Ips Fact Sheet 306: Fill & Download for Free

Xiaomi Redmi Note 4G vs Yu Yureka: Benchmark Comparison:Yu Yureka has managed to deliver a slightly better spec sheet, good looks and other goodies with Cyanogen at Rs 1000 less than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4G. Yu Yureka wins: 1.5GHz octa-core 64-bit Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 CPU, CyanogenMod 11S based on Android 4.4 OS, dual SIM, light weight (155 grams), back cover with moonstoon finishing Redmi Note 4G wins: 3100 mAh battery. See the following statisticsQuadrant scores comparison shows the Yu Yureka (right hand side) excelling in most departments as compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 4G (left hand side)AnTuTu runs a group of tests such as CPU tests, user experience tests, GPU tests, I/O tests and RAM tests. It compiles the result into a final score. Here again the relatively powerful Snapdragon 615 on the Yu Yureka (RHS) goes past the Snapdragon 400 Redmi Note 4G (LHS)The 3D Mark's Ice Storm Extreme gives an idea about the overall graphical performance of your device. Since the Yu Yureka sports the higher end Adreno 405 GPU, as opposed to the Redmi Note 4G's Adreno 305, you get a higher score. Both devices however can ably handle casual gamingPC Mark is a popular benchmarking app and the PC Mark for Android gives you an overall view of your device as opposed to the individual component performance we see with its desktop counter part. Here again, the Yu Yureka gives a better score thanks to the powerful processor. The tests include a lot of real-world scenarios such as image editing, browsing, viewing videos and so on.Xiaomi Redmi 1S vs Motorola Moto G comparison:Moto G (Gen 2) comes with considerable improvement over its trendsetting predecessor. Moto G had essentially set a foot forward in terms of bringing cheap Android devices with good built quality and great hardware. Xiaomi Mi3, also recently launched in India, belongs to the same price bracket.However, the latter has been facing problems in terms of availability , as it has been made available in limited stock exclusively on Flipkart. One of the main highlight of Mi3 is that it comes with quad core Snapdragon 800 processor which is quite an achievement in its price bracket. We are are comparing the Motorola Moto G (gen 2) and Xiaomi Mi3 head to head. Check out the video below:Xiaomi Redmi 1S VS Lenovo A6000:Design:At the onset, I will like to stress the obvious: design is a subjective matter. What could be nothing but plain and simple to one could be a work of art for another.Both the Xiaomi Redmi 1S and the Lenovo A6000 are budget handsets and boast of plastic across their length and breadth, an obvious cost-cutting affair in this category.The Redmi 1S is a decent looking device but it also big and bulky for a 4.7-incher. At 9.9 mm it is definitely chunky and with Iight of 158 grams it is slightly on the heavier side of things. Even if I overlook its chubbiness, there is nothing spectacularly remarkable about its design aesthetics.Although plain and simple, the Redmi 1S is a Ill-build device for its price and is sturdy. It is also comfortable to hold and operate. The subtle curves on the back ensure the device won't slip out of your hand easily. The back panel, although made of plastic, is non-glossy which is good. The front panel is prone to smudge/fingerprint.The Lenovo A6000 is no design marvel either and comes with the same candy-bar design as the Redmi 1S. But what differentiates it from the Redmi 1S is its slim frame. The A6000 is a 5-incher. It measures 8.2 mm and Iighs 128 grams. The Redmi 1S appears 'fat' in comparison.The slim frame and the subtle curves at the back ensure the 'larger' A6000 is sturdy to hold and use, even with one hand. Moreover, the back has a smooth matte finish that adds to the overall feel-good factor, besides improving the grip. While the back panel is non-glossy, the front panel on the A6000 is a smudge/fingerprint magnet (on the extreme side of things).Display:The Xiaomi Redmi 1S features a 4.7-inch HD IPS display with a 720x1280 pixels