Kentucky School District Transportation: Fill & Download for Free

GET FORM

Download the form

How to Edit and draw up Kentucky School District Transportation Online

Read the following instructions to use CocoDoc to start editing and writing your Kentucky School District Transportation:

  • First of all, look for the “Get Form” button and press it.
  • Wait until Kentucky School District Transportation is ready.
  • Customize your document by using the toolbar on the top.
  • Download your finished form and share it as you needed.
Get Form

Download the form

The Easiest Editing Tool for Modifying Kentucky School District Transportation on Your Way

Open Your Kentucky School District Transportation Immediately

Get Form

Download the form

How to Edit Your PDF Kentucky School District Transportation Online

Editing your form online is quite effortless. No need to download any software through your computer or phone to use this feature. CocoDoc offers an easy tool to edit your document directly through any web browser you use. The entire interface is well-organized.

Follow the step-by-step guide below to eidt your PDF files online:

  • Browse CocoDoc official website on your laptop where you have your file.
  • Seek the ‘Edit PDF Online’ button and press it.
  • Then you will open this tool page. Just drag and drop the file, or select the file through the ‘Choose File’ option.
  • Once the document is uploaded, you can edit it using the toolbar as you needed.
  • When the modification is completed, click on the ‘Download’ option to save the file.

How to Edit Kentucky School District Transportation on Windows

Windows is the most conventional operating system. However, Windows does not contain any default application that can directly edit form. In this case, you can download CocoDoc's desktop software for Windows, which can help you to work on documents productively.

All you have to do is follow the steps below:

  • Install CocoDoc software from your Windows Store.
  • Open the software and then attach your PDF document.
  • You can also attach the PDF file from OneDrive.
  • After that, edit the document as you needed by using the a wide range of tools on the top.
  • Once done, you can now save the finished document to your device. You can also check more details about editing PDF documents.

How to Edit Kentucky School District Transportation on Mac

macOS comes with a default feature - Preview, to open PDF files. Although Mac users can view PDF files and even mark text on it, it does not support editing. With the Help of CocoDoc, you can edit your document on Mac easily.

Follow the effortless steps below to start editing:

  • To get started, install CocoDoc desktop app on your Mac computer.
  • Then, attach your PDF file through the app.
  • You can upload the form from any cloud storage, such as Dropbox, Google Drive, or OneDrive.
  • Edit, fill and sign your template by utilizing this CocoDoc tool.
  • Lastly, download the form to save it on your device.

How to Edit PDF Kentucky School District Transportation via G Suite

G Suite is a conventional Google's suite of intelligent apps, which is designed to make your work faster and increase collaboration within teams. Integrating CocoDoc's PDF file editor with G Suite can help to accomplish work handily.

Here are the steps to do it:

  • Open Google WorkPlace Marketplace on your laptop.
  • Look for CocoDoc PDF Editor and install the add-on.
  • Upload the form that you want to edit and find CocoDoc PDF Editor by selecting "Open with" in Drive.
  • Edit and sign your template using the toolbar.
  • Save the finished PDF file on your computer.

PDF Editor FAQ

Other than the Confederacy, has there ever been a multi-state regional compact much less two planning, operating, and working *contrary* independently of the federal government's direction?

