Georgia Domestic Affidavit: Fill & Download for Free

I believe the Electoral College has yet to vote and the media has decided for America. Joe Biden has not won the presidential election. Biden and the media are feeding America a false narrative. There are three states in which the reviewing courts have halted the certification of the Electoral College. (Gmail Dr. Navarro Report of Election)The Deep Swamp has left paper trails and the algorithm of the Dominion voting machines has been tampered with. This news is something the main stream media will not tell you. This is basically a coup d’état by the left to take away our voting rights and the U.S. Constitution.The biggest reason Joe thinks he won because of the fix that Iowa's in. The left manipulated the votes by re-entering some ballots, by resetting the Dominion voting machine and leaving a paper and computer trail.In the case Pearson vs Kemp, Governor of Georgia, plaintiff. the complaint alleges the scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and fraudulently manipulating the vote count to make certain the election of Joe Biden as President of the United States. The fraud was executed by many means, but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious is the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballot-stuffing.”It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. Mathematical and statistical anomalies rising to the level of impossibilities, as shown by affidavits of multiple witnesses, documentation, and expert testimony evince this scheme across the state of Georgia. Especially egregious conduct arose in Forsyth, Paulding, Cherokee, Hall, and Barrow County. This scheme and artifice to defraud affected tens of thousands of votes in Georgia alone and “rigged” the election in Georgia for Joe BidThe massive fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) only recently purchased and rushed into use by Defendants Governor Brian Kemp, Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, and the Georgia Board of Elections. Sequoia voting machines were used in 16 states and District of Colombia in 2006. Smartmatic, which has revenue of about $100 million, focuses on Venezuela and other markets outside the U.S.The design and features of the Dominion software do not permit a simple audit to reveal its misallocation, redistribution, or deletion of votes. First, the system's central accumulator does not include a protected real-time audit log that maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election events. Key components of the system utilize unprotected logs. Essentially, this allows an unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not reflect actual voting tabulations — or more specifically, do not reflect the actual votes of or the will of the people.Indeed, under the professional standards within the industry in auditing and forensic analysis, when a log is unprotected, and can be altered, it can no longer serve the purpose of an audit log. There is incontrovertible physical evidence that the standards of physical security of the voting machines and the software were breached, and machines were connected to the internet in violation of professional standards and state and federal laws.Moreover, lies and conduct of Fulton County election workers about a delay in voting at State Farm Arena and the reasons for it evince the fraud. Specifically, video from the State Farm Arena in Fulton County shows that on November 3rd after the polls closed, election workers falsely claimed a water leak required the facility to close. All poll workers and challengers were evacuated for several hours at about 10:00 PM. However, several election workers remained unsupervised and unchallenged working at the computers for the voting tabulation machines until after 1:00 AM.The fundamental right to vote protected by the Fourteenth Amendment is cherished in our nation because it “is preservative of other basic civil and political rights.” Reynolds, 377 U.S. at 562. Voters have a “right to cast a ballot in an election free from the taint of intimidation and fraud,” Burson v.Freeman, 504 U.S. 191, 211 (1992), and “confidence in the integrity of our electoral processes is essential to the functioning of our participatory democracy.” Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1, 4 (2006) “Obviously included within the right to [vote], secured by the Constitution, is the right of qualified voters within a state to cast their ballots and have them counted” if they are validly cast. Id. 177.)In United States v. Classic, 313U.S. 299, 315 (1941). “[T]he right to have the vote counted” means counted “at full value without dilution or discount. ”Reynolds, 377 U.S. at 555, .29 , South v. Peters, 339 U.S. 276, 279 (1950) (Douglas, J., dissenting)).178.“Every voter in a federal . . . election, whether he votes for a candidate with little chance of winning or for one with little chance of losing, has a right under the Constitution to have his vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S.211, 227 (1974); See Anderson , 417 U.S. at 227. (Writ of Mandate, Pearson vs. Kemp)The right to vote, the right to have one’s vote counted, and the right to have ones vote given equal weight are basic and fundamental constitutional rights incorporated in the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.” Black, 209 F. Supp. 2dat 900 (a state law that allows local election officials to impose different voting schemes upon some portions of the electorate and not others violates due process). “Just as the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits state officials from improperly diluting the right to vote, the due process clause of the Fourteenth amendment forbids state officials from unlawfully eliminating that fundamental right.”