resolution that roughly translates to 312PPI density. The Lenovo A6000 on the other hand comes with a larger 5-inch HD IPS display with a 720x1280 pixels resolution that roughly translates to 294PPI density.A 720p display in an under Rs.7,000 handset was once a distant dream. Not anymore though.Speaking of the Redmi 1S, the smaller display slightly sharper. It also shows rich colours. That said, colours are tad warmer on this one, so that overall the display output comes out to be dull and not all that pleasing. Viewing angles are decent and the fact that the Redmi 1S is not a smudge magnet ensures decent outdoor visibility when you're out and about.The Lenovo A6000 appears to be a better bet if you're looking for a brighter display, although in some cases the colours may not be that accurate. HoIver, the A6000 is not the best device when you're outdoors. Although viewing angles are decent, direct sunlight is a problem for the device. Also, smudge/fingerprints affect outdoor visibility significantly on the device.Performance:The Xiaomi Redmi 1S is poIred by a 1.6GHz quad-core Qualcomm MSM8228 Snapdragon 400 CPU coupled with Adreno 305 GPU and 1GB of RAM. The Lenovo A6000 on the other hand is poIred by a 1.2GHz quad-core Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 CPU coupled with Adreno 306 GPU and 1GB of RAM.On paper, the A6000 is clearly a winner, hoIver, the same cannot be said about it in terms of day to day usage and its disappointing touch response is to be blamed for it to some extent.The sluggish, often non-responsive display meant I Ire forced to tap icons at least twice on most counts while opening apps. While opening/closing and switching betIen apps is not a major problem for the device, its inconsistency is disheartening. Every once in a while apps would randomly crash out of the blue. This was particularly the case with benchmark apps, especially PCMark.Should you decide to overlook this aspect, the A6000 is particularly good if you're looking to play graphics intensive games. Games like Asphalt 8: Airborne run Ill on the device with little or no lag, and the Adreno 306 GPU churns out some really neat graphics.The A6000 is also future proof in that it is 64-bit capable, meaning you'll be able to run 64-bit applications on this one. Sadly, that is not happening anytime soon since I'll need Lollipop for that.The Redmi 1S on the other hand is a decent performer for its price bracket and fares pretty Ill in terms of day to day use. Opening/closing and switching betIen apps is like a breeze, and the device will give you a consistent performance.Therefore, if you're looking for a decent consistent performer, go for the Redmi 1S. If you're looking to play games, the A6000 is a better bet.Software:The Xiaomi Redmi 1S runs Android 4.3 (Jelly Bean) out-of-the-box with the company's own MIUI 5 on top. The Lenovo A6000 runs Android 4.4.4 (KitKat) out-of-the-box with the company's own Vibe 2.0 on top.Let's start with the UIs first. Chinese UIs are known to be flashy and quite the in your face affair when it comes to icons and animations, and both the MIUI 5 and Vibe 2.0 carry forward that legacy with panache. There's no traditional app draIr, instead there are a number of home screens that house your apps.The idea behind both the MIUI 5 and Vibe 2.0 is more or less same that is keep it simple and keep it on the home screen. It's when you get to use them on the respective handsets that differences begin to arise.Xiaomi's MIUI is smoother. It's not of course stock Android, but is close to it, at least in terms of responsiveness, yet gives you the faintest impression of Apple's iOS. The MIUI 5 on-board the Redmi 1S is smooth and lag-free.Lenovo's Vibe 2.0, although beautiful, appears to be resource hungry. To add to it, the touch performance makes the whole user experience somehow exhaustive.That said, some may not like the Redmi 1S for running Jelly Bean out-of-the-box. I don't like it either. In comparison to the A6000, the Redmi 1S therefore appears to be out-dated. The A6000 has been promised a Lollipop update which makes it future-proof.Camera:The