Maritime Patrol Association: Fill & Download for Free

It pains me to say it, being a patriotic Brit, but France wins out, by a large margin. It is not just about the availability and capability of carriers (aircraft carriers and helo carriers), but also about:numbers and availability of naval escorts, amphibious shipping and associated size of marine/commando forcesairpower (offensive fast jets and attack helicopters, maritime patrol aircraft, AWACS, EW aircraft, tankers, air transport etc)numbers and training state of rapidly deployable land forces (army), including trained parachute forces - and the means to deploy themlogistics.Comparison Results of World Military Strengths

It’s P-8I (Poseidon Eight India) ,P-8I is a long-range, multimission maritime patrol aircraft manufactured by Boeing, for the Indian Navy. It is a variant of the P-8A Poseidon operated by the US Navy. P-8I is intended to replace the ageing fleet of Tupolev Tu-142 aircraft that are in service with the Indian Navy.The P-8I aircraft was designed to protect the vast coastline and territorial waters of India. It can conduct anti-submarine warfare (ASW), anti-surface warfare (AsuW), intelligence, maritime patrol, and surveillance and reconnaissance missions.The first P-8I aircraft arrived on schedule at India Naval Station Rajali on May 15, 2013 and the subsequent aircraft that were delivered have joined the Indian Navy's fleet, enhancing India's long-range maritime reconnaissance and anti-submarine warfare capabilities.Based on the company's Next-Generation 737 commercial airplane, the P-8I is the Indian Navy variant of the P-8A Poseidon that Boeing has developed for the U.S. Navy.In order to efficiently design and build the P-8I and the P-8A, the Boeing-led team is using a first-in-industry, in-line production process that draws on the company's Next-Generation 737 production system.The P-8I features open system architecture, advanced sensor and display technologies, and a worldwide base of suppliers, parts and support equipment. P-8I aircraft are built by a Boeing-led industry team that includes CFM International, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Spiri tAeroSystems, BAE Systems and GE Aviation.P-8I design and constructionThe P-8I aircraft is based on the Boeing Next Generation 737-800 aircraft. The forward section of the under-fuselage houses an internal weapons bay. The wings are fitted with hardpoints for carrying air-to-surface missiles.The aircraft has a length of 39.47m, wing span of 37.64m and a height of 12.83m. The maximum take-off gross weight of the P-8I is 85,139kg.The P-8I aircraft are produced by a Boeing-led industry team, comprising CFM International, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Spirit AeroSystems, BAE Systems and GE Aviation. The aircraft are being built at Boeing's production facility in Renton.The fuselage is built by Spirit AeroSystems in Wichita and shipped to Renton, for fabrication and final assembly. The flight testing of P-8I is conducted from Boeing Field in Seattle. The final design review was concluded in July 2010 and production of the P-8I began in December 2010. The final assembly of the first aircraft was completed in August 2011.P-8I cockpit, avionics and weaponsThe P-8I aircraft is manned by nine crew members. The cockpit is integrated with primary flight display, multifunction displays, identification friend or foe (IFF), flight management system and stores management system.The aircraft is equipped with a CAE AN/ASQ-508A magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) system, APS-143C(V)3 multimode radar and a global version of the Raytheon APY-10 surveillance radar.Magnetic Anomaly Detector of P-8IThe APY-10 radar provides precise information in all-weather, day and night missions. The P-8I also integrates BEL Data Link II communications system, Avantel mobile satellite system and a speech secrecy system from Electronics Corporation of India (ECIL).The internal weapons bay can house Mark 54 torpedoes, depth charges and free-fall bombs. The under-wing hardpoints can be armed with air-to-surface missiles.In December 2010, India requested a sale of AGM-84L Harpoon Block II anti-ship missiles and associated equipment to equip its P-8I aircraft. The Harpoon Block II carries a 226kg blast / fragmentation warhead. It can be fired against land and sea targets.Countermeasures of the Indian Navy aircraftThe countermeasures are provided by directional infrared countermeasures (DIRCM) system and the electronic support measures (ESM) system supplied by Northrop Grumman. The DIRCM can protect the aircraft from incoming infrared guided missiles.Engines and performanceThe P-8I aircraft is powered by two CFM56-7 engines supplied by CFM International, a joint venture between Snecma Moteurs and GE Electric. Each engine provides a take-off thrust of 27,300lb. The engines are equipped with