The Foregoing Is A General Summary Of The Restrictions And Limitations Imposed By In: Fill & Download for Free

As John Greathouse noted, in a Series Seed round made up of Accredited Investors, you are not legally required to provide a prospectus or any specific disclosure schedules. As a matter of fact, I actually can't recall (at least recently) seeing a Disclosure Schedule in any of the [many] deals that I have done.Where these schedules and lists do appear, however, is in the due diligence requests from serious investors, which they will undertake prior to the closing. Depending on the size of the round and the size and professionalism of the investors (and the budget of their lawyers) the requested information may range from practically nothing more than a business plan and a slide deck (for an informal seed round), all the way up to a voluminous amount of material for a later stage venture round from a top tier fund.The closing documents will then generally include a representations and warranties clause, in which you swear on a stack of bibles (backed up by some severe economic penalties) that everything you've previously told your investors is actually true...particularly such teeny little issues as "we own all our code" and "we are operating perfectly legally".But if you want an idea as to how far the disclosure issue can go, Entrepreneur Magazine has posted a sample Due Diligence checklist (http://www.entrepreneur.com/formnet/form/774) that includes the following items (but be sure to check out their link for their terms of use and attribution):"Due Diligence" Investigation Check ListCORPORATE MATTERSa. Articles of Incorporation and by-laws of the Company and Seller.b. Corporate minute books and stock transfer records of the Company.c. Federal and state tax returns and related reports of the Company including:i. income tax returns,ii. audit reports of taxing authorities including descriptions of any open issues,iii. real estate tax bills and payment records,iv. personal property tax bills and payment records,v. franchise, license, capital stock, doing business, and similar tax reports, andvi. any other material documents.d. Agreements and arrangements between the Company and Seller or any affiliate of the Company or Seller, including:i. stock subscription agreements,ii. loan, line of credit or other financing arrangements,iii. tax sharing agreements or arrangements,iv. overhead allocation agreements or arrangements,v. management services or personnel loan agreements or arrangements,vi. guarantees or keep-well arrangements for the benefit of creditors or other third parties, andvii. any others.e. Shareholder agreements relating to stock of the Company or stock owned by the Company.f. Documents imposing restrictions or conditions on stock transfer or merger, including any arrangements granting rights of first refusal or other preferential purchase rights.g. Third-party or governmental consent or authorizations required for merger or acquisition.FINANCIAL MATTERSa. Financial statements, including:i. audited financial statements for all periods beginning on or after ^, 19^, consisting, in each case, of at least a balance sheet and income statement,ii. interim monthly unaudited financial statements for periods after the latest audited statements, andiii. working papers relating to the foregoing.b. Bank accounts and depositary arrangements.c. Credit agreements and credit instruments including loan agreements, notes, debentures and bonds, and files relating thereto.d. Performance and financial bonds.e. Letters of credit.f. Instruments or arrangements creating liens, encumbrances, mortgages, or other charges (including mechanics and materialmens' liens) on any real or personal property of the Company, including property held indirectly through joint ventures, partnerships, subsidiaries or otherwise.g. Receivables analysis including aging, turnover and bad debt experience.MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONSa. Internal management reports and memoranda.b. Policy and procedures manuals including those concerning personnel policy, internal controls and legal and regulatory compliance.c. Budgets, financial projections, business plans and capital expenditure plans.d. Contracts and arrangements for supplies or services, including the following which were entered into or under which work was done during the past ^ years:i. contracts for the sale or purchase of real estate,ii. contracts for the purchase or sale of materials, equipment or other personal property or fixtures,iii. contracts or other arrangements for legal, accounting, consulting, brokerage, banking or other services, andiv. construction and engineering contracts or subcontracts.e. Proprietary information and documents, including:i. patents and patent applications,ii. copyrights,iii. trademarks, service marks, logos and trade or assumed names,iv. nonpatentable proprietary know-how,v. federal and