Ps Form 1186: Fill & Download for Free

Yes, it's a yes for all your doubts.Indus valley civilization and Vaigai River Civilization near Keezhadi suggest, Religion is a new thing to humans than actually thought.Indus valley civilization had rituals based on the seals but No Religion.Keezhadi social life is still been excavated but till date No artefacts found to suggest any Religion.Rituals and Religion are different.Example: seal no. M 1186Comparison of rituals from IVC seal ritual Mother Nature INGA, 7 Maidens vs present day Irula tribes in Tamil Nadu.Comparison of IVC seal ritual Mother Nature INGA, 7 Maidens vs present day ritual of 7 Maidens worship in my homeMy uncle performing the rituals of 7 maiden worship, Ganesha is worshipped instead of Mother Inga.Yes Keezhadi is Late Harappan period civilization were well educated irrespective of profession, advanced in pottery making, water conservation, Use of Foundries, terracotta pipes etc.PS: My village is listed by TN Archeological department as “Iron age habitat site” situated near the banks of river Amaravati in Karur district, Tamil Nadu.

A2A:The Judiciary in exercise of their power of judicial review, are not expected to decide a dispute or controversies which is purely theoretical or for which there are no judicially manageable standards available with them. The courts do not generally speaking interfere with the policy matters of the executive unless the policy is either against the Constitution or some statute or is actuated by mala-fides. Policy matters, fiscal or otherwise, are thus best left to the judgment of the Executive. The danger of judiciary creating a multiplicity of rights without the possibility of adequate enforcement is real and may in the ultimate analysis be counter productive and undermine the credibility of the institution. Courts cannot ‘create rights’ where none exists nor can they go on making orders which are incapable of enforcement or violative of other laws or settled legal principles. If they do so, the society will start losing faith in the institutions.The Indian Constitution itself excludes many acts from judicial review. Powers of judicial review is expressly precluded by some of the Articles of the Constitution. They are Articles 31-A, 31-B, read with Ninth Schedule, Articles 77(2), 100 (2), 189(2), 122 (1), 212(1), 323-A, 262, 323-B, 239(a), 352, 360, 356, 363, 368(4) and Tenth schedule. However some of these provision have been struck down by the Supreme Court on ground of being violative of Basic Structure of the Constitution.In Pandit M. S. M. Sharma v. Dr. Shree Krishna Sinha & Ors. (AIR 1960 SC 1186), the Supreme Court has stated that the validity of the proceedings inside the Legislature of a State cannot be called in question on the allegation that the procedure laid down by the law had not been strictly followed. No court can go into these questions which are, within the special jurisdiction of the legislature itself, which has the power to conduct its own business.The immunity from judicial interference under Articles 100(21), 189(2), 122(1) and 212(2), is confined to matter of procedure. But there would be no immunity if the proceedings are held in defiance of the mandatory provisions of the Constitution by exercising powers which the legislature does not possess under the Constitution.Powers of judicial review is expressly precluded by some of the Articles of the our Constitution. Articles 100 (2) and 189(2) bar the jurisdiction of the courts to invalidate the proceedings of a House of legislature on the ground of vacancy in the member ship of the legislature at the relevant time. Similarly clauses (1) of Articles 122 & 212 make immune proceedings of a House of legislature on the ground of ‘irregularity of procedure’. Only irregular procedure is protected from judicial determination. If the impugned procedure is illegal and unconstitutional, it would be open to scrutinized in a court of law.PS: I am not a Lawyer or a Law Student. I don’t vouch for the accuracy of the answers given by me.

If a thousand kilo object traveling at a hundred thousand kph hit the ground, how big a crater (depth and diameter) would it make?CORRECTED = thanks to Larry RivetzAt one tonne and 28-km/s this is well within the size and speed range of meteors that regularly hit the Earth. The energy would be around 3.9E11 J.Most meteors of this mass would break up on their passage through the atmosphere; if this is the case mostof the particles that reach the ground would be small and travelling relatively slowly.If the object is this large when it hits the ground it will create a modest crater. The size will of course depend on local conditions.The plausible mechanisms for such a crater include. unattenuated blast damage (diameter as square root of energy). pure melt effect (diameter as cube root of energy). blast effect with thermal attenuation etc (Fermi: diameter as fifth-root of energy)The energies involved look to be on the margins of being large enough for the Fermi aw to be appropriate.Scaling from the 1186-m crater at the Barringer centre and based on its 10-megaton impact energy, these give radii between about 3-m (plain blast) and 120-m (Fermi fifth-order law for large bombs). I would expect the most appropriate value to be around 100-m. This is still smaller than would be expected from an equivalent bomb, probably because the momentum of the infalling object provides an additional compressive component.Apologies for the much smaller value given previously; this was caused by mistake in my spread-sheet.Thanks for the A2APS Larry Rivetz commented that my original answer seemed much smaller than you would expect from the effects of equivalent mass of TNT. This corrected version remains smaller, but not by as much.Nevertheless, craters in locations with different geology might well be substnatially larger.Thanks again (again) to Larry for the comment