Special Provisions - State Of New Jersey: Fill & Download for Free

So, now you know that “registration” is not common in the U.S., but I’m not sure anyone has provided the information you were looking for.There is an age factor that applies to firearm and changes the way they are viewed under federal law. Any firearm that is 50 years old or older, or those that have some particular historical interest, falls under the category of “Curios and Relics.” This means that they can be exempt from certain provisions of federal law and have special handling provisions, particularly for collectors who have a Curio and Relic license.A more dramatic age demarcation line is the definition of “Antique Firearms.” Any firearm that was designed to use black powder or was manufactured prior to 1898, is not legally considered to be a “firearm” at all, under federal law. The specifics can be a little confusing, as there are provisions for replicas and the like, but generally, if a gun was made prior to 1898, federal gun control laws do not apply. Some states, such as New Jersey, use different definitions for “firearms.” In the case of New Jersey, black powder guns, and even airguns and BB guns, are legally considered to be “firearms,” and are strictly regulated. Be sure you check your local and state laws, and never rely on an answer from an “expert” on the internet or what some cop or bureaucrat tells you on the phone. The only way to be fairly sure of how gun laws apply to you, especially if the gun or other factors are somewhat unique, is to get the various state and federal agencies tasked with enforcement of firearm laws, to provide you with answers to specific questions that apply to your specific circumstances, and even then, they can come back and find some excuse to say that some law that they told you didn’t apply, actually does apply. It really does get very convoluted and treacherous.Hope that helps.

The Civil War was started by the South, not by the North. First they ignored state as well as US law to illegally secede. And then they attacked the United States at Fort Sumter. The Civil War was clearly and unequivocally started by the South so it is their reasons and not those of the United States that are important for the causes of the war.So what did the South claim? To find out from the Confederates themselves we can look at The Declaration of Causes of Seceding States. I suggest reading them in full - but here are some choice excerpts:MississippiOur position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization. That blow has been long aimed at the institution, and was at the point of reaching its consummation. There was no choice left us but submission to the mandates of abolition, or a dissolution of the Union, whose principles had been subverted to work out our ruin. That we do not overstate the dangers to our institution, a reference to a few facts will sufficiently prove.The hostility to this institution commenced before the adoption of the Constitution, and was manifested in the well-known Ordinance of 1787, in regard to the Northwestern Territory.South CarolinaThe General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution. The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.TexasThe States of Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Iowa, by solemn legislative enactments, have deliberately, directly or indirectly violated the 3rd clause of the 2nd section of the 4th article [the fugitive slave clause] of the federal constitution, and laws passed in pursuance thereof; thereby annulling a material provision of the compact, designed by its framers to perpetuate the amity between the members of the confederacy and to secure the rights of the slave-holding States in their domestic institutions-- a provision founded in justice and wisdom, and without the enforcement of which the compact fails to accomplish the object of its creation. Some of those States have imposed high fines and degrading penalties upon any of their citizens or officers who may carry out in good faith that provision of the compact, or the federal laws enacted in accordance therewith.In all the non-slave-holding States, in violation of that good faith and comity which should exist between entirely distinct nations, the people have formed themselves into a great sectional party, now strong enough in numbers to control the affairs of each of those States, based upon an unnatural feeling of hostility to these Southern States and their beneficent and patriarchal system of African slavery, proclaiming the debasing doctrine of equality of all men, irrespective of race or color-- a doctrine at war with nature, in opposition to the experience of mankind, and in violation of the plainest revelations of Divine Law. They demand the abolition of negro slavery throughout the confederacy, the recognition of political equality between the white and negro races, and avow their determination to press on their crusade against us, so long as a negro slave remains in these States.GeorgiaOur Northern confederates, after a full and calm hearing of all the facts, after a fair warning of our purpose not to submit to the rule of the authors of all these wrongs and injuries, have by a large majority committed the Government of the United States into their hands. The people of Georgia, after an equally full and fair and deliberate hearing of the case, have declared with equal firmness that they shall not rule over them. A brief history of the rise, progress, and policy of anti-slavery and the political organization into whose hands the administration of the Federal Government has been committed will fully justify the pronounced verdict of the people of Georgia. The party of Lincoln, called the Republican party, under its present name and organization, is of recent origin. It is admitted to be an anti-slavery party. While it attracts to itself by its creed the scattered advocates of exploded political heresies, of condemned theories in political economy, the advocates of commercial restrictions, of protection, of special privileges, of waste and corruption in the administration of Government, anti-slavery is its mission and its purpose. By anti-slavery it is made a power in the state. The question of slavery was the great difficulty in the way of the formation of the Constitution.While the subordination and the political and social inequality of the African race was fully conceded by all, it was plainly apparent that slavery would soon disappear from what are now the non-slave-holding States of the original thirteen. The opposition to slavery was then, as now, general in those States and the Constitution was made with direct reference to that fact. But a distinct abolition party was not formed in the United States for more than half a century after the Government went into operation. The main reason was that the North, even if united, could not control both branches of the Legislature during any portion of that time.Pretty unequivocal, no? Read through them all to confirm I am not in any way misrepresenting the sources.

In most states and situations, your insurer will drop your child the month after he or she turns 26. If your plan offers COBRA, then COBRA would be available.Some states require insurers to allow children to stay on a parent's plan past age 26. New Jersey, for example, extends group coverage to children up to age 31. There are lots of requirements for this; child has to be unmarried, and so forth.If the child is disabled, there may be special provisions to allow him/her to stay on your group plan also. A disabled child could also qualify for Medicaid and Medicare.