Applicant Notice Of Readiness: Fill & Download for Free

Malaysian Military Combat ReadinessCombat readiness is a subset of national powerIn the context Angkatan Tentera Malaysia, combat readiness determines the availability of its force elements for the application of combat power and fighting power. Most doctrines refer to readiness as the time frame to mount given operations (Malaysian Armed Forces, 2011). Malaysian Armed Forces maintain a given level of readiness at all times that is ascertained by the evaluations of the response needed for national defense contingencies and the reaction time needed. Source F.W. Kwong & N.M. Nor / Zulfaqar Int. J. Polit. Def. Secur. 1(2014) 99-110Malaysian Army (2011, p.xii) defines combat readiness as “A condition of the Army and its constituent units and formations, weapon systems or other military technology and equipment to perform during combat military operation, or functions consistent with the purpose for which they are organized or designed, or the managing of resources and training in preparation for combat” Source F.W. Kwong & N.M. Nor / Zulfaqar Int. J. Polit. Def. Secur. 1(2014) 99-110Angkatan Tentera Malaysia, Especially the Army have fully digitized its Command and Control and fully prepared in Network Centric Warfare. The current stage of Phase One Bravo NCO is ongoing and because of this Malaysia Armed Forces able to measure its combat readiness to the seconds. NCO Phase 1 B provides the ability to measure Malaysia Military Combat Readiness using mathematical models and formulae with measuring either the tangible elements or the intangible elements. Source https://malaysiamilitarypower.blogspot.com/2016/05/network-centric-operation-phase-one.htmlCurrent Malaysian Armed Forces Combat Readiness is a Military Secret. That being said during Lahad Datu Standoff with 400 Kiram terrorist MAF able to deployed joint operations involving a combined arms forces of 7000 troops and armor, warship and fighter bomber asset in Sabah in 48 hours in which a month-long negotiation taken after all the troops are deployed. The OP Daulat itself was concluded in less than 12 hours with mopping up operation follows for couple of weeks. That is the measure of Combat Readiness of Malaysian Armed Forces. Source, NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIACurrently, at any given time a Rapid Reaction Infantry Battalion or Batalion Siap Sedia Tentera Darat which is a combat-ready battalion of the Malaysian Army is always operational and ready. The ARB can be deployed to overseas conflict areas in a short notice under the order of the United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations (UN DPKO) and also Malaysian Military to conduct a military operation in short notice. The battalion consists of multiple capabilities, including special operations, armor, infantry and Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear defense (CBRN defense). Currently, the 7th Battalion, Royal Ranger Regiment (Mechanised) (7 RRD (Mek)) is assigned as the main combat element for the ARB. The 7 RRD (Mek) is supported by various corps and regiments, including special ops operators from the Malaysian Army counter-terrorism regiment, the 11th Special Service Regiment. Source WikiIn ConclusionMalaysia Armed Forces always maintain a high level of readiness at any given time.

