Dignity Health Prior Authorization Form: Fill & Download for Free

Western media and Western leaders are very afraid of China and have tried everything–invasions, embargoes, exclusions, subversion, sabotage, bombing, ridicule and misinformation–to stop their people discovering that, gasp!, there is a good side to China.Once Western people figure out that, for example, China trusts it government much more than any country on earth, they might ask, Why? How come only 9% of us trust our government and 80% of Chinese trust theirs?How will Westerners react when they find out that 95% of Chinese support their government’s policies while only 20% of them trust theirs? Might they not ask, “If we’re a democracy and they’re not, how come they get policies they like and we don’t? What’s going on?”Or what might happen when Western people figure out that every Chinese has been getting a 100% pay raise every decade for 40 years? Won’t they wonder why their wages have been falling for 40 years while their economies have been growing?Imagine what could happen when Westerners find out that Chinese kids are better educated than theirs. That Chinese science has overtaken theirs…the list gets longer every day so their media must try harder to find things to criticize.Western media distract their audience by yelling at the top of their lungs, “Hey!!! Over there!!! Human rights!!! China!!! Bad!!” Of course we know that China’s human rights record is much, much better than, say America’s, so we can just wait until they find that out, along with the education thing and the science thing and the wages thing and the popular policies thing…Do you think I’m exaggerating about China’s human rights record being better than America’s? I’m not.As you read the document below, remember that the Declaration was written by the wealthiest, most advanced country on earth and is based on the US Constitution. China is a poor, developing country which does not even have words in its vocabulary for individual human rights. Out of the 30 Articles, I score 22 for China and 8 for the USA. How about you?Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.Article 1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.Article 2. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.Article 3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.Article 4. No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.Article 5. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.Article 6. Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.Article 7. All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.Article 8. Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.Article 9. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.Article 10. Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.Article 11. (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence. (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.Article 12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.Article 13. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.Article 14. (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.Article 15. (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.Article 16. (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.Article 17. (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.Article 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.Article 19. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.Article 20. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.Article 21. (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives. (2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country. (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.Article 22. Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.Article 23. (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work. (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection. (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.Article 24. Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.Article 25. (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.Article 26. (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit. (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace. (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.Article 27. (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits. (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.Article 28. Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.Article 29. (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible. (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society. (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.Article 30. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

Great question!Recently, writing a scientific article on the subject, with a friend, we come to some findings.The prospect of positive eugenics Galton argued that in order to promote the physical and moral progress in the future, should be applied genetic improvement in the human population. At the other extreme, insisted Galton, the negative eugenics preaching that the inferiority is an inherited trait (like the best human qualities) and not resulting from environmental, social and educational conditions, the only way to prevent the degeneration of the human species would be by through the use of methods such as sterilization, segregation and the adoption of stringent immigration law.With advances in genetic research, some clinics as the Fertility Institutes in Los Angeles offer Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis procedure where you can select the aesthetic standard of children through the same technique previously used to prevent serious birth defects in newborn -born.Advances emerge in many countries. In Italy, medical scientific publication Science said on healing of a disease which takes the capacity of the children walking and talking, through a pioneering technique of gene therapy to correct errors in the DNA. This technique removes patient's stem cells and the virus is used to "infect" the cells from DNA fragments which contain the correct instructions. These, in turn, are placed back into the patient, to correct harmful mutations.In Brazil, one can cite the case of Maria Clara, the first Brazilian born of genetic selection. Maria Clara came into the world in February 2013 to save the lives of older sister, Maria Victoria, who suffered from thalassemia major, genetic disease that could take her to death. The younger sister was generated from a selected embryo in an IVF treatment, not