosure in broad ranges, but Johnson reported selling over $5 million that day — and potentially up to $25 million.In a report filed today, Sen. Ron Johnson R-WI with a very large stock sale earlier this month. pic.twitter.com/c9QbjYOcPa— Jamie Dupree (@jamiedupree) March 20, 2020Not too shabby, I’ll say!Now in Johnson’s defense, he sold off his share in his family’s company but it doesn’t matter since it’s still insider trading. Here’s the filing. eFD: HomeHis sale was reportedly announced February 11th.“A San Francisco-based private equity firm, Gryphon Investors, has made an equity investment in Oshkosh-based Pacur LLC, the supplier of specialty plastic packaging materials to the medical device industry that was led by Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson prior to his election to the U.S. Senate in 2010,” BizJournals reported. “Details of the transaction were not disclosed.” https://www.bizjournals.com/milwaukee/news/2020/02/11/private-equity-firm-makes-equity-investment-in.htmlAnd last but certainly not least, we have Kelly Loeffler. A few words about her first. Kelly Loeffler is married to Jeffrey Sprecher, the chairman of the New York Stock Exchange, and the chairman and CEO of Intercontinental Exchange, which is NYSE's parent company.Loeffler assumed office on Jan. 6 after having been appointed to the seat vacated by retiring Sen. Johnny Isakson. Between then and Jan. 23 she did not report a single stock transaction from accounts owned by her individually or by her and her husband jointly.Between Jan. 24 and Feb. 14, by contrast, Loeffler reported selling stock jointly owned with her husband worth between $1,275,000 and $3,100,000, according to transaction reports filed with Senate ethics officials. On Feb. 14, she also purchased the Citrix stock and another $100,000 to $250,000 in technology company Oracle, which has seen its share price decline by more than 18 percent since then.The 15 stocks that Loeffler reported selling have lost more than a third of their value, on average, since she reported offloading them. She initially reported many of the transactions as sales of stock owned by her husband. Last week she amended the filing to note that most of them were jointly owned. Sen. Kelly Loeffler Dumped Millions in Stock After Coronavirus BriefingThe full scope of Loeffler’s portfolio and its particular holdings is not yet known. Senators are required to regularly disclose that information, but in January she requested an extension from Senate ethics officials. A full accounting of her finances will not be public until May.Fun fact: Loeffler’s worth an estimated $500 million.But what’s really remarkable in an appalling, egregious, heinous way, is that in the weeks after her spate of stock trades, Loeffler sought to downplay the public health and financial threats posed by the coronavirus.“Democrats have dangerously and intentionally misled the American people on #Coronavirus readiness,” she tweeted on Feb. 28. “Here’s the truth: @realDonaldTrump & his administration are doing a great job working to keep Americans healthy & safe.”And to top it off she tweeted this doozy on March 10th:Concerned about #coronavirus? Remember this:The consumer is strong, the economy is strong, & jobs are growing, which puts us in the best economic position to tackle #COVID19 & keep Americans safe.Update following meeting with @realdonaldtrump, @VP, & @StevenMnuchin1: pic.twitter.com/H9t2D6x19k— Senator Kelly Loeffler (@SenatorLoeffler) March 10, 2020She literally sold 7-figures in stock and purchased stock in 'teleworking' companies knowing people would be forced to work from home. Talk about hypocrisy and sheer grifiting…Now what will be the consequences for these four senators? Rest assured that the pressure on them to resign will be overwhelming in the coming days. If Trump wants to call the COVID-19 crisis a “war”, these are war profiteers. And since they’re members of the GOP voting against removal of IMPOTUS, they have even more reason for their resignations.Darn that crony capitalism, kleptocracy, and Republican character traits.And then there’s this:“The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act (Pub.L. 112–105, S. 2038, 126 Stat. 291, enacted April 4, 2012)…prohibits the use of non-public information for private profit, including insider trading by members of Congress and other government employees.”en.wikipedia.org/…(Sec. 6) Amends the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (EGA) to require specified individuals to file reports within 30 to 45 days after receiving notice of a purchase, sale, or exchange which exceeds $1,000 in stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other forms of securities and subject to any waivers and exclusions.Lists such individuals as: (1) the President; (2) the Vice President; (3) executive officers or employees, including certain special government employees and members of a uniformed service; (4) appointed administrative law judges; (5) executive branch employees in positions excepted from the competitive service because of their confidential or policymaking character (except those excluded from such exception by the Director of the Office of Government Ethics [OGE]); (6) the Postmaster General, the Deputy Postmaster General, each Governor of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Postal Service, and certain U.S. Postal Service officers or employees; (7) the OGE Director and each designated agency ethics official; (8) civilian employees of the Executive Office of the President (other than a special government employee) appointed by the President; (9) Members of Congress; and (10) congressional officers and employees.