Douglas County Affidavit: Fill & Download for Free

There seems to be no proof from California in the 2016 election.Here are some examples of actual convictions for voter fraud I did find (I’ll lead off with an example of voter fraud by one of those dreaded foreign immigrants):North Carolina 2003:Who: Joshua WorkmanOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONIneligible VotingJoshua Workman, a Canadian citizen who was one of the youngest delegates to the 2000 Republican National Convention, was charged by the Department of Justice with casting ineligible votes during the 2000 and 2002 primary and general elections in Avery County. He made false statements claiming U.S. citizenship in order to vote. As part of a plea agreement, Workman pleaded guilty to a federal misdemeanor charge of providing false information to election officials and subsequently returned to Canada.Michigan 2012:Who: Jason Bauer and Mike McGuinnessOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONBallot Petition FraudFormer Oakland County Democratic Party officials, Jason Bauer and Mike McGuinness, were charged with election fraud for trying to put a fake Tea Party candidate on the ballot in order to dilute the Republican vote. Bauer pleaded no contest and was sentenced to one year probation and $2,600 in fines. McGuinness pleaded no contest to perjury and forgery, and received one year probation, 180 hours of community service, and $1,965 in fines.Alabama 2000:Who: Sheriff David Sutherland, Denita Lee, Eugene Emerson, Idas “Spooky” Neal, Jr., Judge Ann Richardson, Jimmy Richardson, Mary Jo Ingram, Scotty Cole, William F. BaileyOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONBuying Votes, Fraudulent Use of Absentee BallotsAn absentee-ballot buying operation was uncovered in Winston County, Alabama, that led to the conviction of the sheriff, circuit clerk, a district judge, and several candidates for county commission and the board of education. The conspirators set out to buy absentee ballots in the 2000 Republican primary with bribes of cash, beer, and liquor. Judge Richardson pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of failing to report campaign expenditures; the others pleaded guilty to felony charges stemming from the operation. Bailey was sentenced to three years’ probation, plus a $1,000 fine and 250 hours of community service. Neal got three years’ probation, a $2,500 fine, and 250 hours’ community service. Ingram was ordered to serve a year in prison and pay a $1,000 fine. Emerson got two years’ probation. Judge Richardson resigned, and received a suspended six-month prison sentence, one year probation, and a $1,000 fine.California 2006:Who: Jason Holly, Jessica Sundell, and Donahue FarrowOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONFalse RegistrationsJason Holly and Jessica Sundell pleaded guilty in 2006 to a felony charge of fraudulent completion of an affidavit of registration, and were sentenced to three years’ probation. It was discovered that more than 100 people who thought they were signing petitions to cure breast cancer and punish child molesters were actually registering as Republicans in an elaborate vote-flipping scheme.Donahue Farrow pleaded guilty in 2008 for his involvement in this scheme. He was sentenced to 46 days in jail and three years’ probation. Five others have also pleaded guilty over their involvement in this scheme.Florida 2015:William HazardOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONFalse RegistrationsWilliam Hazard, 53, of West Boynton, pleaded guilty to one felony voter registration charge and three misdemeanor charges of attempting to submit false voter registration information. He was initially charged with multiple counts of false voter registration. He was sentenced to 10 days in the county jail, 36 months’ probation, and was ordered to pay a $7,500 fine. Hazard was hired by a consulting firm to register Republican voters; in the process he illegally switched party registrations for multiple voters and even registered his uncle, an Iowa resident, to vote in Florida.Kansas 2016:Who: James CriswellOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONDuplicate VotingJames Criswell, a Republican from Douglas County, Colorado, pleaded no contest to the charge of double voting in the November 2016 election. Having cast ballots in both Colorado and Kansas, Criswell was fined $1,000 and ordered to pay $158 in court costs. Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach was able to identify this instance of voter fraud through the Interstate Crosscheck Program, a voter registration database that includes 30 states.MASSACHUSETTS 2013:Who: Courtney LlewellynOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONFraudulent Use of Absentee BallotsCourtney Llewellyn, an East Longmeadow town employee, conspired with her husband to cast absentee ballots in her husband’s race for state office. She changed the party registration of 285 registered Democrats to unaffiliated, and then requested Republican primary ballots for all of them. She and her husband took the ballots on the pretense of mailing them to the voters, but never did so. Llewellyn pleaded guilty to five charges including larceny, forgery, conspiracy, and interfering with an election official. She was sentenced to one year of probation.New York 2008:Who: Vincent SculcoOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONBallot Petition FraudVincent Sculco, Republican Chairman for the town of North Greenbush, pleaded guilty to forging a signature on a nomination petition for a 2007 election. The investigation revealed that Sculco may have forged more than 40 signatures. Sculco was sentenced to the sheriff’s work-order program.North Carolina 2017:Who: Dewey GidcumbOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONDuplicate VotingDewey Gidcumb, of Haywood County, was found guilty of voting twice in the 2016 Republican Primary. Gidcumb first cast a ballot in the early voting period, then voted a second time on Election Day. He received a five-to-15-month suspended prison sentence, one year of supervised probation, and 24 hours of community service. He was also fined $100 and ordered to pay court costs.VIRGINIA 2013:Who: Jennifer DerreberyOUTCOME: CRIMINAL CONVICTIONBallot Petition FraudJennifer Derrebery, of Bassett, pleaded guilty to felony counts of election fraud and perjury after she produced hundreds of fraudulent signatures on a petition to get Newt Gingrich on the ballot for the Republican presidential nomination. She received a 10-year suspended sentence and five years’ probation, and she was required to pay $1,266 in court costs.There are many more examples of voter fraud.

What do you think of Trump tweeting that his legal team withdrew their election suit in Michigan because he won Michigan?This whole thing is a bit of a moving target as of November 19th, but the quick answer is that a) President Trump’s tweet is nonsense, because nothing happened that would have meant he “won Michigan,” and b) the Trump team’s lawsuits have been a real jumble, and if they withdrew a lawsuit based on what has happened in the last couple days, then they don’t seem to know what they are doing.Here are the facts in Michigan as they stand now:Joe Biden won Wayne County, the state’s most populous county and the location of Detroit, by something like 241,000 votes. Since his overall state lead is around 150,000, Trump would have won the state if you simply took Wayne County and ceded it to Ontario or something.The Trump team sued in Wayne County to prevent certification of the county’s vote totals based on vague accusations of fraud. But a judge dismissed this suit on November 13th.November 17th was the deadline for the Wayne County Board of Canvassers to certify the county’s votes. But when they met, they initially deadlocked 2–2 on party lines, preventing certification (but not rejecting certification either). Various Republicans, including Trump, celebrated this. If a county doesn’t certify its votes, then the state Board of Canvassers has to do so themselves.However, later on the 17th, the Wayne County board voted again, this time voting 4–0 to certify, based on both public pressure and an apparent agreement to have the state audit Wayne County’s results. With this vote, Wayne County’s results go to the State Board of Canvassers for final certification (along with the other 82 counties in Michigan).On the morning of November 19th, it was reported that the two Republican county canvassers had released affidavits stating that they wanted to change their votes again. It appears that this is what Trump and his team were reacting to, as though this game of takesies-backsies means that the county votes are again not certified and are somehow now just taken out of the state totals, giving the state to Trump.But, since November 17th was the last day for the county to vote, and they voted to certify on that date, there appears to be no mechanism for them to now go back and change their vote. Trump’s tweet, implying that some sort of final action has happened with Wayne County and that he is now leading in Michigan, is just wrong, because the state board has the authority to certify the county’s results even if the county canvassers’ most recent reversal was allowed (which it isn’t). The lawsuit, which sought to stop county certification, was withdrawn ostensibly on the premise that certification was now stopped, which it is not. If anything, it should be withdrawn since Wayne County voted to certify on the 17th, making it moot.The focus now goes to the state board of canvassers anyway, who are meeting on November 23rd, when they need to certify the election for the entire state. The state board is also, by statute, split 2–2 between the Republicans and Democrats. Since everyone is now suddenly focusing on the canvassing process in Michigan, there is clearly going to be pressure on the two Republican state canvassers to vote against certification, leading to a 2–2 deadlock there.If that happens, though, that doesn’t mean that the election is just “not certified.” It seems like the Republican Hail Mary thought is to prevent certification well into December so the Republican-controlled state legislature can just appoint Republican electors. But Michigan law doesn’t really give the state board of canvassers some kind of unilateral or unchecked authority to just block election