to carry sick genes and be fully compatible with the older sister. Maria Victoria received the bone marrow transplant from stem cells and is now cured.However, for some scientists, with the selection and improvement of the human species will not only reduce the incidence of serious genetic diseases, and unknown levels will also be achieved with lives measured in centuries and people with superhuman intelligence.Furthermore, our relationship with the past shows us the negative side of the phenomenon, when we refer to the Holocaust. To ask ourselves if eugenics is a good or bad phenomenon for mankind, we remember almost instantly the horrors committed in the Holocaust by the German Nazis.This sad event wiped out thousands of people who prevented the realization of racial purity sought by Hitler and his supporters. Initially, Hitler began to persecute the Jews and Gypsies, considered the main culprits by preventing the formation of a nation made up of superior beings. At this first stage of persecution, was given the name of ethnic eugenics. Following Hitler also started to use the physician's discretion to exclude all those who were holders of a disability.Thousands of unworthy as schizophrenic and physical disabilities, that "prevented" the Aryan racial supremacy, created by the prospect of a perfect society, were tortured, used as guinea pigs in scientific experiments and decimated, because they are considered a threat to the ideal advocated by Hitler.Subsequently, the social criteria has also become exclusionary factor, decimating prostitutes, alcoholics and religious groups opposed to the regime adopted by Hitler.However, they are mistaken those that restrict eugenics as a phenomenon and essentially equidistant propagated by Hitler.A tragic example in Brazil is the case of Cologne Hospital of Barbacena, which killed more than 60,000 Brazilians. Although it has 200 beds, in the 1960s he came to have 5000 patients hospitalized in the same space. The idea behind the hospital was very similar to the standard developed by Hitler in World War II: eugenics, from the theoretical framework developed by Francis Galton, that eugenics was a form of "control of the means to create a good society -born ". Patients, when they arrived at the institution in dubbed freight cars of "crazy train" had their heads shaved and lost their registration names. According to data, only 30% of those taken to the psychiatric institute had effectively diagnosis of mental illness.Thus, the other 70% consisted of patients considered "not nice people" to social life of the time as unwanted children, women with a sense of leadership, shy men, prostitutes, homosexuals, the homeless, alcoholics, women who lost their virginity before marriage, rape victims, political opponents and even people who were walking in the streets without documents.On the one hand, eugenics enables a generation of babies can grow free from the threat of some types of cancer and other diseases that affect family members, on the other, the negative aspect of the phenomenon shows us that we are in danger to create new forms of segregation when taking each the right to be who you are, with strengths and weaknesses that make us human. The story, through the atrocities, shows us that all those who are not considered worthy of being entered as members of a "well-born society", should be automatically deleted, in submission to the interests of the group, which advocates that only healthy embryo has the right to be born.If it is true that scientific advancement of humanity puts us before a new evolutionary panorama, facing the rapid development of the pharmaceutical industry and medical advances, it is also true that this progress can not be dissociated from the common root of rights: dignity the human person.When selecting, through a social control of the crossings, certain physical traits (those without a physical disability such as blindness or deafness, or even with the aesthetic model considered inferior), behavioral (the most capable, strong and intelligent ), eugenics spread abuse of discrimination, resulting in a categorization of who is fit or not for reproduction.Is what Habermas calls the "snowball effect", that is, with the prior acceptance of a negative eugenics (therapeutic, to prevent disease), the risk we run, due to the custom, falling in a positive eugenics, geared towards the improvement, disregarding the moral dimensions of the person, as the attentive Vicente de Paulo Barretto.Analyzing the Brazilian jurisprudence, are cases of fathers seeking court order for termination of pregnancy in a visible attempt to "choose" who can be born or not, depending on the physical traits. In one case, judged by TJMS, a couple came to the interrupt request, as it was found that the fetus was hydrocephalus carrier. It happens that, in spite of the consequences brought about by hydrocephalus (learning problems, among them, short memory and concentration, personality changes), this does not prevent the extra-uterine life, which is why the termination of pregnancy was denied, acquiring the rights to fetus born alive.In another case, judged by TJRS the request of pregnancy interruption was due to the fact that the fetus is a carrier of arthrogryposis. This is a physical deformity, and a congenital disease characterized by deformity and joint stiffness. Although the physical deformities have normal mental development. The request was denied, because it is not necessary to abortion.It is seen that in both cases, not faced a considerable danger to health, which entailed danger to the mother's life, but plain and simple selfish situation where parents thought themselves the right to decide that the fetus does not I had the right to come to life, for not being a "perfect baby". This is nothing but a form of segregation, because in both cases the child can have a normal life, because the situations involve surgery. In the case of arthrogryposis, surgical treatment is to improve joint movement and, depending on the severity, it requires the use of support equipment such as crutches.To seek termination of pregnancy in cases like these, it denies human dignity, understood the human condition as unique and unconditional value that has the existence of every human being, regardless of any "incidental quality" as the physical health or mental.It's just the thought of Kant which is extensive notion of the dignity which every human being has an intrinsic value, the genus to which it belongs (humanity) also has