Af Form 1975: Fill & Download for Free

Ok - this is Krab:Firing range: above 40kmThis is old Grad:Firing range: above 20km. Yes, this is basically improved katyusha - do you know how demoralizing was katyusha fire in WWII?And this is modern LangustaFiring range: 20–70km, depending on rocket.No early war mobile artillery could offer similar firing range.Neither number of troops, nor number of tanks is important if your enemy can take out your forces from such distances. German losses in first days of war would be tremendous, morale ruined. No real need for tanks.You may say - hey, Luftwaffe has so many aircraft, they’ll bomb them out!This is ZSU-23, still used and modernized:They used to operate in pairs and they are proven to be effective weapon, especially if you think about how slow were early war aircrafts. They are modernized, but even in basic configuration it’s very doubtful that any divebomber could come close to artillery, tanks or infantry carriers. And if that’s not enough this is GROM:Firing range: 5.5km; altitude up to 3.5km,But what about heavier bombers, flying above these altitudes?Polish AF has 28 MiG-29 and 48 F-16. This gives you far more than 100 Luftwaffe planes shot down, if every jet does only 1 flight and some missiles won’t work. Do I have to mention that all kills would be made BVR, no jet would be lost and most German pilots wouldn’t even know what hit them? After such performance, no more planes would be sent over Polish territory. Moreover, Germans wouldn’t have any way to attack these planes airfields - simply no way to counter this advantage.Oh and did I mention why Polish army (and most modern armies) is so small?Average German soldier had 16 weeks of basic training and conscription took 1–2 years. It was very modern army by the standards of 30’s.Polish army in 2018 was 110.000 soldiers strong. But for every each of them being a soldier is a full-time job. By the way, i think that Bundeswehr nowadays is even smaller then a Polish army. Actually, I don’t think that even US troops could outnumber German-Nazi. But again - that’s not how you win a war nowadays.Short answer: no WW2 army could win against any middle-size country with even cold-war era equipment. Technological gap between even 1945 and let’s say 1975 is too great.

A RoV AF officer landed a Cessna onto the deck of the USS Midway to escape the fall of Saigon. …Republic of Vietnam Air Force Major Buang-Ly loaded his wife and five children into a two-seat Cessna O-1 Bird Dog. After overflying the carrier and with only 1 hour of fuel remaining, he dropped a note explaining he had women and children aboard and asked the deck be cleared. The Ship’s CO ordered over $10 million in south Vietnamese aircraft pushed into the sea to clear he deck to the pilot could save his wife and children.A second plane of the same type also landed that afternoon on Midway.many ships of the rescue flotilla were throwing Vietnamese aircraft over the side to make room.Also because some people dont realize it.Saigon fell during the 1975 offensive, almost 3 years after the US military withdrew from combat operations (although some clandestine stuff did continue military operation had ceased), As President Nixon thought it would, Operation Linebacker and Linebacker II had driven the NV to sign a peace accord in Paris and US forces were withdrawn before 1973.When, 2 years later NV again invaded SV, which everyone knew they’d do once a new crop of soldiers had grown up the USA was supposed to, by treaty obligation, come to the aid of SV again.During the intervening years, Congress had passed laws which seriously curtailed the President’s ability to again militarily aid SV… Without help SV fell to the communist onslaught….The US sent ships specifically for the humanitarian purpose of refugees and to withdraw remaining State department and clandestine forces or other Americans who elected to remain behind ( pastors, businessmen, etc).About 10,000 Vietnamese were saved from certain capture and murder be US Navy efforts.

I would say the main reason was drug abuse. The officiel story is that he stopped using heroin in 1969. I believe Lennon had several fallbacks - i.e. when he returned to The Dakota in 1975 - the second heroin honeymoon.By the way, many authors and analysts have claimed, that Yoko Ono never got off heroin. Once a junkie, always a junkie.In 1980, Lennon might have straighten up (I think he did quite a few times during his five-years break), still smoking af lot of thaisticks and according to Fred Seaman, doing a bit of magic mushrooms though. But then, more than ten years on and off heroin just doesn´t do anything good to your body. Look at the pictures from 1980, he´s looking 15 years older than Paul McCartney did.I know this version of the story isn’t popular. Most fans believe in the official story, and you all have my full respect, though everybody ought to know, that Saint John wasn´t perfect in any way. He seemed to be a very honest man, especially because of the Rolling Stone interview from 1970, but many of those who was close to him in the 1960´s seems to have their own oppinion about that.Thank You (and forgive me, loosing my religion!)