Supplemental Name Report: Fill & Download for Free

The baby, if unnamed, with have all the documents labelled “Baby <last name>”.To actually name the baby later requires filing “Supplemental Name Report” form obtained from the Department of Public Health. The completed form must be sent directly to the Birth Registry.If it takes you more than a year, then there is an additional charge; at less than a year, filing the form is free.Note that changing a baby’s name after it has been named is not free.

Well they specify in their report, about a Dr. Ravi Kumar, who apparently is a celebrity doctor in AIIMS, who researched an African fruit and extracted its essence in pills.First of all, I can write a better fan fiction. Second of all, there is no Dr. Ravi Kumar. You can search. It's a generic template name.Natural “Hair Regrowth Solution” Shocks Indian DoctorsI tried to comment on their page , it ended up to an error 405: Not Allowed message.

“Niche Transgender Ideology” is a newspaper headline.Pursuing Google down the rabbit hole, I haven’t found any indication that the term goes any deeper than that. It’s a very “niche” term! :D'Niche' transgender ideology 'corrosive' to society, says reportThe Telegraph UK - Camilla Tominey · June 30, 2020Study by Civitas think tank claims state has been too willing to “coalesce behind the demands of a tiny transgender community” Transgender ideology is leaving a “corrosive impact" on society, according to a new study calling for the scrapping of gender recognition reforms. …Okay, weird. “Corrosive” is rather melodramatic!As you’ll see below, “niche” more correctly describes the author of the study, rather than the transgender people she opposes. Transgender people are no longer “niche”, which is part of the whole point in having transgender rights.A “niche” is an uncomfortable place to live, if we’re not allowed out.This article is about trying to push transgender people back into a “niche”, and is the product of a reactionary branch of feminism, called “gender critical feminism”, which is allied to social conservative and Christian Right organisations.The “corrosive ideology” that the article complains about, is simply the existence of transgender people in public, whereas this “gender critical feminism” really is an ideology.IDEOLOGY | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionaryideology /ˌaɪ.diˈɒl.ə.dʒi/ nouna set of beliefs or principles, especially one on which a political system, party, or organization is basedTransgender people are not a “party” or “organization”. We’re not a “political system”; we’re not an “ideology”; we’re simply people, and we have all sorts of different beliefs.First step to understanding anything weird in the news, is to evaluate sources.The publisher of this headline, The Telegraph UK is known colloquially as “The Torygraph”. It’s the same right-wing conservative newspaper that brought us these beauties:Promoting pro-Kremlin articles supplied by a Russian state-funded publication, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, and a pro-Beijing China controlled supplement named (ironically) “China Watch”, both of which have attracted considerable criticism.“Traditional Chinese medicine ‘helps fight coronavirus”."conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth"."global warming causes about as much damage as benefits". o.OThe article author, Camilla Tominey:refers to trans women as “men”.writes regularly to defend transphobia as justified and harmless.wrote an Islamophobic article slandering Ahammed Hussain, accusing him of links to terrorism and antisemitism, for which the paper later printed an extensive apology and retraction, paying Hussain an undisclosed amount in damages.wrote an op-ed defending whiteness, claiming that there were not enough white women on Meghan Markle’s 15 ‘forces for change’ Vogue cover. She even started her article with the words, “May I make the following remarks without being accused of racism …”. O.OThese are not comprehensive lists. There is no way I’m going to pay for content from “The Torygraph”, and no, I’m not going to promote links to Camilla’s articles, so my apologies in advance that I haven’t referenced a few portions of this post.If you don’t want to go all the way down the rabbit hole, feel free to skip to my TL;DR below.The author of the “study” referenced by the article, Joanna Williams, has a professional background as an English lecturer and writer. She publicly endorses the political hate group LGB Alliance in glowing terms, a group which openly opposes Stonewall and Pink News, but has friendly links to Christian Right conservative organisations, including Center for Bioethics and Culture Network (CBC), the Heritage Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), North Carolina Family Policy Council, Novae Terrae, and ‘Public Discourse’ the journal of the Witherspoon Institute.Here’s how LGB Alliance describes themselves:►https://lgballiance.org.uk/“We believe that attempts to introduce confusion between biological sex and the notion of gender are harming LGB people.”►https://lgballiance.org.uk/about/"In our view, current gender ideologies are psuedo-scientific and present a threat to people whose sexual orientation is towards the same sex ...""To protect children and young people from being taught unscientific gender doctrines ... [and] promote respectful freedom of speech and informed dialog.""