an inherent value. In this sense, the Kantian formulation highlights that rational beings are called persons, "because the nature distinguishes them already as ends in themselves, that is, as something that can not be used as a simple means and therefore limits to that extent all will (and is an object of respect). "The whole issue of eugenics is to go through the examination of the essential role of the principle of human dignity. It is what is called for in a society like ours, where the universe of constitutional and ethical values, arises as a threshold for that atrocities like those perpetrated by Hitler and the Colony Hospital of Barbacena never happen.People have dignity because they are beyond price and, for this reason, Kant says that should not be treated as a means to achieve certain foreign interests, but as ends in themselves.This Kantian reasoning translates to a requirement of non-instrumentalization of human beings, because it is a practice contrary to the dignity and should be the establishment of ethical limits to interventions such as those that seek to predetermine the genetic characteristics of a future person.The Habermas's conception shows concern for the use of genetic techniques as the use of such techniques violate the basic assumptions of responsible actions arising in the context of a level playing field. In synthesis, denaturation occurs scientization by the human species, from the moment the range ceases to exist because the subject is not determined, is determined by third parties, which produce human life under conditions and their preferences.The concern of the international community set obedience to the principle of human dignity, as a guideline idea of ​​bioethical dilemmas faced by medicine and, in particular genetics. But more than a "magic" expression, able to solve problems instantly, to be operational need more concrete notions commonly found in legal harvest.This reflection requires that science should work within the framework of legal and ethical standards. Consequently, the recognition of human dignity, generates about duty.That is why some authors as Andorno explain that "it is ethically permissible to treat human embryos as mere experimental purposes" and that "you can not produce human clones or predetermine the genetic characteristics of a future person to the whim of potential parents."The same author states that it is precisely when we have the worst human suffering present (torture, degrading punishment, sexual violence, food deprivation etc.), we understand what it means to the dignity of the person. An example of how the dignity (and especially the lack of it) appears in the case of Barbacena Hospital of Cologne is the situation of patients, who were forced to sleep on leaves and straw, in the insects and rodents company, amid routine rape, physical and psychological torture. As if that were not sufficiently humiliating and inhuman, they were subjected to shock therapy and Scottish showers, consisting of high pressure water jets fired by a machine. There was no running water or enough food for all patients who defecated in public and sometimes ate their own feces.All this horror story 'praises' eugenics as a way of improving the social well-being through human manipulation, which uses man as a simple object, rather than an end in itself. All these people who entered the "crazy train" did not suit social environment, as not part of the concept of "well-born." The same can be said of Jews, gypsies, homosexual and so many others who did not fit the concept of "pure race", advocated by Hitler.The fact is, people have human dignity, because she was an intrinsic characteristic of human beings. This means that dignity has no equivalent, for those with price are things not people. The dignity of the human person implies a general obligation of respect for the person, as stated Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet. Denying the right to existence of individuals who, in theory, would have the "best" qualities and features not only a racist and prejudiced proposal, but can also be interpreted as a radical attempt to exterminate all forms of differentiated existence, proliferating therefore, individuals unable to live with differences and thus evolve in society.All these considerations lead us to an inevitable conclusion: eugenics expression is paradigmatic. On the one hand we were happy with the ability to change the course of human history in the face of genetic diseases on the other, in arguably outraged on issues such as positive eugenics, where heterodeterminação the individual is irreversible, because it is done for improvement artisan, and therefore, generating the manipulation of the human species.With the use of genetic improvement techniques, is the loss of life authority of consciousness, because the subject is subjected to irreversible intentions set by external agents not it (external heterodeterminação), generating, in consequence, be the impossibility of be understood as the author of your own life.What, then, would be the future awaiting the next generations? Unknown.

I can share my experience and how I wish I’d handled if it was to happen again.My supervisor’s manager shouted at me in front of the department off the top of her lungs to provoke me and injure me. I excused myself quietly, went to senior manager crying for permission to leave. I ended up on medical leave. While I was on leave she was demoted to her original business analyst from operations facility manager position. Regardless, up on my return from medical leave my supervisor who is also her best friend, put me on performance improvement plan claiming I left because I disagreed. I thought I will loose my mind. I still have not recovered from 2 years ago. It feels like it was yesterday. It was deliberate and planned action. In my case it was continued harassment and retaliation to force resignation for telling the truth in engagement survey. Two weeks prior this assault, she told me: “you know it is not personal, it is just business?!” I am bipolar and she knows it. What she did was verbal assault. I wish I was strong enough to file charges with the police. It traumatized me. It is important to note, even healthy person will be traumatized by this behavior. It is extremely important to prioritize your health and dignity over hostility. Shouting at anyone is an act of aggression and violence. No supervisor or manager has the authority for violence against employees. The behavior unjustifiable.