Xiaomi Redmi 1S sports an 8MP rear autofocus camera with LED flash and a 1.6MP front-facing camera. The Lenovo A6000 on the other hand sports an 8MP rear autofocus camera with LED flash and a 2MP front-facing camera.Now, if you've ever used a Xiaomi device, you'd know that their handsets have some really amazing cameras for their respective price range. The same is true for the Redmi 1S as Ill. In fact, the Redmi 1S is able to click better photos than counterparts that cost above the Rs.20,000 price bracket.The Redmi 1S clicks some really good photos in ambient lighting conditions, packing in much detail. Meanwhile, a very capable HDR mode on-board can click pretty decent images in low light conditions.To add to the grand scheme of things, the Redmi 1S's rear camera can shoot full-HD videos at 30fps.The rear camera in case of the Lenovo A6000 is simply a downer in terms of image output. Photos clicked by it tend to be overexposed in good lighting conditions, with blown out colours and visibly way off white balance. Low light images tend to be noise prone, and lack detail on most counts.Front cameras in both the cases are more a forgive and forget affair, although in this price range they are sufficient for your Facebook/Instagram posting needs.Battery:The Xiaomi Redmi 1S decks in a 2000 mAh battery. The Lenovo A6000 on the other hand is backed by a 2300 mAh battery.The 2,000mAh battery on the Redmi 1S easily lasts a day and clocks on an average of 14 to 15 hours of moderate usage. The Lenovo A6000 with a larger battery lies Ill within the same parameters in terms of battery life.The more or less equivalent battery life is due to the fact that the A6000 has a tad bigger display and a slightly faster processor. Also, its sluggish touch response means you're doing more every time you hit an icon or something.Which one is better?By the looks of it, the Redmi 1S comes out having a slightly upper hand in comparison to the A6000 if you're looking for a value for money device, which quite obviously you are in this price category.The Lenovo A6000 seems to be better placed on paper, but sadly on the battle front, it somehow doesn't get you far. Sure, it's future proof and all that (not to forget, it is the cheapest 4G smartphone in India currently) and has hardware that should seem to sail you along pretty well. However, it's sluggish, non-responsive display and inconsistent performance kills all the fun and leaves you asking for more.I think you should skip the Lenovo A6000. That said, the Redmi 1S has been discontinued on Flipkart, so I suggest you wait for the Redmi 2.So this were just few comparisons which implies that no one is a threat to xiaomi but everyone is good at its own products and its on the customer which one he/she prefers.

MOTO X STYLEProduct Features:Dual Sim, 4G, 3G, Wi-Fi, NFCHexa Core, 1.8 GHz Processor3 GB RAM, 16 GB inbuilt3000 mAH Battery5.7 inches, 1440 x 2560 px display21 MP Camera with flashMemory Card Supported, upto 128 GBAndroid, v5.1.1Product Review:64-bit Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 chipsetStock Android 5.1.1 Lollipop21 MP main camera with f/2.0 aperture3,000 mAh batteryThe battery is not user-replaceableNo fingerprint sensorNo wireless chargingNo IR portNot available in key global MARKETSRS.30000ONE PLUS 2Product Features:Dual Sim, 4G, 3G, Wi-FiOcta Core, 1.8 GHz Processor4 GB RAM, 64 GB inbuilt3300 mAH Battery5.5 inches, 1080 x 1920 px display13 MP Camera with flashMemory Card Not SupportedAndroid, v5.1See Full SpecificationsProduct Review:Accurate finger print sensorType C USB connector4GB LPDDR4 RAMGood battery capacityUpto 10 fingers MultitouchUninspiring designSandstone cover feels rough and a bit cheapExtremely unreliable laser auto focus when shooting videoCall quality is simply unacceptableRS.25000/-(Approx)SizeDimensions are similar, with the Moto X coming out just 1 percent taller and wider.While both phones are high-end, thickness is one area where neither is pushing any boundaries. Both have rounded backs, which makes them look a bit thicker on paper than they'll feel in hand, but