Amx Programming Example: Fill & Download for Free

Thanks for the A2A Shane Rooney.That’s actually a pretty hard question, since I really struggle to find examples of modern AFVs that look nearly identical to WW2 AFVs.Of course, there are some examples of refurbished and heavily modernized WW2 AFVs that saw service until relatively recently. For example, Chile operated modified M4 Shermans until 1999:Chilean M60 Sherman with 60mm hyper-velocity gunThere’s also the more famous example of Israeli M-51 Shermans, equipped with a modified French 105mm rifled gun:But these are proper WW2 vehicles that were simply modified for modern use. They are not technically modern AFVs that look like WW2 vehicles.However, there is one particular example of a modern vehicle with a decidedly “WW2 look” that springs to my mind. Meet the Panhard SPHINX:The SPHINX was developed as a private venture by French defense contractor Panhard as their bid for the EBRC program of the French Army (to replace the AMX-10RC and the ERC-90 Sagaie in French service). The SPHINX was therefore designed as a light cavalry vehicle, able to perform armed recon and light attack missions. To my eyes, the SPHINX really reminds me of a WW2 armored scout car:M8 Greyhound armored carHowever, the SPHINX lost the EBRC bid in favor of the Jaguar (from Nexter, Thales and Renault):

I personally use an All4One remote. They operate the majority of TV, AV and Hi-Fi equipment straight out of the box by ‘programming’ them with a simple code from a manual depending on the manufacturer of the device you wish to control. The more advanced models have a ‘learning mode’ where they can learn the IR code from an existing remote control, assign that function to a button and then mimic that remote function.Still more advanced models allow you to create macros. For instance, the audio output from my Sky satellite receiver is a significantly lower level than the output from my CD player and tuner, and the output from my Freeview PVR unit is a little higher. When switching sources, I use a macro to tweak the volume on my Denon amplifier so that the sound level is the same when switching sources.If you want to go really up-market, then a professional touch screen control system from the likes of AMX or Crestron are the way to go. Not only can you control all your entertainment systems but you can also control external devices such as room lighting or electric blinds/curtains.Crestron systems do need programming though, so they are not for the casual user.

What do you mean by the "best" home control system? Best as in least expensive? Best as in best for a DIY project that a consumer can setup and service? Or, best as in most feature rich and flexible? The answer will vary depending on the definition of "best".I will assume by "best" you mean the most feature rich and flexible. Based on my perspective, which includes 15 years in the industry, I would say few systems come close to what Crestron can do. They have it all, and then some.There are keypads and touchpanels that can be programmed to do absolutely anything. There are several different lighting systems that can either replace existing switches and dimmers, or allow relocation of switches to an electronics closet leaving the walls clutter free. They have audio and video distribution hardware that allow all components to be located remotely, sending HD video across the house over Cat5 cabling. Virtually any kind of security or HVAC system can be integrated, using custom written modules if there aren't existing RS-232 or ethernet software written already. And so much more...In addition to touchpanels, hard button keypads, hand held remote controls, mobile device apps and web pages for controlling the system, you can also program sub-system interfaces to control other products. For instance, you can make buttons on a Lutron lighting keypad control the audio system or TV functions, or the pool, or the entry gate, or a sprinkler system. Or, as I had to do several times, make a Jandy pool and spa controller keypad, or a security keypad, send commands to the lighting system, with Crestron acting as the middle man, passing commands between the systems.Yes, Crestron is expensive. And yes, unless you are technically inclined it does require a programmer and/or an installer everytime you add or change DVD players or want to change the functionality of a button or scene. However, in terms of flexibility and interoperability between sub-systems, the variety and customizability of user interfaces, and the range of hardware available, only AMX comes anywhere close.I am a bit biased, having been a Crestron dealer and programmer. And to be fair, things have progressed a bit since I have been active in the industry, so there could be some new developments that I am not aware of... However, just because a device can be controlled with an app, or a webpage, doesn't make it "intelligent". In addition, considering potential security issues, having the operation of your home acessible in any way to an online service, simply doesn't seem that smart to me.An example of a "smart home" is when the garage doors open, and the security system is armed, and it's dark outside, that lights inside the house light a pathway to the main living spaces, and the thermostats change to night mode, while waiting for the security system to be disarmed. Once the system is disarmed, your favorite music playlist can start playing in the home at a low volume level, while the spa is turned on and warmed up, but only if it's a weekday, and not a holiday. That is what could be done 10 years ago with Crestron, and it's still not possible with many so-called "automation" systems today.Then again, not everyone needs that kind of system. For many people simply having one user interface to individually control multiple systems is enough. What is "best" depends on one's expectation of what "intelligent" means, and the amount of expendible income one has at one's disposal.