After scratching my head, I thought about the Articles of Confederation…nah… then checked wiki found this:Operating agencies created by interstate compactEditAtlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission(Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida)[1]Bear River Commission (Idaho, Utah and Wyoming)Bi-State Development Agency (Missouri and Illinois)Breaks Interstate Park Commission (Kentucky and Virginia)[2]Colorado River Compact (Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, Nevada, Arizona, and California)[3]Columbia River Gorge Commission (Oregonand Washington)Connecticut River Valley Flood Control Commission (Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont)[4]Delaware River Basin Commission(Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey, and New York)[5]Delaware River Port Authority (Pennsylvaniaand New Jersey)[6]Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission(Pennsylvania and New Jersey)Delaware River and Bay Authority (Delawareand New Jersey)Dresden School District (New Hampshire, Vermont)Driver License Compact (all states except Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Tennessee, and Wisconsin)Education Commission of the States (all states (except Washington), three territories, and Washington, D.C.)[7]Emergency Management Assistance Compact (all states, plus Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands)Great Lakes Commission (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, plus Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec as associate members)Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission(Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas)Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision (all states, two territories, and Washington, D.C.)[8]Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin (Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and District of Columbia)[9]Interstate Environmental Commission(Connecticut, New Jersey and New York) [10]Interstate Oil and Gas Compact CommissionInterstate Wildlife Violator Compact (all states except Hawaii and Massachusetts)Kansas City Area Transportation Authority(Kansas and Missouri)Midwest Interstate Passenger Rail Commission (Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Wisconsin)[11]Multistate Tax Commission (all states (except Delaware, Nevada, and Virginia)Northwest Power and Conservation Council(Oregon, Washington, Montana, and Idaho[12])Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission(California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Alaska)Palisades Interstate Park Commission (New York and New Jersey)Port Authority of New York and New Jersey(New Jersey and New York)[13]Red River Compact Commission (Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas)[14]Rivendell Interstate School District (New Hampshire, Vermont)Susquehanna River Basin Commission(Pennsylvania, New York, and Maryland)Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (Californiaand Nevada)[15]Virginia-North Carolina High Speed Rail Compact (North Carolina and Virginia)[16]Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.)[17]Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission (Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.)[18]Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor(New Jersey and New York)[19]

What percentage of cases heard by the Supreme Court involve First Amendment issues? I'm looking for a rough number that could fairly accurately describe the focus on the Court since the 1940s or so.

