Legally Domiciled Adult: Fill & Download for Free

Big Democrat states? Probably not under current rules regarding “legal domicile” vs “physical domicile” for state and federal voting laws.First, let’s clarify. Your “legal domicile” is where you are registered to vote. Your “physical domicile” is where you physically live. For instance, a military service member may physically live (called the physical domicile) in Afghanistan; but is legally domiciled in San Diego, CA. And it doesn’t matter where you travel to, you can switch your physical domicile as often as you’d like with no problems. As long as your “legal domicile” remains the same you are free to use your absentee ballot or other means available to vote there.Now, in re-registering to get a new “legal domicile” here is what you’re doing. First you are claiming that you want to now be re-registered to vote at your new address. Upon signing the form, you also bind yourself to also (silently) agreeing by action that you have voluntarily abandoned your old “legal domicile” by demanding a new one.Take students going to college in California. Most, at the urging of academia, change their legal domiciles from HOME (in the nest)…. to the university (left the nest). Then, they can go out into the community, secure rental housing over and over again at different physical domiciles, but still go back to the university to vote because that’s their “legal domicile.”Actually, this was decided by a Calif. case known as Walters vs Weed back in the 1980’s, of which I was an et. al. plaintiff in that case …. meaning that I wanted students to have to follow the rules the rest of the residents of the community have to follow - if you move to a new address, you should have to re-register to vote at the new address! But, the Rose Bird, Supreme Court allowed the decision of the Appellate Court to stand on the basis that students live a very transient nature and it would be unfair to make them re-register to vote every time they moved. Got it!?However, there is HUGE accepted footnote by the court in that case, that while not precise, is accurate in fact and meaning. “It is accepted that university students vote at a rate of 88%-92% for the same candidates and issues, which are generally contrary to the wants and wishes of the rest of the community!”AND THEREIN LIES THE ANSWER BEING “NO” IN MY OPINION REGARDING YOUR QUESTION!The 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gave 18 year-olds adult status and the right to vote. Yet no restrictions what-so-ever were included in that amendment or through other legislation. I felt, and still feel strongly that there should have been! I also feel that NOT putting in one simple restriction is what has turned this country towards the left and set America, and its traditional values, up for destined doom!What’s the restriction? I feel that IF you are a dependent, you should be required to have your “legal domicile” remain at the place your dependent deduction is being taken. If your parents are paying your way and getting a tax deduction for your dependency, then that’s where your “legal domicile” should be required to be. In other words, if you LEAVE THE NEST by voluntary abandonment of that nest via re-registering to change your “legal domicile” to outside the nest…. you should lose dependent status and your parents should lose your dependent tax break! After all, according to the constitution you are an adult!If your parents are divorced and your mom or dad, singularly, is paying your way while taking that dependent deduction for you,, then your “legal domicile” should be your claiming parent’s house. If someone else is paying your way and getting the tax deduction for your dependency, then THAT’S where your “legal domicile” should be.I also feel that we shouldn’t just wrap students up in this action. I feel that all dependents, be they parents, grandparents, or others you have accepted responsibility for, and get a dependent tax exemption from, should be required to have their “legal domicile” at the residence address of the claimant! After all, whether they are voting on tax issues; candidates, or issues, they bear no real consequence because the claimant lives elsewhere and it doesn’t affect their money tree in any way! Niether the dependent, nor the claimant, are consequented! That’s just flat wrong! Screw everyone but yourself? I don’t think so!Why? Because when someone else is paying your way, you hardly bear any responsibility for your voting actions in the community you live in! Certainly not like the life-invested citizens who SHOULD be able to direct their own community’s future with their own like-minded leadership - not academia’s push and control for the greater glories of socialism!But when you drop 20,000, 30,000, 100,000 or more from-somewhere-else, voting students into communities the local life-invested citizens don’t stand a chance! Students are voting 80%+ for the leadership recommended by academia; the taxes recommended by academia (that tax-exempt universities don’t pay); academia-backed, decades-long bond issues, and tons of academia-backed, and inane, P.C. ordinances. You see, if 30% of voters are students voting in excess of 80% (over 4 to 1) one way, while the rest of the community is voting even only 60%–40% (3 to 2) the other way….The community locals will get screwed every single time!So in essence, life-invested community citizens have been effectively couped by academia’s demand for community power and control in a takeover using a continual turnover of re-educated students as their weapon of war upon those communities. You are transformed into lab rats continually looking for more cheese because government keeps taking more of what you have! You have gone from king or queen of your castle to “serfdom” to your government! You don’t stand a chance!This concludes my thought on the subject! Good Luck!

You "have to call them"?This implies you're already out of the house. In which case, why are you still getting an allowance!? If you live on your own, you should be able to support yourself.And if this is some kind of monthly school-related fund, it's not an allowance. It's financial assistance -- which, I'm sorry to have to burst your bubble, you are not entitled to. (Actually, even if it were a true allowance, you're still not entitled to it.)Your parents can, at any time, stop giving you allowance or financial aid. If you are under the age of majority, the only things your parents are obligated to give you (legally and/or ethically) are the following:Good ClothingGood Medical CareHealthy, Nourishing FoodA Safe DomicileDecent EducationLove and NurtureEverything else is gratis. You aren't entitled to money or luxuries of any kind.And if you're over the age of majority, you should be providing for yourself and just accept with gratitude and grace any monies or gifts your parents choose to bestow. If you are adult status, they aren't obligated to give you anything.The fact that you are considering suing them is quite possibly the most selfish, entitled, and ungrateful thing I've ever heard. Yes, you can sue, for anything really. But whether you win or not depends on your parents failing an obligation. They have not.The only thing suing will accomplish is to show your parents how little you appreciate what they do, and that you believe you deserve even more than they are legally obligated for or want to give.

We parents have the right to be secure in the private enjoyment of our own domicile, if that is our wish.We are legally obligated to provide for the welfare and raising of our children until they reach adulthood. Beyond that, our presence and support are based only on the strength or weakness of familial ties, and Societal expectations, not on legal relationships.I have four children, all over 30, one of whom has proven a menace to society, and who is no longer welcome in my house. Another is autistic, and will probably live with us until we are both gone. The other two live on their own, but have my support — and I, theirs — when we need each other. I've seen all ends of the spectrum, and generally try to support my kids; but that's an individual choice, not a legal one. It rests on our love and tolerance for each other, not on legal obligation.