Form Department Publice Printable: Fill & Download for Free

Not sure about branding, but for education, have a look at the following sections from 'Adventures in 3D Printing.'Printing in Education“Plastics, my boy, plastics.”This 1960s piece of career advice, given to Dustin Hoffman's character in The Graduate, resonates with a new generation of makers and hackers nearly fifty years later. Talk of 3D printers is everywhere—in print, on the web, on television, and now set to arrive in the classrooms of schools, colleges, and universities. Schools Across the globe, schools are finding useful ways to incorporate 3D printing in their curricula. Sometimes it is passionate individual teachers that are introducing printers into the classroom, no small sacrifice on a teacher’s salary. One story that really impressed me was that of Wayne Caudle, director of technologies at Boaz schools in Alabama. During the replacement of their computer network, none of the mounts that came with the new switches would fit flush to the walls. Caudle was told by a local machine shop that custom made mounts would be between $5 and $8 a piece. For a total of 364 mounts, this would be in the region of $2,000. Instead, he spent the $2,000 on a Makerbot Replicator 2 and printed them out for less than a nickel a piece, ensuring that the machine paid for itself on its very first job. Leading the charge among manufacturers is Airwolf, who has already helped put 3D printers in many classrooms around the world, from middle and high schools in the United States to universities in the Middle East and trade schools in China.Figure 100. The Airwolf AW3D V5Airwolf clearly understands that what is lacking in schools these days are opportunities to apply maths and science to the practical fields of engineering and industrial design. 3D printing creates ways to reengage students with STEM programs (Science-Technology-Engineering-Maths). Even more importantly, it fires imaginations. During the last few decades, many schools gave up their metalworking and woodworking departments for more intellectual career paths. Lathes, mills, drilling machines, and even CNC equipment were let go and sold on, due to a lack of technical capacity in the teaching staff. Hopefully, the introduction of 3D printers can help to reverse this trend, especially as the manufacturing base of a country is unable to expand unless the leaders make a serious investment in education. This technology assists a wide variety of disciplines. Medical students can fabricate three-dimensional molecular models, architecture majors can create physical representations of their designs, and fine art students can 3D print real life examples of their designs. Just as art students create a portfolio of their work, I wonder how long it will be before we see engineering students assembling portfolios of 3D printed objects to show prospective employers or universities. Will high school students begin including a custom 3D printed object with their applications to engineering colleges to demonstrate their CAD accomplishments and abilities? These days, few students have the opportunity to take apart automobile engines and it is unlikely that they can take apart an iPod like they could a radio. Designing and printing engine parts in the shop, on the other hand, shows students what the actual inside of an engine looks like. It is very empowering for a young person to actually build something, and it is even more remarkable how prolific they become once they gain the ability to turn their 3D designs into real physical objects. We have already seen, in both the US and the UK, what happens when we create an excess of MBAs and so called finance whizzes, and then let them loose on the real estate markets. It is very easy to see the new doors that are being opened in the young minds that are exposed to 3D printing. I read about one class that printed a miniature working catapult to study the physics of velocity. Students in this particular program even showed increased vocabulary. This kind of study also offers the chance to improve spatial intelligence, something that is often overlooked in public education. A 3D printed object held in the hands of the student-designer can bridge the important gap between simple visual perception and three-dimensional spatial visualization. This ability is key to bolstering the current scientific and technical workforce. This technology can be utilized to bring a great deal of ingenuity into any classroom. Just imagine, for example, a youngster developing an Arduino platform and a case to go around it using a 3D printer, thereby creating a hand-held device to analyze bacteria in the air. Science projects of the future are going to become a whole lot more interesting, thanks to 3D printing. One of the most important things that youngsters need to learn is about the limitations of their tools. I have talked extensively about this in the previous chapter, explaining that we can design anything you want on the computer, but we do not always have the machines to create it. Another key lesson is that of nomenclature, all the names of those fiddly engineering parts. Knowing what an item looks like is one thing, but figuring out what to call it, so that it can be ordered from a catalog, can be a real challenge. A recent announcement by the UK Minister of Education stated that all secondary schools (ages eleven and up) will be required to have a 3D printer and introduce children to laser cutters and robotics in the design and technology course. As yet, there has been no indication from where funding for these developments will come. 3D printing is able to help students understand and learn core STEM principles, but it also allows teachers to bring in cheap, easily made visuals that assist the learning process in almost any subject. 