state filings relating to any of the foregoing,vi. licensing agreements relating to any of the foregoing (whether the Company is a licensor or licensee), andvii. confidentiality agreements relating to any of the foregoing.f. Partnership or joint venture agreements to which the Company is a party and any other arrangements with third parties concerning the management or operation of properties, facilities or investments of the Company.g. Reports to management, board of directors or shareholders prepared by outside consultants, engineers or analysts.h. Closing documentation and related files for each prior sale of Company stock and each material asset purchase or sale by the Company during the past ^ years.i. Leases, deeds and related instruments, including without limitation, office premises leases, equipment or vehicle leases, and any such instruments held indirectly through joint ventures, partnerships, subsidiaries or otherwise.j. Agreements or arrangements granting rights of first refusal or other preferential purchase rights to any property of the Company.k. Other material agreements or arrangements.EMPLOYEE MATTERSa. Corporate policies concerning hiring, compensation, advancement and termination.b. Labor contracts together with a list of all labor unions that have represented or attempted to represent employees of the Company during the past ^ years.c. Agreements with individual employees, including:i. executive employment agreements,ii. bonus, profit-sharing and similar arrangements,iii. postemployment agreements including "salary continuation" and "golden parachute" arrangements, andiv. covenants not to compete by present or former employees.d. Names of any officers or key employees who have left the Company during the past years.e. Each of the following which the Company maintains or contributes to, together with filings with the Internal Revenue Service, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Labor, including without limitation Forms 5500 and 5310, summary plan descriptions, summary annual reports, IRS determination letters (for qualified plans), and PBGC reportable events:i. Union-sponsored multiemployer plans,ii. Defined benefit plans,iii. Defined contribution plans including:1. money purchase pension plans,2. profit-sharing plans,3. stock bonus plans,4. employee stock ownership plans, and5. savings or thrift plans,iv. Health and welfare plans, including:1. medical, surgical, hospital or other health care plans or insurance programs including HMOs,2. dental plans,3. short-term disability or sick pay plans or arrangements,4. long-term disability insurance or uninsured arrangements,5. group term or other life or accident insurance,6. unemployment or vacation benefit plans, and7. other welfare plans,v. Nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements including:1. director or officer deferred fee plans,2. excess benefit plans (providing benefits in excess of internal revenue code limitations for qualified plans), and3. severance pay plans,vi. Incentive or bonus plans including:1. stock option plans,2. stock bonus plans,3. stock purchase plans, and4. cash bonus or incentive plans.INSURANCEa. Insurance policies including those covering:i. fire,ii. liability,iii. casualty,iv. life,v. title,vi. workers' compensation,vii. directors' and officers' liability, andviii. any other insured events or matters.b. Claim and loss histories, correspondence with insurance carriers and names of all insurance representatives relating to the foregoing.REAL ESTATE AND EQUIPMENT AND OTHER PERSONAL PROPERTYa. List of real estate (with legal descriptions), equipment and other personal property owned, leased or in the process of being acquired or sold by the Company, with the cost and book value of each item.b. Real estate, equipment and other personal property leases and conditional sale agreements.c. Information relating to title on all property listed in the items above, including motor vehicle title documents.d. Appraisals of real estate, personal property and equipment.GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONa. Licenses, permits, filings or authorizations obtained from, made with or required by any governmental entity.b. Correspondence with any governmental regulatory authority.c. Accident or injury reports to federal, state, local and foreign governmental entities.LITIGATION AND CLAIMSa. Pending or threatened litigation, regulatory investigations, governmental actions, arbitrations, or notices of violation or possible violation, including proceedings in which the Company is a plaintiff or claimant, and the names and addresses of legal counsel advising or representing the Company in each matter.b. Files and records relating to the foregoing including opinions and evaluations.

