Story Release Form Video Release: Fill & Download for Free

My thought?That it is in support of Save the Children’s Save with Stories campaign[1][1][1][1], designed to raise money for children affected by the Covid-19 pandemic.You can see the clip and read the charity’s response on Instagram[2][2][2][2] .I should like to be able to suggest that no-one could possibly attack Meghan for this. Clearly, I am not cynical enough, however, as I have just reported an insincere answer to an unrelated question that did just that.Shameful.Footnotes[1] Save the Children UK | Global Children's Charity[1] Save the Children UK | Global Children's Charity[1] Save the Children UK | Global Children's Charity[1] Save the Children UK | Global Children's Charity[2] Save The Children UK on Instagram: “"Duck! Rabbit!" with Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex (and Harry, The Duke of Sussex behind the camera), read to their son Archie for his 1st…”[2] Save The Children UK on Instagram: “"Duck! Rabbit!" with Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex (and Harry, The Duke of Sussex behind the camera), read to their son Archie for his 1st…”[2] Save The Children UK on Instagram: “"Duck! Rabbit!" with Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex (and Harry, The Duke of Sussex behind the camera), read to their son Archie for his 1st…”[2] Save The Children UK on Instagram: “"Duck! Rabbit!" with Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex (and Harry, The Duke of Sussex behind the camera), read to their son Archie for his 1st…”

I’m not one to claim that it isn’t Harry in his Wellchild or Invictus video, or that there is no Archie, but I do wonder if the two people shown in this video are really them. They are walking completely alone, no delivery vehicle or protection officers in sight. They are wearing masks so it could be anyone. If it is them, well, good for them. But it seems like damage control after allowing the story about the BBC donation being credited to them. Just my humble opinion.

It reminds me an old story, which used to be very popular during our childhood.A man was suffering from cold. He went to a doctor for treatment.The doctor advised him to take bath in cold water and come to his clinic next day.Once the patient was gone, the compounder asked the doctor, “Why did you advise him to take cold bath when he is having a severe cold? Will it not deteriorate his condition even more?”Doctor smiled and said in a hissed tone, “If a patient takes bath during severe cold, he would surely get pneumonia. I can then start the treatment because I know the treatment of pneumonia, but I don’t know the treatment of cold.”This is what had happened in respect of demonetization.We don’t know if it has benefited the country more or harmed more.You can’t expect the government to speak the whole truth about of a scheme which has been launched by it.One thing is sure that 99% of the demonetized notes had been returned to the banks.[1][1][1][1]Thus only 1% of the banned currency notes were destroyed or removed from circulation, which is much lower than the expectations of the Government.It is true that the patient is no more suffering from cold.However, it is also a fact that pneumonia has gone out of control even for the doctor.Footnotes[1] RBI annual report: 99% of demonetised currency back with central bank[1] RBI annual report: 99% of demonetised currency back with central bank[1] RBI annual report: 99% of demonetised currency back with central bank[1] RBI annual report: 99% of demonetised currency back with central bank