3D printing will revolutionize education, empower invention, enable experimentation, and invigorate our rural economy. The technology is perfect for dreamers, tinkerers, inventors, educators, artists, architects, designers, entrepreneurs, and renovators. Printables enable teachers and students to answer complex questions and demonstrate their answers in three dimensions. They can solve real-world problems by constructing and experimenting with a variety of possible solutions. Language teachers can print out physical representations of objects rather than simply handing out vocabulary lists. This allows kinaesthetic learners to use their sense of touch as a valuable aid to memory, something that is ignored by most commercial textbooks. Geography teachers can print out topography, demographic, or population maps, while history teachers can print out facsimiles of historical artifacts for classroom examination and discussion. Instead of just showing a picture of a medieval tool or a King's seal, students will be able to handle copies of the actual objects. In science classes, such as biology and chemistry, students will be able to print 3D models of molecules, DNA, bacteria, cells, viruses, and even organs. Complex excel graphs might be easier for accountancy students to read if they were printed in 3D to look like wireframe buildings using cubes of colored resins. Maths students could work on data visualizations that put simple numbers and formulas into tactile form. Students in cookery classes will be able to create all kinds of original molds, and the list just goes on and on. All we need now is for those of us with 3D printers to get into schools and start showing teachers how to make the best use of this technology. Another manufacturer, Afinia, has teamed with Pitsco Education to make a start by offering an affordable 3D printer combined with curriculum and activity materials. As well as important back up services such as a one-year warranty and telephone support, the package includes a custom designed “3D Printing: Designing and Prototyping: curriculum that includes three weeks of hands-on lessons and activity materials. Colleges and Universities A team at Michigan Technology University have begun work on a library of open source printable optics for study in a laboratory setting. In addition to providing the STL files, the authors point out that such printable equipment could make scientific experimentation much more affordable and efficient. At present the cost of outfitting an undergraduate teaching laboratory with thirty optics set ups including a 1 m optical tracks, optical lens, adjustable lens holder, ray optical kit, and viewing screen, costs about $15,000 for commercially available equipment. In comparison, the total cost using the open-source optics approach is about $500, providing over $14,500 in savings. The study found cost reductions of more than 97 percent, with some components costing only 1 percent of the market price for products of similar function. In addition, commercial suppliers can take weeks to deliver orders. With open source printables, there is no sales tax, shipping costs, or waiting for parts to come into stock. An experimenter may not know so far in advance exactly what type of equipment will be required. Printables solve that problem by making individual pieces completely on demand.

Since you’re interested in working on a specific platform, it would be best for you to consider what your application domain (a field of study that defines a set of common requirements, terminology, functionality, organizational structure, and field-specific issues and problems for any system constructed to solve) would be. For starters, you can always list your domains into the following areas:Healthcare. You deal with areas concerning the work of doctors, nurses, pharmacists and many other professionals concerned with maintaining and lengthening the quality of human life.A personal health record (PHR) is an electronic of the typical patient’s charts and records seen in medical institutions, especially hospitals. The difference is that healthcare professionals aren’t the ones managing the data and information contained in the PHR - the patients themselves do. Aside from the typical forms for managing vital signs, medications, medical history and progress notes that can be in other types of systems such as the electronic medical record (EMR, healthcare professionals manage the data in here), some parts tend to gravitate towards wellness rather than treatment aspects.Extra Points: Get the app to connect with a wearable to measure specific health data like pulse, blood pressure, running time and distance, etc.Education. You coordinate with educators and educational institutions to enhance their means of teaching students and improving educational management.Microsoft OneNote and Evernote are some interesting apps that tend to be useful among students in managing their handouts and notes from classes. An application such as this should ideally be able to not just capture data based from various types of multimedia, it should also be able to provide a wide range of options for organizing such data that fits the user’s preferences.Extra Points: Get the user to produce specific file formats so the files can be transferable and useful to other devices and platforms (e.g. transfer to a PC to be printed).Public/Government. You