Employee Information Change Request: Fill & Download for Free

I will completely disregard the Trump portion of your question as it shows an inate political bias and serves no purpose other than to instigate.It's not that anyone ever actually wants a civil war the question should actually be why do people feel this is the only option?Over history, or at least my 40 years of existence I've noticed several justifiable uprisings where the people having protested silently and written letters and begged for help and begged to the government to do their job which we entrust them with, the people go wholly ignored.Think in the abstract sense. If you wanted something done so you communicated in some way written, speech, sign, what have you; and your request goes unheeded, you would attempt to really others to your cause peacefully.Presumably, you would again repeat that process but with larger numbers in an effort to demonstrate that is not only your will but the will of a multitude of others.If after that process, your request goes ignored, you may venture to a place personally to voice your grievances by protesting, picket lines, letter writing, public speeches, media appearances and so on.If that option were to fail you may possibly correspond directly with the individuals that you would wish to see change one particular thing or other.Should that fail you may attempt a meeting by appointment or phone call or what have you.I asked you, should that fail, what options remain?Nobody said a peep when portland, seattle, New York city, San francisco, Los Angeles... Were being looted, and destroyed, including of course the businesses and livelihood of a multitude of private citizens.Why is it then, when apparently those actions which resulted in wanton destruction of multiple individual's personal property infringing upon their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, was nothing done while politicians applauded very publicly?Yet when the people, “the rightful masters of both the courts and Congress" (Abraham Lincoln) take the fight to their doorstep, which is actually constitutionally allowed and referred to as a duty of the people, should there be punishment?If you disobey your boss, you are put on notice. If you disobey again, you are written up. If you disobey again, you are fired. If you are fired and refused to pack up your workspace, and leave; you may very well be removed from the premises by your boss or a lawful authority.this situation regardless of political affiliation or whether or not it is distasteful or a moral affront to certain people is completely irrelevant.While I do not support the klu Klux Klan or their message I do support their right to spread that message, that is to exercise their right to free speech regardless of whether or not it is offensive. I would even go so far as to protect them because constitutional freedoms apply to everyone.Should they actually engage in violence against the people they speak out about, that is an entirely different story as that as person on person violence and not the people securing their rights which government is meant to protect as government is only a steward of the power bestowed upon the people by a higher power.The Constitution and founding documents chain the government. it is not a list of privileges or a mild suggestion it is a legal document. Even if that document were amended, it doesn't matter. It says in the declaration of Independence that men were bestowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights among them are the right to life liberty and happiness...Civil servants are just that. They are no different officially than any employee at any job and are afforded no further protection and are in truth under much more scrutiny because if your boss betrays you you're not allowed to do certain things to them. If you read the Constitution as it's written and read it closely, the same does not apply to government officials.I've heard so much of people's perspective which is just that an opinion or a bias or something they heard or saw or think but yet when presented with facts that challenge their personal opinion they become defensive and engage in character assassination because they feel themselves threatened which of course is not true.To have one's belief system challenged often presents an opportunity for personal growth and you would think that would be a welcome experience.in the realm of psychology we call this cognitive dissonance. That is, somebody with a bias believes something and even when presented with evidence to the contrary will not concede that it was an opinion and accept factual evidence.this seems to be the case over the past few weeks but in the interest of full disclosure I will say that I do not support either party and never have as in my 40 years somebody is always upset when those in service of the people should be doing the best they can to please everyone within the authority we give them. if somebody is of the opinion they don't like guns for example then that elected official should by rights tell them that is your right not to like guns but I do not have the right to tell others that they cannot have guns.It really and truly is just that simple.No one in their right mind, wants a war, ANY war, for any reason including military officers. It would be far easier to resolve conflict through peaceful means although that is not human nature that also raises the question what do you do when a peaceful approach or multiple peaceful approaches fail?TL;DRA peaceful, calm, rational approach to a given problem; is always the preferred solution. But what is one to do, when peace is given a chance and fails?