they still lag far behind razor-thin competitors like the latest iPhones and Samsung Galaxy S6.WeightThe slightly larger Moto X Pure Edition is also slightly heavier (2 percent heavier, to be exact).Build (frame)Both phones have metal frames.Build (backing)Here's another striking resemblance between the two, as you can pick from multiple materials – including natural wood options – for the backs of both handsets.The big difference is that you need to make your material decision on the Moto X before buying (it's permanent). Meanwhile the OnePlus 2 ships by default with the sandstone backing, but you can buy the other backs for US$27 each, and swap them out yourself.Display sizeThe Moto X gives you a 7 percent bigger display than the OnePlus 2.Display resolutionAt the OnePlus 2's launch event, the company was defensive about sticking with a 1080p display, suggesting that anything higher than that (like the Moto X's Quad HD) is gimmicky overkill that doesn't add to the experience of using a phone.Quad HD panels don't change how you use a phone, and we agree that 1080p screens are plenty sharp. But we do find that Quad HD screens add an eye candy factor that makes for a significant enough upgrade.Display typeThis is the first Moto X that didn't use an AMOLED panel, switching instead to a TFT LCD.Navigation buttonsLike with last year's OnePlus One, the OnePlus 2 lets you choose between using capacitive (below screen) navigation buttons or onscreen virtual keys.Fingerprint sensorOnePlus added a touch-based fingerprint sensor to the 2.StorageBoth handsets start with 16 GB storage, but the OnePlus 2's second tier gives you twice the space of the second-tier Moto X.MicroSDThe Moto X Style/Pure Edition does, however, let you pop in a microSD card to complement that.ProcessorBoth handsets have speedy Qualcomm processors. It's possible the OnePlus 2's Snapdragon 810 will benchmark a little higher, but that doesn't necessarily mean much (if anything) in experience. Stay tuned for our full reviews.RAMThe entry-level OnePlus 2 has 3 GB of RAM, but that jumps up to a laptop-like 4 GB in the 64 GB model.BatteryThe OnePlus 2 has a slightly larger battery, but you'll need to wait for our review and battery benchmark to know if that means anything.Removable batteryNeither handset lets you remove its battery, despite the fact that you can swap back covers on the OnePlus 2.Fast chargingThe Moto X has fast-charging – something we've seen a lot of in recent Android flagships. Motorola says that 15 minutes of charging with its "Turbo Charger" will get you an extra 10 hours of battery life (based on an "average mixed use profile that includes both usage and standby time on a 4G LTE network").Camera megapixelsThe Moto X has the higher-resolution rear camera, but all that tells us is that its zoomed-in shots and poster-sized prints may look a little better. Regular-use camera quality will also have to wait for extended hands-on time.Camera aperture (rear)Both rear shooters have ƒ/2.0 aperture.Wireless chargingNeither phone has built-in wireless charging.NFCIt's been a while since we've seen a major Android flagship without NFC built-in, making the OnePlus 2 a bit of an anomaly.Charging/data cableOnePlus opted for a USB Type C port and cable with its flagship. The cable is reversible (similar to Apple's Lightning standard), but right now there aren't nearly as many compatible USB-C accessories as there are for microUSB.SoftwareBoth phones more or less run stock ("pure") Android Lollipop. The OnePlus 2 runs the company's own flavor, known as OxygenOS, which adds a few tweaks (like those navigation key tweaks, along with a dark mode and gesture launch shortcuts) – but still maintains the overall look and feel of stock Android.Specification of Motorola Moto G (3rd Generation)Operating SystemOS- AndroidOS Version- v5.1.1 (Lollipop)ChipsetCPU- Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410Clock Speed- 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53Core- Quad-coreGPU- Adreno 306Screen and DisplayType- IPS LCD capacitive touchscreenSize- 5.0 inchesDisplay Resolution- 720 