It’s complicated. Trump probably started his endgame during the election doing the same thing most modern campaigns do these days: planning for teams of well-funded lawyers just in case something goes wrong. Why? Well, as we saw in the 2000 election, there can be a grey area in an election decided by hundreds rather than hundreds of thousands of votes, and that might require legal action. But legal actions take time, and you have about a month before the Presidential vote is certified.So Trump started raising money for his legal team as a separate ask from his main campaign funding. That’s also pretty common. Most of these campaign fundraisers are “passthroughs,” meaning that you’re asked for money for one specific thing, but what actually happens is that money comes in and gets split up into various funds and accounts. That’s necessary in a large part because there are hard rules about how much money can go from any individual into campaigns, PACs, etc. and also hard rules about what can be done with that money once actually paid to a political entity. Nothing terribly unusual here, either. Biden also had a legal defense fund for his campaign.Thing was, Trump started bringing in a pretty huge pile of cash, outperforming is rather lackluster fundraising in the heat of the election. I suppose the MAGAs started to actually fear that Trump might lose. Or was it something else?If you recall the 2016 election, near the end, Trump added a new lie to his list of “greatest hits” of lies and grievances that he’d discuss at every new rally: “If I lose, the election was rigged.” No facts, no evidence, nothing at all to suggest this was real, but it got repeated a few thousand times anywhere Trump was speaking.You could write this off as Trump launching a salvo to blow up a little of his loss of face if he lost. But it was a bit more than that. For one, Trump’s business education started with his ruthless father Fred, who did not accept failure in anyone or anything. If you fail, if you lose, that’s you being pathetically weak. Next was Roy Cohn, the famously corrupt New York lawyer who was Trump’s mentor. Cohn’s rules were simple:Never settle, never surrender.Counter-attack, counter-sue immediately.No matter what happens, no matter how deeply into the muck you get, claim victory and never admit defeat.So Trump has been conditioned his entire life to believe that any failure, any loss, even any mistake is a sign of weakness. Think about how petty that’s got in Trump’s public life.Remember Sharpiegate? I mean, the guy obviously just misspoke. I occasional do that, and admit it, so do you. But Trump just couldn’t admit his mistake… no hurricane for Alabama. So he went on television and looked like a silly child, he ordered the National Weather Service to stop telling people the truth, etc. Over NOTHING!So now in 2020, Trump was back up to his old tricks: claiming without evidence that the election was a fraud, but only if he didn’t win. Did he believe this? Well, that’s a hard one to know for sure. On the one hand, he did actually make up the story about a corrupt election for 2020. It originated with him entirely. All of the actual election officials, security experts, etc. felt they had done a far better job at election security than any time in the past.But you might have noticed: that idea of a corrupt election wasn’t Trump’s first lie. He tried every cheat he could come up with in 2016 to win, and it worked. Now sure, it’s actually difficult to work any single cheat to effect an election. Trump also got lucky on the timing of some things, Hillary made her own share of mistakes and that is how elections usually go. It’s never one thing.What’s special about Trump is that for him, cheating isn’t a last-gasp effort to turn over a losing effort. Well, okay, sure it is… but it’s also his first recourse. His opening move. Trump has always been too lazy and stupid to put in the hard work to achieve something honestly. In business, he had Fred and/or Roy knowing who to bribe, who to intimidate, who to extort. It’s a well-known factor in human psychology that a person who lies, cheats, or steals pretty much expects everyone else to lie, cheat, or steal. Trump may honestly believe that cheaters win and honest men lose, because that’s been all he’s ever known — for every scam that brought Trump his fortune, honest people paid the price, and he never has. He always got away with it. And so, if Trump’s defeated, his only rationalization is that whoever beat him had the better cheat. He can’t accept that an honest man — in his universe always a loser — could defeat him on