It can and it will as a Sovereign Nation free of historical baggage and political burden that it carries to this day. Have patience to read through.Now a bit about History1. Pakistan was carved out of India. (The 1947 Indian Independence Act (1947 c. 30 (10 & 11. Geo. 6.)) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that partitioned British India into the two new independent dominions of India and Pakistan. The legislature representatives of the Indian National Congress, the Muslim League, and the Sikh community came to an agreement with Lord Mountbatten on what has come to be known as the 3 June Plan or Mountbatten Plan. This plan was the last plan for independence. Indian Independence Act 1947 - Wikipedia.2. The sole basis of creation of Pakistan was Islam and a separate land for its followers. Most of them left India but a vast majority preferred to stay back in the Hindu State being their native place. (The end of the British Empire in India in August 1947 resulted in the creation of two separate states of India and Pakistan. The division was based on religious lines, a Muslim majority in Pakistan and a Hindu majority in India. The Road to Partition 1939-1947 - The National Archives).3. India was not a Secular State at the time. Constitution was not yet written and the word Secularism was not part of it. (With the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India enacted in 1976, the Preamble to the Constitution asserted that India is a secular nation. institutions to recognise and accept all religions, enforce parliamentary laws instead of religious laws, and respect pluralism. Secularism in India - Wikipedia)4. The Indian Independence Act of 1947 (based on the Mountbatten Plan) provided for the lapse of paramountcy of the British Crown over the Indian states. It also gave each of these rulers the option to accede to the newly born dominions India or Pakistan or continue as an independent sovereign state. https://www.thebetterindia.com/124500/sardar-patel-vp-menon-integration-princely-states-india-independence/5. As for Kashmir, a princely state with a Hindu king ruling over a predominant Muslim population, it had remained reluctant to join either of the two dominions. As partition-related violence raged across the two new nations, the government of Pakistan pressured Kashmir to join it. Pro-Pakistani rebels, funded by Pakistan, took over much of western Kashmir, and in September 1947, Pashtun tribesmen streamed over the border from Pakistan into Kashmir. Watching the prospects of Kashmir slipping out of its hand, Pakistan planned an invasion. On October 22, 1947, over 5,000 Pakistani lashkars (armed tribesmen) Army, invaded Kashmir. Two days later, a desperate Maharaja Hari Singh offered to accede to India in return for immediate military assistance. The Indian Army was asked to assist the Ruler. The Kashmir conflict: How did it start?6. This delay is explained in the dithering approach of Nehru, the then Prime Minister of India. “Things came to a head at the end of October 1947 when raiders from the North West Frontier Province entered the state, killing, looting, and raping along. On October 26, they had reached the outskirts of Srinagar. Hari Singh agreed to sign the Instrument of Accession.7. On the same day a historic meeting was held in Delhi with Mountbatten, the governor general, as chairman. A young army colonel named Sam Manekshaw, who attended the meeting, recalled: 'As usual Nehru talked about the United Nations, Russia, Africa, God Almighty, everybody, until Sardar Patel lost his temper.He said, 'Jawaharlal, do you want Kashmir, or do you want to give it away?' He [Nehru] said, 'Of course, I want Kashmir.' Then he [Patel] said:' Please give your orders.' The blunder of the Pandit8. The Ruler of Jammu & Kashmir exercised that option by signing Instrument of Accession and joined the Indian dominion on 26 Oct 1947.9. Indian Army removed most of the Pakistan Army and its sponsored tribals from Kashmir Valley. Nehru's sentimental attachment to the Mountbattens deeply vitiated the Kashmir issue. It was certainly the most important factor for the failure to find a solution in the first years of the conflict. Events took a turn for the worse at the end of December 1947 when the Governor General managed to convince Nehru that India had to refer the Kashmir issue to the UN instead of conducting a military counterattack in West Punjab. Patel did not agree. But at this precise point in time the Sardar, who had so far looked after the relations with the princely states, was sidetracked. On December 23, he wrote his resignation, but was prevented (by Gandhi) from pressing for it. From that day, with Patel out of Kashmir affairs, things went from bad to worse. In the first months of 1948, during the UN hearings, the British showed where their interests lay. The original Indian complaint was completely left aside and the Security Council began adopting anti-India resolutions. The blunder of the Pandit10. India referred the dispute to the United Nations on 1 January. In a resolution dated August 13, 1948, the UN asked Pakistan