Best Interest Affidavit: Fill & Download for Free

Outsider’s view: nobody could persuade them. If Jesus Christ were to appear before them and declare that Biden had won, they’d start chanting that the Deep State had spread up to Heaven..As I write this answer, we have heard essentially the same narrative from Toni Datna and Cam Coligan: that “this [election] will be known as one of (if not) the biggest hoax [sic] in U.S. history” because “overwhelming evidence has been uncovered via the Dominion computer system [and] of voter fraud being conducted by Democrates [sic].” Also because of “the evidence of foreign software, dead people voting on large scale, and about a thousand signed affidavits from people witnessing republicans not being able to validate ballots is mounting.”They assure us that the 2020 election “will be known as one of (if not) the biggest hoax in U.S. history,” that it “will be overturned with Trump being declared the winner,” and that “this is treason and [the] people involved will be prosecuted within the full extent of the law.”Ron Greene stipulates that Trump will concede once Joe Biden has been “declared the winner,” ignoring the fact that Biden already has, and then tries to tell us that Democrats (he lists names) are “liars and don’t have America’s best interests at heart.”In response to their narrative:If these three Trump followers are any indication, Trump followers will not be persuaded.Chrys Jordan, Trump Detractor since 2016.

Two anecdotes for you:In my first year of practice, I had a client who was accused of domestic battery who had allegedly pushed his wife out of a moving car. My client, of course, denied. He was the one driving, and she said he pushed her out of the car. I get to trial. I question the cop (who saw nothing—only took a report), and then I question the alleged victim. Understand: I am a very VERY slight woman, and I felt like I could kick my client’s tail easily. He looked like you can blow him over and break him, you know. His wife though? She…looked heavy. Not to mention his wingspan was incredibly small for him that I thought it would be nigh impossible for him to have pushed her out WHILE driving AND maintain the lane. Now the wife admitted that she had opened the car door and was in the process of jumping out of the car. Says NOTHING about my client pushing her, touching her, or anything. Anyway, my client was found guilty. Broke my heart for like 2 weeks, because I really believed that client was innocent, and I didn’t understand how he could be found guilty.In May, a 17-year-old girl hires me on behalf of her mother because her mother is in jail (Imagine that, being 17 years old and having to hire your mother an attorney.) Her mother was accused of essentially being a driver for a robbery and assault. Only problem: The lady was at work in another city during the time of the robbery and assault. Even with timesheets, affidavits from her supervisor, and the gate-check records that showed she had clocked in and out at the times that would make it impossible for her to have been at the scene of the crime, it took me 3 months and a lot of talking to get the State to dismiss.So this is what I learned: On paper, our law says the state has a heavy burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and, if there are two plausible versions of a story for an event, that a judge or jury must go with the one most favorable to the defendant. However, in practice, you’re often fighting with confirmation bias. I have NEVER had a case where a prosecutor or a cop just admitted they were wrong, and even when confronted with evidence to the contrary, they will stick to their claim. And I’ve learned that even though they are instructed that a defendant is innocent until the State meets their burden, people often believe that if a person is sitting at the defense table, he’s GOTTA be the guy. And if the State calls a witness that can point to you and say, “There’s the guy that did it,” even if you’re innocent, that’s huge to a jury. Add to that analysis that juries can be highly unpredictable, and may focus on details that seem immaterial to your defense. They may also decide they just flat-out don’t like you. AND if you go to trial and lose, although they’re not supposed to, some judges impose what I call a “trial tax”—where they give you jail time for something that they would otherwise give you probation or some other lesser sentence but for the fact that you insisted on your right to a trial. They never admit that it’s a trial tax…but it is. So in the analysis of a lawyer, the balance of the client’s best interest swings favor sometimes of plea bargaining unless the State’s case is, from the jump, already full of holes.

There was the woman I tried to help. However she did terrible things. She would dress her daughter in shorts tank top and no shoes in the middle of the winter to come to my house when I told her she needed to face it her marriage was over. FOR the terrible things. Before she leave my house i would use my sons clothes they grew out of to dress her daughterI told her she is going to get it for child neglect She was so dazed and on drugs.If it wasn’t for me the kid would starve. Her husband was in the military. When he got back i told him he needs to get custody of his child. She had asked me first.However, I told her husband I cant support her. I did write a letter. I said either you fight or this letter Goes to CPS. He was so happy I was on his side.95% courts side with the mother. However not in this case. She lost custody however her visitation was reduced to court order supervised visitation.My letter and taking the stand and four others who gave similar testimony helped save a little girl from her own motherMy advise is to what’s the best interest of the child even if you have to sacrifice a friendship which maybe painfulIts like the song Don’t Rock the boat till its over By Midnight Star 1987 R & B song .