I do not know what percentage the First Amendment issues account for. I imagine that there are cases that involve First Amendment issues but also other issues that are not cataloged as First Amendment. According to Wikipedia, the following are First Amendment cases, arranged by topic (about 5 of them are pre 1940, two are 1939 and one from 1936, which I think counts as “or so”):The establishment of religion[edit]Standing to sue[edit]Flast v. Cohen (1968)Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State (1982)Tax exemption to religious institutions[edit]Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York (1970)Bob Jones University v. United States (1983)Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock (1989)Legislative chaplains[edit]Marsh v. Chambers (1984)Town of Greece v. Galloway (2014)Government-sponsored religious displays[edit]Lynch v. Donnelly (1984)Board of Trustees of Scarsdale v. McCreary (1985)County of Allegheny v. ACLU Greater Pittsburgh Chapter (1989)McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky (2005)Van Orden v. Perry (2005)Pleasant Grove City v. Summum (2009)Religion in public education[edit]McCollum v. Board of Education (1948)Zorach v. Clauson (1952)Engel v. Vitale (1962)Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)Stone v. Graham (1980)Rosenberger v. University of Virginia (1995)Agostini v. Felton (1997)Mitchell v. Helms (2000)Prayer in public schools[edit]Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)Lee v. Weisman (1992)Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe (2000)Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow (2004)Teaching of creationism in public schools[edit]Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)Governmental aid to church-related schools[edit]Cochran v. Louisiana State Board of Education (1930)Everson v. Board of Education (1947)Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)Board of Education v. Allen (1968)Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)Tilton v. Richardson (1971)Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist (1973)Meek v. Pittenger (1975)Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland (1976)Wolman v. Walter (1977)Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Regan (1980)Mueller v. Allen (1983)Aguilar v. Felton (1985)Grand Rapids School District v. Ball (1985)Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District (1993)Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn (2011)Blue laws[edit]Main article: Blue laws in the United StatesMcGowan v. Maryland (1961)Braunfeld v. Brown (1961)Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Mass., Inc. (1961)Thornton v. Caldor (1985)Religious institution functioning as a government agency[edit]Larkin v. Grendel’s Den (1982)Bowen v. Kendrick (1988)Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School v. Grumet (1994)Unequal government treatment of religious groups[edit]Larson v. Valente (1982)The free exercise of religion[edit]Polygamy[edit]Main article: List of polygamy court casesReynolds v. United States (1878)Davis v. Beason (1890)Religion and the right to work[edit]Sherbert v. Verner (1963)Trans World Airlines v. Hardison (1977)Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools (1986)Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos (1987)Employment Division v. Smith (1990)Religious tests for public service or benefits[edit]Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)Torcaso v. Watkins (1961)McDaniel v. Paty (1978)Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division (1981)Goldman v. Weinberger (1986)Bowen v. Roy (1986)Free exercise and free speech[edit]R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)Good News Club v. Milford Central School (2001)Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal (2006)Free exercise and public education[edit]Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)Widmar v. Vincent (1981)Board of Education of the Westside Community Schools v. Mergens (1990)Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District (1993)Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (1995)Free Exercise and public property[edit]Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette (1995)Solicitation by religious groups[edit]Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)Cox v. New Hampshire (1941)Jones v. City of Opelika (I) (1942)Marsh v. Alabama (1942)Murdock v. Pennsylvania (1943)Jones v. City of Opelika (II) (1943)West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)Prince v. Massachusetts (1944)Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness (1981)Free exercise and eminent domain[edit]Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association (1988)City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)Ritual sacrifice of animals[edit]Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (1993)Government intervention in church controversies[edit]United States v. Ballard (1944)Kedroff v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral (1952)Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church (1969)Jones v. Wolf (1979)Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2012)Freedom of speech[edit]Freedom of speech portalSedition and imminent danger[edit]Debs v. United States (1919)Schenck v. United States (1919)Abrams v. United States (1919)Gitlow v. New York (1925)Whitney v. California (1927)Dennis v. United States (1951)Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board (1955)Yates v. United States (1957)Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)False speech[edit]United States v. Alvarez (2012)Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (2014)Fighting words and the heckler's veto[edit]Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)Terminiello v. Chicago (1949)Feiner v. New York (1951)National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie (1977)R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)Snyder v. Phelps (2011)Freedom of assembly and public forums[edit]Hague v. CIO (1939)Schneider v. New Jersey (1939)Martin v. Struthers (1943)NAACP v. Alabama (1958)Edwards v. South Carolina (1963)Cox v. Louisiana (1965)Brown v. Louisiana (1966)Adderley v. Florida (1966)Carroll v. Princess Anne (1968)Coates v. Cincinnati (1971)Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe (1971)Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad (1975)Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins (1980)Christian Legal Society v. Martinez (2010)Time, place and manner[edit]Cases concerning restrictions on the time, place, and manner of speechChicago Police Dept. v. Mosley (1972)Grayned v. City of Rockford (1972)Ward v. Rock Against Racism (1989)Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York (1997)Hill v. Colorado (2000)McCullen v. Coakley (2014)Symbolic speech[edit]United States v. O'Brien (1968)Cohen v. California (1971)Texas v. Johnson (1989)United States v. Eichman (1990)City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. (2000)Virginia v. Black (2003)Compelled speech[edit]Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)Wooley v. Maynard (1977)Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society (2013)Compelled subsidy for speech of others[edit]Cases that consider the First Amendment implications of payments mandated by the state going to use in part for speech by third partiesAbood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977)Communications Workers of America v. Beck (1978)Chicago Local Teachers Union v. Hudson (1986)Keller v. State Bar of California (1990)Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Ass'n (1991)Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliott Inc. (1997)Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth (2000)United States v. United Foods, Inc. (2001)Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Association (2005)Davenport v. Washington Education Association (2007)Locke v. Karass (2008)Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (2012)Harris v. Quinn (2014)Friedrichs v. California Teachers Ass'n (2016)Janus v. AFSCME (2018)Loyalty oaths and affirmations[edit]American Communications Association v. Douds (1950)Garner v. Board of Public Works, (1951)Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New York, (1952)Wieman v. Updegraff, (1952)Speiser v. Randall, (1958)Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction, (1961)Keyishian v. Board of Regents, (1965)Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb, (1974)School speech[edit]Speech by students in public secondary schools (for cases involving teachers' free-speech rights, see Public employees, below).Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)Board of Education v. Pico (1982)Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986)Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)Poling v. Murphy(1989)Guiles v. Marineau (2006)Morse v. Frederick (2007)Obscenity[edit]Generally[edit]Cases concerned with the definition of obscenity and whether a particular work or type of material is obscene.Roth v. United States (1957)Alberts v. California, (1957)One, Inc. v. Olesen, (1958)MANual Enterprises v. Day, (1962)Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964)Memoirs v. Massachusetts, (1966)Kois v. Wisconsin (1972)Miller v. California (1973)Jenkins v. Georgia (1974)New York v. Ferber (1982)Osborne v. Ohio (1990)United States v. Stevens (2010)As criminal offense[edit]Appeals of criminal convictions for possessing, selling or distributing obscenity that focused on that issueRosen v. United States (1896)Butler v. Michigan (1957)Smith v. California, (1959)Ginzburg v. United States, (1966)Mishkin v. New York, (1966)Redrup v. New York (1967)Ginsberg v. New York (1968)Stanley v. Georgia (1969)Blount v. Rizzi (1971)United States v. Reidel (1971)Heller v. New York (1973)United States v. Orito (1973)Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville (1975)United States v. X-Citement Video (1994)Search, seizure and forfeiture[edit]Cases involving the search and seizure of allegedly obscene materialMarcus v. Search Warrant, (1961)Quantity of Books v. Kansas (1964)Lee Art Theatre, Inc. v. Virginia (1968)United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs (1971)United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film (1973)Roaden v. Kentucky (1973)Lo-Ji Sales, Inc., v. New York (1979)Maryland v. Macon (1985)New York v. P.J. Video, Inc. (1986)Civil and administrative regulation[edit]Cases dealing with civil and administrative regulatory procedures aimed at suppressing or restricting obscenity, such as film-licensing boards or zoning regulations.Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (1915)Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (1952)Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown (1957)Kingsley Int'l Pictures Corp. v. Regents of Univ. of N. Y. (1959)Times Film Corp. v. Chicago (1961)Bantam Books v. Sullivan (1963)Freedman v. Maryland (1965)Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (1973)Young v. American Mini Theatres (1976)Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. (1986)United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group (2000)Internet[edit]Cases involving laws meant to restrict obscenity onlineReno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997)Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union (2002)Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002)Government-funded speech[edit]Cases about restrictions on speech by third parties funded by the government.Rust v. Sullivan (1991)Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez (2001)Speech by public employees[edit]Pickering v. Board of Education (1968)Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth (1972)Perry v. Sindermann (1972)Madison School District v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (1976)Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle (1977)Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District (1979)Snepp v. United States (1980)Connick v. Myers (1983)Rankin v. McPherson (1987)Waters v. Churchill (1994)United States v. National Treasury Employees Union (1995)Board of Commissioners, Wabaunsee County v. Umbehr, (1996)San Diego v. Roe (2004)Garcetti v. Ceballos (2007)Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (2011)Lane v. Franks (2014)Heffernan v. City of Paterson (2016)Political activity and Hatch Act of 1939[edit]Ex parte Curtis (1882)United Public Workers v. Mitchell (1947)United States Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers (1973)Broadrick v. Oklahoma (1973)Elrod v. Burns (1976)Branti v. Finkel (1979)Commercial speech[edit]Valentine v. Chrestensen (1942)Rowan v. U.S. Post Office Dept. (1970)Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations (1973)Lehman v. Shaker Heights (1974)Bigelow v. Commonwealth of Virginia (1974)Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council (1976)Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977)Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Willingboro (1977)Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn. (1978)Friedman v. Rogers (1979)Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission (1980)Consol. Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n (1980)Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (1982)Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp. (1983)Edenfield v. Fane (1993)44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island (1996)Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman (2017)Official retaliation[edit]Cases where it has been alleged government officials retaliated for protected speechLozman v. City of Riviera Beach (2018)Nieves v. Bartlett (2019)Freedom of the press[edit]Prior restraints and censorship[edit]Near v. Minnesota (1931)Lovell v. City of Griffin (1938)Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo (1974)Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart (1976)Houchins v. KQED, Inc. (1978)Tory v. Cochran (2005)Privacy[edit]Time, Inc. v. Hill (1967)Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn (1975)Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia (1980)[1][2]Florida Star v. B. J. F. (1989)Wilson v. Layne (1999)Taxation and privileges[edit]Grosjean v. American Press Co. (1936)Branzburg v. Hayes (1972)Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner (1983)Defamation[edit]Beauharnais v. Illinois (1952)New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)Garrison v. Louisiana (1964)Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts (1967)Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974)Time, Inc. v. Firestone (1976)Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. (1981)Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. (1985)McDonald v. Smith (1985)Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988)Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. (1990)Hoeper v. Air Wisconsin (2014)Broadcast media[edit]Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC (1968)CBS v. Democratic National Committee (1973)FCC v. League of Women Voters of California (1984)FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (1989)Turner Broadcasting v. FCC (1995)Government speech[edit]Cases pertaining to whether or not extending protections to speech constitutes government endorsement of speech.Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans (2015)Matal v. Tam (2017)Freedom of association[edit]Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath (1951)Watkins v. United States (1957)Sweezy v. New Hampshire (1957)NAACP v. Alabama (1958)Shelton v. Tucker (1960)Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee (1963)Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund (1975)Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977)In re Primus (1978)Roberts v. United States Jaycees (1984)Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995)Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)Right to petition[edit]United States v. Cruikshank (1876)Thomas v. Collins (1945)Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. (1961)NAACP v. Button (1963)Edwards v. South Carolina (1963)United Mine Workers v. Pennington (1965)Cox v. Louisiana (1965)California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited (1972)Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees (1979)McDonald v. Smith (1985)Meyer v. Grant (1988)Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation (1999)BE and K Construction Co. V. National Labor Relations Board (2002)Doe v. Reed (2010)Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (2011)

