Application For Family Law Value: Fill & Download for Free

I have used the phrase before to describe Trump crony insiders and I will use it again if necessary but Stephen Miller personifies the great Hannah Arendts description of Hitler’s Nazis, the worst of the worst, as the ‘banality of evil’.Miller is the guy you walk by on the street and never notice him as he looks like nothing, acts like nothing. He could sit next to you on a bus on a subway and would always be looking straight ahead head slightly down, not wanting to make eye contact as he is totally divorced from the world.Miller lived in Trump land, obsessed with eliminating brown people, immigrants in particular from America. He had no solutions other than round them up and send them back to somewhere, who cares just get rid of them.He made no arguments about their value or not, if they were in essential jobs or not, if they were paying taxes as they all have been. He simply made it his goal to eliminate brown people, latino immigrants from the US and to make sure no more got in.Cages for children, no problem. Separate them from their parents, no problem. Deny any applications for refugee status no problem. Use ICE to round them up in ‘sanctuary cities’, no problem.The only difference between Stephen Miller and Hitler’s most notorious henchmen is time and opportunity. Monsters like Reinhard Heydrich or Joseff Goebbels or the most disgusting of them all, Adolf Eichmann who rounded up 450,000 jews and gypsies in 6 weeks in 1944 in Budapest, Hungary, sent them all to the gas chambers at Auschwitz and other camps and that was that.Miller didn’t care if he sent people back to their deaths or abuse or torture, not his problem. He didn’t care if families were ripped apart, bad luck for them but they never should have come.Now a note of realism and why so many millions agreed with Miller, in that all atrocities are twisted to sound like there is at least some truth to them. Miller’s defense is simple, the southern border is porous at best non existent at worse in some places.It needs to be fixed, we should all agree but not with Miller Time solutions.Good bye and good riddance. You missed your calling thank god that you never had the chance to take it to the next level of depravity, but you are out now, we won’t forget and we never want to hear from you ever again.

To be frank ‘no’. Not immediately after marriage.It takes time. Suddenly can you love a stranger kid as your own kid? Some reason, some situation, some bonding ,some time requires.Preaching moral values is very easy.For example..My mom never Scolds me. My mil scolds. There would be a reason. But I don't care. Immediately I compare her with my mom. I think how dare she is to scold me! She has no right on me.!This would be my immediate reaction.After few years of marriage I would be careful, because I know if I do that what results it would give. I may tell other family members also. ‘I don't think this is a right thing to do. Later Mil may scold us. Better let us ask her advice before doing!’This is the first step of learning. If your teacher is a good person. You love . If she is a bad teacher you would hate her.At the same time I forget sometimes I should be a good student too.Immediately no one fall in love with in-laws and accept them as their own family after marriage. Even in-laws too won't love you immediately.It's like you are a new entry in a PG or new roommate in a friend's flat. To get acceptance and love them you need mutual effort.If you try to understand them and make them trust you they start loving you.If you could think neutrally, and could understand they are a generation earlier and won't think like you, you start feeling affection and love towards them.If you just think, why can't they think like me, do like me, accept me? You would be disappointed.In a patriarchal society like us, girl would go to in-laws house. If one person can't adjust herself in the in-law's house. Entire in-law's house members won't change for a single person like her.For boys it's a bit easy. Because nothing is expected out of him. So whatever little he does it's appreciated immediately contrary to a Dil.Since she is younger and inexperienced she should take first step I believe. Like my first day in office. When I expressed my willingness to learn entire office helped.Same way if she shows little interest entire family would reciprocate.Same thing is applicable for son-in-law as well.Then you won't even know when they become your own family.Of course exceptions are there in every thing. Just don't expect a overnight change. Relations need nurturing.Speaking truth I expected generation after generation, situations and relations between inlaws and Dil or son in-law would improve. They would deal in a better way than us. But I am observing they are deteriorating in many cases. Many don't want to have any relation at all between them. Then some thing somewhere wrong in both sides.Without taking care of roots, no plant would grow in to a big tree.

Their selective demand for freedom, feminism and equality.They want ‘equality’ from in-laws family, but would not fight against their own parents for that. They will firmly accept their brother(s) enjoying more freedom/rights/values/ownership in home. There, they readily accept all the bounding regulations, which were never applied on male members.They are against dowry only when they are the one to pay. I never saw any mother opposing demand for dowry for her son.They don’t mind at all, siting on general seats in bus, even when ‘female reserved’ seats are vacant and men are standing helplessly.They would take every assurance from would-be-husband or boyfriend on getting his unbiased support during times of rifts between his family and her. But when it comes to fight against her family for marrying him, they would give up certainly. Forced marriage doesn’t appear as family driven rape to them then. Rather they consider that as their ‘tribute’ to their family.They feel very bad on getting rejected only for her ‘looks’ but don’t mind rejecting any guy just because he couldn’t step-up much in his career-ladder, despite of his hardest effort.Of-course, my views are not universal or generic, and not applicable for every women in the world. There are many women who are flying high, fighting against inequality and discrimination solely, beyond their comfort zone.However, these points still cover most of Indian women, including those who claim to be feminist every then and now, having no idea about the ‘glass of illusion’ they are badly trapped in.Dear Ladies,Your fight for equality shouldn’t be confined to fighting against only men. The real equality will come to you only when you can be daring enough to fight for the same:against everyone and anyoneagainst not only in-laws, but against your family too.against not only men, but against women too.against not only other’s comfort zone, but against yours as well.against not only other’s selfishness, prejudices and hypocrisy, but against yours too.Tell me honestly, can you still dare to demand for equality?If yes, no-one in this universe can snatch that away from you.Regards,A Man , who doesn’t want women to accept themselves as unprivileged.In case, we are meeting for the first time.I am Satwik . No, that’s not just my name.Humanity is the only religion I believe in,Love is the only language I understand,World is the society, I come from,Yes, I am a Global Citizen.#7wik