Benefits Election Form 2013-2021: Fill & Download for Free

Yes, Bengal is BJP’s next target but it is less likely to happen the Bihar way!Although, Mamata Banerjee is known for her hypocrisy but as Nitish joined back NDA, Mamata joining hands with BJP is highly improbable (However anything is possible in Politics)Bihar scenarioThe BJP-JDU alliance was broken in 2013 over Modi’s nomination for the post of PM and had nothing to do with the Bihar BJP. And even his differences with Mr Modi seemed to diminish when Nitish welcomed the demonetisation move and Backed BJP On President.After joining hands with RJD and the Mahagathbandhan in 2016, he was tethered for RJD with 80 seats had the majority mandate. With Lalu's blessings, Shahabuddin was back in September 2016 but with recent cases of corruption against Lalu’s entire family, Nitish’s “clean” image was at stake.People may be seeing a potential PM candidate against Modi in 2019 in him, but even he knew the Mahagathbandhan would not stick by him. Even his CM chair was under predicament.To save himself from the embarrassment, Nitish Kumar did a gharwapasi(home coming). BJP was benefitted as they will now be in power in the state of Bihar as well as it’s strategically good for 2019.Bengal ScenarioMamata Banerjee is single handedly running the government in Bengal. She was once the railway Minister in the Vajapayee regime but with Modi, she has been venomous. She even accused the Indian Army of A Military Coup On top of it, she is acknowledged to be pleasing the Muslims. Joining hands with BJP, takes her nowhere rather would cut down her Muslim votes who form about 30% of the total in West Bengal.Bengal is indeed BJP’s next target and Amit Shah had already launched BJP's Mission Bengal earlier in April for bringing in Modi 2.0 in 2019 elections and uprooting the Mamata led TMC government in 2021. But BJP has to fight alone here as it is unlikely that it would want to collate with any of TMC, CPM or Congress, the other prominent parties in the state.

Look at the United Kingdom Independence Party. from wiki“The UK Independence Party (UKIP is a Eurosceptic, right-wing populist political party in the United Kingdom. As of 2021, it has a single Member of the Senedd. The party reached its greatest level of success in the mid-2010s, when it gained two members of Parliament and was the largest party representing the UK in the European Parliament. The party is currently led in the interim by Neil Hamilton.UKIP originated as the Anti-Federalist League, a single-issue Eurosceptic party established in London by Alan Sked in 1991. It was renamed UKIP in 1993, but its growth remained slow. It was largely eclipsed by the Eurosceptic Referendum Party until the latter's 1997 dissolution. In 1997, Sked was ousted by a faction led by Nigel Farage, who became the party's preeminent figure. In 2006, Farage officially became leader and, under his direction, the party adopted a wider policy platform and capitalised on concerns about rising immigration, in particular among the White British working class. This resulted in significant breakthroughs at the 2013 local elections, 2014 European elections, and 2015 general election. The pressure UKIP exerted on the government contributed to the 2016 referendum which led to the UK's commitment to withdraw from the European Union. Farage then stepped down as UKIP leader, and the party's vote share and membership heavily declined.”So there has been a party campaigning against EU membership for 30 years. It gained in membership and power until it was significant enough for the Conservative Party to recognise that it had to offer a Referendum or risk losing votes to UKIP.So it could be argued that there has been scepticism about the EU project for well over 30 years, and that instead of decreasing as voters saw the benefits, it went the other way and support for the EU diminished as fewer voters saw any real benefits for them, and began to realise it was heading in a direction hey did not want.So objection to the European Union has a longish history in the UK

India has won the unanimous support of all countries in the 55-member Asia-Pacific Group at the United Nations in support of its bid for a non-permanent seat at the UN Security Council (UNSC) for a two-year term in 2021-22.The development is particularly significant given that Pakistan and China, both countries with which India has had diplomatic challenges at the UN, supported the move.“Humbled by the show of solidarity by the Asia-Pacific Group in endorsing India’s candidature,” India’s Ambassador & Permanent Representative to the UN Syed Akbaruddin told The Hindu. “We accept the responsibility with humility and will now seek support from the broader UN membership at the elections in General Assembly next year.”The 55-member Asia-Pacific Group gets to nominate one of its members for the June 2020 elections to a non-permanent seat on the UNSC. Estonia, Niger, Tunisia, Vietnam and St. Vincent and the Grenadines were elected earlier this month.No challenges to India’s candidacy are expected with regard to acquiring the support of other UN members. India will need the vote of two-thirds of the 193 UN General Assembly members to win a non-permanent seat on the UNSC.India has already held a non-permanent seat on the UNSC for seven terms: 1950-1951, 1967-1968, 1972-1973, 1977-1978, 1984-1985, 1991-1992 and 2011-2012. It announced its candidacy for the 2021-22 seat at the end of 2013, with Afghanistan, a potential contender, withdrawing its nomination to accommodate India’s candidacy based on the “long-standing, close and friendly relations” between the two countries, as per what Afghanistan’s UN mission had said at the time.India has been keen to hold the seat in 2021-22 to coincide with the 75th anniversary of Independence in 2022.It will be hosting the G-20 meeting in New Delhi in that year.“Quiet diplomacy always works even in places where megaphones are easily available,” Mr. Akbaruddin said of the support India had received from all countries in the Asia Pacific group, including Pakistan and China.