development systems relevant to public sector activities such as legislation, judiciary and executive affairs, or perhaps departments or ministries within either the local or national government.Not sure of what can be possible here, but from a regular citizen’s point of view, a directory of agencies and ministries and what services they provide can be quite useful to anyone who needs something done (e.g. taxes, social security, etc.)Extra Points: Get the app to allow users to input and produce forms relevant to the agency they are seeking services from. Produced forms must be transferable to other devices (because… well… duh, it’s kinda plain useless if it’s just stuck in the phone, you know).Extra Points: Get the app to ask questions to users to allow the app to narrow down the list of agencies users can look up for the service they are looking for (something akin to decision support).Private/Business. Aside from the specific requirements present due to the type of business, you mostly concern yourself with the management aspects of the business and some administrative issues.In the food business, especially in the formal restaurant ones, ordering and managing tables tends to be a challenge as it requires a lot of moving around for waiters and even the managers. Supporting their mobility through the provision of appropriate technology would be a big help.Extra Points: Get the app to produce an audit of the transactions made per table along with other statistics such as most frequently occupied table and othersMedia/Communication/Entertainment. Some very interesting situations regarding relaying data and information tend to be the focus in this domain which technology can more than possibly help out in. The entertainment aspect also holds some significant areas such as games.TV guides or any similar documents and products of channels and even radio stations are common amenities for subscribers of certain premium entertainment services are any who have access to pay-per-view viewing. A guided list of shows as seen in these types often help viewers in keeping an eye out on their favorites with consideration to their time.Extra Points: Get the app to allow users to pick shows and “save” them into a reminder/notification feature that will alert users upcoming picked shows.Arts. I personally divide this into three major categories - literature, performing arts and visual arts. So anything related to the creation of tools that would aid these activities would count.Within theater, a performing art, managing and visualizing choreography, music and other aspects of the stage entails the need to carefully note and present stage design in an audio-visual manner.Extra Points: Get the app to “play” the stage designs one after another with added curtain closes, theater breaks/intervals, stage music, etc.Sciences. Aside from the natural sciences (the physical (physics and chemistry) and the biological sciences), the formal sciences (mathematics, logic, theoretical computer science) and the social sciences (psychology, political science, anthropology, and others) could also be included in this area. A field mostly concerned with generating knowledge, mobile applications usually help out in organizing and presenting such knowledge.Geography, a notable social and even natural science, would be a very common field in this area for producing a mobile map a la Google Maps.Extra Points: Get the app to save locations and routes into a customized map that can be in a printable and transferable format whether image or document.

I don’t know why Michael Knowles believes this. But, from its inception, the agenda surrounding the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming has been led primarily by politicos, particularly from the UN.For many CAGW alarmists- UN officials, globalists, leftist politicians, greedy and unscrupulous bankers and other investors, radical environmentalists, and avowed socialists/communists, the theory of CAGW is not really about climate change. Rather it is about changing the political and economic systems of the world. Specifically, it is about instituting one world government, replacing capitalism and democracy with global authoritarian socialism, and markedly reducing global population (see proof of this below).“…the global warming rubric has provided an ideal platform to accomplish exactly what [former socialist Venezuelan president] Chavez has in mind…to enable the U.N. to advance large transformational visions of socialism, wealth redistribution, and ultimately, global governance.” The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History Lesson“So-called Climate Change, aka Global Warming, is a neo-malthusian deindustrialization agenda originally developed by circles around the Rockefeller family in the early 1970’s to prevent rise of independent industrial rivals.” The Dark Story Behind Global Warming aka Climate ChangeThe UN and many of its globalist, socialist and environmentalist members and advisors, particularly oil billionaires Maurice Strong and David Rockefeller, along with Rockefeller’s Club of Rome, initially developed much of this scheme. It was formalized at the 1992 Rio Climate Conference (organized by Strong) as UN Agenda 21 or the Sustainable Development Agenda: “Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced; a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level … Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice … The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of the society as a whole.” David J.C. Shearman – No B-S here (I hope)Lest you believe this is just conspiracy theory (as so many alarmists try desperately to make us believe), read what many alarmists have admitted:Gus Hall, former leader of the Communist Party USA: “Human society cannot basically stop the destruction of the environment under capitalism. Socialism is the only structure that makes it possible.”UN Commission on Global Governance: "The concept of national sovereignty has been immutable, indeed a sacred principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation.""This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution." . Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: "This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history." - Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate ChangeFormer U.S. democrat Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S undersecretary of state for global issues, joined Maurice Strong in addressing the 1992 Climate Summit audience: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” (Wirth is now president of the U.N. Foundation which lobbies for $hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries "fight" climate change.) The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History LessonChristine Stewart, then Canadian Minister of the Environment, speaking before editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald in 1998, said, “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_StewartDavid Brower, a founder of the Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth: “The goal now is a socialist, redistributionist society, which is nature’s proper steward and society’s only hope.”Judi Bari, Principal organizer of Earth First! - "If we don't overthrow capitalism, we don't have a chance of saving the world ecologically. I think it is possible to have an ecologically sound society under socialism. I don't think it is possible under capitalism.” Reported in the New American March 7th, 2013 and "Starting from the very reasonable, but unfortunately revolutionary concept that social practices which threaten the continuation of life on Earth must be changed, we need a theory of revolutionary ecology that will encompass social and biological issues, class struggle, and a recognition of the role of global corporate capitalism in the oppression of peoples and the destruction of nature." Starting from the very reasonable, but unfortunately revolutionary conceptHelen Caldicott, an Australian physician and a leading member of the leftist political organization Union of Concerned Scientists: “Free Enterprise really means rich people get richer. They have the freedom to exploit and psychologically rape their fellow human beings in the process…Capitalism is destroying the earth.”(By the way, according to the reference below, the Union of Concerned Scientists is a left-wing advocacy organization that spreads unscientific alarmism about environmental and energy topics. It is not a scientific organization although it is treated as one by the press and others ignorant of its true political agendas. It began as a leftist anti-Vietnam War group and now promotes catastrophic CO2 global warming, anti-nuclear energy, anti-GMO, radical environmental stances, and other left-wing agendas. Apparently anyone can join for $25 to become a “concerned scientist”. Though founded in 1969 by faculty and students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, UCS’ mission from the beginning has never been the pursuit of knowledge through scientific discovery. It has instead pursued left-wing advocacy on technology, environmental, and energy issues—regardless of what the scientific data have shown. Union of Concerned Scientists - Left Exposed Its president is not a scientist but a lifelong political activist. He is close to Al Gore and former democrat senator and CO2 global warming alarmist, Tim Wirth, who commented about the theory of CAGW this way: "we've got to ride the global-warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing — in terms of economic policy and environmental policy." (Not surprisingly, after Wirth left the Senate and the Clinton administration he ended up at the United Nations as president of the UN Foundation. National Review: Climate Change Hypocrisy Also see: https://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-that-the-Trump-administration-is-actively-censoring-data-about-climate-change/answer/Charles-Holley-10/comment/104179721Club of Rome: “Now is the time to draw up a master plan for sustainable growth and world development based on global allocation of all resources and a new global economic system. Ten or twenty years from today it will probably be too late.”David Rockefeller, billionaire founding member Club of Rome and close friend of Maurice Strong: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis…”(Many of the above quotes from: C3: Global Warming Quotes & Climate Change Quotes: Human-Caused Global Warming Advocates/Supporters)"Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class- involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, air-conditioning, and suburban housing- are not sustainable."