results. Since all 83 counties provided certified results to the state, Michigan law appears to basically require the state board to certify the state results. Based on that, if the state board does deadlock, the Michigan Court of Appeals may simply order them to certify, which actually happened in a (lower-stakes) situation in 2006. Although I’ve looked up the relevant Michigan statutes, I’m not a lawyer, so read this article, which actually does a terrific job summarizing the entire issue as of today and includes links to other articles with even further detail:Michigan GOP canvassers under pressure to ignore votes, help TrumpIt’s worth noting that when you go to vote in Michigan, you fill out a single ballot for every election from president down to various local officials. Preventing certification of the election doesn’t just stop certification of presidential electors, it basically throws out the entire election statewide.This whole gambit seems, like everything else, to be really unlikely to actually allow Trump to receive Michigan’s electoral votes. And even if it did, taking Michigan away still leaves Joe Biden with 290 electoral votes. One of the flaws with Trump’s apparent long-shot strategy is that several states all need to somehow change. If folks in one state, or even two (or in some cases three) states, somehow pull off a steal, then they risk incurring a lot of outrage just to end up with Biden still in the White House.But as with so many other things with this circus, the bigger risk is really what precedent it sets going forward. I worry that we’ve already set a standard that election losers can always make fraud accusations and then file frivolous lawsuits against the result. Are we now also going to make it okay to lean on state officials to just throw out results? We know that the Georgia Secretary of State has received pressure from a U.S. Senator to throw out Democratic votes. Now we have canvassers - otherwise unremarkable, essentially bureaucratic officials - receiving pressure to do the same thing. Many election functions in the U.S. aren’t performed by neutral technocrats, but by elected or appointed officials with party affiliation, from secretaries of state to county clerks. Heretofore, the U.S. has had a clear norm that even though these officials are partisan, they will act as neutral referees and certify results that the other party won. How bad will it be for American democracy if, say, Republican secretaries of state decide to start just refusing to recognize any Democratic wins, or vice versa? The Michigan Board of State Canvassers consists of four otherwise unremarkable functionaries - how bad will it be for American democracy if minor, borderline ceremonial, officials have the ability to unilaterally throw out hundreds of thousands or millions of votes on a whim?

The Register of Action of any case will include any evidence that was filed electronically for the jury to look at as well as all written records of the case. It will typically be fraudulent. You can get the Register of Action of your own case for free from the Court’s Clerk window. There may be a way to get the Register of Action for any case that isn’t deemed by the judge confidential - if a pro-se party files documents the judge will not be able to keep a clean fraudulent written record and she’ll do it.Judges don’t like any transparency. It used to be that judges in Colorado had to record their hearings. But you could only get a tape or a transcript from the court in appeals and only from one particular transcriber. In Douglas County it is Transcribing Solutions - they stole a couple of thousand dollars from me.Judges would only record their ruling - if you only provide the transcript for the ruling part in appeals, then the ruling is automatically validated. However, if the court clerk gave you an affidavit showing that the judge only partially recorded the hearing then her ruling is automatically reversed. I paid Transcribing Solutions in Castle Rock $2000 for transcripts, but I excluded all partially recorded hearings from the Designation of Record on Appeal. That meant that they could transcribe none of the hearing - but they refused to give me back my money….I discovered about recordings when Judge Angela Arkin took bribes in my divorce case. I wrote about it to the appeals court and also online. Very soon I saw signs all over the courthouse: “your hearing may be recorded or it may be transcribed.”At that time my illegally appointed Guardian Ad Litem, Virginia Fraser Able, filed fraudulent transcripts with my case (which I excluded in my Designation of Record.) A friend of mine also discovered that she’s getting fraudulent transcripts.Here’s the thing: the Supreme Court convenes every Thursday here and responds to any threat to their bribe schemes instantly by making new illegal laws….On top of preventing video and camera in the court, as well as any recording devices, judges can make a case “secret” by not allowing anybody to get copies of the Register of Action. Also, they can just expunge any case, as if it never existed….That’s why journalists, if they are allowed to sit in the courtroom, have to resign to drawings… Drawings are just hearsay….