Layperson Nom.: Fill & Download for Free

As Denis Masse explained, there is the « enterrement de vie de garçon/de jeune fille » for both fiancés.For the fiancé :Et c’est parti pour le Rouge et OrUn premier «tailgate» de la saison marqué par un enterrement de vie de garçonFor the fiancée :Both may imply going “for the last time” to some nude dancers (yes there are also some for women : the famous 281 for example). The point is to “bury” things that are associated to bachelorhood.Both may imply making the fiancé(e) do something a little humiliating, but it seems more common on the male side.Both may imply to drink a lot.However it seems the trend has been to less intense events (less humiliating, less drinking) and more doing activities outdoors : surf, renting a chalet (cottage), throwing axes, going to various bars, going to the SkyVenture (levitation trough wind tunnels), etc. While typically these events were supposed to not have the other sex attend them, there is a trend to not do that anymore.Que reste-t-il de l'enterrement de vie de garçon ? - La Presse+Something that may differ from elsewhere is that in the Québec Civil Code, it’s not required to duplicate marriages if you want a religious one : the religious one would be valid for the State as well, so no two marriages at the church + the city hall like in several countries (+ a third customary one like in Africa). It’s also possible to appoint a person of your choice as a célébrant to celebrate the marriage, it does not have to be a priest or a mayor.Example of a layperson célébrant :This is a guide for the célébrant(e) :http://www.etatcivil.gouv.qc.ca/publications/Guide_celebrant.pdfThe ceremony has some requirements to be valid :There must be two witnesses.The célébrant(e) has to read some articles of the Québec Civil Code, when it’s not a religious ceremony. In the case of a marriage (as opposed to a civil union) :« __________(nom de l’époux)__________ voulez-vous prendre __________(nom de l’épouse)__________ qui est ici présente, pour épouse?Répondez: «Oui, je le veux».»Le futur époux déclare: «Oui, je le veux».«__________(nom de l’épouse)__________ voulez-vous prendre __________(nom de l’époux)__________ qui est ici présent, pour époux?Répondez: «Oui, je le veux».»La future épouse déclare: «Oui, je le veux».Les époux se donnent alors la main et le célébrant prononce les paroles suivantes:«En vertu des pouvoirs qui me sont conférés par la loi, vous __________(nom de l’époux)__________ et vous __________(nom de l’épouse)__________ je vous déclare maintenant unis par les liens du mariage.».Les époux procèdent alors à l’échange des anneaux. Le célébrant peut ensuite s’adresser en ces termes aux nouveaux époux:«Vous voilà donc mariés suivant la loi. Je vous offre, madame et monsieur, au nom de toutes les personnes présentes et en mon nom personnel, nos meilleurs vœux de bonheur. »Gay marriage is also legal in Québec. It’s not limited to the civil union.

I feel like, if you did quantify differences in terms of opposites, then most languages would be average, and you will wind up with around 1,000 languages out of 7,000 that are on the fringes in terms of having lots of typologically rare things.I speculate that delving into this would yield lots, probably dozens, of different languages which are almost opposite from one another. There might be six, ten, or twenty that are as different from another as is possible, but I suspect there wouldn’t be exactly two and then we can poke them and say:‘Aha! These are the two that will surely mind-blow a layperson! Here read this as a factoid!’Just off the top of my head though, I can think of two languages I studied a bit of that are so far apart, that I would be extremely surprised if they were not one of those languages that were typological near-opposites in syntax and morphology; in phonology they are a lot closer:Japanese and Tagalog.Japanese is a heavily nominative-accusative language, almost extreme in how little ergativity it has, with almost no experiencer-focused verbs. Japanese is rare insofar as it lacks a distinction between see and look.Japanese is subject-object-verb, and extremely suffix heavy. It is fairly easy to argue that Japanese has nominal case, and Japanese obviously has lots of tenses but all of these are marked with suffixes.Tagalog has a syntactic alignment called the Austronesian alignment, and at least has lots of ergative things going on. Some reputable syntacticians (e.g., Edith Aldridge) believe Tagalog is almost fully ergative, and all instances on nominative-accusative are just the antipassive voice. I disagree that it is near fully ergative (I go a bit into that here: Brian Collins' answer to What is the most spoken Ergative-Absolutive language?), but it is obviously fairly ergative.Unlike Japanese, Tagalog not only thus has a distinction between see and look, but between makagat (bite), kumagat (bite), and kinagat (bite).If a your dog bites you, and you do not think it was intentional, then you would use makagat. If a dog bit you, and you wanted to emphasise the dog, you would use kumagat and the unmarked would be kinagat (with the dog being marked in the ergative with the determiner ng, and the thing being bitten marked in the absolutive with the determiner ang)So basically, Tagalog has experiencer verbs which are productive, not just different lexemes like see and look in English but most transitive verbs.As you might have gleaned from the morphology of kagat above, Tagalog, unlike Japanese, is not suffix heavy. Tagalog has about 30 verbal prefixes, a few infixes, and only two suffixes. Tagalog is the exact opposite of suffix heavy.Both Japanese and Tagalog arguably have a case system, but in Tagalog, like in German, cases are primarily expressed on determiners.ang asothe-ABS dogng asothe-ERG dogsa asothe-OBL dogIn German: der Hund (nom), den Hund (acc), dem Hund (dat), des Hundes (gen); you can see the cases are primarily expressed on the articles, rather than the nouns, like in Tagalog.The pronoun system of Tagalog corresponds to this analysis fairly well:siyaS/he (absolutive)niyaS/he (ergative)kaniyas/he (oblique)Japanese has no determiners at all, while Tagalog (and German interestingly) use them for names too. Tagalog has a set of determiners specifically used for names.The determiner si is for absolutives, and ni is for ergatives.If Pedro wants noodles then:Gusto ni Pedro ang pansitlike DET(ERG) Pedro the-ABS noodles.If the dog bit Pedro intentionally:Kinagat ng aso si Pedro.bite ERG dog DET (ABS) Pedro.In terms of the phonology however, Japanese and Tagalog are more similar. Japanese has a fairly large vowel inventory if we count the long-short distinctions, while Tagalog has a small to average one, but they both have almost the same consonants.

The blockchain is an obviously astute development – the brainchild of a man or gathering of individuals known by the nom de plume, Nakamoto. In any case, from that point forward, it has advanced into something more noteworthy, and the principle question everyone is asking is: What is Blockchain?By enabling computerized data to be circulated yet not duplicated, blockchain innovation made the foundation of another sort of web. Initially contrived for the advanced money, Bitcoin, (Buy Bitcoin) the tech network is presently finding other potential uses for the innovation.Bitcoin has been designated "advanced gold," and for a valid justification. To date, the aggregate estimation of the money is near $9 billion US. What's more, blockchains can make different sorts of advanced esteem. Like the web (or your auto), you don't have to know how the blockchain attempts to utilize it. In any case, having an essential learning of this new innovation demonstrates why it's viewed as progressive. Along these lines, we trust you appreciate this, What Is Blockchain Guide. What's more, on the off chance that you definitely realize what blockchain is and need to end up a blockchain engineer (2018 – at present popular!) if you don't mind look at our top to bottom blockchain instructional exercise and make your first blockchain.