the straight and narrow path.So on with the election, and while it’s not decided overnight, Biden emerges the winner. Trump has this white-shoe legal team all assembled, and they spring to life. And he immediately starts fundraising to keep them going. They probably have to buy some recounts, etc. So immediately after the election, 40% of the money coming in through Trump’s various online, email, and other fundraisers goes to his legal team, the Recount Fund. The rest goes to pay off campaign debt. Most of that goes to the Trump Organization, aka, Trump’s pocket. Which seems risky… won’t they need them money?After less than two weeks, all of Trump’s lawyers have quit. There’s no “there” there, no case to make, no corruption, no fraud, nothing. The only election fraud anyone found in Pennsylvania were three people who voted illegally… and they were Republicans. Oops. Lawyers can’t simply being any imaginary case of fraud to a court. Thing Trump invents in his head, conspiracy theories invented by teenagers on 4chan, affidavits claiming that an election worked in PA was “mean”, none of those things actually even get presented in court. In fact, in several court filings in PA, Trump’s legal team had to file a multi-point list of just how much fraud they were not claiming in any way, shape, or form.So Trump hires Crazy Rudy and a couple of Fox News TV Lawyers. These are not the people you bring in to make a legal case… even Trump knows that. These are the people you bring in to rant, rave, and sell a case to low-information voters, on TV. Not surprisingly, at the same time, the money coming in stops feeding the Recount Fund. Ultimately, 25% of it goes to the RNC, the other 75% goes to Trump’s Leadership PAC. Neither of those is paying lawyers. So in this snapshot, it’s very clear that Trump knows he’s lost, but doesn’t want you to give up yet… send $250, quick!How much did Trump bring in? About $495 million between mid-October and the end of November! Now we know why so little went to the election fight… it’s yuuuge! This whole thing, going back to the beginning, maybe not an obvious scam when it began. No one knows Trump’s actual mind but Trump himself. But it clearly became a scam, a con, a grift. Having followed Trump’s activities on and off since maybe the 80s (I grew up in the New York media market, down in Central Jersey, and I lived 45 minutes West of Atlantic City), that was always his thing. I image Trump thinks it’s wrong to not take money from someone stupid enough to give it to you.So … he’s got crazy money coming in, he’s pocketing most of it, and he knows he’s lost. But the electoral college is coming up fast, and he’s got to figure out how to keep this money flowing. Think about this for a moment, too… Trump’s previous job was as a game show host playing a fictionalized version of himself — the successful businessman Trump — for thirteen years. Because he was on the show, owned a piece of it, owned licensing rights for versions in other countries, used “The Apprentice” to boost his name into other scams, er, sales opportunities, he did pretty well. He made a bit over $400 million over those years, pretty good even by TV standards. But this was a frickin’ goldmine!So there has already been a few things in place to keep the money flowing. For example, the web sites promised 1000% matching donations, but only if you beat a count-down timer… hurry, hurry. In very small print was an opted-in box telling you, once you got past a bunch of distractions about THOSE EVIL DEMOCRATS is that you’re the one providing the matching funds. First ten payments. Then they added a second opt-in and one extra payment for December. But now, in early December, with the electoral college looming, they’d need more. So now you if you opted in, you chose monthly payments — no limits.They were not particularly clear, closing in on the electoral college meeting date, as we passed the “Safe Harbor” date by which electors are locked in and lawsuits legally ignored, how to keep the money going. And seriously, how to justify that money… are they literally going to bribe electors?But let’s take a look at another part of the churning caldron of Trump psychological oddities. It was noticed, early on the Trump Administration, that Trump has a tendency to agree with the last person he spoke with. This proved super frustrating in the early Trump White House, as his Cabinet people went to bed thinking they had set Trump straight on various thing, but woke to him all bent around backwards. Why? He had been having late night calls with Sean Hannity and he watched Fox News all morning. The