to remove its troops, after which India was also to withdraw the bulk of its forces. Once this happened, a "free and fair" plebiscite was to be held to allow the Kashmiri people to decide their future. India, having taken the issue to the UN, was confident of winning a plebiscite, since the most influential Kashmiri mass leader, Sheikh Abdullah, was firmly on its side. An emergency government was formed on October 30, 1948 with Sheikh Abdullah as the Prime Minister. A brief history of the Kashmir conflict11. Pakistan ignored the UN mandate and continued fighting, holding on to the portion of Kashmir under its control. On January 1, 1949, a ceasefire was agreed, with 65 per cent of the territory under Indian control and the remainder with Pakistan. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1399992/A-brief-history-of-the-Kashmir-conflict.html12. Abdullah had already started his crusade (particularly with the US administration) for Kashmir's independence. He remained Nehru's friend till his scheming became too dangerous for India. https://www.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/16spec3.htm13. While it was Mountbatten who persuaded Nehru to take the J&K issue to the UN, it was Sheikh Abdullah, who, driven by his ambition to be ruler of an independent Kashmir and his hatred for the Maharaja, persuaded Nehru to give special status to J&K. Among his reasons were – occupation of one third of J&K by Pakistan, reference to the UN and plebiscite. The most sinister aspect of proposed Article 370 was the provision that any changes could be brought about in it only by the concurrence of the constituent assembly of the J & K State. Clause 3 of Article 370 is clear. The President may, by public notification, declare that this Article shall cease to be operative but only on the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly of the State. In other words, Article 370 can be revoked only if a new Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir is convened and is willing to recommend its revocation. Read more at http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/article-370-the-untold-story/Impediments to Integration14. Article 370 has been the biggest impediment to integration of J&K State into Indian Union. That it was incorporated in the Indian Constitution by the machination of two individuals – Sheikh Abdullah and Nehru is all the more regrettable. Nehru had to eat the humble pie when he had to arrest the Sheikh for his divisive and anti-national stance on 8 Aug 1953 but he did not let go of his concept of keeping J&K a separate entity. Article 370 included in the Constitution on a temporary provision should have been gradually abrogated. This has not happened in sixty years. In fact whenever someone mentions this, vested interests raise an outcry that legitimate rights of Kashmiris are being trampled upon. It is often forgotten that J&K state is not a homogeneous entity. Apart from Valley Muslims, Jammu has a predominantly Hindu population while Ladakh has a mix of Buddhist and Muslims. Then you have the Gujjars & Bakarwals. Read more at http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/article-370-the-untold-story/15. Temporary provisions of the arrangement and powers to revoke are evident in Clause 3 of Article 370. “(3) Notwithstanding the anything in the foregoing provisions of the article, the President may, by public notification, declare that this Article shall cease to be operative or shall be operative only with such exceptions and modifications and from such date as he may notify. Provided that the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly of the State referred to in Clause (2) shall be necessary before the President issues such a notification. Read more at:http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/article-370-the-untold-story/16. The main impediment to a final peace has always been the Pakistani military. Not only have Pakistan’s generals fuelled the insurgency and sheltered and abetted terrorist groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba, but, by smothering Pakistani democracy, they have also made reconciliation between the two countries all but impossible. The Pakistani military needs an enemy in order to justify its vast budgets and regular interventions in domestic politics. Why the War Between India and Pakistan for Kashmir Burns On17. Despite the Indian efforts to incorporate J & K into the Indian Union, Pakistan and China have not constitutionally integrated the territories of erstwhile J & K under their control. The State of Governance in PoK is explained here. See the Picture below. https://brill.com/view/book/9789004359994/BP000007.xml?lang=enNow how can India solve the problem without Pakistan.18. The answer needs legal understanding. Read on.a. J&K, although attached to India, retained most of its sovereignty, only transferring certain matters to the central State. At