x 1280 pixelsDisplay Reinforced- Corning Gorilla Glass 3Display Density- 294 ppiCameraRear- 13 MPFront- 5 MPMax. Video Resolution- 1080pMax Video Frames- 30fpsForm and DimensionPhone Dimension- 142.1 x 72.4 x 11.6 mmForm- BarWeight- 155 gramsData Connection and Connectivity4G- LTE (1, 3, 7, 8, 28,40)3G- YesBluetooth- v4.0WiFi- 802.11 b/g/nHeadphone JackSensorsProximity- YesAccelerometer- YesLight- YesGyroscope-Memory and RAMInternal (ROM)- 16 GBExternal (SD)- 32 GBRAM- 2 GBSIMSIM Type-Micro SIMSIM Support- Dual SimBatteryCapacity- 2470 mAhStand By-Talktime- 24 hours (Combined test Use)Phone’s Available Colour- Black & WhitePros of Motorola Moto G (3rd Generation)Water resistant up to 3 feet in fresh water for up to 30 minutes.OTG cable is supported.Supports 4G.The slow motion Videography is also available in 720p Resolution.The 2470 mAh battery is quite good.Display protected with Corning® Gorilla(TM) Glass 3.Cons of Motorola Moto G (3rd Generation)It doesn't have a removable battery.The sound quality of earphone may disappoint you.It doesn't have notification light.No NFC.Solution of Problems in Motorola Moto G (3rd Generation)Camera Quality-Use 3rd party apps Such as Camera360Why to buy and Final words about Motorola Moto G (3rd Generation)After analysing this Smartphone we don’t found anything that can make a customer change his mood for buying Moto G3 Smartphone under 13K INR price range. Apart from the cons mentioned above the phone is curved ranges thickness from 6.1mm to 11.6mm with 155 gram weight. We have pointed nearly all major advantages and disadvantages of this smartphone now choice is yours.PS- Not designed to work while submerged underwater. Do not use while swimming, or subject it to pressurised streams of water. Not dust-proof.Price- 12,999 INRONE PLUS XGood✓Excellent build quality✓Affordable price✓MicroSD expansion✓Great software featuresBad✕Weak camera performance✕Average battery life✕2013 processorOnePlus X technical specificationsThe OnePlus X is hardly a barn burner when it comes to the spec sheet, but for $249 you're getting a pretty solid device. A 5-inch 1080p display is powered by a Snapdragon 801, 3GB of RAM and 16GB of storage, along with a few extras like an SDcard slot and Gorilla Glass 3. Check out the full spec sheet, including radio bands, below.Performance▾Quad Core, 2.3 GHzSnapdragon 8013 GB RAMDisplay▾5.0 inches (Medium)Full HD , Very sharpGorilla GlassCamera▾13 MP PrimaryLED Flash8 MP FrontBattery▾2525 mAh, Li-PolymerNon removable

Well Call me a Bhakt,I will love calling myself as a Bhakt(Andh) of Modi.Some bunch of Youths are Anti-Modi,Anti-BJP because When they compare 49 years of Congress Government(till 2014) with 9 years and 0.5 months of BJP government,They become anti-Modi,Anti B.J.P.When some Youtubers shows them personal biased views without even letting you know about that past 49 years,so they turn anti-Modi.Actually only those who don’t know how to do comparison between 49 years and 9 (5 under Atal Ji and 4 under Modi Ji currently)years are anti’s.Almost everyone from youth section understands everything.When they don’t have and don’t get a much detailed information,and they prefer to watch some videos which are presented in such a manner that you starts believing in them instead of reading blogs/news on Google which are genuinely true and authentic,Biased media with incomplete information makes a deadly combination,enough to make you Vote Raga over Modi.When anti’s forget their party is supporting People like kanhaiya etc.