Release And Refund Bond: Fill & Download for Free

You have to get your application forwarded.Regarding refund of cost of training and enforcement of bond-money in respect of railway employees who secured employment elsewhere on the basis of their duly forwarded applications rule position in Establishment Manual (ref. para 1410) is that if you are going to another government department of Central/State/PSU you are exempted from refunding the cost of training.However, a fresh bond should be taken in the new organisation to ensure that they serve the new employer for the balance of the original bond period. The Railway Administration will write to the new department intimating them about the bond obligation of the individual and clarifying that in the event of his selection for the new post, his release will be subject to the condition that the new organisation obtains from him a fresh bond binding him to serve them for the balance of the original bond period andin case he fails to serve the new department, or leaves it before completion of the original bond period, for a job, where exemption from bond obligation is not available…. , the proportionate bond money should be realised from the individual and refunded to the Railway Administration, with whom he had originally executed a bond.Needless to say that you need to pay cost of the training when you join a private employment leaving railways.

In Texas it is mandated that all counties with a population of over 100,000 residents must have a bail bond board. The sheriff’s office includes deputies whose job it is to supervise the bail bond companies - and report to the bail bond board.The reason I give this background is this…….if the public has a complaint they can report any issues to the liaisons within the sheriff’s office. Legally the money does not have to be refunded as the bonding company performed the job for which it was paid - a bond was posted.However, if a complaint is registered with the bail bond deputies here is what happens. The head deputy calls the bonding company and cajoles the bonding company to refund the money pointing out that the defendant did not walk out of their respective jail. MOST times the bonding company complies with the bail bond division and refunds the money. Because all bonding companies want to remain on good terms with the bail bond division…….they have a lot of power when the bonding company comes up for renewal of their license.

In many cases, no, financial bail is not necessary."Two-thirds of the inmates in U.S. jails are petty, nonviolent offenders who are there for only one reason: They can't afford their bail." Bail Burden Keeps U.S. Jails Stuffed With InmatesPeople who have money, or access to bail bonds, get out. People who don't stay in - and it costs, according to some accounts, as much as $9B a year to house them. People who have the money to either pay their bail or pay a bondsman a non-refundable fee, usually at least 10% of the bail amount, are able to go back to their families, go back to work, and fight their arrest - which increases their chances of less severe penalties for their offense, if convicted, and allows them to better manage the ramifications of being accused.Activist judges in New Jersey ( New Jersey's Chief Justice Urges Bail Change) and New York (New York Judge shakes up the bail system) have been urging change to the bail system, supporting initiatives like pre-trial release, ankle-bracelet monitoring, work-release and the like, both to reduce costs of incarceration and to attempt to mitigate and redress some of the financial inequities within the criminal justice system.The Justice Policy Institute published a paper in 2012: "For Better or For Profit:How the Bail Bonding industry stands in the way of Fair and Effective Pretrial Justice" that discusses the problems - with incentives as well as operationally - within the bail bonding industry. Page on justicepolicy.org Four states, to date, have abolished commercial bail bonding - Illinois, Kentucky, Oregon, and Wisconsin - with mixed results, supposedly. Most nations don't allow bail bondsmen to operate; and the industry in the US is allegedly rife with corruption, and encourages upping of bail amounts. Bail Bond Businesses Banned Elsewhere, But Not in U.S.Compared to most other countries, the United States has unusually harsh bail policies. The United States holds nearly 500,000 people in jail pre-trial. This is a rate of 153 pretrial inmates for every 100,000 people in the population, which is substantially higher than any other country with a population above 10,000,000 people. In comparison, Canada and France both hold less than 50 individuals for every 100,000 people.In 2009, the VERA Insitute for Justice (Vera Institute of Justice) collected bail data on felonies in the 75 largest US counties. This is the chart that shows average bail amounts:see also: Bureau of Justice StatisticsOther nations typically set bail amounts that are more accessible for defendants. A report on bail in South Africa demonstrates that, unlike in the United States, the vast majority of defendants offered bail in district courts are able to pay the bail amount. In Canada, bail must be set so it is within the reach of the individual or their family. In the United Kingdom, defendants are generally either released on their own recognizance or pretrial release is completely denied; financial bail is rarely used....Reformers have been advocating for the increased use of risk assessment tools* to make sure individuals with low probabilities of missing their trial don’t get a high bail or any bail at all. These tools use contextual data such as prior convictions, employment, and drug use history to determine a person's likely behavior. Yet implementing reform is time-consuming and expensive. The state of Maryland has stated its intention to improve its systems, but has made little progress toward that goal. The sector that would most benefit from reforms, the poor, lacks political clout.America's Peculiar Bail SystemIn my opinion, America's bail system is a regressive tax on the poor, denies them justice, and costs taxpayers a fortune. The experience of other nations show that there may be other, more effective ways to achieve the goals of getting people to show up for trial, and more judicious and equitable ways in which financial bail might be used more effectively, not for profit by commercial bondsmen and surety companies, to achieve justice.*Here's an interesting pair of articles on pre-trial risk assessment factors and pre-trial release recommendation guidelines:Page on pretrial.org (risk assessment factors)Page on pretrial.org (risk-based pretrial release recommendation and supervision guidelines)