What is advantages / disadvantages when considering to move to any of these 3 states: Oregon, Washington, Texas? (Hawaii resident & too darn expensive!

Texas has no state income tax, and housing prices are great compared to Hawai’i, Oregon or Washington cities. In nice suburbs of Dallas, $250,000-$300,000 buys a good quality single family brick house around 2000–2500 square feet and possibly with an in ground pool. Older homes built in the 1980s or earlier cost less than similar ones from the 1990s and later obviously, but you can check sites like Zillow: Real Estate, Apartments, Mortgages & Home Values for comparables.Houses in my current neighborhood were built as custom executive homes in the 1970s, mostly single story at least 2000 square feet and with decent lots allowing for pools, patios and grass along with trees and flower beds. These homes are in a well-rated school district with an award winning elementary walking distance (one to three blocks). These houses were solidly built, have central heat/air, mature trees, two or three car garages and typically sell for $200k-250k, so compared to what one could buy in Hawai’i they are quite inexpensive.We can have a “winter” cold snap in North Texas (which means from the Oklahoma border to south of the Dallas area about two or three hour’s drive which is the transition to the Hill Country which includes Austin. However, our worst winter weather is about every three years when we have an ice storm that causes most things to simply shut down for a couple of days due to the locals freaking out. We can get cold (but dry) in January or early February, but compared to the Pacific Northwest our winter is a joke. Our palm trees and hibiscus survive outside. Further south in Texas like Austin, Houston, San Antonio winter is more mild.I haven't lived in the Northwest, but just studying home prices and cost of living that area appears a lot more expensive than Texas. I don't know your politics, but I will say that Texas as a state still leans Republican although the majors cities are Democratic and have much more diverse populations than the small towns or rural areas. It will be a notable change from Hawai’i.I have traveled across a pretty good swath of the state by car from Wichita Falls area down to Austin and as far east as almost in Louisiana for work (first state then federal jobs). I feel more comfortable traveling alone in Texas than I did driving around rural Missouri, Kansas, Kentucky or Ohio. While Dallas has been a “majority minority” metro area for at least 15 years, my bonus sister who is from O’ahu says it feels uncomfortably less diverse than Hawai’i when she is here, so that's just something to consider if your family might feel culture shock.I think people here are friendly and thoughtful. People hold doors for others and have casual exchanges of pleasantries in Texas. They help stranded motorists, parents struggling with kids and strollers, etc. There are a lot of state parks and other areas with outdoor activities nearly year round unless one is in the Texas Panhandle which has its own more extreme climate.I would suggest looking on TripAdvisor: Read Reviews, Compare Prices & Book for more information on locales. Check out public transportation, average fuel costs and school ratings when comparing cities because as you know, Hawai’i may seem like paradise to many who only visit but the cost of living can be a struggle for residents particularly in the retirement years.

View Our Customer Reviews

I can't say enough about CocoDoc. The intelligence of the product is superior to any electronic signature I've used. It is easy to maneuver through and has helped me immensely this year.

Justin Miller