a new-generation full authority digital engine control (FADEC) system.The P-8I aircraft can fly at a maximum speed of 789 km/h and can reach a maximum altitude of 12,496m. The aircraft has a maximum range of 2,222km with four hours on station.The low point of any high tone foreign purchase of military hardware, becomes it’s after sale support and spare parts availability. This was one of the main reason behind Make In India, is given so much push in Indian Armed Forces. Boeing on the other hand understood the pulse and has already created offset suppliers for P-8I, which mean, Indian Navy doesn’t have to wait for spare parts to make the birds flying again.India's long-range maritime snooping and anti-submarine warfare capabilities have received a huge boost with these Poseidon-8Is.The aircraft will provide the Indian Navy the necessary reach and flexibility to undertake extensive surveillance as also to respond swiftly and effectively to contingencies in our areas of interest.Interesting facts about the Boeing P-8I:Armed with deadly Harpoon Block-II missiles, MK-54 lightweight torpedoes, rockets and depth charges, these sensor and radar-packed aircraft are the country's "intelligent hawk eyes" over the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) that is increasingly getting militarized.The P-8I aircraft has achieved a number of operational milestones which includes participation in the search effort for Malaysian Airlines Flight MH 370, the first successful firing of air launched Harpoon Block II missile in the world, torpedo firing and active participation in major naval exercises.Its communication and sensor suite includes indigenous equipment developed by defence PSUs and private manufacturers. Equipped with foreign and indigenous sensors for maritime reconnaissance, anti-submarine operations and electronic intelligence missions, the aircraft is fully integrated with state-of-the-art sensors and highly potent anti-surface and anti-submarine weapons.With a maximum speed of 907 kmph and an operating range of over 1,200 nautical miles, "with four hours on station", the P-8Is will be able to detect "threats" — and neutralize them if required — far before they come anywhere near Indian shores.The P-8I aircraft is a variant of the P-8A Poseidon aircraft that Boeing developed as a replacement for the US Navy's ageing P-3 fleet.Indian Navy became the first international customer for the P-8 aircraft with the conclusion of the nearly US $ 2.1 billion contract on 01 Jan 2009 for a total of eight aircraft. The first aircraft arrived in India on the 15 May 2013 and as of date; all eight aircraft have been inducted into the Indian Navy and are fully integrated into its operations.The aircraft are based at INS Rajali, and are operated by Indian Naval Air Squadron 312A under the command of Commander Venkateshwaran RanganathanOperations Undertaken by P-8IIn January 2016, two P-8I aircraft were deployed for 2 weeks at a military base in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The deployment comes as a response to repeated forays of Chinese conventional and nuclear submarines into the Indian Ocean.On 20-23 March 2016, a P-8I aircraft was deployed to Seychelles to undertake surveillance of the Seychelles EEZ. This was the first time that the P8I aircraft has been deployed to SeychellesOn 15 April 2016, a P-8I aircraft managed to thwart a piracy attack on the high seas by flying over a merchant vessel which was being targeted by a pirate mother ship and two skiffs around 800 nautical miles from Mumbai. The P-8I was on a routine surveillance mission over the Arabian Sea when it received distress calls from the merchant vessel, the Malta-flagged MV Sezai Selah, on the international Channel 16 distress radio. The pirate mother ship and the two high-speed skiffs had come quite close to the merchant vessel. The P-8I immediately responded and made warning transmissions over Channel 16 while flying over the pirate boats. The pirate boats got frightened and altered course to leave MV Sezai Selah alone.Next OrderIndian Navy was so impressed by the capabilities of P-8I, that went forward to order four more, which was part of previous deal and optional.The Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), chaired by PM Narendra Modi, has approved the purchase of four additional Boeing P-8I Neptune aircraft at a cost of $1 billion (Rs 6,700 crore). They are expected to be inducted into the Indian Navy over the next three years.Following are some interesting video’s of P-8ISources:-P-8I Multimission Maritime Patrol AircraftP-8I: 21st Century Maritime Security for the Indian Navy?INAS 312 - WikipediaIndian Navy's Boeing P-8Is dedicated to the nation: 7 facts about surveillance aircraftIndian Navy gets 6th Boeing P-8I and orders 6 advanced ACTAS towed array sonarsP-8I maritime patrol aircraftP.S Sorry for late reply…..!!!Thank You.!