Fox News bosses understood this, and starting tailoring the news to manipulate Trump.But at least he had a few decent people in the Cabinet, smart guys capable of independent thought. Unfortunately, that gradually got them all fired. Trump suggested once in an interview that he always had to be the smartest one in the room, and that meant firing people who spoke up too much (because they knew things and he didn’t, but whatever). So by these latter days, Trump is surrounded by sycophants and yes-men. They don’t dare contradict him — in fact, they chew on the verbal crap Trump spews on them for a bit and spit it back.His only other sources of information are well within the Republican information bubble and noise machine. He watches Fox News, but increasingly, OANN, Newmax, and other tiny conspiracy nut fake news services. These guys are all in hard competition for being Foxier than the far larger Fox, and so they’re also coddling Trump.And so there’s a vicious circle of “fake news” — Trump makes something up, then the kiddies on 4Chan, the nutbaggers on fringe TV, the truth-refugees on Parler, etc. are just spewing these things around in some kind of telephone game for MAGAs. These things all feed back to Trump, but he doesn’t understand that it’s all being launched by what he’s saying and what others make up to seem MAGAier than the next guy. In short, Trump has become his own puppetmaster — and the puppetmaster is barking mad.So it is entirely credible that Trump actually believes there has been corruption and fraud under every rock. He seems to have clearly convinced himself of plenty of other lies he invented himself for, at the time, pure greed, pure politics, etc. But he certainly has been desperate — desperate enough to make several attempts at stealing the election. He sent a mob of ultra-right domestic terrorists to loot the Capitol and shut down Biden’s certification by... well… about four hours, give or take. Four people died, 47 were arrested, several are known have already been charged with fairly serious crimes (at the DC level, nothing Federal yet), and at least dozens more will be arrested in the coming days and perhaps weeks. Law Enforcement has been granted access to a massive amount of social media content related to the attack on the Capitol, and of course, that building itself is full of security cameras.So it’s not just about money, or even just about ego. There’s some clear mental illness here, which is not a thing for anyone to celebrate or ridicule. Hopefully he can get the help he needs when he’s out of office in a 12 days. Hopefully, no one else has to die for Trump in those next few days.The other thing that may be driving Trump’s increasing desperation are the numerous legal troubles facing Trump once he’s out of office. While it’s been a busy week, let’s not forget that he did just shake-down Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger, much as he had Ukrainian President Zelensky, trying to get Raffensperger to just “find” another 11,780 votes two weeks after the electoral college vote was already completed. He could face charges on that at either the State or Federal level. He could still be indicted on the 10-counts of election fraud that landed Michael Cohen in prison. And there are a whole slew of pre-existing financial crimes being investigated in New York and elsewhere.Add to that he’s got something between $350 and $900 million coming due in the next two years, most with Deutsche Bank (from what is known), a bank that will not extend him any more credit. If he’s in serious criminal trouble, they can actually call those loans immediately.Read MoreOpinion | Roy Cohn Is How We Got Trump (Published 2019)https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-fundraising/2020/12/03/3aa1091a-35b6-11eb-8d38-6aea1adb3839_story.htmlThe Trump campaign just admitted one of the scariest things about its candidateWere you conned into donating to Donald Trump's election defense fund?Dave Haynie's answer to How likely is it that Trump will resist leaving the White House?Dave Haynie's answer to Donald Trump is still soliciting donations from his fan base. At this point, could this simply be a money-making machine for Trump and a way of "legally" bilking his supporters?Dave Haynie's answer to "I would like you to do us a favor." (Trump on phone with Ukrainian President, July 19, 2019) "I just want to find 11,780 votes." (Trump on phone with Georgia Sec. of State, Jan. 2, 2021). Are the parallels between these two statements?Dave Haynie's answer to Why do people forget that Donald Trump is a successful businessman?