(Sec. 18) Amends the federal criminal code to subject to a fine or imprisonment of up to 15 years, or both, as well as possible disqualification from holding federal office, certain covered government persons, in addition to Member of Congress and congressional employees, who with the intent to influence, on the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment practice of any private entity: (1) takes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act; or (2) influences, or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another.Extends the meaning of "covered government person" (currently restricted to Members of Congress and congressional employees) to include the President, Vice President, an employee of the U.S. Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission, or any other executive branch employee.www.congress.gov/...Could anyone of them, particulary Senator Burr be prosecuted for insider trading? Here’s what former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) | tweeted:Whether it is insider trading that is illegal (or criminal) is complicated.Insider trading is when someone learns of "material, nonpublic information" and uses that to trade stock. That means that the person knew something the public didn't know, which can sometimes give a trader a big advantage over the public.Insider trading by Senators and Members of Congress was *legal* until the STOCK Act of 2012. (See below.)Interestingly, Burr was one of only three Senators to vote against the STOCK Act.Insider trading is only illegal when the information is "material," meaning that it would have caused a significant change in stock price.It is also only illegal when the information is known by the trader and is not public.To prove Burr engaged in insider trading, the government would have to prove he knew of information that -- if the public knew about it -- would cause a significant change in the price of stocks that he sold.I realize it seems obvious to many of you that this was the case.But the government (SEC or DOJ) would have to prove each of those things. So first of all, they would need to prove exactly what Burr knew and find some piece of information that was not known by the public that was so important that it would have changed stock prices.Remember that there was a *lot* of public information and discussion already about the coronavirus. I suspect that his lawyers would spend a lot of time finding articles by experts that warned of the threat. They would argue that what Burr learned was essentially public.In addition, they would argue the information was not "material" because there was no way Burr would have known that it would have caused a significant change in price in the particular stocks that he sold.They would claim he couldn't have predicted a recession in advance.I'm not saying that these arguments would be successful. But it's complicated, and the first step is for the SEC and DOJ to investigate this matter.There is certainly enough information here to launch an investigation, and there should be a bipartisan call for one.Not all insider trading is prosecuted criminally. An inquiry by the SEC, which polices the stock markets, is a good starting point. There is a far higher burden of proof in a criminal case.The SEC should investigate this matter and see where the evidence leads. Another hurdle for SEC/DOJ would be that the STOCK Act is a fairly new statute that has not been used in the context of information that is not specific to an individual company.Prior cases were based on corporate insiders, not governmental "insiders" under the Act.So to conclude: Richard Burr already announced awhile back that he won’t be running for reelection when his current Senate term is up in 2022, so I won’t be shocked if he tries to cut some kind of resignation deal in exchange for immunity. Kelly Loeffler is in a rather different position. Because she was appointed near the end of a term, she has to run for “reelection” this November. After this scandal, you have to wonder if she’ll remain in the race…

Ok it was a long time ago, 1970’s to be precise and things may be different today but after secondary 2 I did 2 years in an American school. Then returned to the uk for sec 5. It also true my memory may be blurred.Differences I noticed. Math was about 2 years behind in the US. In the UK I was used Physics, Chemistry and biology as seperate subjects in the US you had science. Again in 2 years I’m not actually sure I learnt anything. History in the US is US history and in 2 years we appeared to cover the entire US history up to WWII. I don’t recall any music, tech classes in the US. Where as in the UK I had geography, music woodwork and metal work in sec 1 and 2 in England. In sec 4 in the US they had their first Shakespeare play where as I had already done 1 in each year of secondary school in England. In geography in sec 1 and 2 we covered different types of rock, how they were formed, how landscapes were formed and different economies. I seam to recall doing Patagonia and the Rhine valleys as different economies. In the US I only recall doing US states and their capitals. In the US we had a choice of french or Spanish. In the UK french wasn’t an option it was mandatory and German and Latin were options.