I nominate Captain Charles Butler McVay III: the biggest, most unfortunate and most undeserved scapegoat in the history of the US Navy.McVay’s ship, Portland-class heavy cruiser USS Indianapolis, 10 July 1945. The ship would not survive long enough to see the month of August.On 28 July 1945, USS Indianapolis under the command of Captain McVay, anchored at Guam, was ordered to depart for Leyte, where they would receive training before proceeding to join Vice Admiral Oldendorf’s Task Force 95. For a ship like the Indianapolis, the Guam-Leyte route was extremely hazardous: indeed, no Allied capital ship had successfully made that journey in the entire war without an anti-submarine escort. Unlike several of the US Navy capital ships at that point of the war, the Indianapolis was not outfitted with any submarine detection equipment. Against submarine attack, she was all but defenseless.Indeed, the Buckley-class destroyer escort USS Underhill was torpedoed by a Kaiten manned torpedo fired from a Japanese submarine and sunk in the area four days before the departure of the Indianapolis. None of the crew of the Indianapolis, including Captain McVay, were informed of the event: instead, the official briefing given stated that there was no known submarine activity on their route.Still concerned, McVay requested a destroyer escort prior to his departure. His request was refused.Two days after departure, the Indianapolis ran into the Japanese Type B3 submarine I-58, commanded by Mochitsura Hashimoto. Hashimoto was a veteran Navy man, having served in the Imperial Japanese Navy for more than ten years and having been a submariner for five of those. A Japanese submarine against a clueless heavy cruiser that had neither sonar nor hydrophones was a singularly one-sided conflict: on periscope depth, I-58 fired a spread of six torpedoes and scored three hits. The Indianapolis capsized and sank within twelve minutes, taking nearly three hundred crewmen with it.The last voyage of the Indianapolis- the small arrow shows the location of sinking.And thus, as if the criminally suicidal action of sending Indianapolis to Leyte unescorted was not bad enough, began a comedy of errors.When Indianapolis did not arrive at Leyte on schedule, no report was made of the fact. Lieutenant Stuart B. Gibson, operations officer responsible for tracking the movements of the Indianapolis, marked the ship as having arrived on date, made no report of the delay, and did not investigate the disappearance. The ship’s desperate distress calls were picked up by three shore stations- the commander of one of which was drunk and ignored the call, the second was asleep and had ordered his subordinates not to wake him up, and the third thought it a Japanese ruse and promptly discarded the message.For three and a half days, the United States Navy had lost a ten thousand ton Portland-class heavy cruiser, and nobody had a fucking idea where it was. Meanwhile, nearly nine hundred sailors were stuck in the middle of the Pacific, dying of thirst, hunger, sun and shark attacks.The loss of the Indianapolis was not realized until a Lockheed PV-1 Ventura on maritime patrol duty spotted the men discarded in the ocean by chance, at 10.25 on 2 August. First surface rescue did not make it to the site until after nightfall, in form of the destroyer escort USS Cecil J. Doyle. Seven destroyers and destroyer escorts picked up 316 survivors, two of which died later, from the 1196 strong crew of the Indianapolis. Although wounded, Captain McVay was among the survivors: the next few days, he would feverishly keep asking where the Navy was for four days. He received no answers.But while the crew of the Indianapolis was now safe, the captain’s woes were just beginning.Survivors of the Indianapolis at Guam, August 1945.With the gross display of incompetence that had seen the Indianapolis sunk, someone had to take responsibility- and as expected, it was not those who actually were responsible from the catastrophe.A Navy Court of Inquiry recommended that McVay be brought before a court martial to account for the loss of his ship. The recommendation was hotly contested by Admiral Raymond Spruance, McVay’s direct superior, and Admiral Chester Nimitz ignored the recommendation and issued McVay a letter of reprimand. Nimitz’s decision was then overturned by Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Ernest King(who was speculated to have used the incident to get back at McVay’s father, a retired admiral whom King served under and was reprimanded by long ago), and the court martial was convened by Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal.McVay’s court martial was a laughable kangaroo court the outcome of which was decided from the start. Captain McVay stood accused of endangering his ship by not zigzagging en route, failing to give a