this stage, J&K kept control over the status of its citizens as well as jurisdictional monopoly over civil and criminal matters. Moreover, by not automatically recognizing the future Constitution of India, it enshrined the principle that the State would still be governed by its own constitutional framework. It was for the Constitution of India to uphold and regulate this dual system.b. As a consequence, only articles 1 and 370 of the Indian Constitution directly apply to J&K, article 370 specifically dealing with the relations between J&K and India.c. Hence, any extension of India’s jurisdiction beyond what is already specified in the Instrument of Accession shall beforehand seek the approval of the State government and J&K’s own constituent assembly.d. As such The Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1950 was issued, and extended Parliament’s jurisdiction over matters in the Union List (Seventh Schedule, Constitution of India 1950), as well as the application of a number of articles of the Constitution. This resulted in a political crisis between the government of India and that of J&K, ultimately solved by the Delhi Agreement of 24 July 1952 concluded by both governments, where the special status of J&K was confirmed, along with its complete internal autonomy.e. The Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954 implemented this agreement with the approval of the J&K government. While progressively extending the jurisdiction of Parliament and the Indian Constitution, it also amended or restricted the application of specific articles of the latter in regard to the specificity of J&K.f. J&K enacted a new Constitution in 1956, where it reiterated its inclusion within the Indian Union (art. 3). Yet the goal of this constitution is the “pursuance of the accession of this State [J&K] to India …, to further define the existing relationship of the State with the Union of India as an integral part thereof” (Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir 1956: Preamble).g. J&K vows to be an integral part of India, benefiting from the latter’s protection and advantages as rights, whilst picking and choosing the duties the “motherland” otherwise imposes on the rest of the country. How then can the relationship between India and the State of Jammu and Kashmir be defined? A dual constitutional system is at play here, where two distinct sovereignties have organized their relationship beyond the scope of federalism. Normative hierarchy is blurred, as the Constitution of India is but an empty vessel in regard to J&K—where only the The Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954 holds force. Notwithstanding, to seek greater integration is not the same as being integrated. As such, J&K cannot be characterized as integrated into India under international law. Indeed, the latter would imply equal status between citizens of both territories (UN General Assembly 1960: principle VII).h. J&K’s legal status within the Indian Union as sui generis remains by definition hard to grasp, as it does not easily fit into pre-conceived legal categories, whether through an international or comparative lens. However, the daily judicial inner workings of Srinagar do not induce a similar sense of “exoticism,” as the proceedings follow their course much in the same manner as in the rest of India. Moreover, despite J&K’s gradual legal integration, there does not seem to be any reluctance on the part of Kashmiri litigants to trust and use what could be described as an “imported” judicial administration.i. Therefore, in light of both its British origin and the goal of smoothening the administration of justice with greater legal certainty and security, the substantive legal integration of J&K into the Indian legal framework does not seem to be a problem for the ordinary Kashmiri litigant.j. High Court’s decision in State of J&K v. Sawhney (2003) seeks in fact to protect the existence of permanent residency, and indirectly one of its most important aspects: i.e. that the administration of justice in J&K still be in the hands of Kashmiris.k. In his famous ethnography of the French administrative Supreme Court (Conseil d’État), Bruno Latour (2010) defined Law as “fractal.” Exploratory anthropological fieldwork further tends to show how J&K’s growing substantive legal integration into the Indian legal framework is closely linked to and largely accepted through—on the assurance of being administered by Kashmiri judicial officers—the permanent residency status.Source: A Journey to the Brink of India’s Legal Landscape: Jammu and Kashmi...How to apply Legal/Political provisions to Integrate J & K finally19. Since Kashmiris accept the Indian legal integration as long as it is administered by its own Judicial Officers there is a scope to extend the benefits of the Indian Constitution if Permanent Resident status is not violated. However Ladakh, Jammu and Non Kashmiri and Non-Muslim