Af Form 220: Fill & Download for Free

AF-P is betterJust Like Canon announcing new lens with stepping motor that also compatible with video (silent AF operation) Nikon too announcing silent AF lenses under the AF-P name. That’s all.New AF-P lens designationAF-P is the designation used to distinguish these new lenses from Nikon's existing AF-S models. The full model name is 'AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G' and the only difference between the two new AF-P models is that the cheaper lens does not have Nikon's VR image stabilization system.Both lenses have a retracting mechanism that saves space and bulk when they're not being used. This was first seen on the 18-55mm VR II lens that first appeared with the Nikon D3300. But Nikon's also saved weight and bulk by ditching the AF/MF and VR switches on the lens barrel. Instead, these options are set via a menu on the camera body.Nikon says this is a good thing because it means you won't accidentally change the lens settings through clumsy camera handling, but it could also be interpreted as a bit of cost saving - and it does lead to an additional complication. These controls will be available only on the Nikon D3300, D5300 and D5500 models, and even these may require a firmware update.It's not the first time Nikon has created additional complications by cutting back on physical features - its D3xxx-series and D5xxx-series DSLRs dropped the autofocus drive mechanisms built into the body on other models, so you are restricted to lenses with autofocus motors built in. Most modern lenses do have AF motors, but some older and still useful lenses don't.The new lenses are made for Nikon's DX format cameras and priced pretty keenly, though most users are likely to get them as part of a kit.The AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G (non-VR) weighs 195g and will cost £149.99 (about US$220). The AF-P DX NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR weighs 205g and will cost £199.99 (about US$293).

The Sukhoi Su-30MKI is a twinjet multirole air superiority fighter developed by Russia’s Sukhoi and built under licence by India’s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) for the Indian Air Force (IAF). A variant of the Sukhoi Su-30, it is a heavy, all-weather, long-range fighter.TWIN JET:It has two engines. Why two engines? It can fly and land on a single engine also but for safety reasons, in case one fails, two are used. Why not more than two?Because more engines will have more fuel consumption. So two meets the safety requirement and is also fuel efficient.MULTI-ROLE:It means that in addition to air-to-air combat, it can be used in other missions also. This includes air reconnaissance, forward air control, close air support, electric warfare etc. Popularly known as MRCA (Multi-Role Combat Aircraft)AIR SUPERIORITY FIGHTER:It is a type of fighter aircraft designed for entering and seizing control of enemy airspace as a means of establishing complete dominance over the enemy’s air force (air supremacy). Air superiority fighters are designed primarily to effectively engage enemy fighters, more than other types of aircraft, although some may have a secondary role for air-to-ground strikes.Development of the variant started after India signed a deal with Russia in 2000 to manufacture 140 Su-30 fighter jets. The first Russian-made Su-30MKI variant was accepted into the Indian Air Force in 2002, while the first indigenously assembled Su-30MKI entered service with the IAF in 2004. The IAF had 240 Su-30MKIs in service as of October 2017. The Su-30MKI is expected to form the backbone of the Indian Air Force’s fighter fleet to 2020 and beyond.It has abilities similar to the Sukhoi Su-35 with which it shares many features and components.The Su-30MKI has a range of 3,000 km with internal fuel which ensures a 3.75-hour combat mission. Also, it has an in-flight refuelling (IFR) probe that retracts beside the cockpit during normal operation. The air refuelling system increases the flight duration up to 10 hours with a range of 8,000 km at a cruise height of 11 to 13 km. Su-30MKIs can also use the Cobham 754 buddy refuelling pods.The Sukhoi Su-30MKI is the most potent fighter jet in service with the Indian Air Force in the late 2000s. The MKIs are often fielded by the IAF in bilateral and multilateral air exercises.Typhoon with SU 30 MKIIndian Air Force bases with Su-30MKIsSee also: List of Indian Air Force stationsBareilly AFS: 15 Wing – No. 8 Squadron IAF Eight Pursuits (since mid-2007) & No. 24 Squadron IAF Hunting HawksBhatinda AFS: 34 Wing – No. 17 Squadron IAF Golden Arrows (since June 2012)Chabua AFS: 14 Wing – No. 102 Squadron IAF Trisonics (since 8 March 2011)Halwara AFS: 34 Wing – No. 220 Squadron IAF Desert Tigers (since 25 September 2012) & No. 221 Squadron IAF Valiants (since 24 April 2017)Jodhpur AFS: 32 Wing – No. 31 Squadron IAF Lions (since 1 October 2011)Lohegaon AFS: 2 Wing – No. 20 Squadron IAF Lightning (since 27 September 2002) and No. 30 Squadron IAF Rhinos (since 21 March 2005)Bhuj AFS:27 Wing – No. 15 Squadron IAF Flying Lancers.Tezpur AFS: 11 Wing – No. 2 Squadron IAFWinged Arrows (since 15 June 2009)Maharajpur AFS: 40 Wing – TACDE (since October 2010)Sulur AFS to get Su-30MKI aircraft in 2016.Thanjavur AFS to host a squadron of 16–18 Su-30MKIs beginning in 2017.