- Maurice Strong, Canadian oil billionaire socialist, close friend of David Rockefeller, organizer of the Rio Earth Summit and the UN Foundation The Green AgendaOne of the most ardent supporters of CAGW, socialist author Naomi Klein: “…most leftists have yet to realize that climate science has handed them the most powerful argument against capitalism since William Blake’s ‘dark Satanic Mills’…The deniers did not decide that climate change is a left-wing conspiracy by uncovering some covert socialist plot. They arrived at this analysis by taking a hard look at what it would take to lower global emissions as drastically and as rapidly as climate science demands. They have concluded that this can be done only by radically reordering our economic and political systems in ways antithetical to their “free market” belief system. As British blogger and Heartland regular James Delingpole has pointed out, 'Modern environmentalism successfully advances many of the causes dear to the left: redistribution of wealth, higher taxes, greater government intervention, regulation.' Heartland’s Bast puts it even more bluntly: For the left, 'Climate change is the perfect thing…. It’s the reason why we should do everything [the left] wanted to do anyway.' Here’s my inconvenient truth: they aren’t wrong... arriving at these new systems is going to require shredding the free-market ideology that has dominated the global economy for more than three decades. What follows is a quick-and-dirty look at what a serious climate agenda would mean in the following six arenas: public infrastructure, economic planning, corporate regulation, international trade, consumption and taxation." Capitalism vs. the ClimateClub of Rome, environmental think-tank and consultants to the United Nations. "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill....All these dangers are caused by human intervention....and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself...humans need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum; such a motivation must be found to bring the divided nations together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose… Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time…Democracy has failed us, a new system of global governance, based on environmental imperatives, must be implemented quickly...A radical change from the current trajectory is required, a complete reordering of global society..." From their book “The First Global Revolution”. The First Global Revolution For more COR quotes see: The Green AgendaAustralians Professor David Shearman and ecologist Joseph Wayne Smith published The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. Amazon’s blurb says, “This provocative book presents compelling evidence that the fundamental problem behind environmental destruction―and climate change in particular―is the operation of liberal democracy.” Originally a research tract, the abstract says the authors conclude that an authoritarian form of government is necessary, but this will be governance by experts and not by those who seek power. [Good luck with that!] David J.C. Shearman – No B-S here (I hope)"Government in the future will be based upon . . . a supreme office of the biosphere. The office will comprise specially trained philosopher/ecologists. These guardians will either rule themselves or advise an authoritarian government of policies based on their ecological training and philosophical sensitivities." David Shearman, an IPCC Assessor for 3rd and 4th climate change reports Inconvenient Quotes (For Climate Alarmists) (Al Gore, enemy, global warming, ethical) and https://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/warmist-yearns-for-the-freedom-of-a-dictatorship/news-story/c3f37af24d1ad137dde65fac558c95f0Quotes from an article about a recent UN study: “Meeting current or growing levels of energy need in the next few decades with low-carbon solutions (i.e., renewables) will be extremely difficult, if not impossible. The economic transition must involve efforts to lower total energy use.…international freight transport and aviation cannot continue to grow at current rates.…dairy and meat should make way for largely plant-based diets. But capitalist markets will not be capable of facilitating the required changes – governments will need to step up, and institutions (i.e., globalist elitist groups) will need to actively shape markets to fit the goals of human survival. It can’t happen without considerable reframing of economic-political thinking, however.” This is how UN scientists are preparing for the end of capitalismDr. John Holdren, Obama’s Science Czar - “A transnational “Planetary Regime” should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives... using an armed international police force. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization". (His book, “Ecoscience” co-authored with Paul Ehrlich in 1977) and “A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States...De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation...Redistribution of wealth both within and among nations is absolutely essential, if a decent life is to be provided for every human being." Inconvenient Quotes (For Climate Alarmists) (Al Gore, enemy, global warming, ethical) and https://antioligarch.wordpress.c...Former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev recognizing the importance of using climate alarmism to advance global socialist/Marxist objectives, stated in 1996: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.” The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History LessonEvo Morales, the socialist president of Bolivia at the 20th Conference of the Parties (COP-20) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: "The origin of global warming lies in capitalism… If we could end capitalism then we would have a solution.” 