citizens of J & K demand complete accession and merger with the Indian Union. Ladakhis want no part in Kashmir's secessionist movement but they want to secede from Jammu and Kashmir and turn their district and the adjoining Zanskar region into a Union Territory. It is a longstanding demand, championed by all local politicians. Kashmir tangle: The Third Angle and Not Many Understand 'Jammu and Kashmir' - Ayushman Jamwal’ Blog and What do people of Jammu and Kashmir think about Article 370?20. Ram Jethmalani, prominent lawyer, former Union Minister and Chairman of Kashmir Committee said in Nov 2014, “The Constitution of J&K was not formulated by the Constituent Assembly of India, but by its Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir. That was a plebiscite. It is the Constituent Assembly of J&K which incorporated some provisions of the Indian Constitution. The plebiscite has therefore taken place. Kashmiris are not living under the Constitution of India but under the Constitution which was framed by the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir which has willingly accepted a part of the Indian constitution.” https://www.dailypioneer.com/2015/sunday-edition/kashmir-problem-a-nehruvian-blunder.html21. On March 1, 2019, the 77th and 103rd constitutional amendments were extended to Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) by a presidential order, with the concurrence of the J&K Governor. These relate to reservations in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the State services and special provisions for the advancement of economically weaker sections, respectively. A blow against Article 37022. 1954 presidential order extended various provisions of the Indian Constitution to J&K. This order was made with the concurrence of the State government and also ratified by the State Constituent Assembly. After the J&K Constitution came into effect in 1957, the State Constituent Assembly was dissolved. Since then, more than 40 such orders have been made, through which most constitutional provisions have been extended to the State. The sheer number of such orders, as well as the circumstances under which they were made, have considerably eroded J&K’s special status under Article 370. A blow against Article 37023. In December 2018, the President assumed all the functions of the State government and the Governor through a proclamation under Article 356. In an order passed on the same day, the President directed that all powers assumed by him would be exercisable by the Governor as well, “subject to the superintendence, direction, and control of the President”. A blow against Article 37024. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has hit the ground running with back-to-back meetings with senior officials of various ministries and agencies in the past few days. Sources suggest that among the crucial things on his table is the long-pending delimitation of constituencies in Jammu and Kashmir. This is, in the main to correct an inequity and anomaly of regional disparity long suffered by Jammu province and also provide representation to all reserved categories in the state assembly. Another section of thought is that Kashmir Valley claims that it has no SC or ST while Gujjars, Bakerwals and Gaddies were given ST status in 1991 and form 11 per cent of the population but have no political reservation.25. The last time a delimitation exercise took place in the state was also under President's Rule, as far back as 1995 in extremely difficult circumstances by the Justice (retd) KK Gupta Commission. Incidentally, the Constitution provides for delimitation every 10 years, the next delimitation of assembly constituencies should have logically taken place in 2005. However, in 2002, the Farooq Abdullah government chose to freeze delimitation until 2026 by amending the Jammu & Kashmir Representation of the People Act 1957 and Section 47(3) of the Constitution of Jammu & Kashmir. The Governor is competent to amend Section 47 of the Constitution to delete the objectionable proviso which barred the setting up of a delimitation commission. Furthermore, Section 3 of the Representation of People Act gives the Governor the mandate to constitute a delimitation commission.26. One needs to be mindful that the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir, enacted in 1957, was based on the Maharaja's Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir of 1939, which was still in force. After accession to India, the State Constituent Assembly was constituted under the 1939 Constitution, but Sheikh Abdullah's administration arbitrarily carved out 30 seats for Jammu region and 43 seats for Kashmir region and two seats for Ladakh region. This regional disparity became entrenched thereafter: Kashmir (46), Jammu (37) and Ladakh (4). According to the 2011 census, the total population of Jammu Division was 53,78,538 of which Dogras are the dominant group