Zip Code Boundaries In New Orleans & Surrounding Parishes: Fill & Download for Free

Where can I find Lat/Long boundary data for zip codes? I want to be able to download a file with each zip codWhere can I find Lat/Long boundary data for zip codes? I want to be able to download a file with each zip code and the latitude and longitude of the boundaries of each zip code. The link I attached is what I am looking for but is not up to date.e and the latitude and longitude of the boundaries of each zip code. The link I attached is what I am looking for but is not up to date.The only data that is RELATIVELY current is provided by the government (Data.govThe home of the U.S. Government’s open data Here you will find data, tools, and resources to conduct research, develop web and mobile applications, design data visualizations, and more. For information regarding the Coronavirus/COVID-19, please visit Coronavirus.gov.http://Data.gov). GETTING the data may require some administrative effort, it may not be free. It used to be available as tapes with the expense of tape handling and cost of media (couple of hundred dollars).Your problem will then be formatting the data for use (been there once a LONG time ago - was given the task to make a map of the New Orleans area from the data). The problem is that the lines defining the zip code are rather complex - with one or more lines defining a single boundary - and each line has a latitude/longitude starting point and ending point, and you have to connect the endpoints…. which don’t necessarily make a closed line.The problem then depends on the resolution of the latitude/longitude recording, and not all lines are measured at the same time - so land shift can occur between when the different parts of the line are made… resulting in connection gaps. This isn’t a problem for local mail delivery as the people carrying out that task tend to know the area and still get to the right place without even thinking about it. But it is a problem for maps… And in the countryside, streams and rivers can move… and change the boundaries too.

“If we could get rid of the Second Amendment, would there be less gun violence like Canada?”It is difficult to say, as most of the statistical comparisons compiled are chosen in order to suggest that access to guns are the problem rather than to determine whether access to firearms account for the difference.For example, there have long been very strict gun control laws in countries such as Brazil and Jamaica, but extremely high rates of both murder in general and gun violence in particular as compared with the U.S. Gun control advocates argue that those are poor countries but the U.S. is rich, so the U.S. ought to be compared only with rich countries.But what does it mean that a country is rich or that a country is poor? All of these aforementioned countries have citizens who are rich, citizens who are middle-class, and citizens who are poor. All of these countries have people who are functionally illiterate and innumerate, and who therefore feel frustration and lack of hope. The difference is in the proportions.The frustrated, hopeless, illiterate people are a much higher percentage of the population in Brazil than in the U.S., but might not such people be a significantly higher percentage of the population in the U.S. than in Canada? When I lived in New Orleans, I read in the newspaper that 50% of the residents within the city boundaries were functionally illiterate. Can such a thing be said for any Canadian city?To investigate the effects of gun control, it would therefore seem appropriate to correlate for certain social and cultural standards when comparing the rtes of violent death. Unfortunately, no one records for each death statistics about the murderer's socioeconomic level.It a regretted fact that, in the U.S., many significant socioeconomic factors are highly correlated with ethnicity. Whether this is explained by current racism, institutional racism, structural racism, or other differences in historical experience, it remains a fact. For example, I have read that in Chicago, along with much defacto ethnic and economic residential segregation, there are some zip codes which have murder rates comparable to those of Europe and other zip codes with murder rates comparable to those of the most violent countries of South America — even though the entire city is subject to the same same gun control laws.Therefore, it makes sense to compare across countries within similar ethnic groups to see the effects of gun control laws. One might ask such questions as: "How does the rate at which Jews commit murder (but with and without guns) differ between Brazil, the U.S. and Canada?" "What would be the comparison among recent Japanese immigrants to those countries?" "Immigrants of the last 150 years from Sicily?" And so on.No one, to my knowledge is doing research of this nature. It is more difficult than comparing grosser, but less meaningful statistics. Also, I believe that the people who compare rates of gun violence are not interested in determining the usefulness of gun control so much as they are interested in convincing people that gun control should be accepted. They're real motivation for wanting gun control is more philosophical and political — concerning their concept of what it means to be civilized.So the answer is that we really don’t know, and people in the gun control movement are not interested in knowing. It remains a possibility that gun control just isn’t all that effective. And if not, given a large number of violent people in a society, taking away well-behaved people’s best means of self-defense might have disastrous consequences.In Brazil, for example, middle-class people are so frustrated by crime and their helplessness in the face of it that in some cities police killings of street children actually receives tacit public support. Gun control in a society that is not law-abiding to begin with might actually lead to a drop in the standards of civility.And that is not even taking into account the resulting fury of the people committed to the right to keep and bear arms when subjected to a government which denies that right. Politics would likely become a whole lot meaner.