'The origin of global warming lies in capitalism'Former socialist President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, at the 2010 UN Mexico Climate Conference: “Our revolution seeks to help all people…Socialism,... that’s the way to save the planet; capitalism is the road to hell…Let’s fight against capitalism..." The U.N.'s Global Warming War On Capitalism: An Important History Lesson (He received a standing ovation from the huge crowd of attendees!)The latest United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report led Eric Holthaus, a Grist (environmental magazine based in Seattle) writer, to tweet enthusiastically in 2018, “The world’s top scientists just gave rigorous backing to systematically dismantle capitalism as a key requirement to maintaining civilization and a habitable planet.” U.N. Climate Report Merely a Blueprint for Destroying the World Economy“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States.” - Paul Ehrlich, Stanford Professor of Population Studies and author of “The Population Bomb” (1968) and co-author of “Ecoscience” (1977) with John Holdren http://green-agenda.com/index.htmlRichard Benedick - former US Deputy Assistant of State, headed the policy divisions of the U.S. State Department: “A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect.” from the 1990 book “Trashing the Planet” Inconvenient Quotes (For Climate Alarmists) (Al Gore, enemy, global warming, ethical)Former French President Jacques Chirac, supporting the Kyoto Protocol: “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.” https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/01/22/the-u-n-s-global-warming-war-on-capitalism-an-important-history-lesson-2/#116f7bca29be"The objective, clearly enunciated by the leaders of the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Rio Climate Conference) is to bring about a change in the present system of independent nations. The future is to be World Government with central planning by the United Nations. Fear of environmental crises - whether real or not - is expected to lead to – compliance” -Dixy Lee Ray, PhD Biology Stanford, former Democrat governor of State of Washington, U.S. https://www.azquotes.com/author/12122-Dixie_Lee_RaySaikat Chakrabarti, US Congresswoman and avowed socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's former chief of staff-“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all. Do you guys think of it as a climate thing? Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/magazine/wp/2019/07/10/feature/how-saikat-chakrabarti-became-aocs-chief-of-change/?utm_term=.b996d5303802For additional similar quotes, see: John Walker's answer to Could someone please provide a printable copy of the "global warming agenda” by “the globalists” who are said to push it?Frequently alarmists will try to discredit the above quotes by fallaciously claiming they are taken out of context. But whenever available, I have included the entire context and/or the reference from which quotes were taken. One can look and see for themselves that the quotes express exactly what is indicated. No amount of spin will change that.For a deeper understanding of the political ideology driving the CAGW scam, it is imperative to look briefly at history. WWII devastated the infrastructure and economies of Europe and Japan. The US developed the Marshall Plan (the Foreign Assistance Act of 1948) with help from the left-of-center think tank, the Brookings Institute as requested by then Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman, Arthur Vandenberg. Although a Republican, Vandenberg rejected nationalism and embraced “internationalism”. He strongly supported FDR’s founding of the United Nations.Internationalism is an important component of socialist political theory, based on the principle that working-class people of all countries must unite across national boundaries and actively oppose nationalism and war in order to overthrow capitalism…Internationalism (politics) - Wikipedia The ideal for many internationalists is to create democratic socialist globalization and a one-world government.Ironically, the Marshall Plan was initially developed as a foreign aid plan to the devastated European nations in part to deter the advance of Soviet communism. The US sent the current equivalent of $100 billion to these nations, which was meant to cease once they had recovered. But in 1951, the Marshall Plan was replaced by the Mutual Security Act of 1951, which was replaced by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, which continued $billions in economic aid to portions of Europe along with parts of Asia and South/Central America.Of course, economic aid continues today and has expanded to numerous other countries even though the Cold War ended decades ago. Many of these nations were allowed to raise tariffs against American products while the US usually did not reciprocate. While aid to wealthy western nations has essentially ceased (except for the $billions in military protection the US continues to provide), many of these nations have maintained tariffs on American imports. Thus, since WWII, America has already been redistributing much of its wealth to scores of nations around the world. Again, ironically, many conservatives supported foreign aid to prevent the spread of communism, while much of the drive for this continued wealth redistribution from leftists and globalists was based upon the desire to “fundamentally transform” American exceptionalism and nationalism into internationalism by the redistribution of American wealth and power (anyone recall that phrase, “fundamentally transform”, from Obama’s speeches?).So this is the historical link between the UN goal of internationalism and its goal for the redistribution of American wealth/power to other nations via its fraudulent CAGW campaign. But instead of $billions, it is now $trillions. (It is also