Absolutely though they are two different situations.A sanctuary city or state is just the belief that on a federal law, they will not actively enforce or support it. In other examples that can be anything from states deciding not to enforce passenger screening of domestic travel (they let the federal agencies such as the TSA do that alone), or that they won’t arrest people for selling or smoking pot. It’s still illegal according to federal law. But since none of that law requires the support of local entities they don’t take on the enforcement of it.In this case, if someone arrested (criminal case) who is an illegal immigrant (civil case) they will not hold them if they have been released, posted bail, or served their sentence… for federal officials who are given the legal power to arrest/detain them unless ICE can present the police with a warrant or other order from a judge. It is simply the local government stating that without a crime committed (remember undocumented immigrants are a civil case, not a criminal), they can not hold the person past the time when he should be released according to the Constitution of the US.A big difference between the Fugitive slave act of 1850 and a “sanctuary city” is that the fugitive slave act made it law that the local law enforcement was required to capture and to hold alleged slaves.As for the Fugitive slave act, many northern states would take the same stance. For example, a slaver could show an affidavit that they said John Jones was a runaway slave. Basically just their word that he was once their slave, no further proof necessary. Then federal officials could pick up that alleged slave and take him back to the owner in the slave state. Once that affidavit of the slave owner said he was a slave, that was his legal status, he wasn’t offered a normal trial, due process, etc. because he was… property. So a free person living in Ohio for example would be enslaved just based on a slave owners statement he once belonged to him, and had no legal recourse like other citizens in Ohio, even if he was born and raised there.In other slave states, local law enforcement would hold that alleged slave for the federal officials or just transfer them to the slavers custody. Militias were also given the ability to do so.The update to the law in 1850 made it law that sheriffs would not just have to stand by and not oppose federal law, but actively enforce that law. So if you knew your buddy John Jones as your neighbor since he was a little kid and chose not to arrest him and hand him over to the person claiming he was their slave you could face a $1000 fine (about $35k today). Whereas if you arrested him and got him returned… you’d get a $10 bonus pay (why this was such a hit with some).Once you had him arrested if he said he wasn’t a slave… . Habeas corpus was declared irrelevant, and the Commissioner before whom the fugitive slave was brought for a hearing—no jury was permitted would decide his fate, and the alleged fugitive slave could not testify. And if you were just an ordinary citizen… say John’s dad’s friend and knew him since birth, and tried to hide him from the slavers, you’d face 6 months in prison in addition to that massive fine.In the North you had states which believed in the stance of “innocent until proven guilty”. Meaning that if someone showed up with a piece of paper swearing they were a slave, they should be treated as a free American first, given the ability as any other American would to defend themselves, a trial by a jury of their peers, etc… This belief really upset the slavers who led the South, and was one of the primary reasons for the slavers rebellion. The push back that it should be left up to the federal government to enforce this federal law… and that it wasn’t fair for free men. Abolitionists also spoke up against the “Bloodhound law” as they called it that it didn’t respect the human life that those states held dear.South Carolina for example in their declaration of causes for secession stated “The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution.”That complaint was the state laws stating that since that person wasn’t guilty of a crime in their state, it was up to the federal officials to do the slave catching, not their own people.Mississippi in it’s declaration stated “It has nullified the Fugitive Slave Law in almost every free State in the Union, and has utterly broken the compact which our fathers pledged their faith to maintain.”Georgia in its ones stated “A similar provision of the Constitution requires them to surrender fugitives from labor. This law, which their own bad faith rendered absolutely indispensible for the protection of constitutional rights, was instantly met with ferocious revilings and all conceivable modes of hostility.”