Claim It 258: Fill & Download for Free

It could.Here is the US Electoral College map. All the yellow states are the ones that are even close to being up for grabs. Sure a few other states might possibly go in a landslide for either candidate, but it is highly doubtful.So we can see right off the bat that Biden already has 212 all-but-guaranteed votes. That means for Trump to win, he has to win a major majority of these yellow states. Now some are quite likely, or are at least leaning, Trump, such as Texas, Iowa, Ohio, North Carolina, Georgia, and Nebraska’s 2nd district. Florida is still close, but it looks like Trump is gaining a bit of a lead.So filling all those in for Trump, and he has 248. If Trump manages to flip Minnesota, he now has 258, and only needs 12 more to win the election.With this big number, as long as Trump wins Pennsylvania, he could lose the entire rest of the midwest and still win. Biden could keep Nevada and New Hampshire. Trump could lose Arizona and Maine’s second district. Given Biden’s major stumble in the 2nd debate regarding fracking and oil, PA is absolutely up for the taking.I think the voting in a lot of states is closer than many polls show, and I give MN an even(or maybe slightly less than even) chance to go to Trump.So to answer the question, yes Trump flipping MN would be a big loss for the Democrats. It first means that Biden’s lead is not as big as claimed. It also means that most, if not all, the midwest goes for Trump. Finally, it gives Trump some breathing room. It means he could lose AZ or WI and still be in the same spot.For you-know-what's and giggles, below is my updated prediction for the election.

MERSAL movie is a very good entertainer during diwali for larger chunk of cinema audiences acted by noted actor VIJAY in tamilnadu whom have upto 3 million fan base & his clout is considered undeniable in tamilnadu and kerala..Anyhow in the movie they have misinterpreted the data's about alcohol taxation claiming it as tax-free and taxation of healthcare model in india supporting the cause of singaporeBut the story goes like this, With liquor never comes under the umbrella of GST due to the vehement opposition by the respective state governments all over india due to the loss covered in the revenue sharing modelBut liquor is heavily taxed in tamil nadu upto 0- 258% for different consumption scale and categories and the base price is also very high due to the consistent surge in demand followed by supply.Also India provides free health care in state and central government hospitals provided with good missionary hospitals provide cost free treatment but the movie entirely projected negative shadow neglecting the bigger positives and benefits obtained by the people in the past several years.though a negative is always a negative .These are the few instances that would have caused TN state BJP leaders anger. But overall many accepted the movie as a good entertainer and there are neat messages which must be taken by many audiences as positives despite many statistics are in imaginary sense and laymen tone .Erstwhile, veteran director A.R murugadoss presented his facts right when he took a movie to a large scale of global audiences in vijay acted movie katthi and socially reforming movie Ramana. .

In almost every vote there are MPs who rebel, and it is rarely big news. This was a free vote so MPs were not expected to vote in any specific way, yet still, there were very few MPs who voted against the bill in the Labour and Liberal parties. 22 Labour MPs out of 258 in Parliament, and 4 Lib Dems out of 57 MPs, and these opposers were principally backbenchers. Honestly, it was a bigger story how many Conservative MPs rebelled against David Cameron (more Con MPs voted against than for the bill, including some high profile ministers / cabinet members).Considering the huge margins by which the bill passed (by 400 to 175), most people weren’t concerned about a few faceless backbenchers who no one’s even heard of. If anything, it was remarkable how overwhelmingly Labour/Lib Dem supported the bill; without them the bill could never have passed, especially not by such margins (yet somehow the Conservatives still manage to claim it as a success of their own). People were too busy celebrating an historic achievement for LGBT rights than to be concerned about a couple bad eggs.Were those opposers MPs hypocritical? Maybe. Though I wouldn’t say Labour is necessarily always very culturally liberal, and many Labour members still believe in so-called ‘traditional family values.’ I wouldn’t say those Labour MPs should be criticised anymore than the Conservative MPs. The Lib Dems on the other hand had been campaigning for same-sex marriage, so it’s more strange for those MPs to vote against it. However, the LDs do have factions, so many LD MPs are part of the economically liberal faction and may care little for progressive stances on things such as same-sex marriage and abortion, though they at odds with general party policy.