Which serious Calisthenics athlete “claimed” this? It’s like asking if any powerlifter can preform heavy weighted pull ups, dips or muscle ups all the time.Not just for accessory work, but like this guy: He’s a heavy weight Calisthenics athlete preforming failure sets of (220 lb added) weighted pull ups. Most powerlifter are not that strong at pull ups or needs to be.*I’m tired of seeing Chris Heria everywhere. Here’s a real calisthenics beast:110 lb plated muscle ups. “I thought you had to be light to do muscle ups?” Nope strong af.Find me a powerlifter who puts 330 lbs into a belt and dips it twice.Or this: The same 200+ pound guy holding a straddle planche.And yes. Vitaliy does leg day, even as a calisthenics monster.Or as ridiculous as asking a powerlifter if they can do advanced calisthenics/gymnastics movements such as the planche or Victorian cross.They can’t and there’s nothing wrong with that. This is because Power-lifters train for absolute strength in the big 3 lifts, while Calisthenics athletes, street lifters and gymnasts focus on relative strength and certain calisthenics skills. The radical difference also exists in the fact that powerlifters train open chain movements a lot more, while calisthenics in all forms (even weighted) remains closed chain in its mechanics. Though the exception is deadlifts and squats (arguably closed chain.)Both types of athletes are equally respectable and will excel at the one thing that they train the most. And maybe even above average at multiple forms of training.One of the reasons why the most advanced strength athletes do not over-diversify their training, is specificity. It’s a waste of time for a gymnast to develop a heavy squat for example and in reverse, it’s detrimental to a powerlifter to develop planche strength. So you are obviously going to put all your energy into your goals, otherwise you’ll never achieve them at a high level and you risk unnecessary injuries.For ex it all comes down to strength adaptations from a specific type of training and possible physical barriers, such as limb lengths. Not all people are born with the right leverages for a heavy bench or a heavy deadlift. Being able to deadlift heavy does not necessarily equal a super heavy weighted pull up. It’s all apples and oranges.And in order to get good at any form of strength training, you have to master compound movements specific to that training. The Powerlifter doesn’t care about strength endurance. He/she wants the best 1 rep max within their weight class.So in conclusion, no calisthenics athlete is really beating an elite powerlifter in the big 3 lifts. The reverse remains true too. A powerlifter is likely not going to excel outside of powerlifting without the proper training. You can’t be “elite” at everything.Both are really tough. Through the training, you chose what you want to be an absolute beast at.Edit: Before you try to call me out for bias, I have met a 5′11ish 220 lb powerlifter who has benched 550, squatted 730 and deadlifted like 750. I know how freakishly strong powerlifters can be, even relative to their body weight.And even in that case, he was never able to be at his strongest for all 3 lifts at the same time. It came down to which of the 3 big lifts he prioritized in training. His highest total at a given time was 1,989 lbs and all time highest of all 3 lift pr’s combined, is approx 2,050 lbs. He just about capped his natural genetic limit.