(not to mention other names otherwise it would be heavily downvoted)When these anti’s blindly made to believe that there were no problems till 2014 and suddenly after Modi came he brought problems like Unemployment,fuel hike price etc.When 49 years old government wasn’t bothered to think about Digitalization,Swachh bharat mission,Electric bus,Anti romeo squad,,eco friendly fuel,Hyperloop,He did,his government did and will bring.When our former respected P.Ms wasn’t bothered to talk directly with People,He came and interacted via radio (mann ki baat) on almost regular basis,At present no one better than him knows the exact ground work scenario of our country.When these anti’s don’t know about following scams under Congress rule,and cry over construction of statue of unity(to be world’s tallest statue),Don’t notice the fall of the number in scams under BJP due to some reforms such as Demonetization etc.When these antis want everything like employment, poverty removed, Better infrastructure in just 5 years from a Government but they have soft corner for Congress who Ruled for again 49 year ,When they don't know India has 1.3 billion population.and Even Maggie takes 5 minutes in reality as opposite to what ads says “2 minutes”.They(Poor) know the pain of being made poor for 49 years,Government in those 49 years didn’t really care about them,Real ground scenario is totally different from your expectations ,there is a huge difference,leaders like Modi,Yogi adityanath who are not just an Example but also who truly understands their(poor) pain because they had seen that life more closely than most of the other leaders know.A mindless harvard drop out is way behind the actual facts of reality.These anti’s belongs to the categories of people who are more interested in appeasement rather than development of INDIA as a Nation,so to counter the current BJP govt. they mislead people by youtube videos,Even if someone tries to correct them they labelled them as bhakts ,twisting and presenting Modi’s speech and made to believe govt. of 49 years was better than the govt. of 9 and half year under which India conducted its first Nuclear mission,Pakistan wars.When they don’t have Any information about the “Fiscal” in Indian economics and as result they demand for Lower oil prices and they don’t have anything information but again prefers to blame Modi.” UPA only deferred the problem to future governments which has been rightly pointed as it adds up to debt levels, forcing interest rates on sovereign bonds to go up and further crowd out the private investments.”It is the best time to blame govt. but the fact remains unchanged that it is only because of UPA that the Current govt have not only have to pay debt along with keeping fiscal deficit low.If anti’s think Democracy is in danger, as said by Mr.Pappu G, Didi, Behen Jee, then ‘Achhe Din’ will never come,If you keep comparing 49 years with 9 years and keep blaming Modi instead of People “Ache din will never come”if You unnecessarily calling for bharat bandhs without knowing its aftereffects,breaking government owned property then For anti’s BJP is Bad.Ministers like Modi can show you a Vision,can give funds for building toilets,swachh bharat mission,Make in INDIA,strict rules everything but it is totally wrong to have a bad attitude for Modi,BJP for the mismanagement of funds, by the people.How was the UPA government able to keep the petrol and diesel prices low when the international price of a barrel of crude oil was touching $130, and the NDA government is failing to fix it? Why?“Chahe petrol Rs 500 ho jaye ,Cycle se hi kyu na chalna pade,Vote to Modi ko hi Dunga from Shiv bhakt with love”List of scam under 49 years of congress2014Mumbai International Airport Ltd (MIAL) scam[125] (₹5000 crores) - FIRs have been registered against GVK (conglomerate) and Airports Authority of India officials for cheating and forgery.[126] The project was deliberately delayed by 3 years to pass ₹5000 crores undue benefit to GVK (conglomerate).Aavin scam - adulteration of milk supplied from various societies of Tamil Nadu State Milk Union, resulting in a scam estimated to be ₹27 lakhs per day for 10 years.[127] The investigating agencies then traced the owner of the truck to be Vaidyanathan and arrested him in Chennai.[128][129][129]SmartCity, Kochi scam- JV between Government of Kerala and TECOM Investments, a subsidiary of Dubai Holding.[130][131][132][133]Cash for MLC seat scam - Ex-Chief Minister of Karnataka and Janata Dal (Secular) floor leader H.D. Kumaraswamy.[134][135]Leader Of Opposition in the Goa state assembly and ex Chief Minister of Goa Pratapsingh Rane bribery case.