timely order to abandon ship, and failing to send a distress signal.The fact that the Indianapolis had sent a distress signal which was received and ignored, let alone being brought to the court martial, was not declassified until half a century later. The denial of McVay’s request for destroyer escort was not brought to court. That the presence of confirmed submarine activity on his route was hidden from McVay was not brought to court.Though it was true that McVay, who was under orders to ‘zigzag at his own discretion’, did not have the Indianapolis zigzagging at the time it was sunk, it was testified by several American submarine officers that the technique of zigzagging was of negligible value against submarines. Hashimoto himself, brought in from Japan to testify against McVay, had one thing to say about that particular charge: no amount of zigzagging would save the Indianapolis from the I-58. The ship was doomed.I-58 on its trial runs, May 1944.For McVay, the disgrace of being the first American soldier to be court-martialed despite the opposition of his immediate superior and the only US Navy officer of the Second World War to be court-martialed over the loss of his own ship was just the start. Although he was acquitted on the charge of failing to give an order to abandon ship(because it had been shown that the torpedo hits knocked out the electrical equipment of the Indianapolis, meaning if McVay had to order someone to do something, he had to be in shouting distance), he was, despite all the testimonies by several submarine commanders including Hashimoto himself and thanks to the fact that the Indianapolis was sailing into known submarine activity being concealed from the court martial, found guilty of endangering his ship and sentenced accordingly.Although Nimitz personally remitted his sentence and restored him to active duty, the loss of seniority and the utter annihilation of his until then excellent reputation torpedoed McVay’s career beyond recovery. He retired from the Navy in 1949, with a tombstone promotion to rear admiral on retirement.It still was not over. Eight hundred and eighty-two people had died with the sinking of the Indianapolis, and the US Navy had thrown McVay before the wolves. For the rest of his life, mail from angered families condemning him for the deaths of their sons, husbands and brothers rained on his door. Hundreds of families, families of the men he knew and commanded, called him a murderer for decades to come.On 6 November 1968, his gardener found Captain Charles Butler McVay dead in his back porch. In one hand, he held his Navy service revolver with which he had shot himself, in the other, a toy sailor that his father, himself an admiral, had given him as a boy for good luck.None of the multitude of people who were responsible for the sinking of the Indianapolis received more than letters of reprimand. Most of them did not even receive that much. And with their annoying scapegoat, the one man who had no blame in the affair, now dead, the United States military just twiddled their thumbs and hoped everybody would forget. And everybody did forget- as the survivors of the Indianapolis who had spent decades fighting for the good name of their captain one by one died off or gave up, for three decades, everything was forgotten.Until a bloody kid took notice.Standing between former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich(left) and then-Representative Joe Scarborough(right) is Hunter Alan Scott: the sixth grade student who did what a court martial had not bothered to do. Photo by Associated Press, 18 July 1998.It was a sixth grade student from Florida, Hunter Alan Scott, who ended up uncovering the covered up true story of the Indianapolis. His work, having started as a school project and later evolved into a hunt for truth involving eight hundred authentic documents and interviews with most of the still-alive Indianapolis survivors, tore free the real story of the ship from where it was buried. His then-Congressman Joe Scarborough led Hunter and the Indianapolis Survivors Organization to before the Congress, where they testified concerning their research and McVay’s clear innocence.On 30 October 2000, then-President Bill Clinton signed a Congress resolution exonerating McVay of all charges. Little more than half a year later, then-Secretary of the Navy Gordon Richard England had McVay’s record purged of all wrongdoing.It was an apology given thirty-two years too late to have any real value, an apology to an unfortunate soul who was treated with more honor by the enemy soldier who sank his ship than by his own country, and whose story was researched with more care, attention, honesty and integrity by a twelve year old kid than it was by the Court of Inquiry and the subsequent court martial whose duty was to do exactly that.