Personal Data Form For Employees: Fill & Download for Free

First of all, you would be overwhelmed to see how much data Google has about its users. From everything you search for (search query), to all the websites you visit (search results click, Chrome logs), to all the videos you watch (YouTube), to all the people you communicate to (GChat, G+, and Hangouts), to all the locations you go to (Google maps navigation, Google location history, and Latitude), to almost anything you do online. Basically, Google knows more about you than you know about yourself.As a data scientist, you get this huge amount of data to work on. Google takes the privacy and security of the personal data very very seriously. As a data scientist, you can get access to the anonymized version of the personal data for doing statistical analysis, machine learning, recommendation, prediction, or anything you want. Since the amount of data is so huge, simple algorithms also seem to give surprisingly accurate results.At Google, you can first test your algorithm within your team by making all team-members use it (internally called bug-bash), and later you can dogfood it for all Google employees to use. A lot of researchers also run experiments by hiring outside subjects and doing A/B testing. Some experiments are also run on production servers.

I might be able to provide some insight here... At Zenefits, we manage health insurance (and payroll, and stuff like onboarding, etc -- basically the "boring crap you don't want to deal with" trifecta) for ~ 100 companies. Mostly smaller tech companies, but there are a few others in the pool. Some data:Companies pay 90% of employees' medical insurance costs on average. 40% of companies paid for 100% of employees' personal medical insurance costs.A small handful of companies (less than 10%) pay a fixed amount for employees, rather than a percent of medical plan costs. The average amount paid is ~ $350 / employee / monthWhile subsidies for the employees themselves are quite high, only about half of companies pay anything at all for employees' dependents. Of the companies that do subsidize dependents, the average subsidy is 70% of dependents' medical insurance costs.15% of companies pay for 100% for both employees and dependentsCompanies are less generous in subsidizing dental & vision coverage. Only 65% of companies pay anything for employees' dental coverage (vs 100% for medical), however, the companies that do subsidize dental pay ~ 90% of the costs of a plan on average for employees. Only 30% of companies pay anything for dependents' dental coverage, and when they do, they pay an average of ~ 75% of dependents' costs.Only half of companies subsidize vision coverage. Among those that do, the average subsidy is ~ 90% of the plan cost. Only 25% of companies subsidize dependents' vision coverage, and when they do, they pay about 75%So what's our recommendation?We recommend you pay for 80-90% of employees' insurance costs -- enough that the company is really shouldering most of the load, but leave some cost-sharing in there so that employees have an incentive to choose less expensive plans.We recommend you pay no more than 50% for employee's dependents. The reason for this is that there's a bit of a race to the bottom when it comes to dependents. If an employee's spouse has health coverage through their own employer, you would much rather they get their coverage through their own employer, rather than joining your plan. So you don't want to offer them more generous benefits than their own employer.Of course, I'm always happy to jump on the phone and talk through this stuff with anyone who wants! :)

If by “personal data” you mean a user’s private data stored in Google services, the answer is NO. No. Definitely not. Absolutely not. NO!