comprising 62.55 per cent of the population. Against this Kashmir Division or the intermontane valley population in 2011 was 68,88,475 with 96.40 per cent Muslims. Though it has 15.73 per cent of the state's area, it holds 54.93 per cent of the population. Ladakh has 58.33 per cent of the area accounting for 2.18 per cent of the population, a mere 2,74,289 people reside there of which 46.40 per cent are Muslims, 12.11 per cent Hindus and 39.67 per cent Buddhist.27. In terms of area, geographically, Jammu is about 26,293 square kilometres, Kashmir is 15,948 square kilometres, and Ladakh is far bigger at 59,000 square kilometres. However, since Jammu has 37 seats, on an average, each Assembly constituency is about 710 square kilometres (26,293/37=710.62). In Kashmir, the average area of an Assembly constituency is 346 square kilometres (15,948/46=346.69).28. On a cursory glance, we find that constituencies in Jammu are also bigger, voter-wise, than those in Kashmir. It is easy to extrapolate the results after fair delimitation that the new seat arrangement would be in favour of Jammu and Ladakh, both not in sync with Kashmiri Muslim domination of the State. If a delimitation is done at this juncture, these angularities or bias in favour of Kashmir may get obliterated, and lead to an increase in the number of seats in the Jammu region. This will reduce the political weight of Kashmir in the state and national polity. This would be the end of the J & K divisive politics. https://www.firstpost.com/politics/delimitation-of-jk-assembly-seats-will-end-partisanship-that-favours-kashmir-turned-state-into-rotten-borough-of-valley-6774741.html29. Hence the new Constituent Assembly will be Jammu and Ladakh dominated. Would it wait for Kashmiri Muslims to hold their sway over Article 370 and 35 A? Unlikely.30. With the gradual dilution of Article 370 the Parliament can postpone the amendment of the Constitution itself to abrogate Article 370 but can take the concurrence of the new J & K Constituent Assembly to accept the Presidential Order on abrogating it being the temporary provision.That is the case in detail on how India can tell Pakistan to take a hop on J & K and prepare to return the PoK and Aksai Chin acceded illegally to China.Turning Off the Comments to avoid slanging match over it. It is just a scholarly attempt to answer the question.PS: Comments are open now as requested by some followers personally.Summary of my arguments is as under:Pakistan carved out of India by British Government.Islam as the sole basis of creation of Pakistan. India was Hindu State as a corollary. It became Secular only in 1976 (29 years after Independence) having defeated the ideology of Religion having helped create Bangladesh on Linguistic basis in 1971.543 princely States had option to join either Islamic Pakistan or Hindu India in 1947. Rulers had the choice, not the population as per Mountbatten Plan.Ruler of J & K wanted to be Independent. His State avoided joining either Nation till forced by Pakistani Irregular invasion and consequent slaughter of Non Muslim citizens. He signed Instrument of Accession on 26 Oct 1947 after Patel forced Nehru to accept it.Indian Army defeated and reclaimed 65% of Territory before Nehru in his folly of believing Mountbatten and trusting his childhood friend Sheikh Abdullah accepted UN monitored ceasefire.Nehru forced the Indian Parliament to make special provisions for his friend sheikh Abdullah to get the same status as his bete noire Maharaja Hari Singh, the erstwhile Ruler of J & K. Article 370 was inserted as a temporary provision to help the State stabilise and amalgamate gradually.Pakistan refused to accept the UN resolution to vacate the J & K for UN monitored plebiscite. It continued irregular warfare to retake Kashmir till as late as 1999. Having failed on all fronts it adopted Terrorism as a State Policy since 1990 and started inducting Islamic Terrorists to reclaim Kashmir Valley.Having been comprehensively isolated and defeated in Military, Diplomatic and economic front after advent of Modi Govt in 2014 especially since 2016 Surgical strikes and 2018 Air strikes besides Blacklisting of Masood Azhar and Grey Listing by FATF Pakistan has limited options in Kashmir.India has a chance to proceed ahead with complete integration of Kashmir by following measures:Delimitation of electorate to reduce seats in Kashmir.Winning a Pro India Constituent Assembly dominated by Dogras, Gujjars, Ladakhis and patriotic Kashmiris (Satisfied with Permanent Resident Status and Panchayati Raj) .Abrogation of Article 370 by Presidential Order.Endorsing the Presidential Order through new Constituent assembly.Promoting secession in PoK, Gilgit-Baltistan to become part of Integrated J & K since Pakistan and China have not integrated them to date.This does not require Pakistan at all except as a restive spectator unless it wants to go to war and lose all of Pakistan less Punjab.