simple to comprehend one of the primary reasons the left/socialists/globalist elites loathe Trump and his reciprocal tariffs meant to diminish the flow of jobs and wealth to foreign nations! He is the first president to attempt this since 1948, and the left is trying desperately to make him fail and remove him from office by any means in order to keep him from pursuing his goal of keeping America a sovereign, highly successful capitalist nation and world leader. To them the ends justify their Machiavellian means.)So the CAGW agenda has been led primarily by the UN, particularly the IPCC, and leftist politicians, radical leftist environmentalists, and other socialists. But over the years, wealthy bankers, greedy politicians and other investors have realized that the “green agenda” is a potential gold mine. Certainly Al Gore has cashed in on it. When running for president in 1999, he reported a net worth of $1.7 million. Since then, he has been involved in multiple lucrative climate-related business ventures and served on the boards of numerous high-profile companies like Google and Apple, often because of his public image as a savior of the planet from CAGW. As of 2013, his fortune was estimated at $200 million, a good chunk of which was derived from climate change-related business.Gore was one of the early promoters of the Chicago Climate Exchange (along with Enron!) He, President Obama, and others lobbied feverishly to have CO2 “Cap-and-Trade” legislation passed by Congress, which would have mandated all industries that produced CO2 to either limit their production of CO2 or purchase carbon credit “off-sets” from companies that started with excess credits or which lowered their production enough to sell their excess supply of CO2 credits, all via transactions through the Chicago Climate (commodities) Exchange! In essence, CO2 emissions could initially remain the same, or even increase, for companies willing to pay the additional cost. However, over time, CO2 emission levels were to be sequentially lowered, which would have driven the price of carbon credits (and the Exchange’s stock price) higher and higher. At its founding, it was estimated that the size of the Exchange’s carbon trading market could reach $500 billion. That estimate ballooned over the years to $10 trillion! R.I.P.: Al Gore’s Chicago Climate Exchange Has Died | National ReviewOf course, huge commissions would have been made in the buying and selling process, just like any other commodities trading. And lots of big investors (including Gore and other CAGW promoters) wanted to get in on the action. Goldman-Sachs was the largest shareholder owning 18% of the Exchange. Al Gore, with three former Goldman Sachs bankers, together made up the fifth largest. According to figures released by the Federal Election Commission, Goldman Sachs was also heavily invested in the Obama presidency. Goldman's PAC and individual Goldman contributors made up the campaign's second-largest donation, nearly $1 million.But without the needed legislation (which was never passed by republican congressional majorities), the Exchange could not generate the huge profits envisioned by its wealthy investors. In 2010 it was bought by Intercontinental Exchange (a publicly-traded commodities exchange company). Included in the sale was the European Climate Exchange (still quite profitable because of all of the global warming legislation passed across the EU) for over $600 million. Obviously the original investors made a chunk of change from the sale.“Unlike most real markets, the carbon market was created by banks and governments so that new investment opportunities could seamlessly dovetail with specific government policies. It’s a fantasy casino based on a doctrine of pure science fiction…Placed in its proper historical context, we can see that the man-made global warming movement was a classic merger of radical Collectivist ideas and huge financial opportunities… Never has the world seen a more stunning collusion between government (include the UN here) and big business” - The Great Collapse of the Chicago Climate Exchange - 21st Century Wire“A $16.3 trillion public investment [i.e., increased federal taxes] is necessary to make those [climate change] goals a reality, which falls in line with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who said any viable climate change plan needed to come with a $10 trillion price tag – at least– in order to ‘have a shot’.” Bernie Sanders Unveils Massive $16 Trillion Green New Deal PlanIn the end, the public (consumers and taxpayers) pay the $trillions that the CAGW scam is costing, with $billions of that money going into the pockets of “green” investors and businesses, all pushing the CAGW theory.Bernie Sanders Is Open To A ‘Meat Tax’ To Combat Climate Change(Guess who’s voting for Bernie):“Al Gore is standing to rake in $millions from a World Resources Institute meat consumption reduction report, one that will certainly help boost profits for the meat substitute manufacturers – in which Gore just happens to be a big stakeholder! Gore, partner and advisor to Kleiner Perkins, Beyond Meat’s big investor, stands to haul in $millions, should governments move to restrict real meat consumption” (Or institute a meat tax!) Climate Hustler, Partner At ‘Beyond Meat’ Largest Investor, Al Gore Moves To Profit Big From Anti-Meat DriveBut Gore is small potatoes compared to others hoping to rake in $trillions, who are also fervently pushing the CAGW agenda, albeit behind the scenes of course:“A key player in the linking of world financial institutions with the Green Agenda is outgoing Bank of England head Mark Carney. In December 2015, the [globalist] Bank for International Settlements’ Financial Stability Board (FSB), chaired then by Carney, created the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), to advise ‘investors, lenders and insurance about climate related risks.’ That was certainly a bizarre focus for world central bankers.“In 2016 the TCFD along with the City of London Corporation [the financial center of England] and the UK Government initiated the Green Finance Initiative, aiming to channel trillions of dollars to ‘green’ investments. The central bankers of the FSB nominated 31 people to form the TCFD. Chaired by billionaire Michael Bloomberg of the Financial Wire, it includes key people from JP MorganChase; from BlackRock–one of the world’s biggest asset managers with almost $7 trillion; Barclays Bank; HSBC, the London-Hong Kong bank repeatedly fined for laundering drug and other black funds; Swiss Re, the world’s second largest reinsurance; China’s ICBC bank; Tata Steel, ENI oil, Dow Chemical, mining giant BHP Billington and David Blood of Al Gore’s Generation Investment LLC. In effect it seems the foxes are writing the rules for the new Green Hen House.“Bank of England’s Carney was also a key actor in efforts to make the City of London into the financial center of global Green Finance. The outgoing UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Hammond, in July 2019 released a White Paper, ‘Green Finance Strategy: Transforming Finance for a Greener Future.’ The paper states, ‘One of the most influential initiatives to emerge is the Financial Stability Board’s private sector Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), supported by Mark Carney and chaired by Michael Bloomberg [2020 US democratic presidential primary candidate]. This has been endorsed by institutions representing $118 trillion of assets globally.’ There seems to be a plan here. The plan is the financialization of the entire world economy using fear of an end of world scenario to reach arbitrary aims such as ‘net-zero greenhouse gas emissions.’“The links between the world’s largest financial groups, central banks and global corporations to the current push for a radical climate strategy to abandon the fossil fuel economy in favor of a vague, unexplained Green economy, it seems, is less about genuine concern to make our planet a clean and healthy environment to live. Rather it is an agenda, intimately tied to the UN Agenda 2030 for ‘sustainable’ economy, and to developing literally trillions of dollars in new wealth for the global banks and financial giants who constitute the real powers that be.“In February 2019 following a speech to the EU Commission in Brussels by Greta Thunberg, then-EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, after gallantly kissing Greta’s hand, appeared to be moved to real action. He told Greta and the press that the EU should spend hundreds of billions of euros combating climate change during the next 10 years. Juncker proposed that between 2021 to 2027, ‘every fourth euro spent within the EU budget go toward action to mitigate climate change.’ What the sly Juncker did not say was that the decision had nothing to do with the young Swedish activist’s plea. It had been made in conjunction with the World Bank a full year before in September 26, 2018 at the One Planet Summit, along with the World Bank, Bloomberg Foundations, the World Economic Forum and others. Juncker had cleverly used the media attention given the young Swede to promote his climate agenda.“On October 17, 2018, days following the EU agreement at the One Planet Summit, Juncker’s EU signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Breakthrough Energy-Europe in which member corporations of Breakthrough Energy-Europe will have preferential access to any funding.“The members of Breakthrough Energy include Virgin Air’s Richard Branson, Bill Gates, Alibaba’s Jack Ma, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, HRH Prince Al-waleed bin Talal, Bridgewater Associates’ Ray Dalio; Julian Robertson of hedge fund giant, Tiger Management; David Rubenstein, founder Carlyle Group; George Soros, Chairman Soros Fund Management LLC; Masayoshi Son, founder Softbank, Japan.“Make no mistake. When the most influential multinational corporations, the world’s largest institutional investors including BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, the UN, the World Bank, the Bank of England and other central banks of the BIS line up behind the financing of a so-called green Agenda, call it Green New Deal or what, it is time to look behind the surface of public climate activist campaigns to the actual agenda. The picture that emerges is the attempted financial reorganization of the world economy using climate, something the sun and its energy have orders of magnitude more to do with than mankind ever could—to try to convince us ordinary folk to make untold sacrifice to ‘save our planet.’” [while making themselves richer than God!] https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-money-trail/5690209Yes, there are many climate scientists who are very outspoken about CAGW, such as James Hansen and Michael Mann. But the real power behind the “green agenda” lies in the UN, politicians, wealthy elitists, investors and bankers, radical environmentalists, globalists and socialists. It’s a reprehensible and sinister money-making plot and scam on the entire world’s population. But feel free to obey and hand over your financial assets and constantly increasing tax payments to these greedy charlatans and mendacious politicians.