... parts of the left have shamefully abandoned any commitment to women's rights and the rights of people who define themselves in terms of same-sex sexual orientation."Referring to the experiences and needs of transgender people as “confusion” and “a threat” and “unscientific gender doctrines”, are very old conservative tricks. These closely resemble the tactics employed to endorse homophobia last century.These are not the opinions of the broader LGB population, let alone the LGBT population. These are the niche viewpoints of a small band of very noisy activists who are determined to attack transgender individuals and transgender rights. They created the LGB Alliance specifically because transphobia and working against transgender rights, was not welcomed by their peers in LGBT organisations.“The 'LGB Alliance' is a hate group. It was set up purely to agitate against the rights and dignity of trans people and to drive them from the LGBTQ movement.”— Owen Jones, Guardian columnist“The UK government is using LBG Alliance as cover for anti-trans laws …LGB Alliance is tiny, fringe, and as noted above, associated with right-wing hate groups that oppose LGBTQ rights in general. They do not represent LGBTQ people.”— James Finn, gay activist►https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/04/03/lgb-alliance-neo-nazi-homophobia-spinster-death-head-charity-commission/More than 17,000 people have signed a petition trying to stop the group gaining charity status on the grounds that it is a “transphobic hate group”.►https://www.change.org/p/charity-commission-stop-anti-trans-group-the-lgb-alliance-gaining-charity-status?use_react=falseStop LGB Alliance Gaining Charity Status32,145 have signed. Let’s get to 35,000!As a CIS lesbian I stand with the trans community as others do in the LGBTQ community.Please sign and share this petition.Weirdly, the LGB Alliance has come under fire for being homophobic and biphobic, as well as transphobic.Here’s Dr Williams’ published bio. She is not a scientist at all, and she doesn’t work in any field that seeks to understand or help transgender people. “Corrosive” is her word for describing the needs of transgender people, and does a great job of setting the tone for her piece.►https://joannawilliams.org/about/Dr Joanna Williams is Head of Education and Culture at Policy Exchange. She is an author, commentator and the associate editor of Spiked.Joanna began her career teaching English in secondary schools and Further Education. She started working as a lecturer in Higher Education and Academic Practice at the University of Kent in 2007. She was Director of Kent’s Centre for the Study of Higher Education until 2016.The referenced “study” by Joanna Williams is not a study at all, but an opinion piece dressed up as a literature review, using this paragraph as it’s foundational premise:“Whereas the gay rights movement was about demanding more freedom from the state for people to determine their sex lives unconstrained by the law, the transgender movement demands the opposite: it calls for recognition and protection from the state in the form of intervention to regulate the behaviour of those outside of the identity group.”Ahem, what is marriage equality, if not “recognition from the state”? What are discrimination protections for sexual orientation, if not “protection from the state”? Then you have legislation to prevent harassment and hate crimes in relation to sexual orientation, that too, is “protection from the state” for LGB people. Yes, protection from discrimination, harassment, and hate crimes, certainly are a “form of intervention to regulate the behaviour of those outside of the identity group.”Most LGB people, and indeed most LGBT people, prefer a different kind of message:“A world so hateful, some would rather die than be who they areAnd a certificate on paper Isn't gonna solve it all,But it's a damn good place to start”— Macklemore, Same LoveGovernment intervention has made it possible for LGB folks to thrive and survive, because these are the same interventions that straight cisgender people enjoy. Gay, trans, queer, or straight, we all need recognition from the state, and we all need protection from the state.In particular, Joanna Williams’ literature review seeks to deny transgender children the rights to change of name, change of pronouns, change of school uniform, access to safe bathrooms, access to medical care. She seeks to marginalise gender identity by making it illegal for teachers to talk about it alongside sexual orientation.“It is unusual … for a revolution to callfor fewer rights for people, not more.”― Cassandra ClareTL;DR: The LGB Alliance political group that is behind this article and “study”, is not here to represent either LGB or LGBT people; they are not here to help; they are here to loudly promote a niche, reactionary, conservative, and corrosive, transgender critical ideology.They are here to attack transgender children, because our children are vulnerable.►https://www.change.org/p/charity-commission-stop-anti-trans-group-the-lgb-alliance-gaining-charity-status?use_react=falseStop LGB Alliance Gaining Charity StatusPlease sign and share this petition.Hate carries a human cost.Naomi Lauren's answer to Were J.K. Rowling's comments transphobic?Naomi Lauren's answer to Can you debunk "Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria" (ROGD)?Is “gender critical feminism” a new term for you?If so, I highly recommend this article by Judith Butler, a feminist with far stronger credentials than the author of that “study”.►https://www.newstatesman.com/international/2020/09/judith-butler-culture-wars-jk-rowling-and-living-anti-intellectual-times