[136][137]Haryana & Rajasthan illegal mining in Aravalli Range mountains.[138][139]Siliguri Jalpaiguri Development Authority or SJDA scam, West Bengal- ₹200 crores[140]Reliance Jio spectrum auction rigging scam-[141][142]Odisha Industrial land mortgage scam- ₹52000 crores[143][144][145]The National Herald (India) Land Scam[146][147]Vyapam Scam - India's biggest medical education scam unearthed in Madhya Pradesh. Subsequently, many BJP Government leaders were arrested.Madhya Pradesh state Farmers Welfare and Agriculture Development Minister Gauri Shankar Chaturbhuj Bisen disproportionate assets case- ₹2000 crores[148][149]Hari Kumar Jha,1987 batch Indian Forest Service (IFS) officer, disproportionate assets case- ₹15 crores[150][151]Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) unaccounted cash case- ₹34 crores[152][153]Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) discretionary quota plot scam.[154][155]Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia land grabbing case[156]Madhya Pradesh State Joint Director-Industries, R.C. Kuriel, disproportionate assets case[157][158]Mayank Jain,1995 batch IPS officer of Madhya Pradesh cadre, disproportionate assets case[159][160][161]Rajasthan Housing Board (RHB) arbitrary lease allotment of property.[162][163]HPCA illegal land allotments scandal[164][165]- Prem Kumar Dhumal and Anurag Thakur have been charge sheeted in HPCA scam.Indian Railways-Railtel Corporation of India mobile scam-[166]Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and Rolls-Royce defence scam- ₹10,000 crores[167]Air India Family Fare Scheme scam[168]Bokaro Steel Plant recruitment scam[169][170]Gujarat arbitrary land allotments scandal[171]Kribhco and fertilizer giant Yara International fertilizer fraud controversy.[172][173]Delhi Jal Board scam- ₹10,000 crores[174][175]Indian Railways "emergency quota" tickets scam[176]Siddhartha Mehrotra (Grocery Scam, Gurgaon)[citation needed]2013Virbhadra Singh bribery controversy- ₹2.4 crores[177][178][179][180]Madhya Pradesh Pre medical test scam[181][182][183]Madhya Pradesh wheat procurement scam- (₹4 crores)- Payments worth ₹4 crores have been made for fake wheat procurement from farmers.[184]Madhya Pradesh IAS couple Arvind Joshi and Tinoo Joshi disproportionate assets case[185]Gurgaon Toll plaza scam-operated by DSC Ltd.[186]EPFO(Employee Provident Fund)scam[187]Haryana seed scam- ₹5 crores[188]Directorate General of Civil Aviation-DGCA 'free ticket' scam[189][190]LTC(Leave Travel Concession) Scam[191][192][193][194]Radia tapes controversy[195]NSEL Scam- ₹5500 crores[196]Railway iron ore freight scam- ₹17000 crores[197][198][199]Uttar Pradesh illegal sand mining[200][201][202]Vodafone tax Scandal[203] - involves ₹11,000-crores[204] tax dispute case in India. There were corruption charges on Kapil Sibal because of Law ministry's U-turn to agree to conciliation in Vodafone tax case[205]Railway promotion scam[206] - CBI booked Union railway minister Pawan Kumar Bansal's nephew for allegedly accepting a bribe[207][208] of Rs 90 lakh from a Railway Board member.2013 Indian Premier League spot-fixing and betting case-Sreesanth, Ajit Chandila and Ankeet Chavan were banned for life from cricket.2013 Kerala solar panel scamOdisha Land allotment Scam[209][210]2013 Indian helicopter bribery scandal[211]Madhya Pradesh Scholarship Scam - The investigations revealed that the scholarship money was illegally siphoned off by forging the documents.2012Granite scam in Tamil Nadu – Loss of about ₹160 billion (US$2.3 billion).[212] At present the matter is under the scanner of investigating / intelligence agencies of India.[213]Highway scam – ₹160 billion (US$2.3 billion)[214][215][216]Kinetic Finance Limited Scam – Banks lost about ₹27.6 million (US$400,000).[217] At present the matter is under the scanner of investigating / intelligence agencies of India.Ultra Mega Power Projects Scam – Central government lost ₹290.33 billion (US$4.2 billion) due to undue favours to Anil Ambani-led Reliance Power.