caveat application in the Indian court means that you are requesting any court that if in case a specified person or organisation files a case in the court in which you are having some valid interest -- than no order should be passed by that Hon'ble court without giving you a notice about that case being filed and also without listening your side in that matter. --Caveat petition is a precautionary measure which is undertaken by people usually when they are having very strong apprehension that some case is going to be filed in the court regarding their interest in any manner.The caveat petition remains in force only for 90 days and if during that duration no case gets filed from the opposite side than -- you have to again file a fresh caveat petition as new in the court.you have to clearly specify the name of the opposite party-- whom you apprehend to file a case against youDetailed descriptionA Caveat is a Latin term which means, 'let a person beware' originated in the mid 16th century. In law, it may be understood as a notice, especially in probate, that certain actions may not be taken without informing the person who gave the notice. It may simply be understood as a warning. In the Civil Procedure Code of 1908 (hereinafter, the Code) it was inserted under section 148A by the recommendations of the Law Commission of India's 54th Report and was inserted by the CPC (Amendment) Act 104 of 1976.The Section:The Section talks in brief about the caveat petition. A caveat petition is a precautionary measure which is undertaken by people usually when they are having a very strong apprehension that some case is going to be filed in the Court regarding their interest in any manner.The word 'Caveat' is not defined in the Code. The Court had defined the word Caveat, wherin it said, A Caveat is a caution or warning given by a person to the Court not to take any action or grant relief to the other side without giving notice to the caveator and without affording oppurtunity of hearing him.The Section 148A of the Code reads as under,148A. Right to lodge a caveat.(1) Where an application is expected to be made, or has been made, in a suit or proceedings instituted, or about to be instituted, in a Court, any person claiming a right to appear before the Court on the hearing of such application may lodge a caveat in respect thereof.(2) Where a caveat has been lodged under sub-section (1), the person by whom the caveat has been lodged (hereinafter referred to as the caveator) shall serve a notice of the caveat by registered post, acknowledgement due, on the person by whom the application has been or is expected to be, made, under sub-section (1).(3) Where, after a caveat has been lodged under sub-section (1), any application is filed in any suit or proceeding, the Court, shall serve a notice of the application on the caveator.(4) Where a notice of any caveat has been served on the applicant, he shall forthwith furnish the caveator at the caveator’s expense, with a copy of the application made by him and also with copies of any paper or document which has been, or may be, filed by him in support of the application.(5) Where a caveat has been lodged under sub-section (1), such caveat shall not remain in force after the expiry of ninety days from the date on which it was lodged unless the application referred to in sub-section (1) has been made before the expiry of the said period.There are five basic ingredients to the section, which are discussed in brief,i. Who may lodge a Caveat? (Clause 1)Any person claiming a right to appear before the Court,·Where an application is expected to be made·Where an application has already been made·In a suit or proceeding instituted·In a suit or proceeding which is about to be institutedMay lodge a caveat thereof. It is substantive in a nature.ii. Duties of the Caveator (Clause 2)This clause is directive in nature. The person by whom the Caveat has been lodged is called a Caveator. He shall,·Serve a notice of the Caveat by registered post, acknowledgement due·On the person by whom the application has been made·On the person by whom the application is expected to be madeiii. Duty of the Court (Clause 3)After a Caveat has been lodged under Clause 1, if any application is filed in any suit or proceeding, the Court shall serve a notice of the application on the Caveator. This clause is mandatory in nature.iv. Duties of the Applicant (Clause 4)It is directive in nature and says that, where a notice of any Caveat has been served on the applicant, he shall furnish, at the expense of the Caveator,·A copy of the application made by him.·Copies of any paper or document which has been filed by him in support of his application.·Copies of any paper or document which may be filed by him in support of his application.v.Life of a Caveat Petition (Clause 5)The life of the petition is 90 days, from the date on which it was lodged. The only exception is, if the application already exists, or has been made before the said period, the clause ceases to exist.All the above five ingredients are vital to a Caveat petition all the above are to be followed austerely.Object and Scope of the Section:The object of this section is to safeguard the interest of the Caveator, who is ready to face the suit or proceedings which is expected to be instituted by his opponent, affording an opportunity to be heard, before an ex parte order is made. Also, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, so as to save the costs and conveniences of the Courts.Courtesy- law notes,constitution

Stephanie's answer is correct and succinct. I'll just clarify the answer as a former trademark examining attorney at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The initial processing of a 1(b) intent-to-use (ITU) application is the same as a 1(a) use-based application and Section 44 foreign application/registration based application in that all of these applications, which are filed directly into the USPTO, take roughly 3 months from their filing date to be picked up by an examiner. And once all of these applications are approved by an examiner for publication, the processing of the publication of the application and subsequently the allowance of the application after publication, assuming the application is not opposed, is also the same.The publication period is 30 days and it takes about 4 to 6 weeks from approval of the publication to the actual publication. Then, if the application is not opposed, there usually is about a 2-month period between the end of the opposition period and the issuance of either the registration, if use-based, or the Notice of Allowance if ITU-based.The variable time periods which I omitted above are if the examiner issues an office action once the application is examined after 3 months; and the time period after the issuance of a Notice of Allowance in ITU applications. Both of these time periods require action by the applicant so the applicant's speed in submitting the necessary response or filing is what tends to dictate the processing time. Each office action has a 6-month non-extendable response period but the applicant can respond anytime during that period, from the day that the applicant receives the office action (now often via e-mail) to the deadline date 6 months later. An examiner has about 3 weeks to review the response and take further action on the application once they receive the response. Naturally, filing a response 1 day after receiving the office action leads to faster processing of the application than responding 179 days later. Also, the examiner could have to issue more than one office action depending upon how well the applicant complies with the examiner's requirements in the office action.As Stephanie explained with the 6-month periods after the Notice of Allowance is issued in a 1(b) application, the applicant will have 6 months from the issuance of the NOA to submit a Statement of Use to the USPTO which is essentially a declaration and evidence of use of the mark in Commerce. Delays at this stage are usually by the applicant because the applicant can submit its evidence of use of the mark as early as the date the Notice of Allowance is issued and as late as 6 months later or perhaps 30 months later if the applicant keeps filing extension requests to submit the SOU.The bottom line is that an application filed by a U.S. entity (under Section 1) will only register upon submission to the USPTO of evidence that the mark is in use in U.S. Commerce and if the use evidence is submitted when the application is first filed (i.e. in a use-based application), the application should naturally be ready to register sooner than if the USPTO must wait for the submission of use evidence from the applicant before it can register. So, yes, as Mr. Harvey stated, it is better, faster and less expensive if you can file an application after the mark is in use but that is not always possible and it typically is preferable to have the earliest possible filing date on an application.