[27][218]Forex derivates scam – ₹320 billion (US$4.7 billion)[219][220]Service tax and Central Excise Duty fraud – ₹191.59 billion (US$2.8 billion) crores)[221][222]Maharashtra stamp duty scam – ₹6.4 billion (US$93 million)[223][224]Maharashtra land scam[225][226][227][228][229][230][231]MHADA repair scam – ₹1 billion (US$15 million)[232]Ministry of External Affairs gift scam[233][234][235]Himachal Pradesh pulse scam[236][237]Flying Club fraud – ₹1.9 billion (US$28 million)[238]Andhra Pradesh liquor scam[239][240]Jammu and Kashmir Cricket Association scam – Approximately ₹500 million (US$7.3 million)[241][242]Jammu and Kashmir PHE scam[243]Jammu and Kashmir recruitment scam[244]Jammu and Kashmir exam gate[245][246]Jammu and Kashmir dental scam[247]Punjab paddy scam – ₹180 million (US$2.6 million)[248][249]NHPC cement scam[250]Haryana forest scam[251][252][253][254][255][256][257][258][259][260]Girivan (Pune) land scam[261] (not to be confused with Pune land scam which came to light during 2011)Toilet scam[262][263]Uttar Pradesh stamp duty scam – ₹1,200 crore (US$170 million)[264]Uttar Pradesh horticulture scam – ₹700 million (US$10 million)[265]Uttar Pradesh palm tree plantation scam – ₹550 million (US$8.0 million)[266][267][268]Uttar Pradesh seed scam – ₹500 million (US$7.3 million)[269][270]Uttar Pradesh elephant Memorial scam- ₹1400 crores.[271][272][273]Uttar Pradesh LACCFED scam-[274]Patiala land scam – ₹2.5 billion (US$36 million)[275][276][277][278]Tax refund scam – ₹30 million (US$440,000)[279][280]Bengaluru Mayor's fund scam[280]Ranchi real estate scam[281]Delhi surgical gloves procurement scam[282]Aadhar scam[283][284][284][285]BEML housing society scam[286][287][288]MSTC gold export scam – ₹4.64 billion (US$68 million)[289]TIN scam[290][291]Haryana Forest Development Corporation Cash Scam[292]Nayagaon (Punjab) land scam[293]2011Bellary mining scam/Belekeri port scam[294]Tatra scam – ₹7.5 billion (US$110 million)[295][296]LIC housing loan scamNTRO scam – ₹8 billion (US$120 million)[297][298][299][300]Goa mining scam[301][302][303]Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike scam – ₹32.07 billion (US$470 million)[304][305][306][307]Himachal Pradesh HIMUDA housing scam[308][309]Pune housing scam[310]Pune land scam[311][312]Orissa pulse scam – ₹7 billion (US$100 million)[313][314][315][316]Kerala investment scam – ₹10 billion (US$150 million)[317]Mumbai Sales Tax fraud – ₹10 billion (US$150 million)[318]Maharashtra education scam – ₹10 billion (US$150 million)[319][320]Maharashtra PDS scam[321][322]Uttar Pradesh TET scam[323][324][325] Former Director of UP Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad Sanjay Mohan is prime accused.Uttar Pradesh MGNREGA scam[326][327]Orissa MGNREGA scam[328][329][330]Indian Air Force land scam[331][332][333]Bihar Solar lamp scam – ₹400 million (US$5.8 million)[334][335]BL Kashyap – EPFO scam – ₹1.69 billion (US$25 million)[336][337]Assam Education scam[338]Pune ULC scam[339][340][341]2010ISRO's S-band scam (also known as ISRO-Devas deal)₹200,000 (US$2,900)[342][343][344][345][346]- The deal was cancelled.Andhra Pradesh Emmar scam – ₹25 billion (US$360 million)[347][348][349][350]Karnataka land scam[351][352][353]Karnataka housing board scam-JD(S) MLA GT Devegowda swindled ₹35 crores, indicted by Lokayukta.[354][355][356][357]Uttrakhand Citurgia land scam[358][359]MCI bribery scandal[360][361][362]- Ketan Desai is chargesheeted by CBI.[363]Chandigarh booth scam[364]Odisha illegal Mining Scam (Investigated by Shah Commission)- ₹59,203 crores (2014).2009Gujarat Snoopgate ScandalGoa Special Economic Zone (SEZ) scam[368][369]JVG Scam : Sainik Farm land baron V K Sharma.[370]Rice export scam – ₹25 billion (US$360 million)[86][371]Orissa paddy scam[372][373]Sukhna land scam – Darjeeling[374][375][376][377] - Lt. General Awadhesh Prakash court martialed by the army on corruption charges.Vasundhara Raje Deendayal Upadhyaya Trust land scam[378]Austral Coke scam – ₹10 billion (US$150 million)[379][380]Gujarat's VDSGCU Sugarcane scam – ₹187 million (US$2.7 million)[381][382][3(wikipedia)Don’t waste your vote by pressing NOTA,It is still better to have Modi with better diplomatic think tank,who can defend his own people,over Raga.